IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4704-d1660202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of Sustainable Development in Chinese Counties Based on SDGs

Author

Listed:
  • Yufei Zhao

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, 38 Tongyan Road, Jinnan District, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Chaofeng Shao

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, 38 Tongyan Road, Jinnan District, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Xuesong Zhan

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, 38 Tongyan Road, Jinnan District, Tianjin 300350, China)

Abstract

With the increasingly urgent demand for the localization of the United Nations’ sustainable development goals (SDGs), the construction of an evaluation system and the practice paths of counties, as important spatial units of China’s sustainable development, urgently need to be deepened. Based on the articulation of the SDGs and China’s national conditions, this study innovatively designed an indicator delivery framework covering the United Nations level to the county level; constructed a county-level sustainable development evaluation indicator system that includes three dimensions, including economic development, social culture, and ecological environment; adopted the entropy weight method to determine the weights of indicators; and introduced a dynamic evaluation and analysis model utilizing three analytical methods, namely coupling coordination analysis, obstacle analysis, and Dagum decomposition, to evaluate the level of sustainable development of 76 counties in the 2010–2021 period considering both time and space. The results show that (1) the national county sustainable development index (CSDI) was significantly improved, regional differences were narrowed, the central region has the best overall performance, and the western region has the fastest growth rate; (2) economic development has become the main driving force, and the economic gap between regions has gradually narrowed, but the spatial heterogeneity of the environmental and social dimensions is still prominent; (3) the eastern region has generated positive spillover effects on the central and western regions through industrial transfer and technology diffusion, while the northeastern region develops relatively slowly due to the lagging industrial transformation; and (4) the degree of coupling coordination rises as a whole, but the differences in synergistic ability between regions are obvious. This study provides a scientific basis for the formulation of differentiated sustainable development policies for counties and emphasizes the key role of regional synergy mechanisms in narrowing the development gap.

