IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9185-d873150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local Disproportions of Quality of Life and Their Influence on the Process of Green Economy Development in Polish Voivodships in 2010–2020

Author

Listed:
  • Grzegorz Drozdowski

    (Department of Economics and Finance, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Uniwersytecka 15 Str., 25-406 Kielce, Poland)

  • Paweł Dziekański

    (Department of Economics and Finance, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Uniwersytecka 15 Str., 25-406 Kielce, Poland)

Abstract

Voivodships are centres of economic, social, and cultural life—they gather economic and social activities. This research aimed to evaluate the spatial differentiation of the quality of life in voivodships in Poland with the use of a synthetic measure. To achieve the research objective, the research methods used were literature analysis, statistical analysis, and synthetic measure. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution method was used to build synthetic measures. The choice of variables in 2010–2020 was largely conditioned by the availability of data collected in the regional system at the level of voivodships at the Local Data Bank of the Central Statistical Office. As a result of the analysis of voivodships in Poland, based on the quality of life measure, four groups were distinguished (according to the value of quartiles). In the group of the best voivodeships there were: Pomerania, Masovia, Lower Silesia, and West Pomeranian in 2010, and Masovia, Pomerania, Greater Poland, Lower Silesia, and Lesser Poland in 2020, and in the IV, the weakest group: Lodz Province, Podlasie Province, Lubusz Province, and Holy Cross in 2010, and Lodz Province, Podlasie Province, Holy Cross, and Lublin Province in 2020. The synthetic quality of life ranged from 0.37 to 0.56 in 2010 and from 0.39 to 0.64 in 2020. Regional authorities, taking care to improve economic potential, cause increasing the attractiveness of the area and attracting new entrepreneurs, create new jobs, and improve the quality of life of the inhabitants. Quality of life is shaped by economic activity and working conditions, health, education, free time and social relations, economic and physical security, and the quality of the natural environment. The results of the research conducted allow local governments to make comparisons. The conclusions drawn may allow them to identify potential directions for developing policy optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Grzegorz Drozdowski & Paweł Dziekański, 2022. "Local Disproportions of Quality of Life and Their Influence on the Process of Green Economy Development in Polish Voivodships in 2010–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-26, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9185-:d:873150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9185/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9185/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pawel Dziekanski & Andrzej Pawlik & Magdalena Wronska & Urszula Karpinska, 2020. "Demographic Potential as the Basis for Spatial Differentiation of the Financial Situation Communes of Eastern Poland in 2009-2018," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 872-892.
    2. Michal Bernard Pietrzak, 2016. "The Problem of the Inclusion of Spatial Dependence Within the TOPSIS Method," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 12(3), pages 69-86.
    3. Van de Kerk, Geurt & Manuel, Arthur R., 2008. "A comprehensive index for a sustainable society: The SSI -- the Sustainable Society Index," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(2-3), pages 228-242, June.
    4. Piotr Prus & Paweł Dziekański & Małgorzata Bogusz & Małgorzata Szczepanek, 2021. "Spatial Differentiation of Agricultural Potential and the Level of Development of Voivodeships in Poland in 2008–2018," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-27, March.
    5. Almas Heshmati, 2018. "An empirical survey of the ramifications of a green economy," International Journal of Green Economics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 53-85.
    6. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski, 2022. "Does the Net Present Value as a Financial Metric Fit Investment in Green Energy Security?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Inna Gryshova & Mykola Kyzym & Viktoriia Khaustova & Volodymyr Korneev & Hennadii Kramarev, 2020. "Assessment of the Industrial Structure and its Influence on Sustainable Economic Development and Quality of Life of the Population of Different World Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-25, March.
    8. Paweł Dziekański & Piotr Prus, 2020. "Financial Diversity and the Development Process: Case study of Rural Communes of Eastern Poland in 2009–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-25, August.
    9. Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar & Andrés Navarro Galera & Laura Alcaide Muñoz & María Deseada López Subirés, 2016. "Risk Factors and Drivers of Financial Sustainability in Local Government: An Empirical Study," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 29-51, January.
    10. Alan Murray & Keith Skene & Kathryn Haynes, 2017. "The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 369-380, February.
    11. D'Amato, D. & Korhonen, J., 2021. "Integrating the green economy, circular economy and bioeconomy in a strategic sustainability framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    12. Kukuła, Karol & Luty, Lidia, 2018. "O wyborze metody porządkowania liniowego do oceny gospodarki odpadami w Polsce w ujęciu przestrzennym," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 18(33, Part ), June.
