IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p9457-d619853.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Built Environment Typologies Prone to Risk: A Cluster Analysis of Open Spaces in Italian Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro D’Amico

    (Department of Civil, Building and Environmental Engineering, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00184 Rome, Italy
    Department of Construction, Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICEA), Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy)

  • Martina Russo

    (Department of Civil, Building and Environmental Engineering, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00184 Rome, Italy)

  • Marco Angelosanti

    (Department of Civil, Building and Environmental Engineering, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00184 Rome, Italy)

  • Gabriele Bernardini

    (Department of Construction, Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICEA), Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy)

  • Donatella Vicari

    (Department of Statistical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Enrico Quagliarini

    (Department of Construction, Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICEA), Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy)

  • Edoardo Currà

    (Department of Civil, Building and Environmental Engineering, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00184 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Planning for preparedness, in terms of multi-hazard disasters, involves testing the relevant abilities to mitigate damage and build resilience, through the assessment of deterministic disaster scenarios. Among risk-prone assets, open spaces (OSs) play a significant role in the characterization of the built environment (BE) and represent the relevant urban portion on which to develop multi-risk scenarios. The aim of this paper is to elaborate ideal scenarios—namely, Built Environment Typologies (BETs)—for simulation-based risk assessment actions, considering the safety and resilience of BEs in emergency conditions. The investigation is conducted through the GIS data collection of the common characteristics of OSs (i.e., squares), identified through five parameters considered significant in the scientific literature. These data were processed through a non-hierarchical cluster analysis. The results of the cluster analysis identified five groups of OSs, characterized by specific morphological, functional, and physical characteristics. Combining the outcomes of the cluster analysis with a critical analysis, nine final BETs were identified. The resulting BETs were linked to characteristic risk combinations, according to the analysed parameters. Thus, the multi-risk scenarios identified through the statistical analysis lay the basis for future risk assessments of BEs, based on the peculiar characteristics of Italian towns.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro D’Amico & Martina Russo & Marco Angelosanti & Gabriele Bernardini & Donatella Vicari & Enrico Quagliarini & Edoardo Currà, 2021. "Built Environment Typologies Prone to Risk: A Cluster Analysis of Open Spaces in Italian Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-32, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9457-:d:619853
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9457/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9457/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khamis, Nurulaqilla & Selamat, Hazlina & Ismail, Fatimah Sham & Lutfy, Omar Farouq & Haniff, Mohamad Fadzli & Nordin, Ili Najaa Aimi Mohd, 2020. "Optimized exit door locations for a safer emergency evacuation using crowd evacuation model and artificial bee colony optimization," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Jochen Schmidt & Iain Matcham & Stefan Reese & Andrew King & Rob Bell & Roddy Henderson & Graeme Smart & Jim Cousins & Warwick Smith & Dave Heron, 2011. "Quantitative multi-risk analysis for natural hazards: a framework for multi-risk modelling," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 58(3), pages 1169-1192, September.
    3. Juan Diego Blanco Cadena & Graziano Salvalai & Michele Lucesoli & Enrico Quagliarini & Marco D’Orazio, 2021. "Flexible Workflow for Determining Critical Hazard and Exposure Scenarios for Assessing SLODs Risk in Urban Built Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Conghui Zhou & Yun Wu, 2020. "A Planning Support Tool for Layout Integral Optimization of Urban Blue–Green Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Arnaud Mignan & Stefan Wiemer & Domenico Giardini, 2014. "The quantification of low-probability–high-consequences events: part I. A generic multi-risk approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(3), pages 1999-2022, September.
    6. David Koren & Katarina Rus, 2019. "The Potential of Open Space for Enhancing Urban Seismic Resilience: A literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Rosso, Federica & Golasi, Iacopo & Castaldo, Veronica Lucia & Piselli, Cristina & Pisello, Anna Laura & Salata, Ferdinando & Ferrero, Marco & Cotana, Franco & de Lieto Vollaro, Andrea, 2018. "On the impact of innovative materials on outdoor thermal comfort of pedestrians in historical urban canyons," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 825-839.
