IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i1p98-d1561143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Investigation of Site Selection Decisions of Residential Development Projects in Hangzhou Based on Potential Market Segmentation

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Zhang

    (Center for Balance Architecture, Architectural Design and Research Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Bohong Wu

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Sijie Chen

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

Since 2016, strict regulatory policies have limited the size and financing channels of China’s urban real estate market. To adapt to the new situation, real estate developers need to adjust their development strategies and adopt more precise investment methods. In this respect, cost reduction, an accurate market positioning, and conducting detailed market research are particularly crucial. Given that the uneven development of the urban housing market has exacerbated urban segregation, urban residential space was subdivided into multiple potential submarkets. This study focuses on the land acquisition and the development of commercial residential projects in Hangzhou, China, from 2003 to 2022. Using the latent class analysis method based on the discrete choice model, the potential submarkets of Hangzhou’s housing development market are identified, and the project positioning and land selection preferences of developers are assessed. The results show that Hangzhou’s residential projects can be divided into five potential market categories: high-rise basic demand dwellings, high-end-improvement-type dwellings, luxury low-density dwellings, primary-improvement-type dwellings, and large-scale mixed-density dwellings. The importance of different land elements for developers when developing various types of projects is evaluated by calculating the willingness-to-pay coefficient. The findings of this study provide a comprehensive perspective for the government, real estate developers, and property owners to better understand the development dynamics on the supply side of the real estate market.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Zhang & Bohong Wu & Sijie Chen, 2025. "An Investigation of Site Selection Decisions of Residential Development Projects in Hangzhou Based on Potential Market Segmentation," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:98-:d:1561143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/1/98/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/1/98/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tatjana Ibraimovic & Stephane Hess, 2018. "A latent class model of residential choice behaviour and ethnic segregation preferences," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 544-564, May.
    2. Wu, Jing & Gyourko, Joseph & Deng, Yongheng, 2012. "Evaluating conditions in major Chinese housing markets," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 531-543.
    3. Kopczewska, Katarzyna & Ćwiakowski, Piotr, 2021. "Spatio-temporal stability of housing submarkets. Tracking spatial location of clusters of geographically weighted regression estimates of price determinants," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    4. Steven Bourassa & Eva Cantoni & Martin Hoesli, 2007. "Spatial Dependence, Housing Submarkets, and House Price Prediction," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 143-160, August.
    5. Jangik Jin & Hee-Yeon Lee, 2018. "Understanding residential location choices: an application of the UrbanSim residential location model on Suwon, Korea," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 216-235, April.
    6. Feng Lan & Qi Wu & Tao Zhou & Huili Da, 2018. "Spatial Effects of Public Service Facilities Accessibility on Housing Prices: A Case Study of Xi’an, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Arturo Bujanda & Thomas M. Fullerton, 2017. "Impacts of transportation infrastructure on single-family property values," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(51), pages 5183-5199, November.
    8. Zhang, Wenjia & Kockelman, Kara M., 2016. "Congestion pricing effects on firm and household location choices in monocentric and polycentric cities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-12.
    9. Brian Lee & Paul Waddell, 2010. "Residential mobility and location choice: a nested logit model with sampling of alternatives," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 587-601, July.
    10. Brett Smith & Doina Olaru, 2013. "Lifecycle Stages and Residential Location Choice in the Presence of Latent Preference Heterogeneity," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(10), pages 2495-2514, October.
    11. Zhi Dong & Tien Sing, 2014. "Developer Heterogeneity and Competitive Land Bidding," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 441-466, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Cranenburgh, Sander & Garrido-Valenzuela, Francisco, 2025. "Computer vision-enriched discrete choice models, with an application to residential location choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    2. Ying Fan & Charles Ka Yui Leung & Zan Yang, 2022. "Financial conditions, local competition, and local market leaders: The case of real estate developers," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 131-193, May.
    3. Sander van Cranenburgh & Francisco Garrido-Valenzuela, 2023. "Computer vision-enriched discrete choice models, with an application to residential location choice," Papers 2308.08276, arXiv.org.
    4. Robbennolt, Dale & Haddad, Angela J. & Mondal, Aupal & Bhat, Chandra R., 2024. "Housing choice in an evolving remote work landscape," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    5. Zhongming Lu & Frank Southworth & John Crittenden & Ellen Dunhum-Jones, 2015. "Market potential for smart growth neighbourhoods in the USA: A latent class analysis on heterogeneous preference and choice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(16), pages 3001-3017, December.
    6. Du, Rui & Zheng, Siqi, 2020. "Agglomeration, housing affordability, and new firm formation: The role of subway network," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    7. León, Carmelo J. & Hernández-Alemán, Anastasia & Fernández-Hernández, Carlos & Araña, Jorge E., 2023. "Are rural residents willing to trade-off higher noise for lower air pollution? Evidence from revealed preferences," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    8. Felix Haifeng Liao & Steven Farber & Reid Ewing, 2015. "Compact development and preference heterogeneity in residential location choice behaviour: A latent class analysis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(2), pages 314-337, February.
    9. Juergen Deppner & Marcelo Cajias, 2024. "Accounting for Spatial Autocorrelation in Algorithm-Driven Hedonic Models: A Spatial Cross-Validation Approach," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 235-273, February.
    10. Charles Ka Yui Leung & Joe Cho Yiu Ng & Edward Tang, 2020. "Why is the Hong Kong Housing Market Unaffordable? Some Stylized Facts and Estimations," Globalization Institute Working Papers 380, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
    11. Mark Rosenzweig & Junsen Zhang, 2014. "Co-residence, Life-Cycle Savings and Inter- Generational Support in Urban China," Working Papers 1039, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
    12. Arno Vlist & Daniel Czamanski & Henk Folmer, 2011. "Immigration and urban housing market dynamics: the case of Haifa," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 47(3), pages 585-598, December.
    13. Wu, Guiying Laura & Feng, Qu & Li, Pei, 2015. "Does local governments’ budget deficit push up housing prices in China?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 183-196.
    14. Carlos Garriga & Aaron Hedlund & Yang Tang & Ping Wang, 2023. "Rural-Urban Migration, Structural Transformation, and Housing Markets in China," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 413-440, April.
    15. Marko Kryvobokov, 2011. "Defining apartment neighbourhoods with Thiessen polygons and fuzzy equality clustering," ERES eres2011_142, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    16. Kaiji Chen & Yi Wen, 2017. "The Great Housing Boom of China," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(2), pages 73-114, April.
    17. Yongheng Deng & Joseph Gyourko & Jing Wu, 2012. "Land and House Price Measurement in China," NBER Working Papers 18403, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Zhang, Jianping & Xu, Runda & Chen, Jie, 2024. "Does industrial land marketization reform faciliate urban land use efficiency?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    19. Doddamani, Chetan & Manoj, M. & Maurya, Yashasvi, 2021. "Geographical scale of residential relocation and its impacts on vehicle ownership and travel behavior," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    20. Cai, Zhaoyang & Liu, Zhexi & Zuo, Siming & Cao, Shixiong, 2019. "Finding a Peaceful Road to Urbanization in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 560-563.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:98-:d:1561143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.