IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i15p4191-d1719478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovative Business Models Towards Sustainable Energy Development: Assessing Benefits, Risks, and Optimal Approaches of Blockchain Exploitation in the Energy Transition

Author

Listed:
  • Aikaterini Papapostolou

    (Decision Support Systems Laboratory, School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Zografou, Greece)

  • Ioanna Andreoulaki

    (Decision Support Systems Laboratory, School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Zografou, Greece)

  • Filippos Anagnostopoulos

    (Institute for European Energy and Climate Policy (IEECP), 1043 GR Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Sokratis Divolis

    (Decision Support Systems Laboratory, School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Zografou, Greece)

  • Harris Niavis

    (Inlecom Group, 1000 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Sokratis Vavilis

    (Inlecom Innovation, 14561 Athens, Greece)

  • Vangelis Marinakis

    (Decision Support Systems Laboratory, School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Zografou, Greece)

Abstract

The goals of the European Union towards the energy transition imply profound changes in the energy field, so as to promote sustainable energy development while fostering economic growth. To achieve these changes, the incorporation of sustainable technologies supporting decentralisation, energy efficiency, renewable energy production, and demand flexibility is of vital importance. Blockchain has the potential to change energy services towards this direction. To optimally exploit blockchain, innovative business models need to be designed, identifying the opportunities emerging from unmet needs, while also considering potential risks so as to take action to overcome them. In this context, the scope of this paper is to examine the opportunities and the risks that emerge from the adoption of blockchain in four innovative business models, while also identifying mitigation strategies to support and accelerate the energy transition, thus proposing optimal approaches of exploitation of blockchain in energy services. The business models concern Energy Performance Contracting with P4P guarantees, improved self-consumption in energy cooperatives, energy efficiency and flexibility services for natural gas boilers, and smart energy management for EV chargers and HVAC appliances. Firstly, the value proposition of the business models is analysed and results in a comprehensive SWOT analysis. Based on the findings of the analysis and consultations with relevant market actors, in combination with the examination of the relevant literature, risks are identified and evaluated through a qualitative assessment approach. Subsequently, specific mitigation strategies are proposed to address the detected risks. This research demonstrates that blockchain integration into these business models can significantly improve energy efficiency, reduce operational costs, enhance security, and support a more decentralised energy system, providing actionable insights for stakeholders to implement blockchain solutions effectively. Furthermore, according to the results, technological and legal risks are the most significant, followed by political, economic, and social risks, while environmental risks of blockchain integration are not as important. Strategies to address risks relevant to blockchain exploitation include ensuring policy alignment, emphasising economic feasibility, facilitating social inclusion, prioritising security and interoperability, consulting with legal experts, and using consensus algorithms with low energy consumption. The findings offer clear guidance for energy service providers, policymakers, and technology developers, assisting in the design, deployment, and risk mitigation of blockchain-enabled business models to accelerate sustainable energy development.

