IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p3221-d1628218.html

Which Minimum Indicator Set of Sustainability May Be Utilized in Urban Assessments? Meta-Evidence Gained Through a Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Rosaria Guarini

    (Department of Architecture and Design, Architecture Faculty, Sapienza University, Via Flaminia 359, 00196 Rome, Italy)

  • Giulia Ghiani

    (Department of Architecture and Design, Architecture Faculty, Sapienza University, Via Flaminia 359, 00196 Rome, Italy)

  • Francesco Sica

    (Department of Architecture and Design, Architecture Faculty, Sapienza University, Via Flaminia 359, 00196 Rome, Italy)

  • Francesco Tajani

    (Department of Architecture and Design, Architecture Faculty, Sapienza University, Via Flaminia 359, 00196 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to provide a thorough assessment of the sustainability indicators employed to support the changes related to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 11, which seeks to make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable. A selection of scientific articles published from 2013 to 2022 has been meticulously examined, concentrating on those pertinent to the primary study issues. The utilization of assessment methodologies that draw upon the concepts of divergence (systematic literature review) and convergence (cluster analysis) between diverse information sets is paramount. A dataset of critical indicators for measuring urban sustainability has been gathered. The results show the possibility to identify common patterns among the sustainability assessment indicators, driving towards the construction of a Minimum Indicator Set (MIS), that could be a useful support for, e.g., policymakers and urban planners in realizing sustainable transformative solutions through a common and aligned valuation source.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Rosaria Guarini & Giulia Ghiani & Francesco Sica & Francesco Tajani, 2025. "Which Minimum Indicator Set of Sustainability May Be Utilized in Urban Assessments? Meta-Evidence Gained Through a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3221-:d:1628218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3221/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3221/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denis Michalina & Peter Mederly & Hans Diefenbacher & Benjamin Held, 2021. "Sustainable Urban Development: A Review of Urban Sustainability Indicator Frameworks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Bohringer, Christoph & Jochem, Patrick E.P., 2007. "Measuring the immeasurable -- A survey of sustainability indices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 1-8, June.
    3. Shidong Liu & Peiyi Ding & Binrui Xue & Hongbing Zhu & Jun Gao, 2020. "Urban Sustainability Evaluation Based on the DPSIR Dynamic Model: A Case Study in Shaanxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Yusuf Kristiadi & Riri Fitri Sari & Herdis Herdiansyah & Hayati Sari Hasibuan & Tiong Hoo Lim, 2022. "Developing DPSIR Framework for Managing Climate Change in Urban Areas: A Case Study in Jakarta, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-30, November.
    5. Lewison, Rebecca L. & Rudd, Murray A. & Al-Hayek, Wissam & Baldwin, Claudia & Beger, Maria & Lieske, Scott N. & Jones, Christian & Satumanatpan, Suvaluck & Junchompoo, Chalatip & Hines, Ellen, 2016. "How the DPSIR framework can be used for structuring problems and facilitating empirical research in coastal systems," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 110-119.
    6. Emmanuel Kazuva & Jiquan Zhang & Zhijun Tong & Alu Si & Li Na, 2018. "The DPSIR Model for Environmental Risk Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste in Dar es Salaam City, Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-30, August.
    7. Eduardo Santos & Fernando Fonseca & Aníbal Santiago & Daniel Rodrigues, 2024. "Sustainability Indicators Model Applied to Waste Management in Brazil Using the DPSIR Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Mohsen Aboulnaga & Fatma Ashour & Maryam Elsharkawy & Elena Lucchi & Sarah Gamal & Aya Elmarakby & Shahenda Haggagy & Noureen Karar & Nourhan H. Khashaba & Ahmed Abouaiana, 2025. "Urbanization and Drivers for Dual Capital City: Assessment of Urban Planning Principles and Indicators for a ‘15-Minute City’," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-50, February.
    9. Sina Razzaghi Asl & Hamil Pearsall, 2022. "How Do Different Modes of Governance Support Ecosystem Services/Disservices in Small-Scale Urban Green Infrastructure? A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuan Feng & Chee Keong Khoo, 2025. "How Sustainable Are Chinese Cities? Empirical Insights from Eight Cities Using a Multidimensional Catastrophe Progression Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Daniela Cristina Momete & Manuel Mihail Momete, 2021. "Map and Track the Performance in Education for Sustainable Development across the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Duck Bong Kim, 2019. "An approach for composing predictive models from disparate knowledge sources in smart manufacturing environments," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1999-2012, April.
