IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v8y2019i11p304-d281805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Massification, Marketisation and Loss of Differentiation in Pre-Entry Marketing Materials in UK Higher Education

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Knight

    (Faculty of Education, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia)

Abstract

Since the mid-1970s, the higher education system in the UK has massified. Over this period, the government policy drivers for higher education have shifted towards a homogenised rationale, linking higher education to the economic well-being of the country. The massification of higher education has involved a widening of participation from traditional students to new and diverse student cohorts with differing information needs. The increased positioning of students as consumers by higher education means the student choice process has become complex. Drawing on a recently conferred doctorate, this article asks whether the messages sent by institutions about the motivation for undertaking a degree have changed during the recent period of massification of UK higher education. It asks how such changes are reflected, overtly or in coded form, in the institutional pre-entry ‘prospectus’ documents aimed at students. Taking a discourse-historical approach, the work identifies six periods of discourse change between 1976 and 2013, analysing prospectuses from four case-study institutions of different perceived status. The research finds that the materials homogenise gradually over the period and there is a concordant concealment of the differential status, purpose and offer of the institutions, alongside an increase in the functional importance of the coded signalling power of the differential prestige of undergraduate degrees within the UK. This research’s finding that the documents produced by institutions have become increasingly difficult to differentiate highlights equity issues in provision of marketing in terms of widening participation and fair access aims.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Knight, 2019. "Massification, Marketisation and Loss of Differentiation in Pre-Entry Marketing Materials in UK Higher Education," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:11:p:304-:d:281805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/11/304/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/11/304/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Marginson, 2016. "High Participation Systems of Higher Education," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 87(2), pages 243-271, March.
    2. Kem Saichaie & Christopher C. Morphew, 2014. "What College and University Websites Reveal about the Purposes of Higher Education," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 85(4), pages 499-530, July.
    3. Matthew Hartley & Christopher C. Morphew, 2008. "What's Being Sold and to What End? A Content Analysis of College Viewbooks," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(6), pages 671-691, November.
    4. Massimiliano BRATTI & Robin NAYLOR & Jeremy SMITH, 2008. "Heterogeneities in the returns to degrees: evidence from the British cohort study 1970," Departmental Working Papers 2008-40, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grinis, Inna, 2017. "The STEM requirements of "non-STEM" jobs: evidence from UK online vacancy postings and implications for skills & knowledge shortages," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 85123, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Silke L. Schneider, 2022. "The classification of education in surveys: a generalized framework for ex-post harmonization," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1829-1866, June.
    3. Marie-Agnès Détourbe & Gaële Goastellec, 2018. "Revisiting the Issues of Access to Higher Education and Social Stratification through the Case of Refugees: A Comparative Study of Spaces of Opportunity for Refugee Students in Germany and England," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Green, Francis & Henseke, Golo, 2021. "Europe's evolving graduate labour markets: supply, demand, underemployment and pay," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 55, pages 1-2.
    5. AbdulHafeez Muhammad & Ansar Siddique & Quadri Noorulhasan Naveed & Uzma Khaliq & Ali M. Aseere & Mohd Abul Hasan & Mohamed Rafik N. Qureshi & Basit Shahzad, 2021. "Evaluating Usability of Academic Websites through a Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Massimiliano Bratti & Alfonso Miranda, 2010. "Non‐pecuniary returns to higher education: the effect on smoking intensity in the UK," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(8), pages 906-920, August.
    7. Duryea, Suzanne & Ribas, Rafael P. & Sampaio, Breno & Sampaio, Gustavo R. & Trevisan, Giuseppe, 2023. "Who benefits from tuition-free, top-quality universities? Evidence from Brazil," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    8. Facchini, Marta & Triventi, Moris & Vergolini, Loris, 2019. "Do Grants Improve the Outcomes of University Students in a Context with High Dropout Rates? Evidence from a Matching Approach," SocArXiv k3gwv, Center for Open Science.
    9. Ireland, Norman & Naylor, Robin A. & Smith, Jeremy & Telhaj, Shqiponja, 2009. "Educational returns, ability composition and cohort effects: theory and evidence for cohorts of early-career UK graduates," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 28608, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Shu Wang & Xiao Yu & Kuo Zhang & Jipeng Pei & Karlis Rokpelnis & Xuelong Wang, 2022. "How does education affect intergenerational income mobility in Chinese society?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 774-792, May.
    11. Lawal O. Yesufu, 2018. "Motives and Measures of Higher Education Internationalisation: A Case Study of a Canadian University," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(2), pages 155-155, April.
    12. Jeongeun Kim, 2018. "The Functions and Dysfunctions of College Rankings: An Analysis of Institutional Expenditure," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(1), pages 54-87, February.
    13. Di Paolo, Antonio & Tansel, Aysit, 2017. "Analyzing Wage Differentials by Fields of Study: Evidence from Turkey," GLO Discussion Paper Series 91, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    14. Wang, Dong & Wang, Ziwei & Zong, Xiaohua, 2023. "Impact of economic policy uncertainty on higher education expansion," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    15. Jacob, W. James & Mok, Ka Ho & Cheng, Sheng Yao & Xiong, Weiyan, 2018. "Changes in Chinese higher education: Financial trends in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 64-85.
    16. Pierre Canisius Kamanzi & Gaële Goastellec & Laurence Pelletier, 2021. "Mass University and Social Inclusion: The Paradoxical Effect of Public Policies," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 32-43.
    17. Mara Marini & Stefano Livi & Laura Prislei & Chiara Parisse & Alessandra Cecalupo & Federica Scarci & Guido Benvenuto, 2023. "The Impact of Perceived Barriers to Career Advancement: A Study with a Sample of Italian University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    18. Jennifer M. Ferguson & Dave Griffiths, 2018. "Preparing Versus Persuading: Inequalities between Scottish State schools in University Application Guidance Practices," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-14, September.
    19. Carlo Perrotta, 2018. "Digital Learning in the UK: Sociological Reflections on an Unequal Marketplace," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-12, September.
    20. Weihui Mei & Lorraine Pe Symaco, 2021. "Higher Education for Development: The Role of University Towns in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:11:p:304-:d:281805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.