IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i5p2072-d329888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Industrial Structure and its Influence on Sustainable Economic Development and Quality of Life of the Population of Different World Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Inna Gryshova

    (Jiangsu Normal University, 101 Shanghai Rd, Tongshan Qu, Xuzhou 221100, China)

  • Mykola Kyzym

    (National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Research Centre of Industrial Problems of Development, 1a Inzhenernyi Ln., 61166 Kharkiv, Ukraine)

  • Viktoriia Khaustova

    (National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Research Centre of Industrial Problems of Development, 1a Inzhenernyi Ln., 61166 Kharkiv, Ukraine)

  • Volodymyr Korneev

    (Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine, State Research Institute of Informatization and Modeling of Economy, 38 Druzhby narodiv Boul., 01014 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Hennadii Kramarev

    (National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Research Centre of Industrial Problems of Development, 1a Inzhenernyi Ln., 61166 Kharkiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

The article proves that despite a significant growth in the service sector in recent years, industry remains the main engine of economic growth. Moreover, using the analysis of statistical data, it is shown that the development of industrial complexes of countries of the world is accompanied by corresponding structural changes, which in turn determines their economic development in general. The study aims to solve the following issues: which structure of the national industry can be considered progressive under modern conditions, i.e., can lead to progress and sustainable socio-economic growth; whether there is a correlation between the progressive structure of the country’s industry and its economic development and the quality of life of its population; how the approach of the country’s industrial structure to its progressive state influences the country’s economic development and quality of life of its population. The purpose of the study is to justify or refute the hypothesis about influence of progressiveness of the industrial structure on sustainable economic development and quality of life of the population. The main methods used in the study are cluster analysis and integral assessment. The statistical basis of the study is the data on inter-branch balances for 36 countries of the world for 2009, 2011 and 2014. The results obtained in the study allowed confirming the hypothesis about the positive influence of approach of the industrial structure of countries of the world to its progressive state on the sustainable economic development and quality of life of their population. This conclusion can be considered as the basis for forming the state policy of the world’s countries to develop their economies and improve the quality of life of their population.

