IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i15p4001-d251097.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors that Sustain Health and Safety Management Practices in the Food Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Hazrat Hassan

    (Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Qianwei Ying

    (Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Habib Ahmad

    (Hamdard Institute of Management Sciences, Islamabad Campus, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Sana Ilyas

    (Department of management science and technology, Business school, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

Abstract

Due to the significant change in business organizations, scholarly interest has diverted from studying the determinants of financial performance to understanding the environmental activities, sustainability practices, and health and safety management practices. Despite the extensive literature, it is yet to understand either internal or external factors that improve health and safety management practices in SMEs. This research examines the influence of the internal factors—intellectual capital, information technology capabilities (ITC), and entrepreneurial orientation, and the external capabilities—government financial support, institutional pressure, and managerial networking on six health and safety management practices: management commitment, staff training, worker involvement, safety communication and feedback, safety rules and procedures, and safety promotion policies. We researched 410 Pakistani SMEs from the food business industry. The results indicate that intellectual capital significantly improves management commitment, safety communication and feedback, and safety rules and produces; ITC significantly improves management commitment and safety communication and feedback; and entrepreneurial orientation significantly facilitates safety training and worker involvement only. In the external capabilities, government financial support has a significant influence on management commitment, worker involvement, safety rules and policies, and safety promotion policies. Institutional pressure has a significant influence on management commitment, safety training, safety communication, and feedback and safety promotion policies. Managerial networking significantly influences safety training, worker involvement, safety rules and procedures, and safety promotion policies of SMEs. Focusing only on the food industry is the major limitation of this research, this study recommends SMEs to give sufficient attention to their internal and external factors to enhance health and safety management practices. Further implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hazrat Hassan & Qianwei Ying & Habib Ahmad & Sana Ilyas, 2019. "Factors that Sustain Health and Safety Management Practices in the Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:15:p:4001-:d:251097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/15/4001/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/15/4001/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sher Zaman Khan & Qing Yang & Abdul Waheed, 2019. "Investment in intangible resources and capabilities spurs sustainable competitive advantage and firm performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 285-295, March.
    2. Lotta Dellve & Andrea Eriksson, 2017. "Health-Promoting Managerial Work: A Theoretical Framework for a Leadership Program that Supports Knowledge and Capability to Craft Sustainable Work Practices in Daily Practice and During Organizationa," Societies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Jiuh-Biing Sheu, 2014. "Green Supply Chain Collaboration for Fashionable Consumer Electronics Products under Third-Party Power Intervention—A Resource Dependence Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-44, May.
    4. Soh Hyun Chu & Hongsuk Yang & Mansokku Lee & Sangwook Park, 2017. "The Impact of Institutional Pressures on Green Supply Chain Management and Firm Performance: Top Management Roles and Social Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Shun-Pin Chuang & Sun-Jen Huang, 2018. "The Effect of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility on Environmental Performance and Business Competitiveness: The Mediation of Green Information Technology Capital," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 991-1009, July.
    6. Muhammad Anwar, 2018. "BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATION AND SMEs PERFORMANCE — DOES COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE MEDIATE?," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(07), pages 1-31, October.
    7. Azaroff, L.S. & Levenstein, C. & Wegman, D.H., 2002. "Occupational injury and illness surveillance: Conceptual filters explain underreporting," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(9), pages 1421-1429.
    8. Lai, Kee-hung & Wong, Christina W.Y. & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2015. "Sharing environmental management information with supply chain partners and the performance contingencies on environmental munificence," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 445-453.
    9. Zhu, Qinghua & Geng, Yong & Sarkis, Joseph, 2016. "Shifting Chinese organizational responses to evolving greening pressures," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 65-74.
    10. Shun-Pin Chuang & Sun-Jen Huang, 2015. "Effects of Business Greening and Green IT Capital on Business Competitiveness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 221-231, April.
    11. Sarkis, Joseph & Zhu, Qinghua & Lai, Kee-hung, 2011. "An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Yang Songling & Muhammad Ishtiaq & Muhammad Anwar & Hamid Ahmed, 2018. "The Role of Government Support in Sustainable Competitive Position and Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Bordignon, Massimo & Turati, Gilberto, 2009. "Bailing out expectations and public health expenditure," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 305-321, March.
    14. Curtis Breslin, F. & Polzer, Jessica & MacEachen, Ellen & Morrongiello, Barbara & Shannon, Harry, 2007. "Workplace injury or "part of the job"?: Towards a gendered understanding of injuries and complaints among young workers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 782-793, February.
    15. Julia Wolf, 2014. "The Relationship Between Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Stakeholder Pressure and Corporate Sustainability Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 119(3), pages 317-328, February.
