IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i13p7045-d580431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Idea of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Opinion of Future Managers—Comparative Research between Poland and Georgia

Author

Listed:
  • Iwona Zdonek

    (Department of Organization and Management, Institute of Economy and Informatics, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Anna Mularczyk

    (Department of Organization and Management, Institute of Economy and Informatics, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Grzegorz Polok

    (Department of Public Management and Social Sciences, University of Economics in Katowice, 40-287 Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

The article deals with the issue of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the awareness of economics students as future managers responsible for the implementation of this idea in enterprises. Due to the fact that CSR is a source of many innovations today, the aim of the research was to learn about the awareness and opinions of students about CSR on such issues as: reasons for implementation, main activities, impact on profitability, and the need to explore and assess the usefulness of this knowledge. The research was conducted in 2019 among students from Poland and Georgia (as countries at various stages of advancement in the market economy). The results of the research were statistically analyzed in terms of obtaining answers to the hypotheses and research questions, checking the significance of differences in the answers due to nationality, and additionally, gender (chi-square test and test for two proportions). The primary contribution of this study is an exploration of the views of students on various issues of CSR and sustainability. The results showed that—according to students—ethical values, increased consumer awareness, and the desire to gain a competitive advantage are the most common reasons for the implementation of the CSR concept by companies. The vast majority of respondents indicated the need to enrich the knowledge of business ethics as an important aspect shaping the attitudes of employers and employees. The positive attitude of students regarding the impact of CSR on the company’s profitability was confirmed, although the authors expected more unambiguous results. Differences were also distinguished between the responses of students from both countries on some issues, such as: opinions on the developing ethical sensitivity, the need for the credibility of the EU economic policy, ecology and relations with the local community, as well as relations with the closest stakeholders of companies. The results of the conducted research suggest the need for intense activity in the field of public awareness and the requirement of personnel training for the skilful implementation of CSR principles in enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Iwona Zdonek & Anna Mularczyk & Grzegorz Polok, 2021. "The Idea of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Opinion of Future Managers—Comparative Research between Poland and Georgia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7045-:d:580431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7045/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7045/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bożena Dancewicz & Franziska Struve, 2019. "The Influence of MNEs on CSR in Poland," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Aneta Długopolska-Mikonowicz & Sylwia Przytuła & Christopher Stehr (ed.), Corporate Social Responsibility in Poland, pages 149-165, Springer.
    2. Maia Shekriladze & Christopher Stehr, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility in Rising Economies: Georgia," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Nayan Mitra & René Schmidpeter (ed.), Corporate Social Responsibility in Rising Economies, pages 141-161, Springer.
    3. Dariusz Zdonek & Karol Król, 2021. "The Impact of Sex and Personality Traits on Social Media Use during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-27, April.
    4. Lei Huang & Amelia Clarke & Natalie Heldsinger & Wen Tian, 2019. "The communication role of social media in social marketing: a study of the community sustainability knowledge dissemination on LinkedIn and Twitter," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(2), pages 64-75, June.
    5. Anna Witek-Crabb, 2019. "CSR Maturity in Polish Listed Companies: A Qualitative Diagnosis Based on a Progression Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-28, March.
    6. Waris Ali & Jedrzej George Frynas & Zeeshan Mahmood, 2017. "Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure in Developed and Developing Countries: A Literature Review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(4), pages 273-294, July.
    7. Thomas Osburg, 2013. "Social Innovation to Drive Corporate Sustainability," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Thomas Osburg & René Schmidpeter (ed.), Social Innovation, edition 127, pages 13-22, Springer.
    8. Paul Ziek, 2009. "Making sense of CSR communication," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 137-145, May.
    9. Kyoko Fukukawa & John Balmer & Edmund Gray, 2007. "Mapping the Interface Between Corporate Identity, Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 1-5, November.
    10. Mirvis, Philip & Herrera, Maria Elena Baltazar & Googins, Bradley & Albareda, Laura, 2016. "Corporate social innovation: How firms learn to innovate for the greater good," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5014-5021.
    11. Joyce Falkenberg & Petter Brunsæl, 2011. "Corporate Social Responsibility: A Strategic Advantage or a Strategic Necessity?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 99(1), pages 9-16, February.
    12. Jay J. Janney & Steve Gove, 2011. "Reputation and Corporate Social Responsibility Aberrations, Trends, and Hypocrisy: Reactions to Firm Choices in the Stock Option Backdating Scandal," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(7), pages 1562-1585, November.
    13. Beata Hysa & Aneta Karasek & Iwona Zdonek, 2021. "Social Media Usage by Different Generations as a Tool for Sustainable Tourism Marketing in Society 5.0 Idea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, January.
