IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7460-d411738.html

Urban Sustainability Evaluation Based on the DPSIR Dynamic Model: A Case Study in Shaanxi Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Shidong Liu

    (Institute of Cultural and Tourism, Xi’an University, Xi’an 710065, China)

  • Peiyi Ding

    (Tourism Confucius Institute, Griffith University, Goldcoast 4217, Australia)

  • Binrui Xue

    (Northwest Institute of Historical Environment and Socio-Economic Development, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710065, China)

  • Hongbing Zhu

    (School of Tourism, Huangshan University, Huangshan 245021, China)

  • Jun Gao

    (School of Environmental and Geographical Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China)

Abstract

The sustainability of urban cities has been the focus of significant academic research in recent years and is emphasized in Goal 11 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In this study, we adopted the Drive-Pressure-State-Impact-Response model (DPSIR) to promote a conceptual study of sustainable development index (SDI) to compare the different urban sustainable development status and try to find the factors that affect the urban sustainable development. The framework of indicators we used is mainly based on Goal 11 of the SDGs’ targets and indicators. We chose six cities in the Shaanxi Province of China and studied them from 2008 to 2018. The results show that: (1) the sustainable development of urban cities is greatly influenced by China’s national economic development plans and urban development strategies; (2) the economic growth and management level of authorities can significantly promote urban sustainability; (3) the urban sustainability of the six cities in Shaanxi Province showed a significant imbalance and this imbalance affected the overall development of the region; (4) compared with Guanzhong urban agglomeration, Shannan urban agglomeration is subject to the policy needs of environmental protection in the Qinling mountain area and its economic development is restricted; therefore, its urban sustainability is relatively low. Theoretical contributions are presented to assist in addressing these challenges and to support policies and initiatives that move these cities in China towards achieving SDG 11.

