IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i19p5389-d271955.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Sustainability Concepts Regarding Leather Apparel in China and South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Hye Jung Jung

    (Da Vinci College of General Education, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea)

  • Kyung Wha Oh

    (Department of Fashion Design, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, 17546, Korea)

Abstract

Sustainability in business and personal life has increased over the past few years and is continuing to develop. Consumption in the clothing and textiles industry causes a significant impact on the environment and utilizes unsustainable practices, from clothing production to use and disposal. With shifts toward a more sustainable future within the government, businesses, and society, the apparel industry and consumers must prepare for a sustainable future. This study examines the determinants of sustainable apparel consumption behavior in China and South Korea. Theoretical and practical evidence from the literature on sustainable consumption is applied to develop a model for investigating the consumers’ behavioral intentions to buy, use, and recommend sustainable leather apparel products. Environmental knowledge, perceived consumer effectiveness, sustainable consumption beliefs, and self-enhancement are proposed as key determinants of behavioral intention to buy, use, and recommend eco-friendly faux leather apparel (E-FLA). The hypothesized antecedents of these concepts are part of the model, as modified by the theory of planned behavior, and the model is examined using structural equation modeling on data from a sample of 450 respondents collected in China and South Korea. An analysis of data is carried out to identify the underlying dimensions of sustainable consumption beliefs and behaviors including pro-environmentalism, social responsibility, and animal conservation. The results show that the key determinants of behavioral intentions to buy, use, and recommend E-FLA are pro-environmentalism and social responsibility, which are related to sustainable consumption belief dimensions and consumers’ self-enhancement. The positive determinants of sustainable consumption beliefs are found to be both environmental knowledge and perceived consumer effectiveness. These results suggest the need for greater environmental knowledge and perceived consumer efficiency in the effort to achieve more sustainable clothing consumption. The implications of the findings for public policy and recommendations for further studies are outlined and discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hye Jung Jung & Kyung Wha Oh, 2019. "Exploring the Sustainability Concepts Regarding Leather Apparel in China and South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5389-:d:271955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5389/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5389/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    2. Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen & Wencke Gwozdz & Kerli Kant Hvass, 2018. "Exploring the Relationship Between Business Model Innovation, Corporate Sustainability, and Organisational Values within the Fashion Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 267-284, May.
    3. Minton, Elizabeth A. & Spielmann, Nathalie & Kahle, Lynn R. & Kim, Chung-Hyun, 2018. "The subjective norms of sustainable consumption: A cross-cultural exploration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 400-408.
    4. Wang, Huanzhang & Liu, Honglei & Kim, Sang Jin & Kim, Kyung Hoon, 2019. "Sustainable fashion index model and its implication," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 430-437.
    5. Dan-Cristian Dabija & Cătălin Postelnicu & Vasile Dinu, 2018. "Cross-Generational Investigation of Ethics and Sustainability. Insights from Romanian Retailing," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Samuel O. Idowu & Catalina Sitnikov & Dalia Simion & Claudiu George Bocean (ed.), Current Issues in Corporate Social Responsibility, pages 141-163, Springer.
    6. Vermeir, Iris & Verbeke, Wim, 2008. "Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 542-553, January.
    7. You Kyung Lee, 2017. "A Comparative Study of Green Purchase Intention between Korean and Chinese Consumers: The Moderating Role of Collectivism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fe Yoo & Hye Jung Jung & Kyung Wha Oh, 2021. "Motivators and Barriers for Buying Intention of Upcycled Fashion Products in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Rajumesh Sivarajah, 2024. "Exploring the impact of psychological and social factors on green consumer behaviour: a comprehensive review of green marketing tactics," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(12), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Chorong Youn & Hye Jung Jung, 2021. "Semantic Network Analysis to Explore the Concept of Sustainability in the Apparel and Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Valerio Schiaroli & Rosa Maria Dangelico & Luca Fraccascia, 2025. "Mapping sustainable options in the fashion industry: A systematic literature review and a future research agenda," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 431-464, February.
