IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v8y2015i9p9211-9265d54920.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Critical Review of Robustness in Power Grids Using Complex Networks Concepts

Author

Listed:
  • Lucas Cuadra

    (Department of Signal Processing and Communications, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares,Madrid 28805, Spain)

  • Sancho Salcedo-Sanz

    (Department of Signal Processing and Communications, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares,Madrid 28805, Spain)

  • Javier Del Ser

    (OPTIMA Area, TECNALIA, 48160 Derio, Bizkaia, Spain)

  • Silvia Jiménez-Fernández

    (Department of Signal Processing and Communications, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares,Madrid 28805, Spain)

  • Zong Woo Geem

    (Department of Energy IT, Gachon University, Seongnam 461-701, Korea)

Abstract

This paper reviews the most relevant works that have investigated robustness in power grids using Complex Networks (CN) concepts. In this broad field there are two different approaches. The first one is based solely on topological concepts, and uses metrics such as mean path length, clustering coefficient, efficiency and betweenness centrality, among many others. The second, hybrid approach consists of introducing (into the CN framework) some concepts from Electrical Engineering (EE) in the effort of enhancing the topological approach, and uses novel, more efficient electrical metrics such as electrical betweenness, net-ability, and others. There is however a controversy about whether these approaches are able to provide insights into all aspects of real power grids. The CN community argues that the topological approach does not aim to focus on the detailed operation, but to discover the unexpected emergence of collective behavior, while part of the EE community asserts that this leads to an excessive simplification. Beyond this open debate it seems to be no predominant structure (scale-free, small-world) in high-voltage transmission power grids, the vast majority of power grids studied so far. Most of them have in common that they are vulnerable to targeted attacks on the most connected nodes and robust to random failure. In this respect there are only a few works that propose strategies to improve robustness such as intentional islanding, restricted link addition, microgrids and Energies 2015, 8 9212 smart grids, for which novel studies suggest that small-world networks seem to be the best topology.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucas Cuadra & Sancho Salcedo-Sanz & Javier Del Ser & Silvia Jiménez-Fernández & Zong Woo Geem, 2015. "A Critical Review of Robustness in Power Grids Using Complex Networks Concepts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-55, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:9:p:9211-9265:d:54920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/9/9211/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/9/9211/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johansson, Jonas & Hassel, Henrik & Zio, Enrico, 2013. "Reliability and vulnerability analyses of critical infrastructures: Comparing two approaches in the context of power systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 27-38.
    2. Pagani, Giuliano Andrea & Aiello, Marco, 2014. "Power grid complex network evolutions for the smart grid," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 396(C), pages 248-266.
    3. Francis, Royce & Bekera, Behailu, 2014. "A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 90-103.
    4. Dorogovtsev, S. N. & Mendes, J.F.F., 2013. "Evolution of Networks: From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199686711.
    5. Siano, Pierluigi, 2014. "Demand response and smart grids—A survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 461-478.
    6. Ramon Ferrer i Cancho & Christiaan Janssen & Ricard V. Solé, 2001. "The Topology of Technology Graphs: Small World Patterns in Electronic Circuits," Working Papers 01-05-029, Santa Fe Institute.
    7. M. E. J. Newman & D. J. Watts, 1999. "Renormalization Group Analysis of the Small-World Network Model," Working Papers 99-04-029, Santa Fe Institute.
    8. R. Kinney & P. Crucitti & R. Albert & V. Latora, 2005. "Modeling cascading failures in the North American power grid," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 46(1), pages 101-107, July.
    9. Giuliano Andrea Pagani & Marco Aiello, 2015. "A complex network approach for identifying vulnerabilities of the medium and low voltage grid," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 36-61.
    10. Luis M. Varela & Giulia Rotundo & Marcel Ausloos & Jesús Carrete, 2015. "Complex Network Analysis in Socioeconomic Models," Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance, in: Pasquale Commendatore & Saime Kayam & Ingrid Kubin (ed.), Complexity and Geographical Economics, edition 127, pages 209-245, Springer.
    11. Lingen Luo & Marti Rosas-Casals, 2015. "Correlating empirical data and extended topological measures in power grid networks," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 82-96.
