IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v14y2021i7p308-d589162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis on Probability of Volatility Clusters on Cryptocurrencies, and FOREX Currencies

Author

Listed:
  • Usha Rekha Chinthapalli

    (Independent Researcher, H. No: 5-7-12, Housing Board Colony, Pakabanda Bazar, Khammam 507001, India)

Abstract

In recent years, the attention of investors, practitioners and academics has grown in cryptocurrency. Initially, the cryptocurrency was designed as a viable digital currency implementation, and subsequently, numerous derivatives were produced in a range of sectors, including nonmonetary activities, financial transactions, and even capital management. The high volatility of exchange rates is one of the main features of cryptocurrencies. The article presents an interesting way to estimate the probability of cryptocurrency volatility clusters. In this regard, the paper explores exponential hybrid methodologies GARCH (or EGARCH) and through its portrayal as a financial asset, ANN models will provide analytical insight into bitcoin. Meanwhile, more scalable modelling is needed to fit financial variable characteristics such as ANN models because of the dynamic, nonlinear association structure between financial variables. For financial forecasting, BP is contained in the most popular methods of neural network training. The backpropagation method is employed to train the two models to determine which one performs the best in terms of predicting. This architecture consists of one hidden layer and one input layer with N neurons. Recent theoretical work on crypto-asset return behavior and risk management is supported by this research. In comparison with other traditional asset classes, these results give appropriate data on the behavior, allowing them to adopt the suitable investment decision. The study conclusions are based on a comparison between the dynamic features of cryptocurrencies and FOREX Currency’s traditional mass financial asset. Thus, the result illustrates how well the probability clusters show the impact on cryptocurrency and currencies. This research covers the sample period between August 2017 and August 2020, as cryptocurrency became popular around that period. The following methodology was implemented and simulated using Eviews and SPSS software. The performance evaluation of the cryptocurrencies is compared with FOREX currencies for better comparative study respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Usha Rekha Chinthapalli, 2021. "A Comparative Analysis on Probability of Volatility Clusters on Cryptocurrencies, and FOREX Currencies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:308-:d:589162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/7/308/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/7/308/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael McAleer & Christian M. Hafner, 2014. "A One Line Derivation of EGARCH," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-6, June.
    2. Catania, Leopoldo & Proietti, Tommaso, 2020. "Forecasting volatility with time-varying leverage and volatility of volatility effects," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1301-1317.
    3. Koosakul, Jakree & Shim, Ilhyock, 2021. "The effects of asset price volatility on market participation: Evidence from the Thai foreign exchange market," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    4. Asai, Manabu & Gupta, Rangan & McAleer, Michael, 2020. "Forecasting volatility and co-volatility of crude oil and gold futures: Effects of leverage, jumps, spillovers, and geopolitical risks," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 933-948.
    5. Rognone, Lavinia & Hyde, Stuart & Zhang, S. Sarah, 2020. "News sentiment in the cryptocurrency market: An empirical comparison with Forex," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    6. Dritsaki, Chaido, 2019. "Modeling the Volatility of Exchange Rate Currency using GARCH Model," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 72(2), pages 209-230.
    7. Ataurima Arellano, Miguel & Rodríguez, Gabriel, 2020. "Empirical modeling of high-income and emerging stock and Forex market return volatility using Markov-switching GARCH models," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    8. Altan, Aytaç & Karasu, Seçkin & Bekiros, Stelios, 2019. "Digital currency forecasting with chaotic meta-heuristic bio-inspired signal processing techniques," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 325-336.
    9. Nelson, Daniel B, 1991. "Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 347-370, March.
    10. Trinidad Segovia, J.E. & Fernández-Martínez, M. & Sánchez-Granero, M.A., 2019. "A novel approach to detect volatility clusters in financial time series," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 535(C).
    11. Tan, Shay-Kee & Ng, Kok-Haur & Chan, Jennifer So-Kuen & Mohamed, Ibrahim, 2019. "Quantile range-based volatility measure for modelling and forecasting volatility using high frequency data," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 537-551.
    12. Ruipeng Liu & Riza Demirer & Rangan Gupta & Mark Wohar, 2020. "Volatility forecasting with bivariate multifractal models," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 155-167, March.
    13. Cho, Jae-Beom & Min, Hong-Ghi & McDonald, Judith Ann, 2020. "Volatility and dynamic currency hedging," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    14. Belasen, Ariel R. & Demirer, Rıza, 2019. "Commodity-currencies or currency-commodities: Evidence from causality tests," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 162-168.
