IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i13p3789-d581089.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variability of Normative Properties of Wood Chips and Implications to Quality Control

Author

Listed:
  • Dinko Vusić

    (Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska Cesta 23, 10002 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Filip Vujanić

    (Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska Cesta 23, 10002 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Karlo Pešić

    (Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska Cesta 23, 10002 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Branimir Šafran

    (Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska Cesta 23, 10002 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Vanja Jurišić

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska Cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Željko Zečić

    (Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska Cesta 23, 10002 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

The research was conducted with the goal to determine the variability of the quality parameters of the wood chips produced from the most favorable raw material (energy roundwood), and in the most controllable operational conditions (pellet factory), as the first step in identifying opportunities to optimize the wood chips’ quality monitoring. Four raw material types were tested: fir/spruce and beech debarked energy roundwood, as well as energy wood with bark of the same species. Sampling was conducted during six consecutive months along with laboratory testing, all according to the HRN EN ISO standards for solid biofuels. Interpretation of the results was done in relation to deviation from the first sampling results (as an indicator of the possibility to retain the quality of wood chips), and repeatability and reproducibility set in the standards (as an indicator of acceptable variability). The influence of the species and debarking process on the wood chips’ quality was analyzed as well. Relative deviation from the first sampling as well as the quality class change pointed moisture content as a normative property with the lowest possibility to retain initial values over the six-month period. Ash content results indicated a strong possibility to maintain the initial ash content class in the majority of the samples. In just three cases, the results of ash content were outside the reproducibility limits with first sampling as a reference. Gross calorific value results pointed only four samples outside the reproducibility limits with the first sampling results are set as a reference. Wood species influenced gross calorific value and the median value of the particle size distribution and debarking showed a significant positive effect on the moisture content reduction as well as on the ash content reduction. Presented findings are indicative for the investigated raw materials, however for the general conclusion on the subject of wood chips normative properties variation, various raw material types will have to be examined in further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Dinko Vusić & Filip Vujanić & Karlo Pešić & Branimir Šafran & Vanja Jurišić & Željko Zečić, 2021. "Variability of Normative Properties of Wood Chips and Implications to Quality Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:13:p:3789-:d:581089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/13/3789/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/13/3789/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luigi Pari & Simone Bergonzoli & Paola Cetera & Paolo Mattei & Vincenzo Alfano & Negar Rezaei & Alessandro Suardi & Giuseppe Toscano & Antonio Scarfone, 2020. "Storage of Fine Woodchips from a Medium Rotation Coppice Eucalyptus Plantation in Central Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Mathieu Béland & Evelyne Thiffault & Julie Barrette & Warren Mabee, 2020. "Degraded Trees from Spruce Budworm Epidemics as Bioenergy Feedstock: A Profitability Analysis of Forest Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Angelo Del Giudice & Andrea Acampora & Enrico Santangelo & Luigi Pari & Simone Bergonzoli & Ettore Guerriero & Francesco Petracchini & Marco Torre & Valerio Paolini & Francesco Gallucci, 2019. "Wood Chip Drying through the Using of a Mobile Rotary Dryer," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Sikkema, Richard & Proskurina, Svetlana & Banja, Manjola & Vakkilainen, Esa, 2021. "How can solid biomass contribute to the EU’s renewable energy targets in 2020, 2030 and what are the GHG drivers and safeguards in energy- and forestry sectors?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 758-772.
    5. Michela Zanetti & Corrado Costa & Rosa Greco & Stefano Grigolato & Giovanna Ottaviani Aalmo & Raffaele Cavalli, 2017. "How Wood Fuels’ Quality Relates to the Standards: A Class-Modelling Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Luis Miguel Fonseca & José Pedro Domingues & Alina Mihaela Dima, 2020. "Mapping the Sustainable Development Goals Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Izabella Maj, 2022. "Significance and Challenges of Poultry Litter and Cattle Manure as Sustainable Fuels: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Rukayya Ibrahim Muazu & Siddharth Gadkari & Jhuma Sadhukhan, 2022. "Integrated Life Cycle Assessment Modelling of Densified Fuel Production from Various Biomass Species," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-11, May.