    12. Martí Rosas-Casals & Sandro Bologna & Ettore F. Bompard & Gregorio D'Agostino & Wendy Ellens & Giuliano Andrea Pagani & Antonio Scala & Trivik Verma, 2015. "Knowing power grids and understanding complexity science," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 4-14.
    13. Wei, Du Qu & Luo, Xiao Shu & Zhang, Bo, 2012. "Analysis of cascading failure in complex power networks under the load local preferential redistribution rule," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(8), pages 2771-2777.
    14. Xu, Yan & Gurfinkel, Aleks Jacob & Rikvold, Per Arne, 2014. "Architecture of the Florida power grid as a complex network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 401(C), pages 130-140.
    15. Chassin, David P. & Posse, Christian, 2005. "Evaluating North American electric grid reliability using the Barabási–Albert network model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 355(2), pages 667-677.
    16. Zhang, Guidong & Li, Zhong & Zhang, Bo & Halang, Wolfgang A., 2013. "Understanding the cascading failures in Indian power grids with complex networks theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(15), pages 3273-3280.
    17. Réka Albert & Hawoong Jeong & Albert-László Barabási, 2000. "Error and attack tolerance of complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6794), pages 378-382, July.
    18. Trucco, P. & Cagno, E. & De Ambroggi, M., 2012. "Dynamic functional modelling of vulnerability and interoperability of Critical Infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 51-63.
    19. Wang, Shuliang & Hong, Liu & Chen, Xueguang, 2012. "Vulnerability analysis of interdependent infrastructure systems: A methodological framework," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(11), pages 3323-3335.
    20. Antonio Scala & Sakshi Pahwa & Caterina M. Scoglio, 2015. "Cascade failures and distributed generation in power grids," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 27-35.
    21. Havlin, Shlomo & Stanley, H. Eugene & Bashan, Amir & Gao, Jianxi & Kenett, Dror Y., 2015. "Percolation of interdependent network of networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 4-19.
    22. Arends, Marcel & Hendriks, Paul H.J., 2014. "Smart grids, smart network companies," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 1-11.
    23. Bagler, Ganesh, 2008. "Analysis of the airport network of India as a complex weighted network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(12), pages 2972-2980.
    24. Steven H. Strogatz, 2001. "Exploring complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 410(6825), pages 268-276, March.
    25. Ouyang, Min, 2014. "Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 43-60.
    26. Peng, Xingzhao & Yao, Hong & Du, Jun & Wang, Zhe & Ding, Chao, 2015. "Invulnerability of scale-free network against critical node failures based on a renewed cascading failure model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 421(C), pages 69-77.
    27. Crucitti, Paolo & Latora, Vito & Marchiori, Massimo, 2004. "A topological analysis of the Italian electric power grid," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 338(1), pages 92-97.
    28. Pahwa, S. & Youssef, M. & Schumm, P. & Scoglio, C. & Schulz, N., 2013. "Optimal intentional islanding to enhance the robustness of power grid networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(17), pages 3741-3754.
    29. Wei, Du Qu & Luo, Xiao Shu, 2007. "Passivity-based adaptive control of chaotic oscillations in power system," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 665-671.
    30. Barabási, Albert-László & Albert, Réka & Jeong, Hawoong, 1999. "Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 173-187.
    31. G. Filatrella & A. H. Nielsen & N. F. Pedersen, 2008. "Analysis of a power grid using a Kuramoto-like model," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 61(4), pages 485-491, February.
    32. Ettore Bompard & Lingen Luo & Enrico Pons, 2015. "A perspective overview of topological approaches for vulnerability analysis of power transmission grids," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 15-26.
    33. Bompard, Ettore & Napoli, Roberto & Xue, Fei, 2009. "Analysis of structural vulnerabilities in power transmission grids," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 5-12.
    34. Yusta, Jose M. & Correa, Gabriel J. & Lacal-Arántegui, Roberto, 2011. "Methodologies and applications for critical infrastructure protection: State-of-the-art," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 6100-6119, October.
    35. Ouyang, Min & Pan, Zhezhe & Hong, Liu & Zhao, Lijing, 2014. "Correlation analysis of different vulnerability metrics on power grids," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 396(C), pages 204-211.
    36. Pagani, Giuliano Andrea & Aiello, Marco, 2013. "The Power Grid as a complex network: A survey," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(11), pages 2688-2700.
