IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i24p3947-d1544329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Module Configuration of Rail Freight Transportation with Both Customer Segmentation and Product Family Genealogy in China

Author

Listed:
  • Weiya Chen

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    Rail Data Research and Application Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Shiying Tong

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    Rail Data Research and Application Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Ziyue Yuan

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    Rail Data Research and Application Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Xiaoping Fang

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    Rail Data Research and Application Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha 410075, China)

Abstract

The Chinese government is actively restructuring transportation to shift towards more sustainable rail freight transportation (RFT); however, there is still a lack of more systematic optimization in the whole production chain. This study develops a dual-focus modular configuration approach to explore the integration of customer demand and the production chain to achieve more sustainable operations in RFT. Customers have yielded eleven distinct groups, and operational processes have been segmented into sixteen modules by using the Ant Colony Optimization-based Fuzzy C-Means Clustering (ACOFCM) algorithm. Consequently, a Product Family Genealogy (PFG) model is conducted to identify three tailored product families (i.e., cross-border, multi-modal and general freight product). The developed dual-focus modular configuration approach has been proven to be feasible by utilizing a backtracking algorithm through a case study in an RFT logistics enterprise in China, which provides a standardization and optimization for RFT modular configurations.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiya Chen & Shiying Tong & Ziyue Yuan & Xiaoping Fang, 2024. "Module Configuration of Rail Freight Transportation with Both Customer Segmentation and Product Family Genealogy in China," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:24:p:3947-:d:1544329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/24/3947/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/24/3947/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leandro Gauss & Daniel P. Lacerda & Paulo A. Cauchick Miguel, 2021. "Module-based product family design: systematic literature review and meta-synthesis," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 265-312, January.
    2. Weiya Chen & Xiaoqi Shi & Xiaoping Fang & Yongzhuo Yu & Shiying Tong, 2023. "Research Context and Prospect of Green Railways in China Based on Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Dejan Makovsek & Vincent Benezech & Stephen Perkins, 2015. "Efficiency in Railway Operations and Infrastructure Management," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2015/12, OECD Publishing.
    4. Carliss Y. Baldwin & Kim B. Clark, 2000. "Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262024667, December.
    5. Du, Huibin & Chen, Zhenni & Peng, Binbin & Southworth, Frank & Ma, Shoufeng & Wang, Yuan, 2019. "What drives CO2 emissions from the transport sector? A linkage analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 195-204.
    6. Weiya Chen & Yongzhuo Yu & Xiaoping Fang & Ziyue Yuan & Shiying Tong, 2023. "Using Mixed Methods to Identify Evaluation Indicators for Green Railway Transportation Operations in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-20, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    2. Filippo Carlo Wezel & Gino Cattani & Johannes M. Pennings, 2006. "Competitive Implications of Interfirm Mobility," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(6), pages 691-709, December.
    3. Srivardhini K. Jha & E. Richard Gold & Laurette Dubé, 2021. "Modular Interorganizational Network Governance: A Conceptual Framework for Addressing Complex Social Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Singh, Anuraag & Triulzi, Giorgio & Magee, Christopher L., 2021. "Technological improvement rate predictions for all technologies: Use of patent data and an extended domain description," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    5. Seppo Kuula & Harri Haapasalo & Arto Tolonen, 2018. "Cost-efficient co-creation of knowledge intensive business services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(4), pages 779-808, December.
    6. Gambardella, Alfonso & Conti, Raffaele & Novelli, Elena, 2018. "Specializing in Generality: Firm Strategies When Intermediate Markets Work," CEPR Discussion Papers 12782, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Morgan Dwyer & Bruce Cameron & Zoe Szajnfarber, 2015. "A Framework for Studying Cost Growth on Complex Acquisition Programs," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(6), pages 568-583, November.
    8. Fei Li & Jin Chen & Ying Ying, 2019. "Innovation Search Scope, Technological Complexity, and Environmental Turbulence: A N-K Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-12, August.
    9. Gianmarco Garrisi & Cristina Cervelló-Pastor, 2019. "Train-Scheduling Optimization Model for Railway Networks with Multiplatform Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    10. Bruce Fallick & Charles A. Fleischman & James B. Rebitzer, 2006. "Job-Hopping in Silicon Valley: Some Evidence Concerning the Microfoundations of a High-Technology Cluster," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 88(3), pages 472-481, August.
    11. Markus Menz & Sven Kunisch & Julian Birkinshaw & David J. Collis & Nicolai J. Foss & Robert E. Hoskisson & John E. Prescott, 2021. "Corporate Strategy and the Theory of the Firm in the Digital Age," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(7), pages 1695-1720, November.
    12. Bent Flyvbjerg & Alexander Budzier & Jong Seok Lee & Mark Keil & Daniel Lunn & Dirk W. Bester, 2022. "The Empirical Reality of IT Project Cost Overruns: Discovering A Power-Law Distribution," Papers 2210.01573, arXiv.org.
    13. Scaringella, Laurent & Burtschell, François, 2017. "The challenges of radical innovation in Iran: Knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity highlights — Evidence from a joint venture in the construction sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 151-169.
    14. M. W. Geda & Pai Zheng & C. K. Kwong & Yuk Ming Tang, 2024. "A bilevel optimisation model for the joint configuration of new and remanufactured products considering specification upgrading of used products," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 2175-2191, June.
    15. Gianluigi Giustiziero & Tobias Kretschmer & Deepak Somaya & Brian Wu, 2023. "Hyperspecialization and hyperscaling: A resource‐based theory of the digital firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 1391-1424, June.
    16. Isabel Soares & Paula Sarmento, 2012. "Unbundling in the Telecommunications and the Electricity Sectors: How Far should it Go?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 157-194.
    17. Krafft Jackie & Quatraro Francesco & Colombelli Alessandra, 2011. "High Growth Firms and Technological Knowledge: Do gazelles follow exploration or exploitation strategies?," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201114, University of Turin.
    18. Yang, Chia-Hsuan & Nugent, Rebecca & Fuchs, Erica R.H., 2016. "Gains from others’ losses: Technology trajectories and the global division of firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 724-745.
    19. Sanjith Gopalakrishnan & Moksh Matta & Hasan Cavusoglu, 2022. "The Dark Side of Technological Modularity: Opportunistic Information Hiding During Interorganizational System Adoption," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1072-1092, September.
    20. Panos Constantinides & Ola Henfridsson & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 381-400, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:24:p:3947-:d:1544329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.