IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/emetrv/v37y2018i8p824-849.html

On the invertibility of EGARCH(p, q)

Author

Listed:
  • Guillaume Gaetan Martinet
  • Michael McAleer

Abstract

Of the two most widely estimated univariate asymmetric conditional volatility models, the exponential GARCH (or EGARCH) specification is said to be able to capture asymmetry, which refers to the different effects on conditional volatility of positive and negative effects of equal magnitude, and leverage, which refers to the negative correlation between the returns shocks and subsequent shocks to volatility. However, the statistical properties of the (quasi-)maximum likelihood estimator (QMLE) of the EGARCH(p, q) parameters are not available under general conditions, but only for special cases under highly restrictive and unverifiable sufficient conditions, such as EGARCH(1,0) or EGARCH(1,1), and possibly only under simulation. A limitation in the development of asymptotic properties of the QMLE for the EGARCH(p, q) model is the lack of an invertibility condition for the returns shocks underlying the model. It is shown in this article that the EGARCH(p, q) model can be derived from a stochastic process, for which sufficient invertibility conditions can be stated simply and explicitly when the parameters respect a simple condition.11Using the notation introduced in part 2, this refers to the cases where α ≥ |γ| or α ≤ − |γ|. The first inequality is generally assumed in the literature related to the invertibility of EGARCH. This article provides (in the Appendix) an argument for the possible lack of invertibility when these conditions are not met. This will be useful in reinterpreting the existing properties of the QMLE of the EGARCH(p, q) parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillaume Gaetan Martinet & Michael McAleer, 2018. "On the invertibility of EGARCH(p, q)," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(8), pages 824-849, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:37:y:2018:i:8:p:824-849
    DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2016.1167994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07474938.2016.1167994
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07474938.2016.1167994?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chia-Lin Chang & Yiying Li & Michael McAleer, 2018. "Volatility Spillovers between Energy and Agricultural Markets: A Critical Appraisal of Theory and Practice," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Urom, Christian & Onwuka, Kevin O. & Uma, Kalu E. & Yuni, Denis N., 2020. "Regime dependent effects and cyclical volatility spillover between crude oil price movements and stock returns," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 10-29.
    3. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer & Chien-Hsun Wang, 2017. "An Econometric Analysis of ETF and ETF Futures in Financial and Energy Markets Using Generated Regressors," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Amélie Charles & Olivier Darné, 2019. "The accuracy of asymmetric GARCH model estimation," Post-Print hal-01943883, HAL.
    5. Blasques, Francisco & van Brummelen, Janneke & Gorgi, Paolo & Koopman, Siem Jan, 2024. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Non-Stationary Location Models with Mixture of Normal Distributions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 238(1).
    6. Charles, Amélie & Darné, Olivier, 2019. "The accuracy of asymmetric GARCH model estimation," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 179-202.
    7. Chang, Chia-Lin & McAleer, Michael & Wang, Yu-Ann, 2018. "Modelling volatility spillovers for bio-ethanol, sugarcane and corn spot and futures prices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1002-1018.
    8. Rangan Gupta & Chi Keung Marco Lau & Seong-Min Yoon, 2019. "OPEC News Announcement Effect on Volatility in the Crude Oil Market: A Reconsideration," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 23(4), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Chang, Chia-Lin & McAleer, Michael, 2017. "The correct regularity condition and interpretation of asymmetry in EGARCH," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 52-55.
    10. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer & Yu-Ann Wang, 2016. "Modelling volatility spillovers for bio-ethanol, sugarcane and corn," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2016-03, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico.
    11. Jeffrey Chu & Stephen Chan & Saralees Nadarajah & Joerg Osterrieder, 2017. "GARCH Modelling of Cryptocurrencies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, October.
    12. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-01943883 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Manabu Asai & Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer, 2016. "Realized Matrix-Exponential Stochastic Volatility with Asymmetry, Long Memory and Spillovers," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2016-15, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico.
    14. Yongdeng Xu, 2025. "The exponential HEAVY model: an improved approach to volatility modeling and forecasting," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 727-748, August.
    15. Manabu Asai & Michael McAleer, 2016. "Asymptotic Theory for Extended Asymmetric Multivariate GARCH Processes," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 16-071/III, Tinbergen Institute.
    16. Xiaoyi Shen & Albert K. Tsui & Zhaoyong Zhang, 2019. "Volatility Timing in CPF Investment Funds in Singapore: Do They Outperform Non-CPF Funds?," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Junru Zhang & Hadrian Geri Djajadikerta & Zhaoyong Zhang, 2018. "Does Sustainability Engagement Affect Stock Return Volatility? Evidence from the Chinese Financial Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, September.
    18. You-How Go & Wee-Yeap Lau, 2020. "Does Trading Volume explain the Information Flow of Crude Palm Oil Futures Returns?," The Review of Finance and Banking, Academia de Studii Economice din Bucuresti, Romania / Facultatea de Finante, Asigurari, Banci si Burse de Valori / Catedra de Finante, vol. 12(2), pages 115-136, December.
    19. Xu, Yongdeng, 2024. "Extended multivariate EGARCH model: A model for zero†return and negative spillovers," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2024/24, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section.
    20. Dey, Asim K. & Hoque, G.M. Toufiqul & Das, Kumer P. & Panovska, Irina, 2022. "Impacts of COVID-19 local spread and Google search trend on the US stock market," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 589(C).
    21. Zhang, Junru & Zhang, Zhaoyong, 2021. "CSR, Media and Stock Illiquidity: Evidence from Chinese Listed Financial Firms," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    22. Onur Özdemir, 2022. "Cue the volatility spillover in the cryptocurrency markets during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from DCC-GARCH and wavelet analysis," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-38, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes
    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
    • C50 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - General
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:37:y:2018:i:8:p:824-849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/LECR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.