Suggested Citation

  • Yufei Zhao & Chaofeng Shao & Xuesong Zhan, 2025. "An Evaluation of Sustainable Development in Chinese Counties Based on SDGs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4704-:d:1660202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4704/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4704/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng Cao & Haijun Tao, 2024. "Sustainable Development in Gansu Province: Theil Index and Cluster Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Rong He & Xintong Huang & Xiaoying Ye & Zhe Pan & Heng Wang & Bin Luo & Dongmei Liu & Xinxin Hu, 2022. "County Ecosystem Health Assessment Based on the VORS Model: A Case Study of 183 Counties in Sichuan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Zhenci Xu & Sophia N. Chau & Xiuzhi Chen & Jian Zhang & Yingjie Li & Thomas Dietz & Jinyan Wang & Julie A. Winkler & Fan Fan & Baorong Huang & Shuxin Li & Shaohua Wu & Anna Herzberger & Ying Tang & De, 2020. "Assessing progress towards sustainable development over space and time," Nature, Nature, vol. 577(7788), pages 74-78, January.
    4. Idiano D’Adamo & Cristina Di Carlo & Massimo Gastaldi & Edouard Nicolas Rossi & Antonio Felice Uricchio, 2024. "Economic Performance, Environmental Protection and Social Progress: A Cluster Analysis Comparison towards Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Runchen Zhou & Yang Guo & Yuzhe Wu, 2023. "Exploration on the Innovation Model of County Urbanization Development with the Resource Constraints in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Liu, Dianfeng & Li, Fuxiang & Qiu, Mingli & Zhang, Yang & Zhao, Xiang & He, Jianhua, 2024. "An integrated framework for measuring sustainable rural development towards the SDGs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    7. McArthur, John W. & Rasmussen, Krista, 2019. "Classifying Sustainable Development Goal trajectories: A country-level methodology for identifying which issues and people are getting left behind," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Daniela Firoiu & George H. Ionescu & Anca Băndoi & Nicoleta Mihaela Florea & Elena Jianu, 2019. "Achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDG): Implementation of the 2030 Agenda in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-30, April.
    9. Luis Miguel Fonseca & José Pedro Domingues & Alina Mihaela Dima, 2020. "Mapping the Sustainable Development Goals Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Gao, Kang & Yuan, Yijun, 2022. "Spatiotemporal pattern assessment of China’s industrial green productivity and its spatial drivers: Evidence from city-level data over 2000–2017," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    11. Jiawei Zhong & Xun Li, 2022. "Interlinkages among County-Level Construction Indicators and Related Sustainable Development Goals in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.
    12. Carol Hager & Nicole Hamagami, 2020. "Local Renewable Energy Initiatives in Germany and Japan in a Changing National Policy Environment," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(3), pages 386-411, May.
    13. Jiacheng Xu & Jianjun Bai & Jun Chen, 2019. "An Improved Indicator System for Evaluating the Progress of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Sub-Target 9.1 in County Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Ling Wei & Bing Zeng, 2024. "Urban Technology Transfer, Spatial Spillover Effects, and Carbon Emissions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Xinyi Zhang & Li Zhang & Linyan Bai & Jingjuan Liao & Bowei Chen & Min Yan, 2023. "Assessment of Localized Targets of Sustainable Development Goals and Future Development on Hainan Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    16. ElMassah, Suzanna & Mohieldin, Mahmoud, 2020. "Digital transformation and localizing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Duygu Sever & Evren Tok & Abdel Latif Sellami, 2025. "Sustainable Development Goals in a Transforming World: Understanding the Dynamics of Localization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Huijuan Xiao & Yue Liu & Jingzheng Ren, 2023. "Synergies and trade‐offs across sustainable development goals: A novel method incorporating indirect interactions analysis," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 1135-1148, April.
    3. Hongshuai Wang & Yongheng Yang, 2025. "Measuring and Monitoring Provincial Sustainable Development Goals in China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 176(2), pages 415-472, January.
    4. Renlong Wang & Shutian Cui & Mingang Gao, 2025. "Systematic scenario modeling for priority assessment of sustainable development goals in China under interaction and uncertainty," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(7), pages 15851-15886, July.
    5. Nan Lu & Jiwei Zhu & Hui Chi & Bing Wang & Lu Chen, 2021. "Progress Assessment and Spatial Heterogeneity Analysis of Water Conservancy Modernization Construction in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Kimia Chenary & Omid Pirian Kalat & Ayyoob Sharifi, 2024. "Forecasting sustainable development goals scores by 2030 using machine learning models," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 6520-6538, December.
    7. E. Ricciolini & L. Rocchi & M. Cardinali & L. Paolotti & F. Ruiz & J. M. Cabello & A. Boggia, 2022. "Assessing Progress Towards SDGs Implementation Using Multiple Reference Point Based Multicriteria Methods: The Case Study of the European Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1233-1260, August.
    8. He, Liuyue & Xu, Zhenci & Wang, Sufen & Bao, Jianxia & Fan, Yunfei & Daccache, Andre, 2022. "Optimal crop planting pattern can be harmful to reach carbon neutrality: Evidence from food-energy-water-carbon nexus perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    9. Bryan Cheng-Yu Hsu & Yu-Feng Wu & Hsin-Wei Chen & Man-Lai Cheung, 2020. "How Sport Tourism Event Image Fit Enhances Residents’ Perceptions of Place Image and Their Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Ran, Qiying & Yang, Xiaodong & Yan, Hongchuan & Xu, Yang & Cao, Jianhong, 2023. "Natural resource consumption and industrial green transformation: Does the digital economy matter?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    11. Wirapong Chansanam & Chunqiu Li, 2022. "Scientometrics of Poverty Research for Sustainability Development: Trend Analysis of the 1964–2022 Data through Scopus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    12. Daniela Cristina Momete & Manuel Mihail Momete, 2021. "Map and Track the Performance in Education for Sustainable Development across the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, November.
    13. Mingli Qiu & Yuxin Zhao & Dianfeng Liu, 2025. "Assessing Forest Carbon Sequestration in China Under Multiple Climate Change Mitigation Scenarios," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Jingan Chen & Chengdong Yi & Yourong Wang & Tianyu Bi, 2022. "Do Honored Cities Achieve a Sustainable Development? A Quasi-Natural Experimental Study Based on “National Civilized City” Campaign in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Li, Shu & Zhang, Xiaoyun, 2025. "Can digital transformation of enterprise improve the information environment of the capital market? ——Evidence from Analyst's perspective," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    16. Chun-Yi Lin & Chen Li & Sadaf Mahmood & Feng Guo & Zuoyi Qian, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Integrating Culture and Tourism: A Resilient Scale for Digital Transformation Innovation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 16122-16155, December.
    17. Wang, Weilong & Xiao, Deheng & Wang, Jianlong & Wu, Haitao, 2024. "The cost of pollution in the digital era: Impediments of air pollution on enterprise digital transformation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    18. Luis Fonseca & Vitor Silva & José Carlos Sá & Vanda Lima & Gilberto Santos & Rui Silva, 2022. "B Corp versus ISO 9001 and 14001 certifications: Aligned, or alternative paths, towards sustainable development?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 496-508, May.
    19. Lingyan Meng & Md Qamruzzaman & Anass Hamad Elneel Adow, 2021. "Technological Adaption and Open Innovation in SMEs: An Strategic Assessment for Women-Owned SMEs Sustainability in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Pires, Aliny P.F. & Rodriguez Soto, Clarita & Scarano, Fabio R., 2021. "Strategies to reach global sustainability should take better account of ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4704-:d:1660202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.