IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i9p2587-d228390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shedding Light on Realized Sustainable Consumption Behavior and Perceived Barriers of Young Adults for Creating Stimulating Teaching–Learning Situations

Author

Listed:
  • Christine Kreuzer

    (Institute for Human Resource Education and Management, Munich School of Management, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany)

  • Susanne Weber

    (Institute for Human Resource Education and Management, Munich School of Management, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany)

  • Mona Off

    (Institute for Human Resource Education and Management, Munich School of Management, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany)

  • Tobias Hackenberg

    (Institute for Human Resource Education and Management, Munich School of Management, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany)

  • Chiara Birk

    (Institute for Human Resource Education and Management, Munich School of Management, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany)

Abstract

Sustainable consumption behavior has a central impact on climate balance. Research on sustainable consumption behavior of young adults is still in its infancy. To boost sustainable consumption behavior for young adults in vocational education training, it is necessary to reveal insights on their behavior during their sustainable consumption processes and in its barriers. To get insights of young adults’ sustainable consumption intention, we used a questionnaire ( N = 60). To identify young adults’ consumption behavior as well as the perceived barriers, we also conducted a semi-structured interview ( N = 14). Results show that young adults primarily consider the acquisition and bear less in mind the phases of use and disposal during their realized sustainable consumption behavior. The main barriers identified are high price, lack of information, as well as knowledge and abilities. They do not want to spend time for housekeeping and are not ready to disclaim from fashion or habits. Based on that, stimulating teaching–learning situations can be constructed to broaden the view on all consumption phases. Strategies of already realized behavior can be assured.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine Kreuzer & Susanne Weber & Mona Off & Tobias Hackenberg & Chiara Birk, 2019. "Shedding Light on Realized Sustainable Consumption Behavior and Perceived Barriers of Young Adults for Creating Stimulating Teaching–Learning Situations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2587-:d:228390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2587/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2587/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ingo Balderjahn & Anja Buerke & Manfred Kirchgeorg & Mathias Peyer & Barbara Seegebarth & Klaus-Peter Wiedmann, 2013. "Consciousness for sustainable consumption: scale development and new insights in the economic dimension of consumers’ sustainability," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 3(4), pages 181-192, December.
    2. Yildiz, Özlem & Herrmann-Linß, Caterina & Friedrich, Katja & Baumgarth, Carsten, 2015. "Warum die Generation Y nicht nachhaltig kauft: Eine adaptierte ZMET Studie zum nachhaltigen Modekonsum der Generation Y," Working Papers 85, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute of Management Berlin (IMB).
    3. Van Doorn, Jenny & Verhoef, Peter C., 2015. "Drivers of and Barriers to Organic Purchase Behavior," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 436-450.
    4. Michal Carrington & Benjamin Neville & Gregory Whitwell, 2010. "Why Ethical Consumers Don’t Walk Their Talk: Towards a Framework for Understanding the Gap Between the Ethical Purchase Intentions and Actual Buying Behaviour of Ethically Minded Consumers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 139-158, November.
    5. Micael-Lee Johnstone & Lay Tan, 2015. "Exploring the Gap Between Consumers’ Green Rhetoric and Purchasing Behaviour," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 311-328, December.
    6. Vermeir, Iris & Verbeke, Wim, 2008. "Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 542-553, January.
    7. Hume, Margee, 2010. "Compassion without action: Examining the young consumers consumption and attitude to sustainable consumption," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 385-394, October.
    8. Sonja Maria Geiger & Daniel Fischer & Ulf Schrader, 2018. "Measuring What Matters in Sustainable Consumption: An Integrative Framework for the Selection of Relevant Behaviors," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 18-33, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mercedes Varela-Losada & Azucena Arias-Correa & Uxío Pérez-Rodríguez & Pedro Vega-Marcote, 2019. "How Can Teachers Be Encouraged to Commit to Sustainability? Evaluation of a Teacher-Training Experience in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Daniela Šálková & Inna Čábelková & Dita Hommerová, 2024. "Ethical Consumption: What Makes People Buy "Ethical" Products," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2024(2), pages 27-52.
