IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i12p4528-d186882.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dry Bulk Carrier Investment Selection through a Dual Group Decision Fusing Mechanism in the Green Supply Chain

Author

Listed:
  • Shuang Yao

    (College of Economics and Management, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Donghua Yu

    (School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China)

  • Yan Song

    (College of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China)

  • Hao Yao

    (College of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China)

  • Yuzhen Hu

    (College of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China)

  • Benhai Guo

    (College of Economics and Management, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

Abstract

Uncertain linguistic variables and scoring evaluations are two important evaluation mechanisms in the decision making field. Sustainability requirements for ship investment lead to the complexity of influence factors and the decision making process. The uncertain linguistic assessment features a large amount of ambiguity and subjectivity, while the scoring evaluation features high precision and distinct gradations. This paper constructs a criteria system in the green supply chain and proposes a dual group decision fusing mechanism for integrating the linguistic variable and scoring evaluation into a unified evaluation term. A hierarchical cloud of linguistic variable terms is constructed based on scoring via a reverse cloud generator, and then, the ship investment linguistic terms are transformed into prospect values. In addition, the consistency and investment selection performance are measured after aggregating the individual decision matrices for group decision making. The empirical research results on the selection of dry bulk carriers for investment show that dual group decision fusing mechanisms could effectively improve the consistency, decision making efficiency, and accuracy of dry bulk ship investment choices and reduce the cost of feedback adjustment for group decisions. In comparison with the trapezoidal fuzzy and fuzzy TOPSIS methods of group decision making, the proposed method performs better when there are a large number of alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuang Yao & Donghua Yu & Yan Song & Hao Yao & Yuzhen Hu & Benhai Guo, 2018. "Dry Bulk Carrier Investment Selection through a Dual Group Decision Fusing Mechanism in the Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4528-:d:186882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4528/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4528/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qinghua Zhu & Yong Geng & Tsuyoshi Fujita & Shizuka Hashimoto, 2010. "Green supply chain management in leading manufacturers," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 380-392, March.
    2. Aydin, Nezir, 2017. "A fuzzy-based multi-dimensional and multi-period service quality evaluation outline for rail transit systems," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 87-98.
    3. Sindhu, Sonal & Nehra, Vijay & Luthra, Sunil, 2017. "Investigation of feasibility study of solar farms deployment using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS analysis: Case study of India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 496-511.
    4. Chen, Chen-Tung & Lin, Ching-Torng & Huang, Sue-Fn, 2006. "A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 289-301, August.
    5. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. Yang, Chung-Shan & Lu, Chin-Shan & Haider, Jane Jing & Marlow, Peter Bernard, 2013. "The effect of green supply chain management on green performance and firm competitiveness in the context of container shipping in Taiwan," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 55-73.
    7. Fritsch, Jorik & Poudineh, Rahmatallah, 2016. "Gas-to-power market and investment incentive for enhancing generation capacity: An analysis of Ghana's electricity sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 92-101.
    8. Chih-Yang Tsai, 2017. "The impact of cost structure on supply chain cash flow risk," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(22), pages 6624-6637, November.
    9. Awasthi, Anjali & Chauhan, Satyaveer S. & Goyal, S.K., 2010. "A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 370-378, August.
    10. Anderson Gwanyebit Kehbila & Jürgen Ertel & Alan Colin Brent, 2009. "Strategic corporate environmental management within the South African automotive industry: motivations, benefits, hurdles," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(6), pages 310-323, November.
    11. Azimifard, Arezoo & Moosavirad, Seyed Hamed & Ariafar, Shahram, 2018. "Selecting sustainable supplier countries for Iran's steel industry at three levels by using AHP and TOPSIS methods," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 30-44.
    12. Jyrki Wallenius & James S. Dyer & Peter C. Fishburn & Ralph E. Steuer & Stanley Zionts & Kalyanmoy Deb, 2008. "Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(7), pages 1336-1349, July.
    13. Sivakumar, R. & Kannan, Devika & Murugesan, P., 2015. "Green vendor evaluation and selection using AHP and Taguchi loss functions in production outsourcing in mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 64-75.
    14. Steuer, Ralph E. & Na, Paul, 2003. "Multiple criteria decision making combined with finance: A categorized bibliographic study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(3), pages 496-515, November.
    15. Berling, Peter & Eng-Larsson, Fredrik, 2017. "Environmental implications of transport contract choice - capacity investment and pricing under volume and capacity contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 129-142.
    16. Gallo, Mariano, 2011. "A fuel surcharge policy for reducing road traffic greenhouse gas emissions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 413-424, March.