Suggested Citation

  • Aikaterini Papapostolou & Ioanna Andreoulaki & Filippos Anagnostopoulos & Sokratis Divolis & Harris Niavis & Sokratis Vavilis & Vangelis Marinakis, 2025. "Innovative Business Models Towards Sustainable Energy Development: Assessing Benefits, Risks, and Optimal Approaches of Blockchain Exploitation in the Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-45, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:15:p:4191-:d:1719478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/15/4191/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/15/4191/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hany Habbak & Mohamed Baza & Mohamed M. E. A. Mahmoud & Khaled Metwally & Ahmed Mattar & Gouda I. Salama, 2022. "Privacy-Preserving Charging Coordination Scheme for Smart Power Grids Using a Blockchain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Nadhira Khezami & Nourcherif Gharbi & Bilel Neji & Naceur Benhadj Braiek, 2022. "Blockchain Technology Implementation in the Energy Sector: Comprehensive Literature Review and Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-45, November.
    3. Antonio J. Cabrera-Gutiérrez & Encarnación Castillo & Antonio Escobar-Molero & Juan Cruz-Cozar & Diego P. Morales & Luis Parrilla, 2023. "Blockchain-Based Services Implemented in a Microservices Architecture Using a Trusted Platform Module Applied to Electric Vehicle Charging Stations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Diestelmeier, Lea, 2019. "Changing power: Shifting the role of electricity consumers with blockchain technology – Policy implications for EU electricity law," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 189-196.
    5. Sepideh Mollajafari & Kamal Bechkoum, 2023. "Blockchain Technology and Related Security Risks: Towards a Seven-Layer Perspective and Taxonomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Wang, Beibei & Xu, Lun & Wang, Jialei, 2023. "A privacy-preserving trading strategy for blockchain-based P2P electricity transactions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    7. Gallego-Castillo, Cristobal & Heleno, Miguel & Victoria, Marta, 2021. "Self-consumption for energy communities in Spain: A regional analysis under the new legal framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    8. Roger C. Jensen & Royce L. Bird & Blake W. Nichols, 2022. "Risk Assessment Matrices for Workplace Hazards: Design for Usability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-23, February.
    9. Roberts Lazdins & Anna Mutule & Diana Zalostiba, 2021. "PV Energy Communities—Challenges and Barriers from a Consumer Perspective: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Vernay, Anne-Lorène & Sebi, Carine & Arroyo, Fabrice, 2023. "Energy community business models and their impact on the energy transition: Lessons learnt from France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    11. Irvylle Cavalcante & Jamilson Júnior & Jônatas Augusto Manzolli & Luiz Almeida & Mauro Pungo & Cindy Paola Guzman & Hugo Morais, 2023. "Electric Vehicles Charging Using Photovoltaic Energy Surplus: A Framework Based on Blockchain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, March.
    12. Tzani, Dimitra & Exintaveloni, Danai Sofia & Stavrakas, Vassilis & Flamos, Alexandros, 2023. "Devising policy strategies for the deployment of energy efficiency Pay-for-Performance programmes in the European Union," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    13. Ioanna Andreoulaki & Aikaterini Papapostolou & Vangelis Marinakis, 2024. "Evaluating the Barriers to Blockchain Adoption in the Energy Sector: A Multicriteria Approach Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process for Group Decision Making," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-27, March.
    14. Koasidis, Konstantinos & Marinakis, Vangelis & Nikas, Alexandros & Chira, Katerina & Flamos, Alexandros & Doukas, Haris, 2022. "Monetising behavioural change as a policy measure to support energy management in the residential sector: A case study in Greece," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    15. Xiangyang Yu & Xiaojing Wang, 2023. "Research on Carbon-Trading Model of Urban Public Transport Based on Blockchain Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Jing Yu & Jicheng Liu & Yajing Wen & Xue Yu, 2023. "Economic Optimal Coordinated Dispatch of Power for Community Users Considering Shared Energy Storage and Demand Response under Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-26, April.
    17. Lei, Yu-Tian & Ma, Chao-Qun & Mirza, Nawazish & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Narayan, Seema Wati & Chen, Xun-Qi, 2022. "A renewable energy microgrids trading management platform based on permissioned blockchain," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    18. Gousia Habib & Sparsh Sharma & Sara Ibrahim & Imtiaz Ahmad & Shaima Qureshi & Malik Ishfaq, 2022. "Blockchain Technology: Benefits, Challenges, Applications, and Integration of Blockchain Technology with Cloud Computing," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, November.
    19. Florian Hanke & Jens Lowitzsch, 2020. "Empowering Vulnerable Consumers to Join Renewable Energy Communities—Towards an Inclusive Design of the Clean Energy Package," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-27, April.
    20. Bhargav Appasani & Sunil Kumar Mishra & Amitkumar V. Jha & Santosh Kumar Mishra & Florentina Magda Enescu & Ioan Sorin Sorlei & Fernando Georgel Bîrleanu & Noureddine Takorabet & Phatiphat Thounthong , 2022. "Blockchain-Enabled Smart Grid Applications: Architecture, Challenges, and Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-33, July.
    21. Dongdong Wang & Xinyu Du & Hui Zhang & Qin Wang, 2023. "Blockchain Enabled Credible Energy Trading at the Edge of the Internet of Things," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, January.
    22. Lowitzsch, J. & Hoicka, C.E. & van Tulder, F.J., 2020. "Renewable energy communities under the 2019 European Clean Energy Package – Governance model for the energy clusters of the future?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    23. Thomas Morstyn & Niall Farrell & Sarah J. Darby & Malcolm D. McCulloch, 2018. "Using peer-to-peer energy-trading platforms to incentivize prosumers to form federated power plants," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(2), pages 94-101, February.
    24. Liu, Jicheng & Sun, Jiakang & Yuan, Hanying & Su, Yihan & Feng, Shuxian & Lu, Chaoran, 2022. "Behavior analysis of photovoltaic-storage-use value chain game evolution in blockchain environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    25. Bertoldi, Paolo & Boza-Kiss, Benigna, 2017. "Analysis of barriers and drivers for the development of the ESCO markets in Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 345-355.