    3. Jūratė Banytė & Laura Šalčiuvienė & Aistė Dovalienė & Žaneta Piligrimienė & Włodzimierz Sroka, 2020. "Sustainable Consumption Behavior at Home and in the Workplace: Avenues for Innovative Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-24, August.
    4. Chunting Liu & Guozhu Jia & Jili Kong, 2020. "Requirement-Oriented Engineering Characteristic Identification for a Sustainable Product–Service System: A Multi-Method Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    5. F. Ziesemer & A. Hüttel & I. Balderjahn, 2021. "Young People as Drivers or Inhibitors of the Sustainability Movement: The Case of Anti-Consumption," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 427-453, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maja Hosta & Vesna Zabkar, 2021. "Antecedents of Environmentally and Socially Responsible Sustainable Consumer Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 273-293, June.
    2. Alex Hiller & Tony Woodall, 2019. "Everything Flows: A Pragmatist Perspective of Trade-Offs and Value in Ethical Consumption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(4), pages 893-912, July.
    3. Balderjahn, Ingo & Peyer, Mathias & Seegebarth, Barbara & Wiedmann, Klaus-Peter & Weber, Anja, 2018. "The many faces of sustainability-conscious consumers: A category-independent typology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 83-93.
    4. Wintschnig, Bea Alexandra, 2021. "The Attitude-Behavior Gap – Drivers and Barriers of Sustainable Consumption," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 6(2), pages 324-346.
    5. Hyesun Hwang & Harim Yeo, 2022. "Inconsistency between subjective propensity and practice of sustainable consumption: Impact of the consumers' values‐in‐behavior and social participation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1796-1810, December.
    6. Yuting Cui & Raphael Lissillour & Juraj Chebeň & Drahoslav Lančarič & Chunlin Duan, 2022. "The position of financial prudence, social influence, and environmental satisfaction in the sustainable consumption behavioural model: Cross‐market intergenerational investigation during the Covid‐19 ," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 996-1020, July.
    7. Robert Mai & Stefan Hoffmann & Ingo Balderjahn, 2021. "When drivers become inhibitors of organic consumption: the need for a multistage view," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 1151-1174, November.
    8. Thapa Karki, Shova & Hubacek, Klaus, 2015. "Developing a conceptual framework for the attitude–intention–behaviour links driving illegal resource extraction in Bardia National Park, Nepal," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 129-139.
    9. Paolo Antonetti & Stan Maklan, 2014. "Feelings that Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 117-134, September.
    10. María Belén Prados‐Peña & Francisco Jesús Gálvez‐Sánchez & Ana García‐López, 2023. "Moving toward sustainable development: Social, economic and environmental value as antecedents of purchase intention in the sustainable crafts sector," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 3024-3037, August.
    11. Pilar Fernández‐Ferrín & Belén Bande & Aitor Calvo‐Turrientes & M. Mercedes Galán‐Ladero, 2017. "The Choice of Local Food Products by Young Consumers: The Importance of Public and Private Attributes," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 70-84, January.
    12. Aistė Čapienė & Aušra Rūtelionė & Krzysztof Krukowski, 2022. "Engaging in Sustainable Consumption: Exploring the Influence of Environmental Attitudes, Values, Personal Norms, and Perceived Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    13. Hongru Yan & Huaqi Chai, 2021. "Consumers’ Intentions towards Green Hotels in China: An Empirical Study Based on Extended Norm Activation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Deidre Bauer & Julia Arnold & Kerstin Kremer, 2018. "Consumption-Intention Formation in Education for Sustainable Development: An Adapted Model Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, September.
    15. Catherine Janssen & Joëlle Vanhamme, 2015. "Theoretical Lenses for Understanding the CSR–Consumer Paradox," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(4), pages 775-787, September.
    16. Anna Codini & Michelle Bonera & Giulia Miniero, 2016. "Time horizon and green consumption," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 49-62.
    17. Lea Marie Heidbreder & Julia Steinhorst & Manfred Schmitt, 2020. "Plastic-Free July: An Experimental Study of Limiting and Promoting Factors in Encouraging a Reduction of Single-Use Plastic Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, June.
    18. Michal Carrington & Andreas Chatzidakis & Deirdre Shaw, 2021. "Consuming Worker Exploitation? Accounts and Justifications for Consumer (In)action to Modern Slavery," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(3), pages 432-450, June.
    19. Erifili Papista & Athanasios Krystallis, 2013. "Investigating the Types of Value and Cost of Green Brands: Proposition of a Conceptual Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 75-92, June.
    20. Monica-Maria Tomșa & Andreea-Ioana Romonți-Maniu & Mircea-Andrei Scridon, 2021. "Is Sustainable Consumption Translated into Ethical Consumer Behavior?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2587-:d:228390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.