IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i5p1750-d325333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Incomplete Information Static Game Evaluating Community-Based Forest Management in Zagros, Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Mehdi Zandebasiri

    (Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, Behbahan Khatam Alanbia University of Technology, Behbahan 63616-47189, Iran)

  • José António Filipe

    (Department of Mathematics, ISTA—School of Technology and Architecture, University Institute of Lisbon (ISCTE-IUL), Information Sciences, Technologies and Architecture Research Center (ISTAR-IUL), Business Research Unit-IUL (BRU-IUL), 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Javad Soosani

    (Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture & Natural Resources, Lorestan University, Khorramabad 6814-94414, Iran)

  • Mehdi Pourhashemi

    (Forest Research Division, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran 14968-13111, Iran)

  • Luca Salvati

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Center for Forestry and Wood, Viale S. Margherita 80, I-52100 Arezzo, Italy
    Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Lipová 9, CZ-37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic)

  • Mário Nuno Mata

    (Lisbon Accounting and Business School Lisbon Polytechnic Institute, Avenida Miguel Bombarda 20, 1069-035 Lisbon, Portugal
    Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, School of Management and Technology (ESGTS-IPS), 2001-904 Santarém, Portugal)

  • Pedro Neves Mata

    (ISTA—University Institute of Lisbon (ISCTE-IUL), 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal
    ESCS—Escola Superior de Comunicação Social, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, 1549-014 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

