IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v14y2021i11p530-d674068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of a Portfolio of Investment Projects: A Real Options Approach Using the Omega Measure

Author

Listed:
  • Javier G. Castro

    (Department of Production Engineering, Technology Center, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina—UFSC, Florianópolis 88040-900, Brazil)

  • Edison A. Tito

    (Department of Management, IAG Business School, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro—PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro 22451-045, Brazil)

  • Luiz E. Brandão

    (Department of Management, IAG Business School, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro—PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro 22451-045, Brazil)

Abstract

Investment decisions usually involve the assessment of more than one financial asset or investment project (real asset). The most appropriate way to analyze the viability of a real asset is not to study it in isolation but as part of a portfolio with correlations between the input variables of the projects. This study proposes an optimization methodology for a portfolio of investment projects with real options based on maximizing the Omega performance measure. The classic portfolio optimization methodology uses the Sharpe ratio as the objective function, which is a function of the mean-variance of the returns of the portfolio distribution. The advantage of using Omega as an objective function is that it takes into account all moments of the portfolio’s distribution of returns or net present values (NPVs), not restricting the analysis to its mean and variance. We present an example to illustrate the proposed methodology, using the Monte Carlo simulation as the main tool due to its high flexibility in modeling uncertainties. The results show that the best risk-return ratio is obtained by optimizing the Omega measure.

Suggested Citation

  • Javier G. Castro & Edison A. Tito & Luiz E. Brandão, 2021. "Optimization of a Portfolio of Investment Projects: A Real Options Approach Using the Omega Measure," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:530-:d:674068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/11/530/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/11/530/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maier, Sebastian & Pflug, Georg C. & Polak, John W., 2020. "Valuing portfolios of interdependent real options under exogenous and endogenous uncertainties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 133-147.
    2. van Bekkum, Sjoerd & Pennings, Enrico & Smit, Han, 2009. "A real options perspective on R&D portfolio diversification," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 1150-1158, September.
    3. Mansini, Renata & Ogryczak, Wlodzimierz & Speranza, M. Grazia, 2014. "Twenty years of linear programming based portfolio optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 518-535.
    4. Avinash K. Dixit & Robert S. Pindyck, 1994. "Investment under Uncertainty," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 5474.
    5. James L. Smith and Rex Thompson, 2008. "Managing a Portfolio of Real options: Sequential Exploration of Dependent Prospects," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 43-62.
    6. Medaglia, Andres L. & Graves, Samuel B. & Ringuest, Jeffrey L., 2007. "A multiobjective evolutionary approach for linearly constrained project selection under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(3), pages 869-894, June.
    7. James E. Smith, 2005. "Alternative Approaches for Solving Real-Options Problems," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 2(2), pages 89-102, June.
    8. Hassanzadeh, Farhad & Nemati, Hamid & Sun, Minghe, 2014. "Robust optimization for interactive multiobjective programming with imprecise information applied to R&D project portfolio selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 41-53.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Amy M. & Li, Huanan, 2020. "Incorporating the impacts of climate change in transportation infrastructure decision models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 271-287.
    2. Alain Bensoussan & Benoit Chevalier-Roignant & Alejandro Rivera, 2022. "A model for wind farm management with option interactions," Post-Print hal-04325553, HAL.
    3. Secomandi, Nicola, 2022. "Quadratic hedging of risk neutral values," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Jafarzadeh, M. & Tareghian, H.R. & Rahbarnia, F. & Ghanbari, R., 2015. "Optimal selection of project portfolios using reinvestment strategy within a flexible time horizon," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(2), pages 658-664.
    5. Pennings, H.P.G., 2010. "Does Contract Complexity Limit Opportunities? Vertical Organization and Flexibility," ERIM Inaugural Address Series Research in Management EIA-2010-044-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam..
    6. Alexander, Carol & Chen, Xi & Ward, Charles, 2021. "Risk-adjusted valuation for real option decisions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 1046-1064.
    7. Nicola Secomandi, 2020. "Quadratic Hedging and Optimization of Option Exercise Policies," Papers 2001.05788, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    8. Dalton Garcia Borges de Souza & Erivelton Antonio dos Santos & Nei Yoshihiro Soma & Carlos Eduardo Sanches da Silva, 2021. "MCDM-Based R&D Project Selection: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-34, October.
    9. Gordon Briest & Elmar Lukas & Sascha H. Mölls & Timo Willershausen, 2020. "Innovation speed under uncertainty and competition," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(8), pages 1517-1527, December.
    10. Sungchul Kim & Ronald Giachetti & Sangsung Park, 2018. "Real Options Analysis for Acquisition of New Technology: A Case Study of Korea K2 Tank’s Powerpack," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, October.
    11. E. Brandão, Luiz & Dyer, James S. & Hahn, Warren J., 2012. "Volatility estimation for stochastic project value models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 642-648.
    12. Carlos Andrés Zapata Quimbayo, 2020. "OPCIONES REALES Una guía teórico-práctica para la valoración de inversiones bajo incertidumbre mediante modelos en tiempo discreto y simulación de Monte Carlo," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionales, number 138, August.
    13. Sebastian Maier, 2021. "Re-evaluating natural resource investments under uncertainty: An alternative to limited traditional approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 907-937, April.
    14. Jorge Tarifa-Fernández & Ana María Sánchez-Pérez & Salvador Cruz-Rambaud, 2019. "Internet of Things and Their Coming Perspectives: A Real Options Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, June.
    15. Sahoo, Nihar R. & Mohapatra, Pratap K.J. & Mahanty, Biswajit, 2017. "Compliance choice analysis for India's thermal power sector in the market-based energy efficiency regime," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 624-633.
    16. B R Cobb & J M Charnes, 2010. "A graphical method for valuing switching options," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(11), pages 1596-1606, November.
    17. Giovanna Lo Nigro & Azzurra Morreale & Lorenzo Abbate, 2016. "An Open Innovation Decision Support System to Select a Biopharmaceutical R&D Portfolio," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(6), pages 392-406, September.
    18. Wang, Juite & Yang, Chung-Yu, 2012. "Flexibility planning for managing R&D projects under risk," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 823-831.
    19. Secomandi, Nicola & Seppi, Duane J., 2014. "Real Options and Merchant Operations of Energy and Other Commodities," Foundations and Trends(R) in Technology, Information and Operations Management, now publishers, vol. 6(3-4), pages 161-331, July.
    20. Ben Abdallah, Skander & Lasserre, Pierre, 2016. "Asset retirement with infinitely repeated alternative replacements: Harvest age and species choice in forestry," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 144-164.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:530-:d:674068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.