IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i17p4783-d263184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Improved Indicator System for Evaluating the Progress of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Sub-Target 9.1 in County Level

Author

Listed:
  • Jiacheng Xu

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 713100, China)

  • Jianjun Bai

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 713100, China)

  • Jun Chen

    (National Geomatics Center of China, Beijing 100830, China)

Abstract

In order to assess the progress of the SDG sub-target 9.1 at the county level, the SDG indicator 9.1.1 (rural access index) and 9.1.2 (passenger and freight volumes) were implemented in Deqing County, China to explore the fitness-for-purpose of these indicators for county level evaluations. It is found that the country-oriented indicator system has some localization problems and cannot fully reflect the connotation of the SDG sub-target 9.1 when used in the county level. An improved indicator system was built by modifying the SDG indicator 9.1.1 and adding three more indicators (namely the road density, accessibility, and total postal business). The analysis of the calculation process and results showed that the improved indicator system can solve the problems arising from the original SDG indicator when applied in the county level. The modified resident access index can eliminate the dependence of the original indicator 9.1.1 calculations on urban-rural boundary data, and takes into account the urban vulnerable groups such as urban villages residents. While the road density and accessibility can be used to measure the quantity, quality, and connectivity of the road and the reality of the residents to obtain the road, which enables the indicators to reflect the necessary details of the level of the transportation infrastructure construction. The total postal business can help the SDG indicator 9.1.2 reflect the relationship between the transportation infrastructure construction and the development of the economic and people’s livelihood.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiacheng Xu & Jianjun Bai & Jun Chen, 2019. "An Improved Indicator System for Evaluating the Progress of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Sub-Target 9.1 in County Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4783-:d:263184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4783/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4783/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elaine Unterhalter, 2019. "The Many Meanings of Quality Education: Politics of Targets and Indicators in SDG4," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 10(S1), pages 39-51, January.
    2. Iimi,Atsushi & Humphrey,Richard Martin & Melibaeva,Sevara, 2015. "Firm productivity and infrastructure costs in east Africa," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7278, The World Bank.
    3. Andrzej Raszkowski & Bartosz Bartniczak, 2019. "On the Road to Sustainability: Implementation of the 2030 Agenda Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Shao, Saijun & Xu, Gangyan & Li, Ming & Huang, George Q., 2019. "Synchronizing e-commerce city logistics with sliding time windows," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 17-28.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. S. Duygu Sever & Evren Tok & Abdel Latif Sellami, 2025. "Sustainable Development Goals in a Transforming World: Understanding the Dynamics of Localization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Rohit Agrawal & Abhijit Majumdar & Kirty Majumdar & Rakesh D. Raut & Balkrishna E. Narkhede, 2022. "Attaining sustainable development goals (SDGs) through supply chain practices and business strategies: A systematic review with bibliometric and network analyses," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3669-3687, November.
    3. Bartosz Bartniczak & Andrzej Raszkowski, 2022. "Implementation of the Sustainable Cities and Communities Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Maosheng Li & Hui Xie & Panpan Shu, 2021. "Study on the Impact of Traffic Accidents in Key Areas of Rural Roads," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Shidong Liu & Peiyi Ding & Binrui Xue & Hongbing Zhu & Jun Gao, 2020. "Urban Sustainability Evaluation Based on the DPSIR Dynamic Model: A Case Study in Shaanxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Yufei Zhao & Chaofeng Shao & Xuesong Zhan, 2025. "An Evaluation of Sustainable Development in Chinese Counties Based on SDGs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thor Olav Iversen, 2023. "Boundary experts: Science and politics in measuring the Sustainable Development Goals," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(4), pages 600-610, September.
