IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i9p952-d631541.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Features and Socio-Economic Sustainability of Traditional Chestnut Forestry Landscape in China: A Case of Kuancheng County, Hebei Province

Author

Listed:
  • Lulu He

    (College of Humanities and Development, China Agricultural University, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100094, China
    These authors have an equal contribution to this article.)

  • Qingwen Min

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 11A, Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19A Yuquan Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing 100049, China
    These authors have an equal contribution to this article.)

  • Chuanchun Hong

    (School of Management, Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
    School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China)

  • Yongxun Zhang

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhongguancun South Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

Since Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (IAHS) were launched by the FAO to protect the sustainable traditional agricultural systems around the world, their conservation has become a new difficult issue under the context of urbanization. Farmers in IAHS sites giving up small-scale traditional farming due to their low economic benefit and high labor intensity are considered as the main cause hindering effective conservation of these heritages. This study takes the Kuancheng traditional chestnut cultivation system (KTCCS) in northern China as a case to assess its economic and socio-cultural sustainability. Based on questionnaires and interviews, this study found that: the traditional ecological farming methods were still used by local farming households to plant chestnut trees; and most farmers support IAHS conservation. KTCCS performs economic and socio-cultural sustainability. For a household, the labor productivity of chestnut cultivation was 1.33 times that of their non-farm jobs because of the low labor input of chestnut cultivation. Farmers widely consider they live in a harmonious social environment but are lower than other households in economic status. Most farmers still lack an understanding of indigenous traditional knowledge and cultures. In the future, secondary and tertiary industries should be developed to provide farmers with employment opportunities in their hometowns for protecting KTCCS.

