IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i17p7100-d406536.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable HRM through Improving the Measurement of Employee Work Engagement: Third-Person Rating Method

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Zeng Xu

    (School of Management, Shandong University, 27 Shanda Nan Road, Jinan 250100, China
    Center for Service Strategy and Service Management, Shandong University, 27 Shanda Nan Road, Jinan 250100, China)

  • Yun Zhang

    (School of Management, Shandong University, 27 Shanda Nan Road, Jinan 250100, China)

  • Huixin Yang

    (School of Management, Shandong University, 27 Shanda Nan Road, Jinan 250100, China)

  • Bob T. Wu

    (Allen W. and Carol M. Schmidthorst College of Business, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA)

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to present the survey findings of two alternative methods (self-rating (SR) and third-person rating (TPR)) of measuring employee work engagement (EWE). The potential impacts of gender, job tenure, position, and work condition on TPR vs. SR were also investigated. A sample of 649 of hotel service workers, supervisors, and managers in China participated in the study. An accurate measure of employee work engagement serves as a leading indicator of turnover intention and an early diagnostic tool for sustainable human resource management. Despite its popularity as a work engagement measure, SR method has many limitations. This research attempted to demonstrate that TPR is a viable and better alternative measure of EWE. The results indicated that TPR does possess desirable measurement characteristics, such as convergent validity, nomological validity, and structure invariant. TPR also provides a more conservative, and perhaps more accurate as well, measure of EWE. The difference in mean EWE scores as measured by SR vs. TPR was found to be affected by the specific dimension under study, with the least observable absorption dimension the most affected. The difference was also found to be significantly higher for males than for females, bigger as an employee’s position moves higher, and larger as the length of job tenure increases. Additionally, the difference in satisfaction–EWE correlations, as measured by TPR vs. SR, were much higher when the work conditions were poor. For practitioners, the importance of this study lies in the fact that TPR, as a conservative measure of EWE, can play an important role in detecting early signs of employee troubles sooner and lead management to take timely actions, making human resource management more sustainable. For academics, the results that SR and TPR of EWE generally result in similar pattern of findings offer strong encouragement to build future research on EWE through the TPR method.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Zeng Xu & Yun Zhang & Huixin Yang & Bob T. Wu, 2020. "Sustainable HRM through Improving the Measurement of Employee Work Engagement: Third-Person Rating Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7100-:d:406536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7100/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7100/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jose Ramon Saura & Ana Reyes-Menendez & Cesar Alvarez-Alonso, 2018. "Do Online Comments Affect Environmental Management? Identifying Factors Related to Environmental Management and Sustainability of Hotels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Leiyan Shen & Jianwei Qian & Sandy C. Chen, 2020. "Effective Communication Strategies of Sustainable Hospitality: A Qualitative Exploration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Tanya Bondarouk & Chris Brewster, 2016. "Conceptualising the Future of HRM and Technology Research," John H Dunning Centre for International Business Discussion Papers jhd-dp2016-06, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    4. Heidi Skeiseid & Lukasz Andrzej Derdowski & Åsa Helen Grahn & Håvard Hansen, 2019. "Motivating Sustainable Change in Tourism Behavior: The First- and Third-Person Effects of Hard and Soft Messages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Cheol Young Kim & Joo Han Lee & Soo Young Shin, 2019. "Why Are Your Employees Leaving the Organization? The Interaction Effect of Role Overload, Perceived Organizational Support, and Equity Sensitivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-10, January.
    6. Adam R. Szromek & Zygmunt Kruczek & Bartłomiej Walas, 2019. "The Attitude of Tourist Destination Residents towards the Effects of Overtourism—Kraków Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Tomasz Gigol, 2020. "Influence of Authentic Leadership on Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: The Intermediate Role of Work Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, February.
    8. Ehnert, Ina & Harry, Wes, 2012. "Recent Developments and Future Prospects on Sustainable Human Resource Management: Introduction to the Special Issue," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 23(3), pages 221-238.
    9. Hyo Sun Jung & Hye Hyun Yoon, 2020. "How Does Workplace Romance Influence Employee Performance in the Hospitality Industry?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-13, July.
    10. Miguel Ángel Ríos-Martín & José Antonio Folgado-Fernández & Pedro R. Palos-Sánchez & Paula Castejón-Jiménez, 2019. "The Impact of the Environmental Quality of Online Feedback and Satisfaction When Exploring the Critical Factors for Luxury Hotels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Chung-Te Ting & Chi-Ming Hsieh & Hsiao-Ping Chang & Han-Shen Chen, 2019. "Environmental Consciousness and Green Customer Behavior: The Moderating Roles of Incentive Mechanisms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Małgorzata Baran & Barbara Sypniewska, 2020. "The Impact of Management Methods on Employee Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    13. Char-lee Moyle & Brent Moyle & Lisa Ruhanen & Alexandra Bec & Betty Weiler, 2018. "Business Sustainability: How Does Tourism Compare?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Igor Trišić & Snežana Štetić & Donatella Privitera & Adrian Nedelcu, 2019. "Wine Routes in Vojvodina Province, Northern Serbia: A Tool for Sustainable Tourism Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Fisher, Robert J, 1993. "Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(2), pages 303-315, September.