    15. Reus, Lorenzo & Carrasco, José A. & Pincheira, Pablo, 2020. "Do it with a smile: Forecasting volatility with currency options," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    16. Ho, Kin-Yip & Shi, Yanlin & Zhang, Zhaoyong, 2017. "Does news matter in China’s foreign exchange market? Chinese RMB volatility and public information arrivals," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 302-321.
    17. Su, Fei, 2021. "Conditional volatility persistence and volatility spillovers in the foreign exchange market," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    18. Wen, Tiange & Wang, Gang-Jin, 2020. "Volatility connectedness in global foreign exchange markets," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    19. Afees A. Salisu & Oluwatomisinn Oyewole & Ismail O. Fasanya, 2017. "Modelling Return and Volatility Spillovers in Global Foreign Exchange Markets," Working Papers 030, Centre for Econometric and Allied Research, University of Ibadan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Alaminos & M. Belén Salas & Manuel Á. Fernández-Gámez, 2023. "Quantum Monte Carlo simulations for estimating FOREX markets: a speculative attacks experience," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junru Zhang & Hadrian Geri Djajadikerta & Zhaoyong Zhang, 2018. "Does Sustainability Engagement Affect Stock Return Volatility? Evidence from the Chinese Financial Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Chia-Lin Chang & Shu-Han Hsu & Michael McAleer, 2018. "An Event Study Analysis of Political Events, Disasters, and Accidents for Chinese Tourists to Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-77, November.
    3. Chia-Lin Chang & Yiying Li & Michael McAleer, 2018. "Volatility Spillovers between Energy and Agricultural Markets: A Critical Appraisal of Theory and Practice," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Chang, C-L. & Hsu, S.-H. & McAleer, M.J., 2018. "An Event Study of Chinese Tourists to Taiwan," Econometric Institute Research Papers 2018-003/III, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    5. Guillaume Gaetan Martinet & Michael McAleer, 2018. "On the invertibility of EGARCH(p, q)," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(8), pages 824-849, September.
    6. Caporin, Massimiliano & Chang, Chia-Lin & McAleer, Michael, 2019. "Are the S&P 500 index and crude oil, natural gas and ethanol futures related for intra-day data?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 50-70.
    7. Gong, Yuting & Li, Kevin X. & Chen, Shu-Ling & Shi, Wenming, 2020. "Contagion risk between the shipping freight and stock markets: Evidence from the recent US-China trade war," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    8. David E. Allen & Michael McAleer, 2018. "Theoretical and Empirical Differences between Diagonal and Full BEKK for Risk Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Michael McAleer, 2014. "Asymmetry and Leverage in Conditional Volatility Models," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-6, September.
    10. Zhang, Li & Wang, Lu & Peng, Lijuan & Luo, Keyu, 2023. "Measuring the response of clean energy stock price volatility to extreme shocks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1289-1300.
    11. Xiafei Li & Dongxin Li & Xuhui Zhang & Guiwu Wei & Lan Bai & Yu Wei, 2021. "Forecasting regular and extreme gold price volatility: The roles of asymmetry, extreme event, and jump," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(8), pages 1501-1523, December.
    12. Kostyrka, Andreï & Malakhov, Dmitry, 2021. "Was there ever a shift: Empirical analysis of structural-shift tests for return volatility," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 61, pages 110-139.
    13. Anastasios Zopiatis & Christos S. Savva & Neophytos Lambertides & Michael McAleer, 2016. "Tourism stocks in times of crises: An econometric investigation of non-macro factors," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2016-18, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico.
    14. Viviane Naimy & José-María Montero & Rim El Khoury & Nisrine Maalouf, 2020. "Market Volatility of the Three Most Powerful Military Countries during Their Intervention in the Syrian War," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-21, May.
    15. Dey, Asim K. & Hoque, G.M. Toufiqul & Das, Kumer P. & Panovska, Irina, 2022. "Impacts of COVID-19 local spread and Google search trend on the US stock market," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 589(C).
    16. Tetsuya Takaishi, 2021. "Time-varying properties of asymmetric volatility and multifractality in Bitcoin," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Karima Saci, 2022. "Modelling the Relationship Between Trading Volume and Stock Returns Volatility for Islamic and Conventional Banks: The Case of Saudi Arabia نمذجة العلاقة بين حجم التداول وتقلب عوائد الأسهم للبنوك الإس," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 35(1), pages 41-55, January.
    18. Chia-Lin Chang & Tai-Lin Hsieh & Michael McAleer, 2018. "Connecting VIX and Stock Index ETF with VAR and Diagonal BEKK," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, September.
    19. Chang, Chia-Lin & McAleer, Michael & Wang, Yu-Ann, 2018. "Modelling volatility spillovers for bio-ethanol, sugarcane and corn spot and futures prices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1002-1018.
    20. Chang, Chia-Lin & McAleer, Michael, 2017. "The correct regularity condition and interpretation of asymmetry in EGARCH," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 52-55.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:308-:d:589162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.