IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v91y2020ics0264837719300869.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of austerity on funding green infrastructure: A DPSIR evaluation of the Liverpool Green & Open Space Review (LG&OSR), UK

Author

Listed:
  • Mell, Ian

Abstract

Following the introduction of austerity measures by the coalition government in 2010, Local Planning Authorities (LPAs) across the UK were required to take stock of those services that they are legally and financially obliged to deliver. One area directly impacted has been the funding of green infrastructure (GI), which is often considered an “optional extra” in service provision. The financial limitations placed on GI maintenance have a significant influence on both the liveability and quality of urban environments. To address this dilemma this paper contextualises the complexities facing UK cities within a global discussion of GI financing but goes further by presenting an ex-post DPSIR examination of the choices being made by Liverpool City Council (LCC) to fund maintenance. DPSIR is an evaluation process which provides scope to better understand the factors influencing GI at an LPA scale. The paper reflects upon the drivers, pressures and impacts associated with austerity asking what responses are being used by LCC. The paper argues that, although austerity has placed significant constraints on LCC, through the Liverpool Green & Open Space Review (LG&OSR) the city is engaged in an ongoing dialogue pertaining to innovative funding mechanisms. It concludes that, although no single approach can effectively finance GI, a suite of complementary financial models exists, which are transferable between cities addressing current political, socio-economic, and ecological limitations.

