IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i11p4767-d369992.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CoRiMaS—An Ontological Approach to Cooperative Risk Management in Seaports

Author

Listed:
  • Salvatore F. Pileggi

    (School of Information, Systems and Modelling, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia)

  • Marius Indorf

    (Institute of Business Logistics and General Management, Hamburg University of Technology, 21073 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Ayman Nagi

    (Institute of Business Logistics and General Management, Hamburg University of Technology, 21073 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Wolfgang Kersten

    (Institute of Business Logistics and General Management, Hamburg University of Technology, 21073 Hamburg, Germany)

Abstract

For today’s global value chains, seaports and their operations are indispensable components. In many cases, the cargo handling takes place in close proximity to residential and/or environmentally sensitive areas. Furthermore, seaports are often not operated by a single organization, but need to be considered as communities of sometimes hundreds of internal and external stakeholders. Due to their close cooperation in the cargo handling process, risk management should be a common approach among the internal stakeholders as well in order to effectively mitigate and respond to emerging risks. However, empirical research has revealed that risk management is often limited to the organization itself, which indicates a clear lack of cooperation. Primary reasons in this regard are missing knowledge about the relations and responsibilities within the port and differing terminologies. Therefore, we propose an ontology (CoRiMaS) that implements a developed reference model for risk management that explicitly aims at seaports with a cooperative approach to risk management. CoRiMaS has been designed looking at the Semantic Web and at the Linked Data model to provide a common interoperable vocabulary in the target domain. The key concepts of our ontology comprise the hazard, stakeholder, seaport, cooperation aspect, and risk management process. We validated our ontology by applying it in a case study format to the Port of Hamburg (Germany). The CoRiMaS ontology can be widely applied to foster cooperation within and among seaports. We believe that such an ontological approach has the potential to improve current risk management practices and, thereby, to increase the resilience of operations, as well as the protection of sensitive surrounding areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Salvatore F. Pileggi & Marius Indorf & Ayman Nagi & Wolfgang Kersten, 2020. "CoRiMaS—An Ontological Approach to Cooperative Risk Management in Seaports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4767-:d:369992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4767/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4767/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jochen Schmidt & Iain Matcham & Stefan Reese & Andrew King & Rob Bell & Roddy Henderson & Graeme Smart & Jim Cousins & Warwick Smith & Dave Heron, 2011. "Quantitative multi-risk analysis for natural hazards: a framework for multi-risk modelling," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 58(3), pages 1169-1192, September.
    2. Zixiang Gong & Nan Liu, 2020. "Mitigative and adaptive investments for natural disasters and labor strikes in a seaport–dry port inland logistics network," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 92-108, January.
    3. Nicola Guarino & Daniel Oberle & Steffen Staab, 2009. "What Is an Ontology?," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Steffen Staab & Rudi Studer (ed.), Handbook on Ontologies, pages 1-17, Springer.
    4. Xinhu Cao & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam, 2019. "Simulation-based severe weather-induced container terminal economic loss estimation," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 92-116, January.
    5. Nagi, Ayman & Indorf, Marius & Kersten, Wolfgang, 2017. "Bibliometric analysis of risk management in seaports," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Digitalization in Supply Chain Management and Logistics: Smart and Digital Solutions for an Industry 4.0 Environment. Proceedings of the Hamburg Inter, volume 23, pages 491-521, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    6. Zuritah A. Kadir & Roslina Mohammad & Norazli Othman & Astuty Amrin & Mohd Nabil Muhtazaruddin & Siti Hawa Abu-Bakar & Firdaus Muhammad-Sukki, 2020. "Risk Management Framework for Handling and Storage of Cargo at Major Ports in Malaysia towards Port Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Wolfgang Kron, 2013. "Coasts: the high-risk areas of the world," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 66(3), pages 1363-1382, April.
    8. Cristina Izaguirre & Iñigo J. Losada & Paula Camus & Patricia González-Lamuño & Vladimir Stenek, 2020. "Seaport climate change impact assessment using a multi-level methodology," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 544-557, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ayman Nagi & Meike Schroeder & Wolfgang Kersten, 2021. "Risk Management in Seaports: A Community Analysis at the Port of Hamburg," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Muhammad Reza Bagus & Shinya Hanaoka, 2023. "Interdependency patterns of potential seaport risk factors in relation to supply chain disruption in Indonesia," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-28, December.