Suggested Citation

  • Shidong Liu & Peiyi Ding & Binrui Xue & Hongbing Zhu & Jun Gao, 2020. "Urban Sustainability Evaluation Based on the DPSIR Dynamic Model: A Case Study in Shaanxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7460-:d:411738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7460/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7460/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrzej Raszkowski & Bartosz Bartniczak, 2019. "On the Road to Sustainability: Implementation of the 2030 Agenda Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Júlia A. Nagy & József Benedek & Kinga Ivan, 2018. "Measuring Sustainable Development Goals at a Local Level: A Case of a Metropolitan Area in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Mell, Ian, 2020. "The impact of austerity on funding green infrastructure: A DPSIR evaluation of the Liverpool Green & Open Space Review (LG&OSR), UK," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Tulin Vural Arslan & Selen Durak & Deniz Ozge Aytac, 2016. "Attaining SDG11: can sustainability assessment tools be used for improved transformation of neighbourhoods in historic city centers?," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(4), pages 180-202, November.
    5. Ness, Barry & Urbel-Piirsalu, Evelin & Anderberg, Stefan & Olsson, Lennart, 2007. "Categorising tools for sustainability assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 498-508, January.
    6. Jiacheng Xu & Jianjun Bai & Jun Chen, 2019. "An Improved Indicator System for Evaluating the Progress of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Sub-Target 9.1 in County Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Lei Gao & Brett A. Bryan, 2017. "Finding pathways to national-scale land-sector sustainability," Nature, Nature, vol. 544(7649), pages 217-222, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Junyuan Zhao & Shengjie Wang & Jiayue Li, 2023. "Study on the Spatial–Temporal Pattern and Driving Mechanism of Tourism Eco-Security in the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Bartosz Bartniczak & Andrzej Raszkowski, 2022. "Implementation of the Sustainable Cities and Communities Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Mengtian Lu & Xiaoying Wang & Weihong Liao & Chao Wang & Xiaohui Lei & Hao Wang, 2022. "An Assessment of Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of Regional Water Resources Security in the DPSIR Framework in Jiangxi Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Maria Rosaria Guarini & Giulia Ghiani & Francesco Sica & Francesco Tajani, 2025. "Which Minimum Indicator Set of Sustainability May Be Utilized in Urban Assessments? Meta-Evidence Gained Through a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Hamid Jafarzadeh & Yangdong Feng, 2023. "Economic and Spatial Restructuring in the Aras Economic Zone: The Impact of Cross-Border Cooperation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Changlin Ji & Yuwei Feng, 2025. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Evaluating the Innovation-Boosting Potential of Low-Carbon Pilot Policies: A Multi-Subject Co-Governance Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 6033-6072, June.
    7. Sneha Kaira & Oz Sahin & Anisur Rahman & Sherif Mohamed, 2022. "An Integrated DPSIR-SD Framework for Sustainability Assessment of Roads in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-31, June.
    8. Hamid Jafarzadeh & Dongfeng Yang, 2023. "Impacts of the Belt and Roads Initiative on Sustainability: Local Approaches to Spatial Restructuring in the Aras Special Economic Zones," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Edward Ayebeng Botchway & Kofi Agyekum & Jenefailus Nikoi Kotei-Martin & Hayford Pittri & Annabel Morkporkpor Ami Dompey & Samuel Owusu Afram & Nathaniel Elikplim Asare, 2023. "Achieving Healthy City Development in Ghana: Referencing Sustainable Development Goal 11," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roland Zinkernagel & James Evans & Lena Neij, 2018. "Applying the SDGs to Cities: Business as Usual or a New Dawn?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Bartosz Bartniczak & Andrzej Raszkowski, 2022. "Implementation of the Sustainable Cities and Communities Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Rubio Rodríguez, M.A. & Ruyck, J. De & Díaz, P. Roque & Verma, V.K. & Bram, S., 2011. "An LCA based indicator for evaluation of alternative energy routes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 630-635, March.
    4. Figge, Frank & Hahn, Tobias & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "The If, How and Where of assessing sustainable resource use," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 274-283.
    5. L. Hay & A. H. B. Duffy & R. I. Whitfield, 2017. "The S‐Cycle Performance Matrix: Supporting Comprehensive Sustainability Performance Evaluation of Technical Systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 45-70, January.
    6. Mostafa Shaaban & Jürgen Scheffran & Jürgen Böhner & Mohamed S. Elsobki, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation Technologies in Egypt Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Ngoc-Ninh Ho & Truong Lam Do & Dinh-Thao Tran & Trung Thanh Nguyen, 2022. "Indigenous pig production and welfare of ultra-poor ethnic minority households in the Northern mountains of Vietnam," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 156-179, January.
    8. Schilling, Markus & Chiang, Lichun, 2011. "The effect of natural resources on a sustainable development policy: The approach of non-sustainable externalities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 990-998, February.
    9. Alexandra Doernberg & Annette Piorr & Ingo Zasada & Dirk Wascher & Ulrich Schmutz, 2022. "Sustainability assessment of short food supply chains (SFSC): developing and testing a rapid assessment tool in one African and three European city regions," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(3), pages 885-904, September.
    10. Oriana Gava & Fabio Bartolini & Francesca Venturi & Gianluca Brunori & Angela Zinnai & Alberto Pardossi, 2018. "A Reflection of the Use of the Life Cycle Assessment Tool for Agri-Food Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Weiwei Li & Pingtao Yi & Danning Zhang, 2018. "Sustainability Evaluation of Cities in Northeastern China Using Dynamic TOPSIS-Entropy Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Michinori Uwasu & Keishiro Hara & Masashi Kuroda & Ji Han, 2024. "Assessing the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Environmental Sustainability in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-14, June.
    13. Frame, Bob & Brown, Judy, 2008. "Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 225-241, April.
    14. Janoskova Katarina & Kral Pavol, 2019. "National innovative performance and sustainable development – the case of Slovakia," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 28-37, May.
    15. Emine Tahsin, 2026. "Challenges of the SDGs performance of Türkiye “An Evenness and Income Trend Evaluation”," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-35, March.
    16. Hrishidev Unni & Rubal Rathi & Sangita Dutta Gupta & Anirban Chakraborti, 2025. "Analyzing the progress of Indian states chasing sustainable development goals using complex network framework," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 327-340, September.
    17. Badir S. Alsaeed & Dexter V. L. Hunt & Soroosh Sharifi, 2024. "A Sustainable Water Resources Management Assessment Framework (SWRM-AF) for Arid and Semi-Arid Regions—Part 1: Developing the Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-43, March.
    18. Castellani, V. & Sala, S., 2010. "Sustainable performance index for tourism policy development," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 871-880.
    19. José M. Núñez-Sánchez & Jesús Molina-Gómez & Pere Mercadé-Melé & Santiago Almadana-Abón, 2024. "Boosting Competitiveness Through the Alignment of Corporate Social Responsibility, Strategic Management and Compensation Systems in Technology Companies: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Jean Hugé & Nibedita Mukherjee & Camille Fertel & Jean-Philippe Waaub & Thomas Block & Tom Waas & Nico Koedam & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas, 2015. "Conceptualizing the Effectiveness of Sustainability Assessment in Development Cooperation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-17, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7460-:d:411738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.