    13. Grzegorz Drozdowski, 2021. "Economic Calculus Qua an Instrument to Support Sustainable Development under Increasing Risk," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    14. Aleksandra Kuzior & Olena Arefieva & Zarina Poberezhna & Oleksiy Ihumentsev, 2022. "The Mechanism of Forming the Strategic Potential of an Enterprise in a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martina Zámková & Stanislav Rojík & Martin Prokop & Simona Činčalová & Radek Stolín, 2023. "Consumers’ Behavior in the Field of Organic Agriculture and Food Products during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Czech Republic: Focus on a Comparison of Hyper-, Super- and Farmers’ Markets and Direct Pu," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Piotr Misztal & Paweł Dziekański, 2023. "Green Economy and Waste Management as Determinants of Modeling Green Capital of Districts in Poland in 2010–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    3. Zhiyuan Yang & Dong Yang & Jingjie Geng & Fengxia Tian, 2022. "Evaluation of Suitability and Spatial Distribution of Rural Settlements in the Karst Mountainous Area of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paweł Dziekański & Adam Wyszkowski & Piotr Prus & Andrzej Pawlik & Mansoor Maitah & Magdalena Wrońska, 2022. "Zero Waste as a Determinant of Shaping Green Economy Processes on the Example of Communes of Eastern Poland in 2010–2020," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Piotr Misztal & Paweł Dziekański, 2023. "Green Economy and Waste Management as Determinants of Modeling Green Capital of Districts in Poland in 2010–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    3. Hui Wang & Shu Xu, 2022. "Heterogeneity Effect of Corporate Financialization on Total Factor Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Mirela Panait & Arkadiusz Babczuk, 2022. "Can the Economic Value Added Be Used as the Universal Financial Metric?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Paweł Dziekański & Piotr Prus & Piotr Sołtyk & Magdalena Wrońska & Florin Imbrea & Laura Smuleac & Raul Pascalau & Karolina Błaszczyk, 2022. "Spatial Disproportions of the Green Economy and the Financial Situation of Polish Voivodeships in 2010–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, October.
    6. Grzegorz Drozdowski & Joanna Rogozińska-Mitrut & Jacek Stasiak, 2021. "The Empirical Analysis of the Core Competencies of the Company’s Resource Management Risk. Preliminary Study," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-12, June.
    7. Yanli Li & Jiayuan Li & Luyao Gan, 2022. "A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Environmental Regulations and Competitiveness and Conditions for Its Realization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-12, June.
    8. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Mirela Panait & Simona Andreea Apostu, 2022. "The Weighted Average Cost of Capital and Its Universality in Crisis Times: Evidence from the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Pawel Dziekanski & Andrzej Pawlik & Magdalena Wronska & Urszula Karpinska, 2020. "Demographic Potential as the Basis for Spatial Differentiation of the Financial Situation Communes of Eastern Poland in 2009-2018," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 872-892.
    10. Piotr Prus & Paweł Dziekański & Małgorzata Bogusz & Małgorzata Szczepanek, 2021. "Spatial Differentiation of Agricultural Potential and the Level of Development of Voivodeships in Poland in 2008–2018," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-27, March.
    11. Umut Burak Geyikci & Serkan Çınar & Fatih Mehmet Sancak, 2022. "Analysis of the Relationships among Financial Development, Economic Growth, Energy Use, and Carbon Emissions by Co-Integration with Multiple Structural Breaks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-11, May.
    12. Tina Wiegand & Martin Wynn, 2023. "Sustainability, the Circular Economy and Digitalisation in the German Textile and Clothing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-30, June.
    13. Mechthild Donner & Anne Verniquet & Jan Broeze & Katrin Kayser & Hugo de Vries, 2021. "Critical success and risk factors for circular business models valorising agricultural waste and by-products," Post-Print hal-03004851, HAL.
    14. Cornelis Leeuwen & Jos Frijns & Annemarie Wezel & Frans Ven, 2012. "City Blueprints: 24 Indicators to Assess the Sustainability of the Urban Water Cycle," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(8), pages 2177-2197, June.
    15. Zizhan Jiang & Burrell Montz & Thomas Vogel, 2023. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Land Use Planning Alternatives Based on GIS-ANP," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, July.
    16. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    17. Patricia van Loon & Luk N. Van Wassenhove & Ales Mihelic, 2022. "Designing a circular business strategy: 7 years of evolution at a large washing machine manufacturer," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1030-1041, March.
    18. Millar, Neal & McLaughlin, Eoin & Börger, Tobias, 2019. "The Circular Economy: Swings and Roundabouts?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 11-19.
    19. Pengen Mai & Steven James Day, 2023. "Persuading Reluctant Customers: The Online Marketing Communications of Car Sharing Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Pim Martens & Mohsin Raza, 2010. "Is Globalisation Sustainable?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-14, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9185-:d:873150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.