IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i8p3393-d348537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business Models Amid Changes in Regulation and Environment: The Case of Finland–Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Oskari Lähdeaho

    (Industrial Engineering and Management, LUT Kouvola, LUT University, Prikaatintie 9, FIN-45100 Kouvola, Finland)

  • Olli-Pekka Hilmola

    (Industrial Engineering and Management, LUT Kouvola, LUT University, Prikaatintie 9, FIN-45100 Kouvola, Finland
    Estonian Maritime Academy, Tallinn University of Technology (Taltech), Kopli 101, 11712 Tallinn, Estonia)

Abstract

Changes in regulation are affecting the international business environment. In this study the impact of regulation changes and ways to benefit from those in Finland and Russia are examined. Logistics and manufacturing companies are studied using the case study approach including ten semi-structured interviews (Finland and Russia) and a survey (Southeast Finland), further supported by an additional survey for logistics sector companies (Southeast Finland). The changes in the business environment have created a fragmented market with a growing number of actors. Three business models (blockchain-based, platform-based and innovative subcontracting-based), capitalizing on the growing number of actors, were incepted in the interview phase and evaluated in the survey phase with companies. These models are integrable with the circular economy, a relevant practice according to the studied companies. Blockchain was perceived as a still immature technology. Further study revealed that the companies are not well prepared for environmental demands in logistics, and the overall volumes and business climate between the analyzed countries have not improved. Additionally, those companies do not actively pursue the possibilities of new technologies. The impact of regulatory changes in this region has not been examined closely with a case study approach. This study helps to explain the current trends in an established market.