    3. Ayman Nagi & Wolfgang Kersten, 2022. "A Process Model for Cooperative Risk Management in Seaports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Chiara Bicchielli & Noemi Biancone & Fernando Ferri & Patrizia Grifoni, 2021. "BiOnto: An Ontology for Sustainable Bioeconomy and Bioproducts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bi Wang & Kwai Sang Chin & Qin Su, 2022. "Risk management and market structures in seaport–dry port systems," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(1), pages 114-137, March.
    2. Simon Gorecki & Jalal Possik & Gregory Zacharewicz & Yves Ducq & Nicolas Perry, 2020. "A Multicomponent Distributed Framework for Smart Production System Modeling and Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Visbeck, Martin & Kronfeld-Goharani, Ulrike & Neumann, Barbara & Rickels, Wilfried & Schmidt, Jörn & van Doorn, Erik & Matz-Lück, Nele & Ott, Konrad & Quaas, Martin F., 2014. "Securing blue wealth: The need for a special sustainable development goal for the ocean and coasts," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 184-191.
    4. Caridad Ballesteros & José A. Jiménez & Christophe Viavattene, 2018. "A multi-component flood risk assessment in the Maresme coast (NW Mediterranean)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 90(1), pages 265-292, January.
    5. Hai Zhu & Xingsi Xue & Hongfeng Wang, 2022. "Matching Ontologies through Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm with Relevance Matrix," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, June.
    6. Reguero, Borja G. & Beck, Michael W. & Schmid, David & Stadtmüller, Daniel & Raepple, Justus & Schüssele, Stefan & Pfliegner, Kerstin, 2020. "Financing coastal resilience by combining nature-based risk reduction with insurance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    7. Guoqiang Shen & Long Zhou & Yao Wu & Zhiming Cai, 2018. "A Global Expected Risk Analysis of Fatalities, Injuries, and Damages by Natural Disasters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Martins Fernando L.C. & Giordano Fabio & Barrella Walter, 2021. "Socio-Environmental Vulnerability of Water in the Estuary of the Metropolitan Region of Santos (Brazil)," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 40(4), pages 113-125, December.
    9. Grant Smith & Nover Juria, 2019. "Diagnosis of historical inundation events in the Marshall Islands to assist early warning systems," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(1), pages 189-216, October.
    10. Ângela F. Brochado & Eugénio M. Rocha & Diogo Costa, 2024. "A Modular IoT-Based Architecture for Logistics Service Performance Assessment and Real-Time Scheduling towards a Synchromodal Transport System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Ayman Nagi & Meike Schroeder & Wolfgang Kersten, 2021. "Risk Management in Seaports: A Community Analysis at the Port of Hamburg," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    12. Xingsi Xue & Qi Wu & Miao Ye & Jianhui Lv, 2022. "Efficient Ontology Meta-Matching Based on Interpolation Model Assisted Evolutionary Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Ghavamifar, Ali & Torabi, S. Ali & Moshtari, Mohammad, 2022. "A hybrid relief procurement contract for humanitarian logistics," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    14. Cheng, Yao & Elsayed, E.A. & Chen, Xi, 2021. "Random Multi Hazard Resilience Modeling of Engineered Systems and Critical Infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    15. Wang, Bi & Chin, Kwai Sang & Su, Qin, 2022. "Prevention and adaptation to diversified risks in the seaport–dry port system under asymmetric risk behaviors: Invest earlier or wait?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 11-36.
    16. Melanie Kappes & Margreth Keiler & Kirsten Elverfeldt & Thomas Glade, 2012. "Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 64(2), pages 1925-1958, November.
    17. Nerea Portillo Juan & Vicente Negro Valdecantos & Jose María del Campo, 2022. "Review of the Impacts of Climate Change on Ports and Harbours and Their Adaptation in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Shubham Kumar & Preet Lal & Amit Kumar, 2020. "Turbulence of tropical cyclone ‘Fani’ in the Bay of Bengal and Indian subcontinent," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 1613-1622, August.
    19. Mohammad Amin Hariri-Ardebili, 2020. "Living in a Multi-Risk Chaotic Condition: Pandemic, Natural Hazards and Complex Emergencies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-16, August.
    20. Mieko Kumasaki & Malcolm King & Mitsuru Arai & Lili Yang, 2016. "Anatomy of cascading natural disasters in Japan: main modes and linkages," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1425-1441, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4767-:d:369992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.