IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v11y2014i2p1279-1298d32409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of Telehealth Service Implementation Frameworks

Author

Listed:
  • Liezl Van Dyk

    (Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa)

Abstract

Despite the potential of telehealth services to increase the quality and accessibility of healthcare, the success rate of such services has been disappointing. The purpose of this paper is to find and compare existing frameworks for the implementation of telehealth services that can contribute to the success rate of future endeavors. After a thorough discussion of these frameworks, this paper outlines the development methodologies in terms of theoretical background, methodology and validation. Finally, the common themes and formats are identified for consideration in future implementation. It was confirmed that a holistic implementation approach is needed, which includes technology, organizational structures, change management, economic feasibility, societal impacts, perceptions, user-friendliness, evaluation and evidence, legislation, policy and governance. Furthermore, there is some scope for scientifically rigorous framework development and validation approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Liezl Van Dyk, 2014. "A Review of Telehealth Service Implementation Frameworks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:2:p:1279-1298:d:32409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/2/1279/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/2/1279/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pelletier-Fleury, Nathalie & Fargeon, Valerie & Lanoe, Jean-Louis & Fardeau, Michele, 1997. "Transaction costs economics as a conceptual framework for the analysis of barriers to the diffusion of telemedicine," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Paul Attewell, 1992. "Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pavani Rangachari & Swapandeep S. Mushiana & Krista Herbert, 2021. "A Narrative Review of Factors Historically Influencing Telehealth Use across Six Medical Specialties in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Samar Helou & Elie El Helou & Victoria Abou-Khalil & Jad Wakim & Jeanine El Helou & Alain Daher & Charline El Hachem, 2020. "The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Physicians’ Use and Perception of Telehealth: The Case of Lebanon," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Chun-Hsun Chen & Yu-Li Lan & Wei-Pang Yang & Fang-Ming Hsu & Chin-Lon Lin & Hsing-Chu Chen, 2019. "Exploring the Impact of a Telehealth Care System on Organizational Capabilities and Organizational Performance from a Resource-Based Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Cannavacciuolo, Lorella & Capaldo, Guido & Ponsiglione, Cristina, 2023. "Digital innovation and organizational changes in the healthcare sector: Multiple case studies of telemedicine project implementation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    5. Catalin Popescu & Hani EL-Chaarani & Zouhour EL-Abiad & Iza Gigauri, 2022. "Implementation of Health Information Systems to Improve Patient Identification," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Fernández Coves, Andrea & Yeung, Karene Hoi Ting & van der Putten, Ingeborg M & Nelson, E. Anthony S, 2022. "Teleconsultation adoption since COVID-19: Comparison of barriers and facilitators in primary care settings in Hong Kong and the Netherlands," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(10), pages 933-944.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pavani Rangachari & Swapandeep S. Mushiana & Krista Herbert, 2021. "A Narrative Review of Factors Historically Influencing Telehealth Use across Six Medical Specialties in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Fındık, Derya & Tansel, Aysit, 2013. "Resources on the stage: a firm level analysis of the ict adoption in Turkey," MPRA Paper 65956, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Aug 2014.
    3. Ashwin W. Joshi, 2017. "OEM implementation of supplier-developed component innovations: the role of supplier actions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 548-568, July.
    4. Gediminas Adomavicius & Jesse Bockstedt & Alok Gupta, 2012. "Modeling Supply-Side Dynamics of IT Components, Products, and Infrastructure: An Empirical Analysis Using Vector Autoregression," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 397-417, June.
    5. Haijun Bao & Xiaoting Zhu & Yingying Cen & Yi Peng & Jibin Xue, 2018. "Effects of Social Network on Human Capital of Land-Lost Farmers: A Study in Zhejiang Province," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 167-187, May.
    6. Harborne, Paul & Hendry, Chris, 2009. "Pathways to commercial wind power in the US, Europe and Japan: The role of demonstration projects and field trials in the innovation process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 3580-3595, September.
    7. Christopher J. Blackburn & Mallory E. Flowers & Daniel C. Matisoff & Juan Moreno‐Cruz, 2020. "Do Pilot and Demonstration Projects Work? Evidence from a Green Building Program," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 1100-1132, September.
    8. Fuentelsaz, Lucio & Gómez, Jaime & Palomas, Sergio, 2016. "Interdependences in the intrafirm diffusion of technological innovations: Confronting the rational and social accounts of diffusion," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 951-963.
    9. Christopher F Baum & Hans Lööf & Pardis Nabavi, 2019. "Innovation strategies, external knowledge and productivity growth," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 348-367, March.
    10. Prasanna Tambe & Lorin M. Hitt, 2014. "Job Hopping, Information Technology Spillovers, and Productivity Growth," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 338-355, February.
    11. Tomomi Hamada, 2019. "Determinants of Decision-Makers’ Attitudes toward Industry 4.0 Adaptation," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Domenico Raucci & Dominique Lepore, 2020. "A Simplified Activity-Based Costing Approach for SMEs: The Case Study of an Italian Small Road Company," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 198-214.
    13. Xiong, Hang & Payne, Diane & Kinsella, Stephen, 2016. "Peer effects in the diffusion of innovations: Theory and simulation," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-13.
    14. Myriam Le Goff-Pronost & Claude Sicotte, 2010. "The added value of thorough economic evaluation of telemedicine networks," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 11(1), pages 45-55, February.
    15. Prasanna Tambe, 2014. "Big Data Investment, Skills, and Firm Value," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1452-1469, June.
    16. Fabrizio, Kira R. & Hawn, Olga, 2013. "Enabling diffusion: How complementary inputs moderate the response to environmental policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1099-1111.
    17. Paola Perez-Aleman, 2011. "Collective Learning in Global Diffusion: Spreading Quality Standards in a Developing Country Cluster," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 173-189, February.
    18. Tedi Skiti, 2020. "Institutional entry barriers and spatial technology diffusion: Evidence from the broadband industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(7), pages 1336-1361, July.
    19. Feng Zhang & Guohua Jiang, 2019. "Combination of Complementary Technological Knowledge to Generate “Hard to Imitate” Technologies," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(02), pages 1-24, June.
    20. Vachara Peansupap & Derek Walker, 2006. "Innovation diffusion at the implementation stage of a construction project: a case study of information communication technology," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 321-332.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:2:p:1279-1298:d:32409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.