    3. Valentyna Stanytsina & Volodymyr Artemchuk & Olga Bogoslavska & Artur Zaporozhets & Antonina Kalinichenko & Jan Stebila & Valerii Havrysh & Dariusz Suszanowicz, 2022. "Fossil Fuel and Biofuel Boilers in Ukraine: Trends of Changes in Levelized Cost of Heat," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Dudziec, Paweł & Stachowicz, Paweł & Stolarski, Mariusz J., 2023. "Diversity of properties of sawmill residues used as feedstock for energy generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 822-833.
    5. Jakub Stolarski & Sławomir Wierzbicki & Szymon Nitkiewicz & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski, 2023. "Wood Chip Production Efficiency Depending on Chipper Type," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-15, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wirapong Chansanam & Chunqiu Li, 2022. "Scientometrics of Poverty Research for Sustainability Development: Trend Analysis of the 1964–2022 Data through Scopus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Sekoai, Patrick T. & Chunilall, Viren & Msele, Kwanele & Buthelezi, Lindiswa & Johakimu, Jonas & Andrew, Jerome & Zungu, Manqoba & Moloantoa, Karabelo & Maningi, Nontuthuko & Habimana, Olivier & Swart, 2023. "Biowaste biorefineries in South Africa: Current status, opportunities, and research and development needs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Luis Fonseca & Vitor Silva & José Carlos Sá & Vanda Lima & Gilberto Santos & Rui Silva, 2022. "B Corp versus ISO 9001 and 14001 certifications: Aligned, or alternative paths, towards sustainable development?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 496-508, May.
    4. Lingyan Meng & Md Qamruzzaman & Anass Hamad Elneel Adow, 2021. "Technological Adaption and Open Innovation in SMEs: An Strategic Assessment for Women-Owned SMEs Sustainability in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Khouya, Ahmed, 2021. "Modelling and analysis of a hybrid solar dryer for woody biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    6. Ramos, Maria Priscila & Custodio, Estefania & Jiménez, Sofía & Sartori, Martina & Ferrari, Emanuele, 2022. "Enhancing labour productivity by improving nutrition in Kenya: micro-econometric estimates for dynamic CGE model calibration," Conference papers 333426, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Antonella Cammarelle & Mariarosaria Lombardi & Rosaria Viscecchia, 2021. "Packaging Innovations to Reduce Food Loss and Waste: Are Italian Manufacturers Willing to Invest?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Nguyen Hong Duc & Pankaj Kumar & Pham Phuong Lan & Tonni Agustiono Kurniawan & Khaled Mohamed Khedher & Ali Kharrazi & Osamu Saito & Ram Avtar, 2023. "Hydrochemical indices as a proxy for assessing land-use impacts on water resources: a sustainable management perspective and case study of Can Tho City, Vietnam," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(3), pages 2573-2615, July.
    9. Henrique Oliveira & Víctor Moutinho, 2021. "Renewable Energy, Economic Growth and Economic Development Nexus: A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, July.
    10. Lachlan Curmi & Kumudu Kaushalya Weththasinghe & Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq, 2022. "Global Policy Review on Embodied Flows: Recommendations for Australian Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Alem Desta Wuneh & Afework Mulugeta Bezabih & Yemisrach Behailu Okwaraji & Lars Åke Persson & Araya Abrha Medhanyie, 2022. "Wealth and Education Inequities in Maternal and Child Health Services Utilization in Rural Ethiopia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-12, April.
    12. Sharifah Mohammad & Siti Baidurah & Naofumi Kamimura & Seitaro Matsuda & Nurul Alia Syufina Abu Bakar & Nik Nur Izzati Muhamad & Aizat Hisham Ahmad & Debbie Dominic & Takaomi Kobayashi, 2021. "Fermentation of Palm Oil Mill Effluent in the Presence of Lysinibacillus sp. LC 556247 to Produce Alternative Biomass Fuel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Teresa Galanti, 2021. "Risk Management and Learning Climate in Emergency Contexts: A Qualitative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    14. Brassard, P. & Godbout, S. & Hamelin, L., 2021. "Framework for consequential life cycle assessment of pyrolysis biorefineries: A case study for the conversion of primary forestry residues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    15. Rajeev Ravindran & Kwame Donkor & Lalitha Gottumukkala & Abhay Menon & Amita Jacob Guneratnam & Helena McMahon & Sybrandus Koopmans & Johan P. M. Sanders & James Gaffey, 2022. "Biogas, Biomethane and Digestate Potential of By-Products from Green Biorefinery Systems," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-16, January.
    16. Gaydaa Al-Zohbi & Maura A. E. Pilotti, 2023. "Contradictions about Sustainability: A Case Study of College Students from Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    17. Maija A. Benitz & Li-Ling Yang, 2021. "Bridging Education and Engineering Students through a Wind Energy-Focused Community Engagement Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Francisco Rincon‐Roldan & Alvaro Lopez‐Cabrales, 2021. "Ethical values in social economy for sustainable development," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(4), pages 705-729, December.
    19. Fanny Groundstroem & Sirkku Juhola, 2021. "Using systems thinking and causal loop diagrams to identify cascading climate change impacts on bioenergy supply systems," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 1-48, October.
    20. Hazem S Kassem & Salim Bagadeem & Bader Alhafi Alotaibi & Mohammed Aljuaid, 2021. "Are partnerships in nonprofit organizations being governed for sustainability? A partnering life cycle assessment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-25, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:13:p:3789-:d:581089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.