    2. Danli Yang & Jianwei Sun & Shuangyu Xie & Jing Luo & Fangqin Yang, 2025. "Spatial Accessibility Characteristics and Optimization of Multi-Stage Schools in Rural Mountainous Areas in China: A Case Study of Qixingguan District," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Jacek Michalak & Bartosz Michałowski, 2022. "Understanding Sustainability of Construction Products: Answers from Investors, Contractors, and Sellers of Building Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Isabela Caroline de Sousa & Tiago F. A. C. Sigahi & Izabela Simon Rampasso & Gustavo Hermínio Salati Marcondes de Moraes & Walter Leal Filho & João Henrique Paulino Pires Eustachio & Rosley Anholon, 2024. "A Delphi–Fuzzy Delphi Study on SDGs 9 and 12 after COVID-19: Case Study in Brazil," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Patrik Richnák & Helena Fidlerová, 2022. "Impact and Potential of Sustainable Development Goals in Dimension of the Technological Revolution Industry 4.0 within the Analysis of Industrial Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    6. María Luisa de Lázaro Torres & Pilar Borderías Uribeondo & Francisco José Morales Yago, 2020. "Citizen and Educational Initiatives to Support Sustainable Development Goal 6: Clean Water and Sanitation for All," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, March.
    7. Henrique Oliveira & Víctor Moutinho, 2021. "Renewable Energy, Economic Growth and Economic Development Nexus: A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, July.
    8. Fukuda-Parr Sakiko & Smaavik Hegstad Thea, 2018. "“Leaving No One Behind” as a Site of Contestation and Reinterpretation," Journal of Globalization and Development, De Gruyter, vol. 9(2), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Sanja Borkovic & Peter Tabak, 2018. "Public investment and corporate productivity in Croatia," Public Sector Economics, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 42(2), pages 171-186.
    10. Elżbieta Sobczak & Bartosz Bartniczak & Andrzej Raszkowski, 2021. "Implementation of the No Poverty Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) in Visegrad Group (V4)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Andrzej Raszkowski & Bartosz Bartniczak, 2019. "Sustainable Development in the Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs): Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Onesmus Mbaabu Mutiiria & Qingjiang Ju & Koffi Dumor, 2020. "Infrastructure and inclusive growth in sub-Saharan Africa: An empirical analysis," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 20(3), pages 187-207, July.
    13. Paulina Permatasari & Assyifa Szami Ilman & Carol Ann Tilt & Dian Lestari & Saiful Islam & Rita Helbra Tenrini & Arif Budi Rahman & Agunan Paulus Samosir & Irwanda Wisnu Wardhana, 2021. "The Village Fund Program in Indonesia: Measuring the Effectiveness and Alignment to Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-30, November.
    14. Magdalena Kowalska & Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka, 2025. "Sustainable Development Through the Lens of Climate Change: A Diagnosis of Attitudes in Southeastern Rural Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-21, June.
    15. Alberto Dello Strologo & Edoardo D’Andrassi & Niccolò Paoloni & Giorgia Mattei, 2021. "Italy versus Other European Countries: Sustainable Development Goals, Policies and Future Hypothetical Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-46, March.
    16. Xin Yao & Yuanyuan Cheng & Li Zhou & Malin Song, 2022. "Green efficiency performance analysis of the logistics industry in China: based on a kind of machine learning methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 727-752, January.
    17. Shidong Liu & Peiyi Ding & Binrui Xue & Hongbing Zhu & Jun Gao, 2020. "Urban Sustainability Evaluation Based on the DPSIR Dynamic Model: A Case Study in Shaanxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    18. Joanna Brzyska & Izabela Szamrej-Baran, 2023. "The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals: The EU Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Fernanda Alves de Araújo & João Gilberto Mendes dos Reis & Marcia Terra da Silva & Emel Aktas, 2022. "A Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Model to Evaluate Logistics Service Expectations and Delivery Methods in Last-Mile Delivery in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Michał Lasota & Aleksandra Zabielska & Marianna Jacyna & Piotr Gołębiowski & Renata Żochowska & Mariusz Wasiak, 2024. "Method for Delivery Planning in Urban Areas with Environmental Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4783-:d:263184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.