IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v16y2023i1p49-d1034245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Employees’ Energy Saving in the Workplace: DR and the Philippines’ Realities

Author

Listed:
  • Luis J. Camacho

    (School of Business, SUNY Empire State College, College Road, Selden, NY 11784, USA)

  • Michael Pasco

    (Graduate School of Business, San Beda University, 638 Mendiola St., San Miguel, Manila 1005, Philippines)

  • Moises Banks

    (School of Economic and Business Sciences, APEC University, Máximo Gomez 72, Santo Domingo 10100, Dominican Republic)

  • Randall Pasco

    (College of Business Administration, Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng, San Pablo 4000, Philippines)

  • Marisela Almanzar

    (School of Marketing and International Business, APEC University, Máximo Gomez 72, Santo Domingo 10100, Dominican Republic)

  • Alvin Rodriguez

    (Graduate School of Engineering, APEC University, Máximo Gomez 72, Santo Domingo 10100, Dominican Republic)

  • Akinlawon Amoo

    (Department of Entrepreneurial Studies and Management, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4001, South Africa)

  • Nelda Rosima

    (College of Accountancy, Business and Economics, Batangas State University, Lipa 4200, Philippines)

Abstract

Understanding how employees act at work to save energy and the meaning for sustainability and environmental protection is essential. This research aimed to analyze the influences of Subjective Norms (SN), Descriptive Norms (DN), and Environmental Knowledge (EK) on employees’ intention to save energy (ISE) in the Philippines (PH) and the Dominican Republic (DR). The effects of SN, DN, and EK on ISE were evaluated by comparing two developing countries and the mediation effect of EK on the relationship between DN, SN, and ISE. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), followed by structural equation modeling and path analysis based on samples collected from employees from DR (340) and PH (339), was performed. Also, construct convergent and discriminant validity were assessed using composite reliability, maximal reliability, average variance extracted, and maximum shared variance. The findings of this study indicate that SN influences ISE positively among employees in PH (β = 0.15, p < 0.05) but not among employees in DR. Descriptive Norms positively influence ISE among employees in PH (β = 0.47, p < 0.01) and DR (β = 0.27, p < 0.01), while EK has a positive and significant influence on the ISE among employees in PH (β = 0.22, p < 0.01) and not in DR. There is a partial mediation effect between SN and EK on ISE when EK is the mediator in PH, and no mediation effects for RD. The intention to save energy is significant in economic terms because reducing energy consumption can help decrease energy costs and improve business profitability and competitiveness; in social terms, it can reduce energy consumption worldwide and improve social health, reducing gas emissions and pollution.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis J. Camacho & Michael Pasco & Moises Banks & Randall Pasco & Marisela Almanzar & Alvin Rodriguez & Akinlawon Amoo & Nelda Rosima, 2023. "Understanding Employees’ Energy Saving in the Workplace: DR and the Philippines’ Realities," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:49-:d:1034245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/1/49/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/1/49/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    2. Park, C Whan & Mothersbaugh, David L & Feick, Lawrence, 1994. "Consumer Knowledge Assessment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 71-82, June.
    3. Olawole Fawehinmi & Mohd Yusoff Yusliza & Zaleha Mohamad & Juhari Noor Faezah & Zikri Muhammad, 2020. "Assessing the green behaviour of academics," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 41(7), pages 879-900, January.
    4. Guomin Li & Wei Li & Zihan Jin & Zhihao Wang, 2019. "Influence of Environmental Concern and Knowledge on Households’ Willingness to Purchase Energy-Efficient Appliances: A Case Study in Shanxi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Patrick Moriarty & Damon Honnery, 2019. "Energy Efficiency or Conservation for Mitigating Climate Change?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Imran Hossain & Maria Fekete-Farkas & Md. Nekmahmud, 2022. "Purchase Behavior of Energy-Efficient Appliances Contribute to Sustainable Energy Consumption in Developing Country: Moral Norms Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Zhu, Weiwei & Wei, Jiuchang & Zhao, Dingtao, 2016. "Anti-nuclear behavioral intentions: The role of perceived knowledge, information processing, and risk perception," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 168-177.