Suggested Citation

  • Oskari Lähdeaho & Olli-Pekka Hilmola, 2020. "Business Models Amid Changes in Regulation and Environment: The Case of Finland–Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3393-:d:348537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3393/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3393/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irina Svaetichin & Tommi Inkinen, 2017. "Port Waste Management in the Baltic Sea Area: A Four Port Study on the Legal Requirements, Processes and Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Micael Thunberg & Anna Fredriksson, 2018. "Bringing planning back into the picture – How can supply chain planning aid in dealing with supply chain-related problems in construction?," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(8), pages 425-442, August.
    3. Henry Chesbrough & Richard S. Rosenbloom, 2002. "The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 11(3), pages 529-555, June.
    4. Solaymani, Saeed, 2019. "CO2 emissions patterns in 7 top carbon emitter economies: The case of transport sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 989-1001.
    5. Bertrand Guillotin, 2019. "Using Unconventional Wisdom to Re-Assess and Rebuild the BRICS," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Stefano Poponi & Gabriella Arcese & Enrico Maria Mosconi & Michelangelo Arezzo di Trifiletti, 2020. "Entrepreneurial Drivers for the Development of the Circular Business Model: The Role of Academic Spin-Off," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Osorio-Tejada, Jose Luis & Llera-Sastresa, Eva & Scarpellini, Sabina, 2017. "Liquefied natural gas: Could it be a reliable option for road freight transport in the EU?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 785-795.
    8. Fahimnia, Behnam & Sarkis, Joseph & Davarzani, Hoda, 2015. "Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 101-114.
    9. Asoke Dey & Paul LaGuardia & Mahesh Srinivasan, 2011. "Building sustainability in logistics operations: a research agenda," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(11), pages 1237-1259, October.
    10. Arteconi, A. & Brandoni, C. & Evangelista, D. & Polonara, F., 2010. "Life-cycle greenhouse gas analysis of LNG as a heavy vehicle fuel in Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(6), pages 2005-2013, June.
    11. Olli-Pekka Hilmola, 2019. "The Sulphur Cap in Maritime Supply Chains," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-98545-9, June.
    12. Richard M. Burton & Børge Obel, 2011. "Computational Modeling for What-Is, What-Might-Be, and What-Should-Be Studies---And Triangulation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1195-1202, October.
    13. Tatiana Romanova, 2016. "Sanctions and the Future of EU–Russian Economic Relations," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(4), pages 774-796, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adriana Neligan & Rupert J. Baumgartner & Martin Geissdoerfer & Josef‐Peter Schöggl, 2023. "Circular disruption: Digitalisation as a driver of circular economy business models," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 1175-1188, March.
    2. Yi Wang & Yafei Yang & Zhaoxiang Qin & Yefei Yang & Jun Li, 2023. "A Literature Review on the Application of Digital Technology in Achieving Green Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Zhang Yu & Muhammad Umar & S. Abdul Rehman, 2022. "Adoption of technological innovation and recycling practices in automobile sector: under the Covid-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 298-306, June.
    4. Margarita Ignatyeva & Vera Yurak & Alexey Dushin & Vladimir Strovsky & Sergey Zavyalov & Alexander Malyshev & Polina Karimova, 2021. "How Far Away Are World Economies from Circularity: Assessing the Capacity of Circular Economy Policy Packages in the Operation of Raw Materials and Industrial Wastes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Ashish Dwivedi & Sanjoy Kumar Paul, 2022. "A framework for digital supply chains in the era of circular economy: Implications on environmental sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1249-1274, May.
    6. Marija Jović & Edvard Tijan & Dražen Žgaljić & Saša Aksentijević, 2020. "Improving Maritime Transport Sustainability Using Blockchain-Based Information Exchange," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Vineet Paliwal & Shalini Chandra & Suneel Sharma, 2020. "Blockchain Technology for Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature Review and a Classification Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-39, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olli-Pekka Hilmola & Andres Tolli & Ain Kiisler, 2020. "Internet page content analysis of north European Sea ports," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Oskari Lähdeaho & Olli-Pekka Hilmola & Riitta Kajatkari, 2020. "Maritime supply chain sustainability: South-East Finland case study," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Wanke, Peter Fernandes & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel José & Moreira Antunes, Jorge Junio & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Roubaud, David & Sobreiro, Vinicius Amorim & Santibanez Gonzalez‬, Erne, 2021. "An original information entropy-based quantitative evaluation model for low-carbon operations in an emerging market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    4. Sun, Shouheng & Ertz, Myriam, 2022. "Life cycle assessment and risk assessment of liquefied natural gas vehicles promotion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    5. Ivan Smajla & Daria Karasalihović Sedlar & Branko Drljača & Lucija Jukić, 2019. "Fuel Switch to LNG in Heavy Truck Traffic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Pfoser, Sarah & Schauer, Oliver & Costa, Yasel, 2018. "Acceptance of LNG as an alternative fuel: Determinants and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 259-267.
    7. Md Arman Arefin & Md Nurun Nabi & Md Washim Akram & Mohammad Towhidul Islam & Md Wahid Chowdhury, 2020. "A Review on Liquefied Natural Gas as Fuels for Dual Fuel Engines: Opportunities, Challenges and Responses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Volker Frehe & Frank Teuteberg, 2017. "Information and communication technology in green logistics: status quo and research gaps," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 65-96, April.
    9. Mingfeng Tang & Grace Sheila Walsh & Cuiwen Li & Angathevar Baskaran, 2021. "Exploring technology business incubators and their business incubation models: case studies from China," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 90-116, February.
    10. Thomson, Heather & Corbett, James J. & Winebrake, James J., 2015. "Natural gas as a marine fuel," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 153-167.
    11. Deniz Turkcu & Nina Tura & Ville Ojanen, 2022. "A Conceptual Framework of the Sustainability Challenges Experienced during the Life Cycle of Biobased Packaging Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Jasmina Ćetković & Slobodan Lakić & Angelina Živković & Miloš Žarković & Radoje Vujadinović, 2021. "Economic Analysis of Measures for GHG Emission Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    13. Konstantina Peloriadi & Petros Iliadis & Panagiotis Boutikos & Konstantinos Atsonios & Panagiotis Grammelis & Aristeidis Nikolopoulos, 2022. "Technoeconomic Assessment of LNG-Fueled Solid Oxide Fuel Cells in Small Island Systems: The Patmos Island Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    14. Livio Cricelli & Michele Grimaldi & Silvia Vermicelli, 2022. "Crowdsourcing and open innovation: a systematic literature review, an integrated framework and a research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1269-1310, July.
    15. Roel M. Post & Paul Buijs & Michiel A. J. uit het Broek & Jose A. Lopez Alvarez & Nick B. Szirbik & Iris F. A. Vis, 2018. "A solution approach for deriving alternative fuel station infrastructure requirements," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 592-607, September.
    16. Cinzia Battistella & Gianluca Murgia & Fabio Nonino, 2021. "Free-driven web-based business models," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 445-486, June.
    17. Fu Jia & Yan Jiang, 2018. "Sustainable Global Sourcing: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, February.
    18. Gerrit Remane & Andre Hanelt & Jan F. Tesch & Lutz M. Kolbe, 2017. "The Business Model Pattern Database — A Tool For Systematic Business Model Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-61, January.
    19. Antonio C. S. Tavares & Rosangela M. Vanalle & João A. Camarotto, 2019. "Influence of Green Initiatives on Environmental, Economic and Operational Outcomes: The Case of the Brazilian Packaging Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, January.
    20. Oseni, Musiliu O. & Pollitt, Michael G., 2017. "The prospects for smart energy prices: Observations from 50 years of residential pricing for fixed line telecoms and electricity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 150-160.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3393-:d:348537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.