IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i3p161-d1614758.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Greater Sustainability of Stablecoins Relative to Other Cryptocurrencies

Author

Listed:
  • Adi Wolfson

    (Green Processes Center, Sami Shamoon Collage of Engineering, Beer-Sheva 8410802, Israel)

  • Gerard Khaladjan

    (Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel)

  • Yotam Lurie

    (Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel)

  • Shlomo Mark

    (Software Engineering Department, Sami Shamoon Collage of Engineering, Beer-Sheva 8410802, Israel)

Abstract

Cryptocurrencies are decentralized digital financial services that do not physically exist in the world of tangible products and goods, and therefore purportedly offer some positive environmental sustainability features. However, since they are based on blockchain technology, which requires a relatively large input of energy, their climatic impact is not benign. Furthermore, they are very volatile and characterized by low levels of transparency and control, thus creating some negative economic and social sustainability effects. Stablecoins, which are a pegged type of cryptocurrency, exhibit much less volatility and have higher levels of management and interoperability. This raises the following question: are stablecoins more sustainable compared to other cryptocurrencies? To explore this, a sustainability assessment was conducted, comparing cryptocurrencies and stablecoins across environmental, social, and economic dimensions while identifying the key characteristics of sustainability. It was found that stablecoins can mitigate the economic and social risks associated with cryptocurrencies and thus increase their overall sustainability. Moreover, since stablecoins are managed and governed to a greater extent, a key consideration in their development is the selection and implementation of more appropriate mechanisms that can reduce energy use and enhance sustainability. Finally, stablecoins offer more effective—and not just more efficient—solutions, based on value co-creation between several providers and a customer.

Suggested Citation

  • Adi Wolfson & Gerard Khaladjan & Yotam Lurie & Shlomo Mark, 2025. "The Greater Sustainability of Stablecoins Relative to Other Cryptocurrencies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:161-:d:1614758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/3/161/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/3/161/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ante, Lennart & Fiedler, Ingo & Strehle, Elias, 2021. "The impact of transparent money flows: Effects of stablecoin transfers on the returns and trading volume of Bitcoin," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    2. Ayten Kahya & Bhaskar Krishnamachari & Seokgu Yun, 2021. "Reducing the Volatility of Cryptocurrencies -- A Survey of Stablecoins," Papers 2103.01340, arXiv.org.
    3. Igor Makarov & Antoinette Schoar, 2022. "Cryptocurrencies and Decentralized Finance (DeFi)," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 53(1 (Spring), pages 141-215.
    4. Mohammad El Hajj & Imad Farran, 2024. "The Cryptocurrencies in Emerging Markets: Enhancing Financial Inclusion and Economic Empowerment," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-27, October.
    5. Davidson, Sinclair & De Filippi, Primavera & Potts, Jason, 2018. "Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(4), pages 639-658, August.
    6. Igor Makarov & Antoinette Schoar, 2022. "Cryptocurrencies and Decentralized Finance (DeFi)," NBER Working Papers 30006, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Pradipta Kumar SAHOO, 2017. "Bitcoin as digital money: Its growth and future sustainability," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(4(613), W), pages 53-64, Winter.
    8. Tobias Hahn & Frank Figge & Jonatan Pinkse & Lutz Preuss, 2010. "Trade‐offs in corporate sustainability: you can't have your cake and eat it," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(4), pages 217-229, May.
    9. Makarov, Igor & Schoar, Antoinette, 2022. "Cryptocurrencies and decentralized finance (DeFi)," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117711, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bogdan Adamyk & Vladlena Benson & Oksana Adamyk & Oksana Liashenko, 2025. "Risk Management in DeFi: Analyses of the Innovative Tools and Platforms for Tracking DeFi Transactions," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-31, January.
    2. repec:osf:osfxxx:ube2z_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Dimitriadis, Konstantinos A. & Koursaros, Demetris & Savva, Christos S., 2024. "Evaluating the sophisticated digital assets and cryptocurrencies capacities of substituting international currencies in inflationary eras," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    4. José Zapata Sevilla, 2024. "Analysing decentralised autonomous organisations (DAOs): limits and perspective," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 425-436, December.
    5. João Almeida & João Alves & Carlos Bettencourt & Maria Bettencourt & Madalena Borges & Filipa Castilho & Sónia Correia & Gisela Fonseca & Mariana Júdice & André Leal & Afonso Marques & Carla Marques &, 2024. "Occasional paper on Decentralised Finance," Working Papers o202402, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    6. Allen, Franklin & Barbalau, Adelina, 2024. "Security design: A review," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    7. Natalie Slawinski & Jonatan Pinkse & Timo Busch & Subhabrata Bobby Banerjeed, 2014. "The role of short-termism and uncertainty in organizational inaction on climate change: multilevel framework," Working Papers hal-00961226, HAL.
    8. Wu, WenTing & Chen, XiaoQian & Zvarych, Roman & Huang, WeiLun, 2024. "The Stackelberg duel between Central Bank Digital Currencies and private payment titans in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    9. Iulia-Monica Oehler-Șincai & Claudia Gabriela Baicu & Sorin-Nicolae Curcă, 2022. "Fragmentation and Concentration within the International Payments, System – Risks, Challenges, Opportunities," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 10(2), pages 35-45, December.
    10. Emmanuelle Reuter, 2022. "Hybrid business models in the sharing economy: The role of business model design for managing the environmental paradox," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 603-618, February.
    11. Simone Carmine & Valentina De Marchi, 2023. "Reviewing Paradox Theory in Corporate Sustainability Toward a Systems Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 139-158, April.
    12. Fortin, Mélissa & Pimentel, Erica, 2024. "Bitcoin: An accounting regime," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. Catherine Le Roux & Marius Pretorius, 2016. "Conceptualizing the Limiting Issues Inhibiting Sustainability Embeddedness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-22, April.
    14. Kirsti Iivonen, 2018. "Defensive Responses to Strategic Sustainability Paradoxes: Have Your Coke and Drink It Too!," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 309-327, March.
    15. Fabien Martinez, 2014. "Corporate strategy and the environment: towards a four-dimensional compatibility model for fostering green management decisions," Post-Print hal-02887618, HAL.
    16. Allen, Darcy W.E. & Berg, Chris & Markey-Towler, Brendan & Novak, Mikayla & Potts, Jason, 2020. "Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    17. Jacob D. Leshno & Elaine Shi & Rafael Pass, 2024. "On the Viability of Open-Source Financial Rails: Economic Security of Permissionless Consensus," Papers 2409.08951, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2025.
    18. Łęt, Blanka & Sobański, Konrad & Świder, Wojciech & Włosik, Katarzyna, 2023. "What drives the popularity of stablecoins? Measuring the frequency dynamics of connectedness between volatile and stable cryptocurrencies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    19. Tina C. Ambos & Katherine Tatarinov, 2022. "Building Responsible Innovation in International Organizations through Intrapreneurship," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 92-125, January.
    20. Hellen Ogutu & Youssef El Archi & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Current trends in sustainable organization management: A bibliometric analysis," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(1), pages 11-45, March.
    21. Teck Ming Tan & Saila Saraniemi, 2023. "Trust in blockchain-enabled exchanges: Future directions in blockchain marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 914-939, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:161-:d:1614758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.