IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i4p175-d1620137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Government Oversight and Institutional Influence: Exploring the Dynamics of Individual Adoption of Spot Bitcoin ETPs

Author

Listed:
  • Shirin Hasavari

    (Department of Information Science & Systems, Graves School of Business & Management, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA)

  • Mahed Maddah

    (Information Systems and Operations Management Department, Sawyer Business School, Suffolk University, Boston, MA 02108, USA)

  • Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh

    (Department of Information Systems & Business Analytics, College of Business, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

Abstract

Spot Bitcoin Exchange Traded Products (ETPs) are financial instruments enabling Bitcoin to be traded on traditional brokerage platforms, reducing the risks associated with direct Bitcoin exposure while addressing fraud and market manipulation concerns. This study examines the adoption of Spot Bitcoin ETPs, emphasizing the roles of financial and digital literacy, market dynamics, and regulatory frameworks in influencing individual investor behavior. Based on a survey of 428 U.S. respondents, financial literacy and early adopter traits were found to significantly enhance adoption likelihood (β = 0.458, p < 0.001). Government factors, such as compliance guidelines and tax policies, improved investor confidence and adoption rates (β = 0.409, p < 0.001). Market factors, including volatility and sentiment, played a notable yet secondary role (β = 0.34, p < 0.001). Institutional investment mediated the effects of regulatory and market dynamics on individual adoption, legitimizing Spot Bitcoin ETPs and fostering trust (β = 0.298, p < 0.001). The findings emphasize the need for clear regulations, robust disclosure requirements, and investor education to enhance adoption. Policymakers should focus on regulatory transparency to build investor confidence, while financial institutions can advance adoption by promoting financial and digital literacy. This study contributes to understanding how individual, market, and regulatory factors collectively drive the integration of regulated cryptocurrency products into mainstream finance.

Suggested Citation

  • Shirin Hasavari & Mahed Maddah & Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh, 2025. "Government Oversight and Institutional Influence: Exploring the Dynamics of Individual Adoption of Spot Bitcoin ETPs," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-25, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:4:p:175-:d:1620137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/4/175/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/4/175/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wolfgang Karl Härdle & Campbell R Harvey & Raphael C G Reule, 2020. "Understanding Cryptocurrencies," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 181-208.
    2. Umar Kayani & Fakhrul Hasan, 2024. "Unveiling Cryptocurrency Impact on Financial Markets and Traditional Banking Systems: Lessons for Sustainable Blockchain and Interdisciplinary Collaborations," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Rainer Böhme & Nicolas Christin & Benjamin Edelman & Tyler Moore, 2015. "Bitcoin: Economics, Technology, and Governance," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(2), pages 213-238, Spring.
    4. Rakowski, David, 2010. "Fund Flow Volatility and Performance," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 223-237, February.
    5. Wolfgang Karl Hardle & Campbell R. Harvey & Raphael C. G. Reule, 2020. "Editorial: Understanding Cryptocurrencies," Papers 2007.14702, arXiv.org.
    6. Segars, A. H., 1997. "Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement: a paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 107-121, February.
    7. Smales, L.A., 2019. "Bitcoin as a safe haven: Is it even worth considering?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 385-393.
    8. Bikhchandani, Sushil & Hirshleifer, David & Welch, Ivo, 1992. "A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change in Informational Cascades," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 100(5), pages 992-1026, October.
    9. Yukun Liu & Aleh Tsyvinski, 2021. "Risks and Returns of Cryptocurrency," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(6), pages 2689-2727.
    10. Ahmad Chokor & Élise Alfieri, 2021. "Long and short-term impacts of regulation in the cryptocurrency market," Post-Print hal-03275473, HAL.
    11. Chokor, Ahmad & Alfieri, Elise, 2021. "Long and short-term impacts of regulation in the cryptocurrency market," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 157-173.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee A. Smales, 2021. "Volatility Spillovers among Cryptocurrencies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-12, October.
    2. Muhammad Anas & Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad & Larisa Yarovaya, 2024. "The use of high-frequency data in cryptocurrency research: a meta-review of literature with bibliometric analysis," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-31, December.
    3. Daehan Kim & Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Doojin Ryu, 2021. "Are suspicious activity reporting requirements for cryptocurrency exchanges effective?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Walker, Clive B., 2024. "Going mainstream: Cryptocurrency narratives in newspapers," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Smales, L.A., 2022. "Investor attention in cryptocurrency markets," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Dirk G. Baur & Lee A. Smales, 2022. "Trading behavior in bitcoin futures: Following the “smart money”," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(7), pages 1304-1323, July.
    7. Chen, Bin-xia & Sun, Yan-lin, 2024. "Risk characteristics and connectedness in cryptocurrency markets: New evidence from a non-linear framework," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(PA).
    8. Arkorful, Gideon Bruce & Chen, Haiqiang & Gu, Ming & Liu, Xiaoqun, 2023. "What can we learn from the convenience yield of Bitcoin? Evidence from the COVID-19 crisis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 141-153.
    9. Zhao, Xiaojuan & Wang, Ye & Liu, Weiyi, 2024. "Someone like you: Lottery-like preference and the cross-section of expected returns in the cryptocurrency market," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    10. Sakkas, Athanasios & Urquhart, Andrew, 2024. "Blockchain factors," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    11. Baur, Dirk G. & Karlsen, Jonathan R. & Smales, Lee A. & Trench, Allan, 2024. "Digging deeper - Is bitcoin digital gold? A mining perspective," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    12. Florin Aliu & Ujkan Bajra & Naim Preniqi, 2021. "Analysis of diversification benefits for cryptocurrency portfolios before and during the COVID-19 pandemic," Studies in Economics and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(3), pages 444-457, September.
    13. Almeida, José & Gonçalves, Tiago Cruz, 2023. "A systematic literature review of investor behavior in the cryptocurrency markets," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    14. Liebi, Luca J., 2022. "Is there a value premium in cryptoasset markets?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    15. Yae, James & Tian, George Zhe, 2024. "Volatile safe-haven asset: Evidence from Bitcoin," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    16. Pattnaik, Debidutta & Hassan, M. Kabir & Dsouza, Arun & Tiwari, Aviral & Devji, Shridev, 2023. "Ex-post facto analysis of cryptocurrency literature over a decade using bibliometric technique," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    17. Luciano Somoza & Antoine Didisheim, 2022. "The End of the Crypto-Diversification Myth," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 22-53, Swiss Finance Institute.
    18. Danial Saef & Yuanrong Wang & Tomaso Aste, 2022. "Regime-based Implied Stochastic Volatility Model for Crypto Option Pricing," Papers 2208.12614, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    19. Ferdinand Thies & Sören Wallbach & Michael Wessel & Markus Besler & Alexander Benlian, 2022. "Initial coin offerings and the cryptocurrency hype - the moderating role of exogenous and endogenous signals," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1691-1705, September.
    20. Parthajit Kayal & Purnima Rohilla, 2021. "Bitcoin in the economics and finance literature: a survey," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(7), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:4:p:175-:d:1620137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.