    16. Chen, James K.C. & Zorigt, Dulamjav, 2013. "Managing occupational health and safety in the mining industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(11), pages 2321-2331.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vanitha Prasannath & Rajendra P. Adhikari & Sarel Gronum & Morgan P. Miles, 2024. "Impact of government support policies on entrepreneurial orientation and SME performance," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1533-1595, September.
    2. Nathalia Suchek & Mário Franco, 2024. "Inter-organisational Cooperation Oriented Towards Sustainability Involving SMEs: a Systematic Literature Review," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 1952-1972, March.
    3. Zarith Delaila Abd Aziz & Nor Azian Abdul Rahman & Muhamad Khalil Omar & Norashikin Hussein, 2024. "Empowering Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: A Conceptual Paper on Exploring the Impact of Government Support on SMEs in Malaysia," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(3), pages 573-583.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amer Saeed & Yun Jun & Saviour Ayertey Nubuor & Hewawasam Puwakpitiyage Rasika Priyankara & Mahabaduge Prasad Fernando Jayasuriya, 2018. "Institutional Pressures, Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Environmental and Economic Performance: A Two Theory View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Guowei Li & Zhe Luo & Muhammad Anwar & Yuqiu Lu & Xiantao Wang & Xuening Liu, 2020. "Intellectual capital and the efficiency of SMEs in the transition economy China; Do financial resources strengthen the routes?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, July.
    3. Ahmad Fathulla Ahmad & Georgiana Karadas, 2021. "Managers’ Perceptions Regarding the Effect of Leadership on Organizational Performance: Mediating Role of Green Supply Chain Management Practices," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    4. Tobias Rebs & Daniel Thiel & Marcus Brandenburg & Stefan Seuring, 2019. "Impacts of stakeholder influences and dynamic capabilities on the sustainability performance of supply chains: a system dynamics model," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(7), pages 893-926, September.
    5. Miao Su & Su‐Han Woo & Xiaochun Chen & Keun‐sik Park, 2023. "Identifying critical success factors for the agri‐food cold chain's sustainable development: When the strategy system comes into play," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 444-461, January.
    6. Muhammad Ishfaq Khan & Shahbaz Khalid & Umer Zaman & Ana Ercília José & Paulo Ferreira, 2021. "Green Paradox in Emerging Tourism Supply Chains: Achieving Green Consumption Behavior through Strategic Green Marketing Orientation, Brand Social Responsibility, and Green Image," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Maya Novitasari & Anggita Langgeng Wijaya & Nindya Mariana Agustin & Ardi Gunardi & Leo‐Paul Dana, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Green supply chain management as a mediating variable," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 267-276, January.
    8. Tai-Wei Chang & Fei-Fan Chen & Hua-Dong Luan & Yu-Shan Chen, 2019. "Effect of Green Organizational Identity, Green Shared Vision, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment on Green Product Development Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Saeed Nosratabadi & Gergo Pinter & Amir Mosavi & Sandor Semperger, 2020. "Sustainable Banking; Evaluation of the European Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Edi Suandi & Herri & Yulihasri & Syafrizal, 2023. "Evaluating the relationship between entrepreneurial marketing, competitive advantage, and Islamic banks performance," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(3), pages 599-614, September.
    11. Yu‐Xiang Yen, 2018. "Buyer–supplier collaboration in green practices: The driving effects from stakeholders," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1666-1678, December.
    12. Mir Danial Mousavi & Mir Damoun Mousavi, 2023. "The Effect of Stakeholder’s Pressure on firm Market Performance and the Mediating Role of Corporate Responsibility, Sustainable Supplier Selection, and Marketing Capability," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(3), pages 179-191, August.
    13. Sanjay Kumar Singh & Manlio Del Giudice & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Hengky Latan & Amrik Singh Sohal, 2022. "Stakeholder pressure, green innovation, and performance in small and medium‐sized enterprises: The role of green dynamic capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 500-514, January.
    14. Ma Degong & Farid Ullah & Muhammad Sualeh Khattak & Muhammad Anwar, 2018. "Do International Capabilities and Resources Configure Firm’s Sustainable Competitive Performance? Research within Pakistani SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Muhammad Anwar & Shuangjie Li, 2021. "Spurring competitiveness, financial and environmental performance of SMEs through government financial and non-financial support," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7860-7882, May.
    16. S. M. Shafiul Alam & K. M. Zahidul Islam, 2021. "Examining the role of environmental corporate social responsibility in building green corporate image and green competitive advantage," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Khan, Rizwan Ullah & Richardson, Christopher & Salamzadeh, Yashar, 2022. "Spurring competitiveness, social and economic performance of family-owned SMEs through social entrepreneurship; a multi-analytical SEM & ANN perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    18. Trentin, Alessio & Forza, Cipriano & Perin, Elisa, 2015. "Embeddedness and path dependence of organizational capabilities for mass customization and green management: A longitudinal case study in the machinery industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 253-276.
    19. Xiaocui Li & Nengmin Wang & Bin Jiang & Tao Jia, 2023. "Institutional pressures and proactive environmental strategy: The mediating effect of top managerial environment attitude and the moderating effect of new media pressure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 6106-6123, December.
    20. Bikram Jit Singh Mann & Harmeet Kaur, 2020. "Sustainable Supply Chain Activities and Financial Performance: An Indian Experience," Vision, , vol. 24(1), pages 60-69, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:15:p:4001-:d:251097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.