IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i9p3346-d170741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Geospatial Association of the Urban Agglomeration around the South China Sea Based on Marine Traffic Flow

Author

Listed:
  • Xianzhe Zhang

    (Collaborative Innovation Center of South China Sea Studies, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
    Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Yanming Chen

    (Collaborative Innovation Center of South China Sea Studies, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
    Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Manchun Li

    (Collaborative Innovation Center of South China Sea Studies, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
    Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China)

Abstract

Studying the geospatial association within the urban agglomeration around the South China Sea can provide a basis for understanding the internal development of the China-Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Free Trade Area (CAFTA) and provide ideas for promoting economic and trade cooperation among cities in the region. The purpose of this paper was to reflect the characteristics of the urban agglomeration association network based on big traffic data. Based on trajectory data mining and complex network analysis methods, the automatic identification system (AIS) data was used to construct the traffic flow association network of the urban agglomeration around the South China Sea and then analysis and evaluation were carried out in three aspects: Spatial distribution characteristics of marine traffic flow, analysis of spatial hierarchy and internal difference analysis of the urban agglomeration. The results show the following: (1) The distribution of marine traffic flow within the urban agglomeration around the South China Sea is characterized by polarization and localization and shows a specific power-law distribution; (2) there is a close relationship within the urban agglomeration and the core urban and the marginal urban agglomerations were apparent; (3) subgroup division of urban agglomeration around the South China Sea shows an evident geographic agglomeration phenomenon and there were significant differences between the level of economic development among subgroups; and (4) relative to static factors such as population size and economic aggregate, dynamic flow of information and capital traffic flow plays a more important role in the spatial correlation between cities. Strengthening the links among the three layers of core-intermediate-edge cities through trade and investment means enhancing cooperation among cities within the urban agglomeration and ultimately promoting sustainable regional development.