    37. Koç, Yakup & Warnier, Martijn & Mieghem, Piet Van & Kooij, Robert E. & Brazier, Frances M.T., 2014. "The impact of the topology on cascading failures in a power grid model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 402(C), pages 169-179.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abedi, Amin & Gaudard, Ludovic & Romerio, Franco, 2019. "Review of major approaches to analyze vulnerability in power system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 153-172.
    2. Lucas Cuadra & Miguel Del Pino & José Carlos Nieto-Borge & Sancho Salcedo-Sanz, 2017. "Optimizing the Structure of Distribution Smart Grids with Renewable Generation against Abnormal Conditions: A Complex Networks Approach with Evolutionary Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-31, July.
    3. Wu, Di & Ma, Feng & Javadi, Milad & Thulasiraman, Krishnaiya & Bompard, Ettore & Jiang, John N., 2017. "A study of the impacts of flow direction and electrical constraints on vulnerability assessment of power grid using electrical betweenness measures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 466(C), pages 295-309.
    4. Kashin Sugishita & Yasuo Asakura, 2021. "Vulnerability studies in the fields of transportation and complex networks: a citation network analysis," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-34, March.
    5. Kim, Dong Hwan & Eisenberg, Daniel A. & Chun, Yeong Han & Park, Jeryang, 2017. "Network topology and resilience analysis of South Korean power grid," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 465(C), pages 13-24.
    6. Guo, Hengdao & Zheng, Ciyan & Iu, Herbert Ho-Ching & Fernando, Tyrone, 2017. "A critical review of cascading failure analysis and modeling of power system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 9-22.
    7. Ma, Xiangyu & Zhou, Huijie & Li, Zhiyi, 2021. "On the resilience of modern power systems: A complex network perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    8. Pagani, Giuliano Andrea & Aiello, Marco, 2013. "The Power Grid as a complex network: A survey," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(11), pages 2688-2700.
    9. Gianluca Fulli & Marcelo Masera & Catalin Felix Covrig & Francesco Profumo & Ettore Bompard & Tao Huang, 2017. "The EU Electricity Security Decision-Analytic Framework: Status and Perspective Developments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Nie, Yan & Zhang, Guoxing & Duan, Hongbo, 2020. "An interconnected panorama of future cross-regional power grid: A complex network approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    11. Zhang, Ding-Xue & Zhao, Dan & Guan, Zhi-Hong & Wu, Yonghong & Chi, Ming & Zheng, Gui-Lin, 2016. "Probabilistic analysis of cascade failure dynamics in complex network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 461(C), pages 299-309.
    12. Giuliano Andrea Pagani & Marco Aiello, 2015. "A complex network approach for identifying vulnerabilities of the medium and low voltage grid," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 36-61.
    13. Laurienti, Paul J. & Joyce, Karen E. & Telesford, Qawi K. & Burdette, Jonathan H. & Hayasaka, Satoru, 2011. "Universal fractal scaling of self-organized networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(20), pages 3608-3613.
    14. Ouyang, Min & Zhao, Lijing & Hong, Liu & Pan, Zhezhe, 2014. "Comparisons of complex network based models and real train flow model to analyze Chinese railway vulnerability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 38-46.
    15. Zhang, Guidong & Li, Zhong & Zhang, Bo & Halang, Wolfgang A., 2013. "Understanding the cascading failures in Indian power grids with complex networks theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(15), pages 3273-3280.
    16. H Jönsson & J Johansson & H Johansson, 2008. "Identifying critical components in technical infrastructure networks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 222(2), pages 235-243, June.
    17. Zhou, Dongyue & Hu, Funian & Wang, Shuliang & Chen, Jun, 2021. "Power network robustness analysis based on electrical engineering and complex network theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 564(C).
    18. Chao Fang & Piao Dong & Yi-Ping Fang & Enrico Zio, 2020. "Vulnerability analysis of critical infrastructure under disruptions: An application to China Railway High-speed," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(2), pages 235-245, April.
    19. Zou, Yanli & Wang, Ruirui & Gao, Zheng, 2020. "Improve synchronizability of a power grid through power allocation and topology adjustment," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 548(C).
    20. Forsberg, Samuel & Thomas, Karin & Bergkvist, Mikael, 2023. "Power grid vulnerability analysis using complex network theory: A topological study of the Nordic transmission grid," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 626(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:9:p:9211-9265:d:54920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.