Suggested Citation

  • Lulu He & Qingwen Min & Chuanchun Hong & Yongxun Zhang, 2021. "Features and Socio-Economic Sustainability of Traditional Chestnut Forestry Landscape in China: A Case of Kuancheng County, Hebei Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:9:p:952-:d:631541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/9/952/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/9/952/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stallman, Heidi R. & James, Harvey S., 2015. "Determinants affecting farmers' willingness to cooperate to control pests," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 182-192.
    2. Francis H. D'Emden & Rick S. Llewellyn & Michael P. Burton, 2008. "Factors influencing adoption of conservation tillage in Australian cropping regions ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 52(2), pages 169-182, June.
    3. Fukamachi, Katsue, 2020. "Building resilient socio-ecological systems in Japan: Satoyama examples from Shiga Prefecture," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    4. Rochecouste, Jean-Francois & Dargusch, Paul & Cameron, Donald & Smith, Carl, 2015. "An analysis of the socio-economic factors influencing the adoption of conservation agriculture as a climate change mitigation activity in Australian dryland grain production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 20-30.
    5. Zhang, Yongxun & He, Lulu & Li, Xiande & Zhang, Canqiang & Qian, Chen & Li, Jingdong & Zhang, Aiping, 2019. "Why are the Longji Terraces in Southwest China maintained well? A conservation mechanism for agricultural landscapes based on agricultural multi-functions developed by multi-stakeholders," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 42-51.
    6. Lennox, Erin & Gowdy, John, 2014. "Ecosystem governance in a highland village in Peru: Facing the challenges of globalization and climate change," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 10(C), pages 155-163.
    7. D'Emden, Francis H. & Llewellyn, Rick S. & Burton, Michael P., 2008. "Factors influencing adoption of conservation tillage in Australian cropping regions," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 52(2), pages 1-14.
    8. Movahedi, Reza & Jawanmardi, Sina & Azadi, Hossein & Goli, Imaneh & Viira, Ants-Hannes & Witlox, Frank, 2021. "Why do farmers abandon agricultural lands? The case of Western Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Emerton, Lucy & Snyder, Katherine A., 2018. "Rethinking sustainable land management planning: Understanding the social and economic drivers of farmer decision-making in Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 684-694.
    10. Margaret M Calderon & Josefina T. Dizon & Asa Jose U. Sajise & Rogelio T. Andrada II & Nathaniel T. Bantayan & Myranel G. Salvador, 2009. "Towards the Development of a Sustainable Financing Mechanism for the Conservation of the Ifugao Rice Terraces in the Philippines," EEPSEA Research Report rr2009071, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), revised Jul 2009.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yongxun Zhang & Xiande Li, 2022. "Protecting Traditional Agricultural Landscapes by Promoting Industrial Integration Development: Practices from Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (IAHS) Sites in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Sun, Huaping & Tariq, Gulzara & Youn, Ik Joong & Mansoor, Sofia, 2022. "Impacts of green energy finance on eco-friendly environments," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    3. Maolin Li & Yongxun Zhang & Changhong Miao & Lulu He & Jiatao Chen, 2022. "Centennial Change and Source–Sink Interaction Process of Traditional Agricultural Landscape: Case from Xin’an Traditional Cherry Cultivation System (1920–2020)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schipmann, Christin & Qaim, Matin, 2009. "Modern Supply Chains and Product Innovation: How Can Smallholder Farmers Benefit?," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51046, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Micheels, Eric T. & Nolan, James F., 2016. "Examining the effects of absorptive capacity and social capital on the adoption of agricultural innovations: A Canadian Prairie case study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 127-138.
    3. Nordblom, Thomas L. & Penfold, Chris & Weckert, Melanie & Norton, Mark R., 2017. "Straw and living mulches compared with herbicide for under-vine weed control in a Public-Private Benefit Framework," 2017 Conference (61st), February 7-10, 2017, Brisbane, Australia 258677, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    4. Wade, Tara & Claassen, Roger, 2015. "Modeling No-Tillage Adoption by Corn and Soybean Producers: Insights into Sustained Adoption," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 204957, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Katherine Dentzman & Ian Cristofer Burke, 2021. "Herbicide Resistance, Tillage, and Community Management in the Pacific Northwest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Xin Yang & Yiming Sang, 2020. "How Does Part-Time Farming Affect Farmers’ Adoption of Conservation Agriculture in Jianghan Plain, China?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-12, August.
    7. Tingting Liu & Randall J. F. Bruins & Matthew T. Heberling, 2018. "Factors Influencing Farmers’ Adoption of Best Management Practices: A Review and Synthesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, February.
    8. Yigezu, Yigezu Atnafe & Mugera, Amin & El-Shater, Tamer & Aw-Hassan, Aden & Piggin, Colin & Haddad, Atef & Khalil, Yaseen & Loss, Stephen, 2018. "Enhancing adoption of agricultural technologies requiring high initial investment among smallholders," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 199-206.
    9. Rafia Afroz, 2017. "An Alternative Model for Supporting the Rice Farmers in Adaptation of Climate Change," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(5), pages 317-330.
    10. Massfeller, Anna & Meraner, Manuela & Hüttel, Silke & Uehleke, Reinhard, 2022. "Farmers' acceptance of results-based agri-environmental schemes: A German perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    11. Wang, Zhenhua & Liu, Qiaochu & Yang, Jian & Jiang, Jinqi, 2021. "Can Technology Demonstration Promote Rural Households’ Adoption of Conservation Tillage in the Main Grain-Producing Areas of China?," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315171, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Jacques Fils Pierre & Luis Latournerie-Moreno & René Garruña-Hernández & Krista L. Jacobsen & Carrie A. M. Laboski & Lucila de Lourdes Salazar-Barrientos & Esaú Ruiz-Sánchez, 2021. "Farmer Perceptions of Adopting Novel Legumes in Traditional Maize-Based Farming Systems in the Yucatan Peninsula," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Njabulo Lloyd Ntshangase & Brian Muroyiwa & Melusi Sibanda, 2018. "Farmers’ Perceptions and Factors Influencing the Adoption of No-Till Conservation Agriculture by Small-Scale Farmers in Zashuke, KwaZulu-Natal Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Valborg Kvakkestad & Åsmund Lægreid Steiro & Arild Vatn, 2021. "Pesticide Policies and Farm Behavior: The Introduction of Regulations for Integrated Pest Management," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, August.
    15. Kolikow, Steven & Kragt, Marit Ellen & Mugera, Amin W., 2012. "An interdisciplinary framework of limits and barriers to climate change adaptation in agriculture," Working Papers 120467, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    16. Marita Laukkanen & NAUGES Céline, 2009. "Environmental and production cost impacts of no-till: estimates from observed behavior," LERNA Working Papers 09.28.304, LERNA, University of Toulouse.
    17. Schimmelpfennig, David & Ebel, Robert, 2016. "Sequential Adoption and Cost Savings from Precision Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(1), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Thomas, Dean T. & Moore, Andrew D. & Bell, Lindsay W. & Webb, Nicholas P., 2018. "Ground cover, erosion risk and production implications of targeted management practices in Australian mixed farming systems: Lessons from the Grain and Graze program," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 123-135.
    19. Love Offeibea Asiedu-Ayeh & Xungang Zheng & Kobina Agbodah & Bright Senyo Dogbe & Adjei Peter Darko, 2022. "Promoting the Adoption of Agricultural Green Production Technologies for Sustainable Farming: A Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    20. Lisa Lobry de Bruyn & Susan Andrews, 2016. "Are Australian and United States Farmers Using Soil Information for Soil Health Management?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-33, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:9:p:952-:d:631541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.