IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i6p1228-d151790.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eigenvector Spatial Filtering Regression Modeling of Ground PM 2.5 Concentrations Using Remotely Sensed Data

Author

Listed:
  • Jingyi Zhang

    (School of Resource and Environment Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Bin Li

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA)

  • Yumin Chen

    (School of Resource and Environment Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Meijie Chen

    (School of Resource and Environment Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Tao Fang

    (School of Resource and Environment Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Yongfeng Liu

    (Wuhan Geomatics Institute, Wuhan 430022, China)

Abstract

This paper proposes a regression model using the Eigenvector Spatial Filtering (ESF) method to estimate ground PM 2.5 concentrations. Covariates are derived from remotely sensed data including aerosol optical depth, normal differential vegetation index, surface temperature, air pressure, relative humidity, height of planetary boundary layer and digital elevation model. In addition, cultural variables such as factory densities and road densities are also used in the model. With the Yangtze River Delta region as the study area, we constructed ESF-based Regression (ESFR) models at different time scales, using data for the period between December 2015 and November 2016. We found that the ESFR models effectively filtered spatial autocorrelation in the OLS residuals and resulted in increases in the goodness-of-fit metrics as well as reductions in residual standard errors and cross-validation errors, compared to the classic OLS models. The annual ESFR model explained 70% of the variability in PM 2.5 concentrations, 16.7% more than the non-spatial OLS model. With the ESFR models, we performed detail analyses on the spatial and temporal distributions of PM 2.5 concentrations in the study area. The model predictions are lower than ground observations but match the general trend. The experiment shows that ESFR provides a promising approach to PM 2.5 analysis and prediction.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingyi Zhang & Bin Li & Yumin Chen & Meijie Chen & Tao Fang & Yongfeng Liu, 2018. "Eigenvector Spatial Filtering Regression Modeling of Ground PM 2.5 Concentrations Using Remotely Sensed Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:6:p:1228-:d:151790
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/6/1228/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/6/1228/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Won Kim, Chong & Phipps, Tim T. & Anselin, Luc, 2003. "Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 24-39, January.
    2. Chuanglin Fang & Haimeng Liu & Guangdong Li & Dongqi Sun & Zhuang Miao, 2015. "Estimating the Impact of Urbanization on Air Quality in China Using Spatial Regression Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Yongwan Chun & Daniel A. Griffith & Monghyeon Lee & Parmanand Sinha, 2016. "Eigenvector selection with stepwise regression techniques to construct eigenvector spatial filters," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 67-85, January.
    4. Yongwan Chun & Daniel Griffith & Monghyeon Lee & Parmanand Sinha, 2016. "Eigenvector selection with stepwise regression techniques to construct eigenvector spatial filters," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 67-85, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daoru Liu & Qinli Deng & Zeng Zhou & Yaolin Lin & Junwei Tao, 2018. "Variation Trends of Fine Particulate Matter Concentration in Wuhan City from 2013 to 2017," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel A. Griffith & Yongwan Chun & Jan Hauke, 2022. "A Moran eigenvector spatial filtering specification of entropy measures," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(1), pages 259-279, February.
    2. Wenwen Sun & Daisuke Murakami & Xin Hu & Zhuoran Li & Akari Nakai Kidd & Chunlu Liu, 2023. "Supply–Demand Imbalance in School Land: An Eigenvector Spatial Filtering Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Oshan, Taylor M., 2020. "The spatial structure debate in spatial interaction modeling: 50 years on," OSF Preprints 42vxn, Center for Open Science.
    4. Rodolfo Metulini & Roberto Patuelli & Daniel A. Griffith, 2018. "A Spatial-Filtering Zero-Inflated Approach to the Estimation of the Gravity Model of Trade," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Donegan, Connor & Chun, Yongwan & Hughes, Amy E., 2020. "Bayesian estimation of spatial filters with Moran's eigenvectors and hierarchical shrinkage priors," OSF Preprints fah3z, Center for Open Science.
    6. Lan Hu & Yongwan Chun & Daniel A. Griffith, 2020. "Uncovering a positive and negative spatial autocorrelation mixture pattern: a spatial analysis of breast cancer incidences in Broward County, Florida, 2000–2010," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 291-308, July.
    7. Lan Hu & Daniel A. Griffith & Yongwan Chun, 2018. "Space-Time Statistical Insights about Geographic Variation in Lung Cancer Incidence Rates: Florida, USA, 2000–2011," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Chagas, André L.S. & Azzoni, Carlos R. & Almeida, Alexandre N., 2016. "A spatial difference-in-differences analysis of the impact of sugarcane production on respiratory diseases," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 24-36.
    9. Daniel A. Griffith, 2019. "Negative Spatial Autocorrelation: One of the Most Neglected Concepts in Spatial Statistics," Stats, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-28, August.
    10. Charlotte Ham & John B. Loomis & Patricia A. Champ, 2015. "Relative Economic Values of Open Space Provided by National Forest and Military Lands to Surrounding Communities," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 81-96, March.
    11. S. Wong & C. Yiu & K. Chau, 2013. "Trading Volume-Induced Spatial Autocorrelation in Real Estate Prices," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 596-608, May.
    12. Li, Kunming & Fang, Liting & He, Lerong, 2019. "How population and energy price affect China's environmental pollution?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 386-396.
    13. Tapsuwan, Sorada & Polyakov, Maksym & Bark, Rosalind & Nolan, Martin, 2015. "Valuing the Barmah–Millewa Forest and in stream river flows: A spatial heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent (SHAC) approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 98-105.
    14. Tuo Shi & Yuanman Hu & Miao Liu & Chunlin Li & Chuyi Zhang & Chong Liu, 2020. "How Do Economic Growth, Urbanization, and Industrialization Affect Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations? An Assessment in Liaoning Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-14, July.
    15. Zhuang Miao & Tomas Baležentis & Zhihua Tian & Shuai Shao & Yong Geng & Rui Wu, 2019. "Environmental Performance and Regulation Effect of China’s Atmospheric Pollutant Emissions: Evidence from “Three Regions and Ten Urban Agglomerations”," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(1), pages 211-242, September.
    16. Sunak, Yasin & Madlener, Reinhard, 2012. "The Impact of Wind Farms on Property Values: A Geographically Weighted Hedonic Pricing Model," FCN Working Papers 3/2012, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN), revised Mar 2013.
    17. Gayer Gabrielle & Gilboa Itzhak & Lieberman Offer, 2007. "Rule-Based and Case-Based Reasoning in Housing Prices," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-37, April.
    18. Malayaranjan Sahoo & Narayan Sethi, 2022. "The dynamic impact of urbanization, structural transformation, and technological innovation on ecological footprint and PM2.5: evidence from newly industrialized countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 4244-4277, March.
    19. Sanglim Yoo & John E. Wagner, 2016. "A review of the hedonic literatures in environmental amenities from open space: a traditional econometric vs. spatial econometric model," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 141-166, March.
    20. O. Ashton Morgan & Stuart E. Hamilton, 2009. "Disentangling Access and View Amenities in Access-restricted Coastal Residential Communities," Working Papers 09-10, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:6:p:1228-:d:151790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.