IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v13y2025i2p79-d1650003.html

Financial Literacy and Financial Well-Being Amid Varying Economic Conditions: Evidence from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking 2017–2022

Author

Listed:
  • Vivekananda Das

    (Department of Family and Consumer Studies, College of Social and Behavioral Science, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA)

Abstract

This study examines whether the gaps in four financial well-being (FWB) indicators—emergency fund availability, spending less than income, perceived financial comfort, and no credit card debt—between groups with varying levels of financial literacy changed during the economic disruptions of 2020–2022 compared to the more stable period of 2017–2019. Using data from the 2017–2022 waves of the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking conducted by the Federal Reserve Board, this study applies difference-in-differences and event study methods to explore these trends. Descriptive findings, consistent with prior research, show that respondents with higher financial literacy reported greater FWB across all years. Regression estimates based on respondents who provided definitive answers (correct or incorrect) to the Big Three financial literacy questions suggest that the pre-existing gaps in emergency fund availability and perceived financial comfort between respondents with higher and lower financial literacy widened in 2020–2022, whereas the gap in spending less than income remained unchanged. There is some evidence of a widening gap in the likelihood of having no credit card debt, but the estimates are less conclusive. In general, these results indicate that higher financial literacy might have served as a protective factor for some aspects of FWB amid the challenging economic conditions of 2020–2022. However, results based on respondents who provided either correct or “don’t know” answers to the same questions differ in direction from the results of the earlier analysis. The findings of this study have implications for measuring financial literacy and investigating its role in shaping FWB.

Suggested Citation

  • Vivekananda Das, 2025. "Financial Literacy and Financial Well-Being Amid Varying Economic Conditions: Evidence from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking 2017–2022," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-39, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:79-:d:1650003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/2/79/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/2/79/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ferdi Botha & John P. New & Sonja C. New & David C. Ribar & Nicolás Salamanca, 2021. "Implications of COVID-19 labour market shocks for inequality in financial wellbeing," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 34(2), pages 655-689, April.
    2. Annamaria Lusardi & Olivia S. Mitchell, 2008. "Planning and Financial Literacy: How Do Women Fare?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(2), pages 413-417, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohd Sufian Ab Kadir & Maimunah Johari & Ngau Duo Seng & Nor Balkish Zakaria & Norlinda Tendot Abu Bakar, 2025. "Determinants of Financial Retirement Planning in Malaysia: A Conceptual Paper," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(8), pages 2884-2893, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Y. Campbell, 2016. "Restoring Rational Choice: The Challenge of Consumer Financial Regulation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 1-30, May.
    2. Bottazzi, Laura & Lusardi, Annamaria, 2021. "Stereotypes in financial literacy: Evidence from PISA," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Angelici, Marta & Del Boca, Daniela & Oggero, Noemi & Profeta, Paola & Rossi, Maria Cristina & Villosio, Claudia, 2022. "Pension information and women’s awareness," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 23(C).
    4. Mitchell, O.S. & Piggott, J., 2016. "Workplace-Linked Pensions for an Aging Demographic," Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, in: Piggott, John & Woodland, Alan (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 865-904, Elsevier.
    5. Elisabeth Beckmann & Lukas Olbrich & Joseph Sakshaug, 2024. "Multivariate assessment of interviewer-related errors in a cross-national economic survey (Lukas Olbrich, Elisabeth Beckmann, Joseph W. Sakshaug)," Working Papers 253, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank).
    6. Bannier, Christina E. & Neubert, Milena, 2016. "Gender differences in financial risk taking: The role of financial literacy and risk tolerance," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 130-135.
    7. Sseruyange, J. & Bulte, E., 2018. "Do Incentives matter for Knowledge Diffusion? Experimental Evidence from Uganda," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275896, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Bertocchi, Graziella & Brunetti, Marianna & Torricelli, Costanza, 2014. "Who holds the purse strings within the household? The determinants of intra-family decision making," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 65-86.
    9. Florian Deuflhard & Dimitris Georgarakos & Roman Inderst, 2019. "Financial Literacy and Savings Account Returns," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 131-164.
    10. Cheng, Zhiming & Smyth, Russell & Zhang, Le, 2024. "Does childhood adversity affect household portfolio decisions? Evidence from the Chinese Great Famine," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Deborah A. Cobb-Clark & Sonja C. Kassenboehmer & Mathias G. Sinning, 2013. "Locus of Control and Savings," Ruhr Economic Papers 0455, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.
    12. Fisch, Jill E. & Wilkinson-Ryan, Tess & Firth, Kristin, 2016. "Investor financial literacy in the workplace," CFS Working Paper Series 554, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    13. Michael Ziegelmeyer & Julius Nick, 2013. "Backing out of private pension provision: lessons from Germany," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 40(3), pages 505-539, August.
    14. Dohmen, Thomas & Falk, Armin & Huffman, David & Marklein, Felix & Sunde, Uwe, 2009. "Biased probability judgment: Evidence of incidence and relationship to economic outcomes from a representative sample," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 903-915, December.
    15. Lim, Thien Sang & Mail, Rasid & Abd Karim, Mohd Rahimie & Ahmad Baharul Ulum, Zatul Karamah & Jaidi, Junainah & Noordin, Raman, 2018. "A serial mediation model of financial knowledge on the intention to invest: The central role of risk perception and attitude," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 74-79.
    16. Thomas A. Hanson, 2022. "Family Communication, Privacy Orientation, & Financial Literacy: A Survey of U.S. College Students," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-13, November.
    17. Bechly, Paul Lorin, 2019. "An Examination of Demographic Differences in Obtaining Investment and Financial Planning Information," OSF Preprints vn8yj, Center for Open Science.
    18. Lena Dräger & Ulrich Fritsche, 2013. "Don't Worry, Be Right! Survey Wording Effects on In flation Perceptions and Expectations," Macroeconomics and Finance Series 201308, University of Hamburg, Department of Socioeconomics.
    19. Grohmann, Antonia & Hamdan, Jana S., 2020. "The Effect of Self-Control on Borrowing: Experimental Evidence," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 264, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    20. Beata Bieszk-Stolorz & Krzysztof Dmytrów, 2022. "Assessment of the Similarity of the Situation in the EU Labour Markets and Their Changes in the Face of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:79-:d:1650003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.