    3. Hyun Joo Kwon & Mira Ahn & Jiyun Kang, 2021. "The Effects of Knowledge Types on Consumer Decision Making for Non-Toxic Housing Materials and Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Olawale Fatoki, 2022. "Determinants of Employee Electricity Saving Behavior in Small Firms: The Role of Benefits and Leadership," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2022. "Beyond the triangle of renewable energy acceptance: The five dimensions of domestic hydrogen acceptance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    6. Krishna Moorthy & Aufa Amalina Kamarudin & Lee Xin & Lim Min Hui & Lim Thong Way & Puah Sien Fang & Wong Carmen, 2021. "Green packaging purchase behaviour: a study on Malaysian consumers," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 15391-15412, October.
    7. Samah Ibnou-Laaroussi & Husam Rjoub & Wing-Keung Wong, 2020. "Sustainability of Green Tourism among International Tourists and Its Influence on the Achievement of Green Environment: Evidence from North Cyprus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    8. ShiYong Zheng & Hua Liu & Weili Guan & Yuping Yang & JiaYing Li & Shah Fahad & Biqing Li, 2022. "Identifying Intention-Based Factors Influencing Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Electric Vehicles: A Sustainable Consumption Paradigm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Martinho, Graça & Pires, Ana & Portela, Gonçalo & Fonseca, Miguel, 2015. "Factors affecting consumers’ choices concerning sustainable packaging during product purchase and recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 58-68.
    10. Roh, Taewoo & Seok, Junhee & Kim, Yaeri, 2022. "Unveiling ways to reach organic purchase: Green perceived value, perceived knowledge, attitude, subjective norm, and trust," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    11. Francesco Testa & Silvia Sarti & Marco Frey, 2019. "Are green consumers really green? Exploring the factors behind the actual consumption of organic food products," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 327-338, February.
    12. Olawole Fawehinmi & Mohd Yusoff Yusliza & Samuel Ogbeibu & M. Imran Tanveer & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour, 2022. "Academic employees' green behaviour as praxis for bolstering environmental sustainable development: A linear moderated mediation evaluation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3470-3490, November.
    13. Olawole Fawehinmi & M. Y. Yusliza & Wan Zulkifli Wan Kasim & Zaleha Mohamad & Muhammad Abi Sofian Abdul Halim, 2020. "Exploring the Interplay of Green Human Resource Management, Employee Green Behavior, and Personal Moral Norms," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    14. Muhammad Yaseen Bhutto & Xiaohui Liu & Yasir Ali Soomro & Myriam Ertz & Yasser Baeshen, 2020. "Adoption of Energy-Efficient Home Appliances: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    15. Kim, Hyeyoung & House, Lisa A., 2014. "Linking Consumer Health Perceptions to Consumption of Nonalcoholic Beverages," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 43(1), pages 1-16, April.
    16. Imran Hossain & Md. Nekmahmud & Maria Fekete-Farkas, 2022. "How Do Environmental Knowledge, Eco-Label Knowledge, and Green Trust Impact Consumers’ Pro-Environmental Behaviour for Energy-Efficient Household Appliances?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, May.
    17. Angshuman Ghosh & Sanjeev Varshney & Pingali Venugopal, 2014. "Social Media WOM: Definition, Consequences and Inter-relationships," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 39(3), pages 293-308, August.
    18. Barbara Borusiak & Andrzej Szymkowiak & Bartłomiej Pierański & Katarzyna Szalonka, 2021. "The Impact of Environmental Concern on Intention to Reduce Consumption of Single-Use Bottled Water," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, April.
    19. Alessia Cavaliere & Silvia Pigliafreddo & Elisa De Marchi & Alessandro Banterle, 2020. "Do Consumers Really Want to Reduce Plastic Usage? Exploring the Determinants of Plastic Avoidance in Food-Related Consumption Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-15, November.
    20. Lin, Boqiang & Lan, Tianxu, 2023. "Progress of increasing-block electricity pricing policy implementation in China's first-tier cities and the impact of resident policy perception," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:49-:d:1034245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.