    14. Maria Teresa Roszkowska-Menkes, 2018. "Integrating strategic CSR and open innovation. Towards a conceptual framework," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(4), pages 950-966, October.
    15. Justyna Szumniak-Samolej, 2019. "Social Media for Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy Creation and Communication in Poland," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Aneta Długopolska-Mikonowicz & Sylwia Przytuła & Christopher Stehr (ed.), Corporate Social Responsibility in Poland, pages 273-286, Springer.
    16. Won-Moo Hur & Hanna Kim & Jeong Woo, 2014. "How CSR Leads to Corporate Brand Equity: Mediating Mechanisms of Corporate Brand Credibility and Reputation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 75-86, November.
    17. Cowen, Scott S. & Ferreri, Linda B. & Parker, Lee D., 1987. "The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 111-122, March.
    18. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4687 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Mauricio Andrés Latapí Agudelo & Lára Jóhannsdóttir & Brynhildur Davídsdóttir, 2019. "A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-23, December.
    20. Joanna Dyczkowska & Joanna Krasodomska & Jan Michalak, 2016. "CSR in Poland: Institutional Context, Legal Framework and Voluntary Initiatives," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 15(2), pages 206-254, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iwona Zdonek & Anna Mularczyk & Marian Turek & Stanisław Tokarski, 2023. "Perception of Prosumer Photovoltaic Technology in Poland: Usability, Ease of Use, Attitudes, and Purchase Intentions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Akrum Helfaya & Nasser Fathi Easa, 2022. "Islamic Religiosity and CSR Attitudes—The Case of Egyptian Managers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Witek-Crabb, 2019. "CSR Maturity in Polish Listed Companies: A Qualitative Diagnosis Based on a Progression Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-28, March.
    2. Mª Eugenia López‐Pérez & Iguácel Melero & F Javier Sese, 2017. "Management for Sustainable Development and Its Impact on Firm Value in the SME Context: Does Size Matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(7), pages 985-999, November.
    3. Karol Król & Dariusz Zdonek, 2021. "Most Often Motivated by Social Media: The Who, the What, and the How Much—Experience from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Grueso Gala, Melanie & Camisón Zornoza, César, 2022. "A bibliometric analysis of the literature on non-financial information reporting: Review of the research and network visualization," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    5. Dong Ding & Bin Liu & Millicent Chang, 2023. "Carbon Emissions and TCFD Aligned Climate-Related Information Disclosures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(4), pages 967-1001, February.
    6. Istianingsih & Terri Trireksani & Daniel T. H. Manurung, 2020. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on the Future Earnings Response Coefficient (ASEAN Banking Analysis)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Anna Jessop & Nicole Wilson & Michal Bardecki & Cory Searcy, 2019. "Corporate Environmental Disclosure in India: An Analysis of Multinational and Domestic Agrochemical Corporations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-33, September.
    8. Sojin Jung & Stacy H. Lee, 2022. "The buffering effect of continuous corporate social responsibilities engagement on negative consumer responses toward brand crises," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1636-1646, September.
    9. He, Jingbin & Ma, Xinru, 2023. "Is corporate social responsibility engagement influenced by nearby firms? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    10. Heather Markham Kim & Kyuha Cho & Younggin Choi & Junghoon (Jay) Lee & Jinsoo Hwang, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in the Casino Industry: A Content Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Jesús J. Cambra-Fierro & María Fuentes-Blasco & Rocío Huerta-Álvarez & Ana Olavarría, 2021. "Customer-based brand equity and customer engagement in experiential services: insights from an emerging economy," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 15(3), pages 467-491, September.
    12. Liang Wang & Justin Tan, 2023. "Coevolution of Strategy, Innovation and Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(4), pages 711-721, September.
    13. Mª. Eugenia López‐Pérez & Iguácel Melero & F. Javier Sesé, 2017. "Does Specific CSR Training for Managers Impact Shareholder Value? Implications for Education in Sustainable Development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5), pages 435-448, September.
    14. Fatma Bulut Sürdü & Arzu Özsözgün Çalışkan & Emel Esen, 2020. "Human Resource Disclosures in Corporate Annual Reports of Insurance Companies: A Case of Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Nirino, Niccolò & Santoro, Gabriele & Miglietta, Nicola & Quaglia, Roberto, 2021. "Corporate controversies and company's financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    16. Łukasz Matuszak & Ewa Różańska, 2017. "CSR Disclosure in Polish-Listed Companies in the Light of Directive 2014/95/EU Requirements: Empirical Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Bianca Alves Almeida Machado & Lívia Cristina Pinto Dias & Alberto Fonseca, 2021. "Transparency of materiality analysis in GRI‐based sustainability reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 570-580, March.
    18. Nusirat Ojuolape Gold & Fauziah Md. Taib & Yaxin Ma, 2022. "Firm-Level Attributes, Industry-Specific Factors, Stakeholder Pressure, and Country-Level Attributes: Global Evidence of What Inspires Corporate Sustainability Practices and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-28, October.
    19. Contreras-Pacheco, Orlando E. & Claasen, Cyrlene, 2017. "Fuzzy reporting as a way for a company to greenwash: perspectives from the Colombian reality," MPRA Paper 85472, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Marc Bollecker & Pierre Mathieu & Claude Clementz, 2006. "Le Comportement Socialement Responsable Des Entreprises : Une Lecture Des Travaux En Comptabilite Et Contrôle De Gestion Dans Une Perspective Neo-Institutionnaliste," Post-Print halshs-00769052, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7045-:d:580431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.