    16. Laura Cismaru & Ray Iunius, 2019. "Bridging the Generational Gap in the Hospitality Industry: Reverse Mentoring—An Innovative Talent Management Practice for Present and Future Generations of Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-38, December.
    17. Joanna Trafialek & Ewa Czarniecka-Skubina & Jurgita Kulaitiené & Nijolė Vaitkevičienė, 2019. "Restaurant’s Multidimensional Evaluation Concerning Food Quality, Service, and Sustainable Practices: A Cross-National Case Study of Poland and Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Ehnert, Ina & Harry, Wes, 2012. "Recent Developments and Future Prospects on Sustainable Human Resource Management: Introduction to the Special Issue," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 23(3), pages 221-238.
    19. Siyuan Miao & Jaehoon Rhee & In Jun, 2020. "How Much Does Extrinsic Motivation or Intrinsic Motivation Affect Job Engagement or Turnover Intention? A Comparison Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alvaro Lleo & Miquel Bastons & Carlos Rey & Fernando Ruiz-Perez, 2021. "Purpose Implementation: Conceptualization and Measurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Mahmoud Alreahi & Zoltán Bujdosó & Moaaz Kabil & Ali Akaak & Kata Feketéné Benkó & Widhayani Puri Setioningtyas & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2022. "Green Human Resources Management in the Hotel Industry: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Wagih Salama & Mohamed Nor El Deen & Azzam Albakhit & Karam Zaki, 2022. "Understanding the Connection between Sustainable Human Resource Management and the Hotel Business Outcomes: Evidence from the Green-Certified Hotels of Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Stanley Y. B. Huang & Yu-Ming Fei & Yue-Shi Lee, 2021. "Predicting Job Burnout and Its Antecedents: Evidence from Financial Information Technology Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-10, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nina Pološki Vokić, 2015. "Competitiveness and sustainability of HRM activities in Croatia –CRANET survey results," EFZG Working Papers Series 1506, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb.
    2. Guosen Miao & Guoping Chen & Fan Wang & Anupam Kumar Das, 2023. "The Effect of Corporate Greenwashing on Employees’ Environmental Performance: Person–Organization Values Fit Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Maria Järlström & Essi Saru & Sinikka Vanhala, 2018. "Sustainable Human Resource Management with Salience of Stakeholders: A Top Management Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 703-724, October.
    4. Shao-Long Li & Fang Sun & Mingze Li, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management Nurtures Change-Oriented Employees: Relationship between High-Commitment Work Systems and Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Shuang Ren & Guiyao Tang & Susan Jackson, 2018. "Green human resource management research in emergence: A review and future directions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 769-803, September.
    6. Khwaja Abdul Naim Latifi & Seunghoo Lim, 2019. "Strategic Human Resource Management in the Afghanistan Ministry of Mines and Petroleum: A Network Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Çiğdem VATANSEVER & Nevin KILIÇ & Gülesra DİNLER, 2018. "Yeşil Örgütsel Davranış Ölçeği: Bir Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması," Istanbul Management Journal, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 29(85), pages 7-39, December.
    8. Astrid Kainzbauer & Parisa Rungruang & Philip Hallinger, 2021. "How Does Research on Sustainable Human Resource Management Contribute to Corporate Sustainability: A Document Co-Citation Analysis, 1982–2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    9. De Prins, Peggy & Van Beirendonck, Lou & De Vos, Ans & Segers, Jesse, 2014. "Sustainable HRM: Bridging theory and practice through the ‘Respect Openness Continuity (ROC)’-model," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 25(4), pages 263-284.
    10. Faiza Manzoor & Longbao Wei & Tamás Bányai & Mohammad Nurunnabi & Qazi Abdul Subhan, 2019. "An Examination of Sustainable HRM Practices on Job Performance: An Application of Training as a Moderator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Adolfo Carballo‐Penela & Emilio Ruzo‐Sanmartín & Carlos M. P. Sousa, 2023. "Does business commitment to sustainability increase job seekers' perceptions of organisational attractiveness? The role of organisational prestige and cultural masculinity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5521-5535, December.
    12. Barbara Sypniewska & Małgorzata Baran & Monika Kłos, 2023. "Work engagement and employee satisfaction in the practice of sustainable human resource management – based on the study of Polish employees," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1069-1100, September.
    13. Lu Zhang & Xiaochao Guo & Zhimei Lei & Ming K. Lim, 2019. "Social Network Analysis of Sustainable Human Resource Management from the Employee Training’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.
    14. Jihye Park & Dawoon Jung & Pyoungsoo Lee, 2019. "How to Make a Sustainable Manufacturing Process: A High-Commitment HRM System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Anna-Maija Lämsä & Suvi Heikkinen & Raminta PuÄ Ä—taitÄ—, 2023. "Social Sustainability, Leadership and Human Resource Management," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 12(1), pages 7-13, April.
    16. Aslanertik Banu Esra & Çolak Murat, 2021. "The Link Between Sustainability Reporting and the Core Characteristics of Sustainable Human Resource Management," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 57(4), pages 15-24, December.
    17. Monica Santana & Alvaro Lopez‐Cabrales, 2019. "Sustainable development and human resource management: A science mapping approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1171-1183, November.
    18. Astrid Kainzbauer & Parisa Rungruang, 2019. "Science Mapping the Knowledge Base on Sustainable Human Resource Management, 1982–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    19. Shaha Faisal, 2023. "Twenty-Years Journey of Sustainable Human Resource Management Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, May.
    20. Beatrice I.J.M. Van der Heijden & Ans De Vos, 2015. "Sustainable careers: introductory chapter," Chapters, in: Handbook of Research on Sustainable Careers, chapter 1, pages 1-19, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7100-:d:406536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.