IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i20p8318-d425582.html

Model of Third-Party Risk Index for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Delivery in Urban Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Xinhui Ren

    (College of Economics and Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)

  • Caixia Cheng

    (College of Economics and Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)

Abstract

In order to assess the airspace risk of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) operating at low altitudes, the third-party risks of UAV urban operations were defined: the risks caused by drones to people on the ground who are not involved in operations and do not profit from operations, and the sources and objects of the risk were clarified. Taking into account the drone crash, noise, on-board camera, and ground environment factors, a UAV urban logistics risk index evaluation model was constructed. First, the UAV image regression model was used to construct a three-dimensional grid, and then a comprehensive third-party risk index model of UAV urban logistics was built based on the casualty and noise risks. Finally, the Southern District of Civil Aviation University of China was selected as an example scene, and surface data were obtained through a field investigation and instrument measurements. Then, the risk of drone operations in the airspace 30–60 m above this area was evaluated. The results showed that the third-party risk was lower when the UAV flying altitude above a building was greater. However, in other areas such as lakes, woods, roads, open spaces, a lower flight altitude had a lower risk. A comparison of the whole airspace showed that the third-party risk was the lowest when the drone operated at an altitude of 30 m. The results also showed that the third-party risk above the lake and greenery was the lowest when on the same plane, followed by the lower risk above the buildings and open squares, with the highest third-party risk above the canteen passage.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinhui Ren & Caixia Cheng, 2020. "Model of Third-Party Risk Index for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Delivery in Urban Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8318-:d:425582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8318/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8318/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Sang Hyun, 2020. "Choice model based analysis of consumer preference for drone delivery service," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Al Haddad, Christelle & Chaniotakis, Emmanouil & Straubinger, Anna & Plötner, Kay & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2020. "Factors affecting the adoption and use of urban air mobility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 696-712.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Osakwe, Christian Nedu & Hudik, Marek & Říha, David & Stros, Michael & Ramayah, T., 2022. "Critical factors characterizing consumers’ intentions to use drones for last-mile delivery: Does delivery risk matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    2. Pang, Bizhao & Hu, Xinting & Dai, Wei & Low, Kin Huat, 2022. "UAV path optimization with an integrated cost assessment model considering third-party risks in metropolitan environments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    3. Thuy-Hang Tran & Dinh-Dung Nguyen, 2022. "Management and Regulation of Drone Operation in Urban Environment: A Case Study," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Sushma, M.B. & Mashhoodi, Bardia & Tan, Wendy & Liujiang, Kang & Xu, Qianwen, 2025. "Spatial drone path planning: A systematic review of parameters and algorithms," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chae, Munhyun & Kim, Sang Ho & Kim, Migyoung & Park, Hee-Tae & Kim, Sang Hyun, 2024. "Potential market based policy considerations for urban air mobility," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Ren, Xinhui & Wang, Jiarui, 2025. "Symbiotic evolution mechanism of urban air mobility industrial innovation ecosystem: Evidence from low altitude air mobility in Shenzhen," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    3. Li, Xiangyu & Dang, Anrong & Chen, Maini, 2025. "Green, safe, and Cost-Effective? An integrated structural analysis of public acceptance of urban air mobility," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    4. Militão, Aitan M. & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2021. "Optimal fleet size for a shared demand-responsive transport system with human-driven vs automated vehicles: A total cost minimization approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 52-80.
    5. Jan Silberer & Stefanie Astfalk & Patrick Planing & Patrick Müller, 2023. "User needs over time: the market and technology maturity model (MTMM)," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Ariza-Montes, Antonio & Quan, Wei & Radic, Aleksandar & Koo, Bonhak & Kim, Jinkyung Jenny & Chua, Bee-Lia & Han, Heesup, 2023. "Understanding the behavioral intention to use urban air autonomous vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Yanghee Kim & Leishuo Wang & Jinho Noh & Taewoo Roh, 2025. "Exploring the role of innovation diffusion and trust transfer on technology acceptance: intention to use drone delivery service in China," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(3), pages 357-384, July.
    8. Nazari, Fatemeh & Noruzoliaee, Mohamadhossein & Nurul Habib, Khandker, 2026. "Assessing public acceptance of urban air mobility: Behavioral insights," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    9. Coppola, Pierluigi & De Fabiis, Francesco & Silvestri, Fulvio, 2024. "Urban Air Mobility (UAM): Airport shuttles or city-taxis?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 24-34.
    10. Kähler, Svantje T. & Abben, Thomas & Luna-Rodriguez, Aquiles & Tomat, Miriam & Jacobsen, Thomas, 2022. "An assessment of the acceptance and aesthetics of UAVs and helicopters through an experiment and a survey," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    11. Janotta, Frederica & Hogreve, Jens, 2024. "Ready for take-off? The dual role of affective and cognitive evaluations in the adoption of Urban Air Mobility services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    12. Samadzad, Mahdi & Ansari, Fatemeh & Afshari Moez, Mohammad Amin, 2024. "Who will board urban air taxis? An analysis of advanced air mobility demand and value of travel time for business, airport access, and regional tourism trips in Iran," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    13. ElSayed, Mo & Foda, Ahmed & Mohamed, Moataz, 2024. "The impact of civil airspace policies on the viability of adopting autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles in last-mile applications," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 37-54.
    14. Ehrhardt, Nick & Horlacher, Paul Herrmann & Straubinger, Anna, 2024. "Innovation strategies for non-existent markets - Profiting from urban air mobility," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    15. Cai, Lanhui & Yuen, Kum Fai & Xie, Diancen & Fang, Mingjie & Wang, Xueqin, 2021. "Consumer's usage of logistics technologies: Integration of habit into the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    16. Boddupalli, Sreekar-Shashank & Garrow, Laurie A. & German, Brian J. & Newman, Jeffrey P., 2024. "Mode choice modeling for an electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) air taxi commuting service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    17. Jang, Hyeokjun & Kwon, Yeongmin & Jang, Kitae & Kim, Suji, 2025. "Urban air mobility for airport access: Mode choice preference associated with socioeconomic status and airport usage behavior," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    18. Anna Straubinger & Erik T. Verhoef & Henri L.F. de Groot, 2021. "Will urban air mobility fly? The efficiency and distributional impacts of UAM in different urban spatial structures," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 21-021/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    19. Zhang, Honggang & Liu, Zhiyuan & Dong, Yu & Zhou, Hongyue & Liu, Pan & Chen, Jun, 2024. "A novel network equilibrium model integrating urban aerial mobility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    20. Decker, Christopher & Chiambaretto, Paul, 2022. "Economic policy choices and trade-offs for Unmanned aircraft systems Traffic Management (UTM): Insights from Europe and the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 40-58.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8318-:d:425582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.