    8. Melanie Kappes & Margreth Keiler & Kirsten Elverfeldt & Thomas Glade, 2012. "Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 64(2), pages 1925-1958, November.
    9. Maxx Dilley & Robert S. Chen & Uwe Deichmann & Arthur L. Lerner-Lam & Margaret Arnold, 2005. "Natural Disaster Hotspots: A Global Risk Analysis," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7376, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mieko Kumasaki & Malcolm King & Mitsuru Arai & Lili Yang, 2016. "Anatomy of cascading natural disasters in Japan: main modes and linkages," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1425-1441, February.
    2. Mieko Kumasaki & Malcolm King & Mitsuru Arai & Lili Yang, 2016. "Anatomy of cascading natural disasters in Japan: main modes and linkages," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1425-1441, February.
    3. Guoqiang Shen & Long Zhou & Yao Wu & Zhiming Cai, 2018. "A Global Expected Risk Analysis of Fatalities, Injuries, and Damages by Natural Disasters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Christopher T. Emrich & Yao Zhou & Sanam K. Aksha & Herbert E. Longenecker, 2022. "Creating a Nationwide Composite Hazard Index Using Empirically Based Threat Assessment Approaches Applied to Open Geospatial Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Valentina Gallina & Silvia Torresan & Alex Zabeo & Andrea Critto & Thomas Glade & Antonio Marcomini, 2020. "A Multi-Risk Methodology for the Assessment of Climate Change Impacts in Coastal Zones," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-28, May.
    6. Casey Zuzak & Matthew Mowrer & Emily Goodenough & Jordan Burns & Nicholas Ranalli & Jesse Rozelle, 2022. "The national risk index: establishing a nationwide baseline for natural hazard risk in the US," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(2), pages 2331-2355, November.
    7. Saurabh Prabhu & Mohammad Javanbarg & Marc Lehmann & Sez Atamturktur, 2019. "Multi-peril risk assessment for business downtime of industrial facilities," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 97(3), pages 1327-1356, July.
    8. Changhong Zhou & Mu Chen & Jiangtao Chen & Yu Chen & Wenwu Chen, 2024. "A Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment Model for a Road Network Based on Neural Networks and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Gustavo Barrantes, 2018. "Multi-hazard model for developing countries," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(2), pages 1081-1095, June.
    10. Pilar Baquedano Julià & Tiago Miguel Ferreira, 2021. "From single- to multi-hazard vulnerability and risk in Historic Urban Areas: a literature review," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 93-128, August.
    11. Melanie Kappes & Margreth Keiler & Kirsten Elverfeldt & Thomas Glade, 2012. "Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 64(2), pages 1925-1958, November.
    12. Ran Wang & Laiyin Zhu & Han Yu & Shujuan Cui & Jing’ai Wang, 2016. "Automatic Type Recognition and Mapping of Global Tropical Cyclone Disaster Chains (TDC)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Adriana Galderisi & Giada Limongi, 2021. "A Comprehensive Assessment of Exposure and Vulnerabilities in Multi-Hazard Urban Environments: A Key Tool for Risk-Informed Planning Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Arnaud Mignan & Stefan Wiemer & Domenico Giardini, 2014. "The quantification of low-probability–high-consequences events: part I. A generic multi-risk approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(3), pages 1999-2022, September.
    15. Giovanni Forzieri & Luc Feyen & Simone Russo & Michalis Vousdoukas & Lorenzo Alfieri & Stephen Outten & Mirco Migliavacca & Alessandra Bianchi & Rodrigo Rojas & Alba Cid, 2016. "Multi-hazard assessment in Europe under climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 105-119, July.
    16. Heidi Kreibich & Philip Bubeck & Michael Kunz & Holger Mahlke & Stefano Parolai & Bijan Khazai & James Daniell & Tobia Lakes & Kai Schröter, 2014. "A review of multiple natural hazards and risks in Germany," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(3), pages 2279-2304, December.
    17. Arnaud Mignan, 2022. "A Digital Template for the Generic Multi-Risk (GenMR) Framework: A Virtual Natural Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Baoyin Liu & Yim Ling Siu & Gordon Mitchell & Wei Xu, 2016. "The danger of mapping risk from multiple natural hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(1), pages 139-153, May.
    19. Wei Xu & Xiaodong Ming & Yunjia Ma & Xinhang Zhang & Peijun Shi & Li Zhuo & Bingqiang Lu, 2019. "Quantitative Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment of Crop Loss in the Yangtze River Delta Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, February.
    20. Yang Zhou & Yansui Liu & Wenxiang Wu & Ning Li, 2015. "Integrated risk assessment of multi-hazards in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(1), pages 257-280, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9457-:d:619853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.