The present study adopts a game theory approach analyzing land-use planning in Zagros forests, Iran. A Static Game of Incomplete Information (SGII) was applied to the evaluation of participatory forest management in the study area. This tool allows a complete assessment of sustainable forest planning producing two modeling scenarios based on (i) high and (ii) low social acceptance. According to the SGII results, the Nash Bayesian Equilibrium (NBE) strategy suggests the importance of landscape protection in forest management. The results of the NBE analytical strategy show that landscape protection with barbed wires is the most used strategy in local forest management. The response to the local community includes cooperation in conditions of high social acceptance and noncooperation in conditions of low social acceptance. Overall, social acceptance is an adaptive goal in forest management plans.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehdi Zandebasiri & José António Filipe & Javad Soosani & Mehdi Pourhashemi & Luca Salvati & Mário Nuno Mata & Pedro Neves Mata, 2020. "An Incomplete Information Static Game Evaluating Community-Based Forest Management in Zagros, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1750-:d:325333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1750/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1750/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Limaei, Soleiman Mohammadi & Lohmander, Peter, 8. "A game theory approach to the Iranian forest industry raw material market," Scandinavian Forest Economics: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, issue 41, May.
    2. Limaei, Soleiman Mohammadi, 2010. "Mixed strategy game theory, application in forest industry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(7), pages 527-531, September.
    3. Soltani, Arezoo & Sankhayan, Prem Lall & Hofstad, Ole, 2016. "Playing forest governance games: State-village conflict in Iran," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 251-261.
    4. Kahsay, Goytom Abraha & Bulte, Erwin, 2019. "Trust, regulation and participatory forest management: Micro-level evidence on forest governance from Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 118-132.
    5. Rebecca A. Riggs & James D. Langston & Chris Margules & Agni Klintuni Boedhihartono & Han She Lim & Dwi Amalia Sari & Yazid Sururi & Jeffrey Sayer, 2018. "Governance Challenges in an Eastern Indonesian Forest Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Soltani, Arezoo & Angelsen, Arild & Eid, Tron & Naieni, Mohammad Saeid Noori & Shamekhi, Taghi, 2012. "Poverty, sustainability, and household livelihood strategies in Zagros, Iran," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 60-70.
    7. Soltani, Arezoo & Sankhayan, Prem L. & Hofstad, Ole, 2014. "A dynamic bio-economic model for community management of goat and oak forests in Zagros, Iran," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 174-185.
    8. Shahi, Chander & Kant, Shashi, 2007. "An evolutionary game-theoretic approach to the strategies of community members under Joint Forest Management regime," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(7), pages 763-775, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. António Abreu, 2021. "Innovation Ecosystems: A Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-3, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soltani, Arezoo & Sankhayan, Prem Lall & Hofstad, Ole, 2016. "Playing forest governance games: State-village conflict in Iran," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 251-261.
    2. Moradi, Sohrab & Limaei, Soleiman Mohammadi, 2018. "Multi-objective game theory model and fuzzy programing approach for sustainable watershed management," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 363-371.
    3. Abedi Sarvestani, Ahmad & Ingram, Verina, 2020. "Perceptions and practices of rural council participatory forest governance : Closed co-management in Chehel-Chay, Iran," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    4. Limaei, Soleiman Mohammadi, 2010. "Mixed strategy game theory, application in forest industry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(7), pages 527-531, September.
    5. Soltani, Arezoo & Sankhayan, Prem L. & Hofstad, Ole, 2015. "A recipe for co-management of forest and livestock — Results of bio-economic model at a village level in Iran," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 74-86.
    6. Kibria, Abu SMG & Costanza, Robert & Soto, José R, 2022. "Modeling the complex associations of human wellbeing dimensions in a coupled human-natural system: In contexts of marginalized communities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).
    7. Lan, Xiao & Zhang, Qin & Xue, Haili & Liang, Haoguang & Wang, Bojie & Wang, Weijun, 2021. "Linking sustainable livelihoods with sustainable grassland use and conservation: A case study from rural households in a semi-arid grassland area, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    8. Mukisa, Nicholas & Zamora, Ramon & Lie, Tek Tjing, 2020. "Assessment of community sustainable livelihoods capitals for the implementation of alternative energy technologies in Uganda – Africa," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 886-902.
    9. Xie, Hualin & Wang, Wei & Zhang, Xinmin, 2018. "Evolutionary game and simulation of management strategies of fallow cultivated land: A case study in Hunan province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 86-97.
    10. Yami, M. & Mekuria, Wolde, 2022. "Challenges in the governance of community-managed forests in Ethiopia: review," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 1-14(3):147.
    11. Seewald, Eva, 2024. "The environment-poverty nexus using a multidimensional poverty index in rural Vietnamese households," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Finger, Anne & Badelt, Ole & Dahmen, Kathleen & Heilen, Lydia & Mai, Nora & Seegers, Ronja & Seewald (ed.), Transformationsprozesse in Stadt und Land: Erkenntnisse, Strategien und Zukunftsperspektiven, volume 23, pages 184-200, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    12. Julius Uti Nchor, 2023. "Livelihood Strategies and Their Determinants among Informal Households in Calabar, Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Dehghani Pour, Milad & Motiee, Naser & Barati, Ali Akbar & Taheri, Fatemeh & Azadi, Hossein & Gebrehiwot, Kindeya & Lebailly, Philippe & Van Passel, Steven & Witlox, Frank, 2017. "Impacts of the Hara Biosphere Reserve on Livelihood and Welfare in Persian Gulf," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 76-86.
    14. Kumar, Pradeep & Kant, Shashi, 2016. "Revealed social preferences and joint forest management outcomes," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 37-45.
    15. Mohammad Shamsul Hoq & Md. Taj Uddin & Shankar Kumar Raha & Mohammad Ismail Hossain, 2022. "Determinants of households’ livelihood diversification strategies to adapt to natural hazards: evidence from ecologically vulnerable haor region of Bangladesh," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(3), pages 3255-3291, December.
    16. Chuan Liao & Christopher Barrett & Karim-Aly Kassam, 2015. "Does Diversification Improve Livelihoods? Pastoral Households in Xinjiang, China," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(6), pages 1302-1330, November.
    17. William Adzawla & Abou Kane, 2018. "Gender Perspectives Of The Determinants Of Climate Adaptation: The Case Of Livelihood Diversification In Northern Ghana [Une Approche Genrée des déterminants de l'adaptation au climat: le cas de la," Post-Print hal-01929070, HAL.
    18. Beytollah Mahmoudi & Eric Zenner & Davood Mafi-Gholami & Fatemeh Eshaghi, 2023. "Livelihood Analysis and a New Inferential Model for Development of Forest-Dependent Rural Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, June.
    19. Huiqin Li & Tinghong Guo & Peter Nijkamp & Xuelian Xie & Jingjing Liu, 2020. "Farmers’ Livelihood Adaptability in Rural Tourism Destinations: An Evaluation Study of Rural Revitalization in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.
    20. van Oosten, Cora & Runhaar, Hens & Arts, Bas, 2021. "Capable to govern landscape restoration? Exploring landscape governance capabilities, based on literature and stakeholder perceptions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1750-:d:325333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.