Suggested Citation

  • Mell, Ian, 2020. "The impact of austerity on funding green infrastructure: A DPSIR evaluation of the Liverpool Green & Open Space Review (LG&OSR), UK," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:91:y:2020:i:c:s0264837719300869
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837719300869
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104284?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ian Mell, 2018. "Financing the future of green infrastructure planning: alternatives and opportunities in the UK," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 751-768, August.
    2. Umberto Janin Rivolin, 2017. "Global crisis and the systems of spatial governance and planning: a European comparison," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 994-1012, June.
    3. Frank W. Geels, 2013. "The Impact of the Financial and Economic Crisis on Sustainability Transitions: Financial Investment, Governance and Public Discourse. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 39," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 47014, February.
    4. duPont, Carolyn M. & Levitt, James N. & Bilmes, Linda J., 2015. "Green Bonds and Land Conservation: The Evolution of a New Financing Tool," Working Paper Series 15-072, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    5. International Monetary Fund, 2009. "The Effects of the Financial Crisison Public-Private Partnerships," IMF Working Papers 2009/144, International Monetary Fund.
    6. Maxim, Laura & Spangenberg, Joachim H. & O'Connor, Martin, 2009. "An analysis of risks for biodiversity under the DPSIR framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 12-23, November.
    7. Darinka Asenova & Stephen Bailey & Claire McCann, 2015. "Managing Municipal Austerity: Mitigation of Social Risks," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Patricia Kennett & Gerwyn Jones & Richard Meegan & Jacqui Croft, 2015. "Recession, Austerity and the ‘Great Risk Shift’: Local Government and Household Impacts and Responses in Bristol and Liverpool," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 622-644, July.
    9. Vivien Lowndes & Alison Gardner, 2016. "Local governance under the Conservatives: super-austerity, devolution and the ‘smarter state’," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 357-375, May.
    10. McAllister, Pat & Shepherd, Edward & Wyatt, Peter, 2018. "Policy shifts, developer contributions and land value capture in London 2005–2017," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 316-326.
    11. Lee Pugalis & Alan Townsend, 2013. "Rescaling of Planning and Its Interface with Economic Development," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 104-121, February.
    12. Michael H. Finewood & A. Marissa Matsler & Joshua Zivkovich, 2019. "Green Infrastructure and the Hidden Politics of Urban Stormwater Governance in a Postindustrial City," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(3), pages 909-925, May.
    13. Susannah Gunn & Jean Hillier, 2014. "When Uncertainty is Interpreted as Risk: An Analysis of Tensions Relating to Spatial Planning Reform in England," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 56-74, February.
    14. Alex Lord & Mark Tewdwr-Jones, 2014. "Is Planning "Under Attack"? Chronicling the Deregulation of Urban and Environmental Planning in England," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 345-361, February.
    15. Mick Lennon & Mark Scott & Marcus Collier & Karen Foley, 2016. "Developing green infrastructure ‘thinking’: devising and applying an interactive group-based methodology for practitioners," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(5), pages 843-865, May.
    16. Betsy Donald & Amy Glasmeier & Mia Gray & Linda Lobao, 2014. "Austerity in the city: economic crisis and urban service decline?," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 7(1), pages 3-15.
    17. Gemma Jerome, 2017. "Defining community-scale green infrastructure," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 223-229, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bridget Thodesen & Berit Time & Tore Kvande, 2022. "Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems: Themes of Public Perception—A Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Ian Mell & Sarah Clement & Fearghus O’Sullivan, 2023. "Mainstreaming Nature-Based Solutions in City Planning: Examining Scale, Focus, and Visibility as Drivers of Intervention Success in Liverpool, UK," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Mosaffaie, Jamal & Salehpour Jam, Amin & Tabatabaei, Mahmoud Reza & Kousari, Mahammad Reza, 2021. "Trend assessment of the watershed health based on DPSIR framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    4. Shidong Liu & Peiyi Ding & Binrui Xue & Hongbing Zhu & Jun Gao, 2020. "Urban Sustainability Evaluation Based on the DPSIR Dynamic Model: A Case Study in Shaanxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Ian Mell & Meredith Whitten, 2021. "Access to Nature in a Post Covid-19 World: Opportunities for Green Infrastructure Financing, Distribution and Equitability in Urban Planning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Hamid Jafarzadeh & Dongfeng Yang, 2023. "Impacts of the Belt and Roads Initiative on Sustainability: Local Approaches to Spatial Restructuring in the Aras Special Economic Zones," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annette Hastings & Nick Bailey & Glen Bramley & Maria Gannon, 2017. "Austerity urbanism in England: The ‘regressive redistribution’ of local government services and the impact on the poor and marginalised," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(9), pages 2007-2024, September.
    2. Bernardino Romano & Francesco Zullo & Lorena Fiorini & Cristina Montaldi, 2022. "Micromunicipality (MM) and Inner Areas in Italy: A Challenge for National Land Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Kristian Olesen & Helen Carter, 2018. "Planning as a barrier for growth: Analysing storylines on the reform of the Danish Planning Act," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(4), pages 689-707, June.
    4. Tomao, Antonio & Quaranta, Giovanni & Salvia, Rosanna & Vinci, Sabato & Salvati, Luca, 2021. "Revisiting the ‘southern mood’? Post-crisis Mediterranean urbanities between economic downturns and land-use change," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. Crispian Fuller, 2017. "City government in an age of austerity: Discursive institutions and critique," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 745-766, April.
    6. Crispian Fuller, 2018. "Entrepreneurial urbanism, austerity and economic governance," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(3), pages 565-585.
    7. Kruse, Tobias & Atkinson, Giles, 2022. "Understanding public support for international climate adaptation payments: Evidence from a choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    8. Yanguas Parra, Paola & Hauenstein, Christian & Oei, Pao-Yu, 2021. "The death valley of coal – Modelling COVID-19 recovery scenarios for steam coal markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    9. Andy Inch & Richard Dunning & Aidan While & Hannah Hickman & Sarah Payne, 2020. "‘The object is to change the heart and soul’: Financial incentives, planning and opposition to new housebuilding in England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(4), pages 713-732, June.
    10. Kate Gasparro & Ashby Monk, 2020. "Demystifying “localness†of infrastructure assets: Crowdfunders as local intermediaries for global investors," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(5), pages 878-897, August.
    11. David Clelland, 2020. "Beyond the city region? Uneven governance and the evolution of regional economic development in Scotland," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(1), pages 7-26, February.
    12. Alys Solly & Erblin Berisha & Giancarlo Cotella & Umberto Janin Rivolin, 2020. "How Sustainable Are Land Use Tools? A Europe-Wide Typological Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    13. Julia Heslop & Josh Chambers & James Maloney & George Spurgeon & Hannah Swainston & Hannah Woodall, 2023. "Re-contextualising purpose-built student accommodation in secondary cities: The role of planning policy, consultation and economic need during austerity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(5), pages 923-940, April.
    14. Agnieszka Kozera, 2021. "Investment Activity of Large Cities - Regional Centres in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 220-247.
    15. Evgeny M. Bukhvald, 2020. "Managing the spatial development of the Russian economy: Goals and tools," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(6), pages 2-14, December.
    16. Alexander Nurse & Olivier Sykes, 2019. "It’s more complicated than that!: Unpacking ‘Left Behind Britain’ and some other spatial tropes following the UK’s 2016 EU referendum," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(6), pages 589-606, September.
    17. Wesselink, Anna & Paavola, Jouni, 2008. "WP1: Analysing multilevel water and biodiversity governance in their context. Report," UFZ Discussion Papers 5/2008, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    18. Weigelt, Carmen & Lu, Shaohua & Verhaal, J. Cameron, 2021. "Blinded by the sun: The role of prosumers as niche actors in incumbent firms’ adoption of solar power during sustainability transitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    19. Lhermie, Guillaume & Wernli, Didier & Jørgensen, Peter Søgaard & Kenkel, Donald & Lin Lawell, C.-Y. Cynthia & Tauer, Loren William & Gröhn, Yrjo Tapio, 2019. "Tradeoffs between resistance to antimicrobials in public health and their use in agriculture: Moving towards sustainability assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-1.
    20. Renato Monteiro & José C. Ferreira & Paula Antunes, 2020. "Green Infrastructure Planning Principles: An Integrated Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:91:y:2020:i:c:s0264837719300869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.