    17. Papapostolou, Nikos C. & Pouliasis, Panos K. & Kyriakou, Ioannis, 2017. "Herd behavior in the drybulk market: an empirical analysis of the decision to invest in new and retire existing fleet capacity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 36-51.
    18. Lixian Fan & Meifeng Luo, 2013. "Analyzing ship investment behaviour in liner shipping," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 511-533, November.
    19. Shashank Thanki & Jitesh Thakkar, 2018. "A quantitative framework for lean and green assessment of supply chain performance," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 67(2), pages 366-400, February.
    20. Vachon, Stephan & Klassen, Robert D., 2008. "Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 299-315, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haiyun, Cui & Zhixiong, Huang & Yüksel, Serhat & Dinçer, Hasan, 2021. "Analysis of the innovation strategies for green supply chain management in the energy industry using the QFD-based hybrid interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amer Saeed & Yun Jun & Saviour Ayertey Nubuor & Hewawasam Puwakpitiyage Rasika Priyankara & Mahabaduge Prasad Fernando Jayasuriya, 2018. "Institutional Pressures, Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Environmental and Economic Performance: A Two Theory View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Attari, Mahdi Yousefi Nejad & Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi, 2018. "Developing benders decomposition algorithm for a green supply chain network of mine industry: Case of Iranian mine industry," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 371-382.
    3. Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa & Frascareli, Fernanda Cortegoso de Oliveira & Jabbour, Charbel José Chiappetta, 2015. "Green supply chain management and firms’ performance: Understanding potential relationships and the role of green sourcing and some other green practices," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PB), pages 366-374.
    4. Maciej Nowak, 2010. "Interactive Multicriteria Decision Aiding Under Risk—Methods and Applications," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 69-91, October.
    5. Dimitris Bertsimas & Allison O'Hair, 2013. "Learning Preferences Under Noise and Loss Aversion: An Optimization Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1190-1199, October.
    6. Kannan, Devika & Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa & Jabbour, Charbel José Chiappetta, 2014. "Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 432-447.
    7. Jing Wang & Jian-Qiang Wang & Hong-Yu Zhang & Xiao-Hong Chen, 2017. "Distance-Based Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Approaches with Multi-Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Information," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04), pages 1069-1099, July.
    8. Laura Maria Ferri & Nelly Oelze & André Habisch & Mario Molteni, 2016. "Implementation of responsible Procurement Management: An Institutional Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 261-276, May.
    9. Wang, Di & Shen, Ye & Zhao, Yueying & He, Wei & Liu, Xue & Qian, Xiangyan & Lv, Tao, 2020. "Integrated assessment and obstacle factor diagnosis of China's scientific coal production capacity based on the PSR sustainability framework," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    10. Chen, Lujie & Zhao, Xiande & Tang, Ou & Price, Lydia & Zhang, Shanshan & Zhu, Wenwen, 2017. "Supply chain collaboration for sustainability: A literature review and future research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 73-87.
    11. Dai, Jing & Montabon, Frank L. & Cantor, David E., 2014. "Linking rival and stakeholder pressure to green supply management: Mediating role of top management support," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 173-187.
    12. Nihan Kabadayı, 2020. "An Integrated Fuzzy DEMATEL and Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Method to Evaluate Sustainable Suppliers," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 8(2), pages 201-226, December.
    13. Stefan A. Hajkowicz, 2012. "For the Greater Good? A Test for Strategic Bias in Group Environmental Decisions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 331-344, May.
    14. Durbach, Ian N. & Stewart, Theodor J., 2012. "A comparison of simplified value function approaches for treating uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 456-464.
    15. Mohammed, Ahmed & Harris, Irina & Govindan, Kannan, 2019. "A hybrid MCDM-FMOO approach for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 171-184.
    16. Wang, Xu & Fang, Hong & Fang, Siran, 2020. "An integrated approach for exploitation block selection of shale gas—based on cloud model and grey relational analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    17. Dilip Kumar Sen & Saurav Datta & Siba Sankar Mahapatra, 2016. "A TODIM-Based Decision Support Framework for G-Resilient Supplier Selection in Fuzzy Environment," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(05), pages 1-40, October.
    18. Golmohammadi, Davood, 2011. "Neural network application for fuzzy multi-criteria decision making problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 490-504, June.
    19. Batur Sir, G. Didem & Çalışkan, Emre, 2019. "Assessment of development regions for financial support allocation with fuzzy decision making: A case of Turkey," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 161-169.
    20. Wenwen Zhu & Zhiqiang Wang, 2018. "The Collaborative Networks and Thematic Trends of Research on Purchasing and Supply Management for Environmental Sustainability: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-28, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4528-:d:186882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.