Suggested Citation

  • Xianzhe Zhang & Yanming Chen & Manchun Li, 2018. "Research on Geospatial Association of the Urban Agglomeration around the South China Sea Based on Marine Traffic Flow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:3346-:d:170741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3346/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3346/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu, Mengqiao & Li, Zhenfu & Shi, Yanlei & Zhang, Xiaoling & Jiang, Shufei, 2015. "Evolution of regional inequality in the global shipping network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-12.
    2. Gao, Cai & Wei, Daijun & Hu, Yong & Mahadevan, Sankaran & Deng, Yong, 2013. "A modified evidential methodology of identifying influential nodes in weighted networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(21), pages 5490-5500.
    3. Huang, Rocco R., 2007. "Distance and trade: Disentangling unfamiliarity effects and transport cost effects," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 161-181, January.
    4. Xiaobo Zhang & Kevin Honglin Zhang, 2002. "Regional Inequality," Chapters, in: Shang-Jin Wei & Guanzhong James Wen & Huizhong Zhou (ed.), The Globalization of the Chinese Economy, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. James E. Anderson, 2011. "The Gravity Model," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 3(1), pages 133-160, September.
    6. Pan, Haozhi & Deal, Brian & Chen, Yan & Hewings, Geoffrey, 2018. "A Reassessment of urban structure and land-use patterns: distance to CBD or network-based? — Evidence from Chicago," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 215-228.
    7. Ricardo J Sánchez & Jan Hoffmann & Alejandro Micco & Georgina V Pizzolitto & Martín Sgut & Gordon Wilmsmeier, 2003. "Port Efficiency and International Trade: Port Efficiency as a Determinant of Maritime Transport Costs," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 5(2), pages 199-218, June.
    8. Frederic Robert-Nicoud & Gianmarco Ottaviano & Rikard Forslid & Richard Baldwin & Philippe Martin, 2004. "The Core Periphery Model : Key Features and Effects," Post-Print hal-03568289, HAL.
    9. Megumi Muto, 2012. "The Impacts of Mobile Phones and Personal Networks on Rural-to-Urban Migration: Evidence from Uganda," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 21(5), pages -807, November.
    10. Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. & Larch, Mario & Yotov, Yoto V., 2015. "Economic integration agreements, border effects, and distance elasticities in the gravity equation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 307-327.
    11. Konishi, Hideo, 2000. "Formation of Hub Cities: Transportation Cost Advantage and Population Agglomeration," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 1-28, July.
    12. Zhaohui Chong & Chenglin Qin & Xinyue Ye, 2016. "Environmental Regulation, Economic Network and Sustainable Growth of Urban Agglomerations in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-21, May.
    13. Runsen Zhang & Kakuya Matsushima & Kiyoshi Kobayashi, 2017. "Computable urban economic model incorporated with economies of scale for urban agglomeration simulation," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 59(1), pages 231-254, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fei Ma & Yujie Zhu & Kum Fai Yuen & Qipeng Sun & Haonan He & Xiaobo Xu & Zhen Shang & Yan Xu, 2022. "Exploring the Spatiotemporal Evolution and Sustainable Driving Factors of Information Flow Network: A Public Search Attention Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Qiufang Shi & Xiaoyong Yan & Bin Jia & Ziyou Gao, 2020. "Freight Data-Driven Research on Evaluation Indexes for Urban Agglomeration Development Degree," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zouheir El-Sahli, 2023. "The Partial and General Equilibrium Effects of the Greater Arab Free Trade Agreement," The International Trade Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 185-199, March.
    2. Rudiger Ahrend & Cyrille Schwellnus, 2013. "Do investors disproportionately shed assets of distant countries during global financial crises?: The role of increased uncertainty," OECD Journal: Economic Studies, OECD Publishing, vol. 2012(1), pages 1-20.
    3. Roy, Jayjit, 2017. "On the environmental consequences of intra-industry trade," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 50-67.
    4. Katharina Längle, 2020. "Upgrading of Exports: Does the Integration into Trade Agreements Pave the Way to Product Upgrading?," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 20006, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    5. Mulabdic, Alen & Rotunno, Lorenzo, 2022. "Trade barriers in government procurement," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    6. Anderson, James E. & Yotov, Yoto V., 2020. "Short run gravity," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    7. Federico Carril-Caccia & Jordi Paniagua & Francisco Requena, 2021. "Asylum Migration, Borders, and Terrorism in a Structural Gravity Model," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 146-158.
    8. Benedikt Heid & Mario Larch & Yoto V. Yotov, 2021. "Estimating the effects of non‐discriminatory trade policies within structural gravity models," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 376-409, February.
    9. Ohyun Kwon & Constantinos Syropoulos & Yoto V. Yotov, 2022. "The Extraterritorial Effects of Sanctions," CESifo Working Paper Series 9578, CESifo.
    10. Ducruet, César, 2017. "Multilayer dynamics of complex spatial networks: The case of global maritime flows (1977–2008)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 47-58.
    11. Katrin Oesingmann, 2022. "The determinants of air cargo flows and the role of multinational agreements: An empirical comparison with trade and air passenger flows," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(8), pages 2370-2393, August.
    12. Anderson, James E. & Borchert, Ingo & Mattoo, Aaditya & Yotov, Yoto V., 2018. "Dark costs, missing data: Shedding some light on services trade," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 193-214.
    13. Felbermayr, Gabriel & Yotov, Yoto V., 2021. "From theory to policy with gravitas: A solution to the mystery of the excess trade balances," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    14. Jareb, Colin & Nigai, Sergey, 2022. "Gravity models and the Law of Large Numbers," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    15. Ingo Borchert & Mario Larch & Serge Shikher & Yoto V. Yotov, 2022. "Disaggregated gravity: Benchmark estimates and stylized facts from a new database," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 113-136, February.
    16. Heid, Benedikt & Stähler, Frank, 2024. "Structural gravity and the gains from trade under imperfect competition: Quantifying the effects of the European Single Market," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    17. Federico Carril-Caccia & Jordi Paniagua & Marta Suárez-Varela, 2022. "Forced migration and food crises," Working Papers 2227, Banco de España.
    18. Marina Papanastassiou & Robert Pearce & Antonello Zanfei, 2020. "Changing perspectives on the internationalization of R&D and innovation by multinational enterprises: A review of the literature," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(4), pages 623-664, June.
    19. Fabien Candau & Geoffroy Guepie & Reine Kouakou, 2018. "In Gravity no Veritas: Dubious Trade Elasticiy and Weak Effects of Regional Trade Agreements in Africa," Working Papers hal-02625930, HAL.
    20. Imran Ur Rahman & Mohsin Shafi & Liu Junrong & Enitilina Tatiani M.K. Fetuu & Shah Fahad & Buddhi Prasad Sharma, 2021. "Infrastructure and Trade: An Empirical Study Based on China and Selected Asian Economies," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:3346-:d:170741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.