    26. Qin, Meng & Wu, Tong & Ma, Xuecheng & Albu, Lucian Liviu & Umar, Muhammad, 2023. "Are energy consumption and carbon emission caused by Bitcoin? A novel time-varying technique," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 109-120.
    27. Ahl, Amanda & Goto, Mika & Yarime, Masaru & Tanaka, Kenji & Sagawa, Daishi, 2022. "Challenges and opportunities of blockchain energy applications: Interrelatedness among technological, economic, social, environmental, and institutional dimensions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    28. Ibrahim, Nur Atirah & Wan Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul & Mustaffa, Azizul Azri & Kidam, Kamarizan, 2022. "Risk matrix approach of extreme temperature and precipitation for renewable energy systems in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    29. Jiani Wu & Nguyen Khoi Tran, 2018. "Application of Blockchain Technology in Sustainable Energy Systems: An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, August.
    30. George Blumberg & Maurizio Sibilla, 2023. "A Carbon Accounting and Trading Platform for the uk Construction Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-20, February.
    31. Kim, Myeonghyun & Lee, Joonyoung & Oh, Jihyeon & Park, Kisung & Park, Youngho & Park, Kilhoum, 2022. "Blockchain based energy trading scheme for vehicle-to-vehicle using decentralized identifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    32. Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin & Amiri, Maghsoud & Hosseini Bamakan, Seyed Mojtaba, 2024. "Evaluating the blockchain technology strategies for reducing renewable energy development risks using a novel integrated decision framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Schletz & Ana Cardoso & Gabriela Prata Dias & Søren Salomo, 2020. "How Can Blockchain Technology Accelerate Energy Efficiency Interventions? A Use Case Comparison," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Roth, Tamara & Utz, Manuel & Baumgarte, Felix & Rieger, Alexander & Sedlmeir, Johannes & Strüker, Jens, 2022. "Electricity powered by blockchain: A review with a European perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    3. Bernadette Fina & Hans Auer, 2020. "Economic Viability of Renewable Energy Communities under the Framework of the Renewable Energy Directive Transposed to Austrian Law," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, November.
    4. Ernest Barceló & Katarina Dimić-Mišić & Monir Imani & Vesna Spasojević Brkić & Michael Hummel & Patrick Gane, 2023. "Regulatory Paradigm and Challenge for Blockchain Integration of Decentralized Systems: Example—Renewable Energy Grids," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    5. Ahl, A. & Yarime, M. & Goto, M. & Chopra, Shauhrat S. & Kumar, Nallapaneni Manoj. & Tanaka, K. & Sagawa, D., 2020. "Exploring blockchain for the energy transition: Opportunities and challenges based on a case study in Japan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    6. Thomas Puschmann & Christian Hugo Hoffmann & Valentyn Khmarskyi, 2020. "How Green FinTech Can Alleviate the Impact of Climate Change—The Case of Switzerland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-30, December.
    7. Hoicka, Christina E. & Lowitzsch, Jens & Brisbois, Marie Claire & Kumar, Ankit & Ramirez Camargo, Luis, 2021. "Implementing a just renewable energy transition: Policy advice for transposing the new European rules for renewable energy communities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    8. Sid-Ali Amamra, 2025. "A Hybrid Blockchain Solution for Electric Vehicle Energy Trading: Balancing Proof of Work and Proof of Stake," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-26, April.
    9. Jenny Palm, 2021. "The Transposition of Energy Communities into Swedish Regulations: Overview and Critique of Emerging Regulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
    10. Marina Bertolini & Gregorio Morosinotto, 2023. "Business Models for Energy Community in the Aggregator Perspective: State of the Art and Research Gaps," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-26, June.
    11. Kubli, Merla & Puranik, Sanket, 2023. "A typology of business models for energy communities: Current and emerging design options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    12. Ma, Chao-Qun & Lei, Yu-Tian & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Chen, Xun-Qi & Wang, Yi-Ran & Narayan, Seema, 2024. "Systematic analysis of the blockchain in the energy sector: Trends, issues, and future directions," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(2).
    13. Vallecha, Harshit & Bhattacharjee, Debraj & Osiri, John Kalu & Bhola, Prabha, 2021. "Evaluation of barriers and enablers through integrative multicriteria decision mapping: Developing sustainable community energy in Indian context," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    14. Qin, Meng & Zhang, Xiaojing & Li, Yameng & Badarcea, Roxana Maria, 2023. "Blockchain market and green finance: The enablers of carbon neutrality in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    15. Siripha Junlakarn & Phimsupha Kokchang & Kulyos Audomvongseree, 2022. "Drivers and Challenges of Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Development in Thailand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, February.
    16. Lode, Maria Luisa & Felice, Alex & Martinez Alonso, Ander & De Silva, Jayesh & Angulo, Maria E. & Lowitzsch, Jens & Coosemans, Thierry & Ramirez Camargo, Luis, 2023. "Energy communities in rural areas: The participatory case study of Vega de Valcarce, Spain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    17. Abada, Ibrahim & Ehrenmann, Andreas & Lambin, Xavier, 2025. "Risk-sharing in energy communities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(3), pages 870-888.
    18. Álvaro Manso-Burgos & David Ribó-Pérez & Manuel Alcázar-Ortega & Tomás Gómez-Navarro, 2021. "Local Energy Communities in Spain: Economic Implications of the New Tariff and Variable Coefficients," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Ahl, Amanda & Goto, Mika & Yarime, Masaru & Tanaka, Kenji & Sagawa, Daishi, 2022. "Challenges and opportunities of blockchain energy applications: Interrelatedness among technological, economic, social, environmental, and institutional dimensions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    20. Zhou, Yue & Wu, Jianzhong & Song, Guanyu & Long, Chao, 2020. "Framework design and optimal bidding strategy for ancillary service provision from a peer-to-peer energy trading community," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:15:p:4191-:d:1719478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.