    4. Xuanying Chen & Lang Zhang & Qicheng Zhong & Guilian Zhang & Yang Yi & Di Wang & Qingping Zhang, 2025. "Applying Circuit Theory and Risk Assessment Models to Evaluate High-Temperature Risks for Vulnerable Groups and Identify Control Zones," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-26, June.
    5. Zhicheng Lai & Lei Li & Zhuomin Tao & Tao Li & Xiaoting Shi & Jialing Li & Xin Li, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Ecological Well-Being Performance from the Perspective of Strong Sustainability: A Case Study of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Changlin Ji & Yuwei Feng, 2025. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Evaluating the Innovation-Boosting Potential of Low-Carbon Pilot Policies: A Multi-Subject Co-Governance Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 6033-6072, June.
    7. Svatava Janoušková & Tomáš Hák & Bedřich Moldan, 2018. "Global SDGs Assessments: Helping or Confusing Indicators?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Ernest Reig‐Martínez & José A. Gómez‐Limón & Andrés J. Picazo‐Tadeo, 2011. "Ranking farms with a composite indicator of sustainability," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 42(5), pages 561-575, September.
    9. Michael Appiah & Stephen Taiwo Onifade & Bright Akwasi Gyamfi, 2025. "Pathways to Sustainability in Sub-Sahara Africa: Are Institutional Quality Levels Subservient in Achieving Green GDP Growth?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 2366-2390, March.
    10. Yuanyuan Zhu & Yuan Luo & Jing Chen & Qing Wan, 2025. "Industrial transformation efficiency and sustainable development of resource-exhausted cities: a case study of Daye City, Hubei province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(9), pages 20669-20693, September.
    11. Alexandre Troian & Mário Conill Gomes & Tales Tiecher & Julio Berbel & Carlos Gutiérrez-Martín, 2021. "The Drivers-Pressures-State-Impact-Response Model to Structure Cause−Effect Relationships between Agriculture and Aquatic Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Kajsa Borgnäs, 2017. "Indicators as ‘circular argumentation constructs’? An input–output analysis of the variable structure of five environmental sustainability country rankings," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 769-790, June.
    13. Shelby D. Hunt, 2017. "Strategic marketing, sustainability, the triple bottom line, and resource-advantage (R-A) theory: Securing the foundations of strategic marketing theory and research," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(1), pages 52-66, June.
    14. Rickels, Wilfried & Weigand, Christian & Grasse, Patricia & Schmidt, Jörn Oliver & Voss, Rüdiger, 2018. "Does the European Union achieve comprehensive blue growth? Progress of EU coastal states in the Baltic and North Sea, and the Atlantic Ocean against sustainable development Goal 14," Kiel Working Papers 2112, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    15. Purvis, Ben & Calzolari, Tommaso & Genovese, Andrea, 2025. "Consensus and contestation: Reflections on the development of an indicator framework for a just transition to a circular economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    16. Becken, S. & Simmons, D., 2008. "Using the concept of yield to assess the sustainability of different tourist types," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 420-429, October.
    17. Richard R. Shaker & Joseph Aversa & Victoria Papp & Bryant M. Serre & Brian R. Mackay, 2020. "Showcasing Relationships between Neighborhood Design and Wellbeing Toronto Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    18. Yi Xiao & Jialong Zhong & Jue Wang & Lanyue Zhang & Xinmeng Qian & Wei Liu & Huan Huang, 2023. "Exploring the Coupling Coordination Relationship of Urban Resilience System in Ecologically Fragile Areas: Case Study of the Loess Plateau in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, October.
    19. Zhou, P. & Wang, M., 2016. "Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: A review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 47-59.
    20. Falko Leukhardt & Simon Allen, 2013. "How environmentally focused is the German sustainability strategy? A critical discussion of the indicators used to measure sustainable development in Germany," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 149-166, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3221-:d:1628218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.