Suggested Citation

  • Inna Gryshova & Mykola Kyzym & Viktoriia Khaustova & Volodymyr Korneev & Hennadii Kramarev, 2020. "Assessment of the Industrial Structure and its Influence on Sustainable Economic Development and Quality of Life of the Population of Different World Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-25, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:2072-:d:329888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/2072/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/2072/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Todaro, Michael P, 1969. "A Model for Labor Migration and Urban Unemployment in Less Developed Countries," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(1), pages 138-148, March.
    2. Michael Fritsch, 2017. "The theory of economic development – An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(4), pages 654-655, April.
    3. Raiser, Martin & Schaffer, Mark & Schuchhardt, Johannes, 2004. "Benchmarking structural change in transition," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 47-81, March.
    4. Enrico Tanuwidjaja & Shandre Thangavelu, 2007. "Structural Change and Productivity Growth in the Japanese Manufacturing Industry," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 385-405.
    5. Inna Gryshova & Tatyana Shabatura & Stasys Girdzijauskas & Dalia Streimikiene & Remigijus Ciegis & Ingrida Griesiene, 2019. "The Paradox of Value and Economic Bubbles: New Insights for Sustainable Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    6. RUI MaO & YANG YAO, 2012. "Structural Change In A Small Open Economy: An Application To South Korea," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(1), pages 29-56, February.
    7. Yanqing Jiang, 2011. "Structural Change And Growth In China Under Economic Reforms: Patterns, Causes And Implications," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 48-65, March.
    8. Hollis Chenery & Moises Syrquin, 1980. "A Comparative Analysis of Industrial Growth," International Economic Association Series, in: R. C. O. Matthews (ed.), Economic Growth and Resources, chapter 11, pages 223-257, Palgrave Macmillan.
    9. Kiminori Matsuyama, 2009. "Structural Change in an Interdependent World: A Global View of Manufacturing Decline," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 7(2-3), pages 478-486, 04-05.
    10. Ulrich Thießen & Paul R. Gregory, 2005. "Modelling the Structural Change of Transition Countries," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 519, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    11. Dale W. Jorgenson & Marcel P. Timmer, 2011. "Structural Change in Advanced Nations: A New Set of Stylised Facts," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 113(1), pages 1-29, March.
    12. repec:gdk:wpaper:49 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Dale W. Jorgenson & Marcel P. Timmer, "undated". "Structural Change in Advanced Nations," Working Paper 13525, Harvard University OpenScholar.
    14. Dani Rodrik, 2013. "Unconditional Convergence in Manufacturing," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 128(1), pages 165-204.
    15. Inna Gryshova & Mariana Petrova & Milena Tepavicharova & Aleksey Petrovich Diachenko & Tatiana Gutsul, 2019. "A model for selection of a management team to ensure the sustainability and development of the business organizations," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(1), pages 690-703, September.
    16. Igor Lopes Rocha, 2018. "Manufacturing as driver of economic growth," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 71(285), pages 103-138.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Piotr Misztal & Paweł Dziekański, 2023. "Green Economy and Waste Management as Determinants of Modeling Green Capital of Districts in Poland in 2010–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Xiangfei Ma & Inna Gryshova & Viktoriia Khaustova & Olena Reshetnyak & Maryna Shcherbata & Denys Bobrovnyk & Mykyta Khaustov, 2022. "Assessment of the Impact of Scientific and Technical Activities on the Economic Growth of World Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-35, November.
    3. Inna Gryshova & Mykola Kyzym & Irina Hubarieva & Viktoriia Khaustova & Anatoly Livinskyi & Mykola Koroshenko, 2020. "Assessment of the EU and Ukraine Economic Security and Its Influence on Their Sustainable Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-26, September.
    4. Grzegorz Drozdowski & Paweł Dziekański, 2022. "Local Disproportions of Quality of Life and Their Influence on the Process of Green Economy Development in Polish Voivodships in 2010–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Jana Coronicova Hurajova & Zuzana Hajduova, 2021. "Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Using TOPSIS and WSA Method for Quality of Life: The Case of Slovakia Regions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-11, October.
    6. Zhicheng Duan & Tingting Tang, 2022. "Quantitative Simulation and Verification of the Coordination Curves between Sustainable Development and Green Innovation Efficiency: From the Perspective of Urban Agglomerations Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alistair Dieppe, 2021. "Global Productivity," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 34015, December.
    2. Gitana Dudzevičiūtė & Gitana Dudzevičiūtė, 2013. "Lithuanian manufacturing trends in the context of developed and developing countries," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 1(1), pages 55-66, September.
    3. Gitana Dudzevičiūtė, 2013. "Lithuanian manufacturing trends in the context of developed and developing countries," Post-Print hal-01694317, HAL.
    4. Herrendorf, Berthold & Rogerson, Richard & Valentinyi, Ákos, 2014. "Growth and Structural Transformation," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 6, pages 855-941, Elsevier.
    5. Oshiro, Jun & Sato, Yasuhiro, 2021. "Industrial structure in urban accounting," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Ajit K. Ghose, 2021. "Structural Change and Development in India," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 15(1), pages 7-29, April.
    7. Gisela Di Meglio & Jorge Gallego & Andrés Maroto & Maria Savona, 2015. "Services in Developing Economies: A new chance for catching-up?," SPRU Working Paper Series 2015-32, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    8. Murat Üngör, 2016. "Did the rising importance of services decelerate overall productivity improvement of Turkey during 2002–2007?," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 238-261, July.
    9. Takeo Hori & Noriko Mizutani & Taisuke Uchino, 2018. "Endogenous structural change, aggregate balanced growth, and optimality," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 65(1), pages 125-153, January.
    10. Liboreiro, Pablo R. & Fernández, Rafael & García, Clara, 2021. "The drivers of deindustrialization in advanced economies: A hierarchical structural decomposition analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 138-152.
    11. Carlo Ciccarelli & Matteo Gomellini & Paolo Sestito, 2019. "Demography and Productivity in the Italian Manufacturing Industry: Yesterday and Today," CEIS Research Paper 457, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 16 May 2019.
    12. Jörg Mayer, 2021. "Development strategies for middle‐income countries in a digital world—Insights from modern trade economics," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(9), pages 2515-2546, September.
    13. Emre Özçelik & Erdal Özmen, 2020. "Premature Deindustrialisation: The International Evidence," ERC Working Papers 2001, ERC - Economic Research Center, Middle East Technical University, revised Sep 2020.
    14. Diane Coyle & Jen‐Chung Mei, 2023. "Diagnosing the UK productivity slowdown: which sectors matter and why?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 90(359), pages 813-850, July.
    15. Felipe Saffie & Liliana Varela & Kei-Mu Yi, 2020. "The Micro and Macro Dynamics of Capital Flows," NBER Working Papers 27371, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Marcel P. Timmer & Ilya B. Voskoboynikov, 2014. "Is Mining Fuelling Long-Run Growth in Russia? Industry Productivity Growth Trends Since 1995," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 60(S2), pages 398-422, November.
    17. Sen, Ali, 2020. "Structural change within the services sector, Baumol's cost disease, and cross-country productivity differences," MPRA Paper 99614, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Dani Rodrik, 2016. "Premature deindustrialization," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-33, March.
    19. Yahya Z. ALSHEHHI & Jozsef POPP, 2017. "Sectoral Analysis: Growth Accounting Of Tertiary Industries," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 14, pages 221-230, August.
    20. Margarida Duarte & Diego Restuccia, 2020. "Relative Prices and Sectoral Productivity," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 18(3), pages 1400-1443.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:2072-:d:329888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.