    5. Osmud Rahman & Dingtao Hu & Benjamin C. M. Fung, 2023. "A Systematic Literature Review of Fashion, Sustainability, and Consumption Using a Mixed Methods Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-37, August.
    6. Sher Jahan Khan & Saeed Badghish & Puneet Kaur & Rajat Sharma & Amandeep Dhir, 2023. "What motivates the purchasing of green apparel products? A systematic review and future research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4183-4201, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leonidou, Leonidas C. & Eteokleous, Pantelitsa P. & Christofi, Anna-Maria & Korfiatis, Nikolaos, 2022. "Drivers, outcomes, and moderators of consumer intention to buy organic goods: Meta-analysis, implications, and future agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 339-354.
    2. Hsu, Chia-Lin & Chang, Chi-Ya & Yansritakul, Chutinart, 2017. "Exploring purchase intention of green skincare products using the theory of planned behavior: Testing the moderating effects of country of origin and price sensitivity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 145-152.
    3. Yidong Liu & Yongxin Wu & Xichen Feng & Euitay Jung, 2025. "A Study on the Driving Factors of Continued Use of Sustainable Ready-to-Drink Packaging: The Moderating Roles of Perceived Sustainability and Perceived Value Fit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Liobikienė, Genovaitė & Mandravickaitė, Justina & Bernatonienė, Jurga, 2016. "Theory of planned behavior approach to understand the green purchasing behavior in the EU: A cross-cultural study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 38-46.
    5. Ragna Nilssen & Geoff Bick & Russell Abratt, 2019. "Comparing the relative importance of sustainability as a consumer purchase criterion of food and clothing in the retail sector," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(1), pages 71-83, January.
    6. Thapa Karki, Shova & Hubacek, Klaus, 2015. "Developing a conceptual framework for the attitude–intention–behaviour links driving illegal resource extraction in Bardia National Park, Nepal," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 129-139.
    7. Paolo Antonetti & Stan Maklan, 2014. "Feelings that Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 117-134, September.
    8. Litvine, Dorian & Gazull, Laurent & Dabat, Marie-Hélène, 2014. "Assessing the potential demand for biofuel by combining Economics and Psychology: A focus on proximity applied to Jatropha oil in Africa," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 85-95.
    9. Chad M. Baum, 2013. "The Missing Link between Research and Reality: the significance of the relationship between retail format and organic food consumption," Jena Economics Research Papers 2013-049, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    10. Jaejin Lee & Jihye Kim, 2016. "The Effect of Consumer Characteristics on the Cause-Related Marketing Campaign: The Role of Personal Life Values," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 1-82, August.
    11. Frommeyer, Britta & Wagner, Elisa & Hossiep, C. Richard & Schewe, Gerhard, 2022. "The utility of intention as a proxy for sustainable buying behavior – A necessary condition analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 201-213.
    12. Aistė Čapienė & Aušra Rūtelionė & Krzysztof Krukowski, 2022. "Engaging in Sustainable Consumption: Exploring the Influence of Environmental Attitudes, Values, Personal Norms, and Perceived Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    13. Hongru Yan & Huaqi Chai, 2021. "Consumers’ Intentions towards Green Hotels in China: An Empirical Study Based on Extended Norm Activation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Luigi Cembalo & Alessia Lombardi & Stefano Pascucci & Domenico Dentoni & Giuseppina Migliore & Fabio Verneau & Giorgio Schifani, 2015. "“Rationally Local”: Consumer Participation in Alternative Food Chains," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 330-352, June.
    15. Anne Bäro & Felix Toepler & Timo Meynhardt & Vivek K. Velamuri, 2022. "Participating in the sharing economy: The role of individual characteristics," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3715-3735, December.
    16. Deidre Bauer & Julia Arnold & Kerstin Kremer, 2018. "Consumption-Intention Formation in Education for Sustainable Development: An Adapted Model Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, September.
    17. Dat Duy Nguyen, 2023. "Evaluating the Consumer Attitude and Behavioral Consumption of Green Products in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Amitabha Ghose & Bibhas Chandra, 2020. "Models for Predicting Sustainable Durable Products Consumption Behaviour: A Review Article," Vision, , vol. 24(1), pages 81-89, March.
    19. Saari, Ulla A. & Damberg, Svenja & Frömbling, Lena & Ringle, Christian M., 2021. "Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    20. Xin Shen & Qianhui Xu & Qiao Liu, 2022. "Predicting sustainable food consumption across borders based on the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic structural equation model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-22, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5389-:d:271955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.