IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i6p1278-d1352811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Barriers to Blockchain Adoption in the Energy Sector: A Multicriteria Approach Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process for Group Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Ioanna Andreoulaki

    (Decision Support Systems Laboratory, School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece)

  • Aikaterini Papapostolou

    (Decision Support Systems Laboratory, School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece)

  • Vangelis Marinakis

    (Decision Support Systems Laboratory, School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

The blockchain has been proposed for use in various applications in the energy field. Although the blockchain has technical strengths, several obstacles affect the application of the technology in energy services. The scope of this study is to highlight and prioritise the most important barriers to such applications. The first step in this direction is specifying the potential areas of the implementation of blockchain technology in the energy sector. Two useful tools for market analysis were used: Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal and Environmental, PESTLE Analysis, and Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats, SWOT Analysis, which examine external and internal factors, respectively. Thus, a list of the most important elements hindering the incorporation of the blockchain in the energy sector was extracted. The detected barriers were classified and ranked by energy and IT experts using the multicriteria method, “Analytical Hierarchy Process for Group Decision Making”. The results reveal that legal barriers relating to the complexities of deficiencies of regulations are the most significant, while technological barriers, especially those related to security issues, are also important. Sociopolitical barriers related mainly to lack of trust in blockchain, as well as economic concerns such as high upfront costs, are less influential but should still be considered. The conclusions of the conducted research have the potential to guide market actors in their endeavours to modernise energy systems through the use of the blockchain, assisting them in designing the most appropriate market strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioanna Andreoulaki & Aikaterini Papapostolou & Vangelis Marinakis, 2024. "Evaluating the Barriers to Blockchain Adoption in the Energy Sector: A Multicriteria Approach Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process for Group Decision Making," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-27, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:1278-:d:1352811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/6/1278/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/6/1278/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Kostmann & Wolfgang K. Härdle, 2019. "Forecasting in Blockchain-Based Local Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-27, July.
    2. Yang, Qing & Wang, Hao & Wang, Taotao & Zhang, Shengli & Wu, Xiaoxiao & Wang, Hui, 2021. "Blockchain-based decentralized energy management platform for residential distributed energy resources in a virtual power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    3. Aikaterini Papapostolou & Charikleia Karakosta & Kalliopi-Anastasia Kourti & Haris Doukas & John Psarras, 2019. "Supporting Europe’s Energy Policy Towards a Decarbonised Energy System: A Comparative Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-26, July.
    4. Sikandar Ali Abbasi & Khanji Harijan & Zubair Ahmed Memon & Faheemullah Shaikh & Nayyar Hussain Mirjat, 2021. "Is Coal Power Generation a Sustainable Solution for Energy Needs of Pakistan: A Delphi-SWOT Paradigm?," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(1), pages 308-317.
    5. Noor, Sana & Yang, Wentao & Guo, Miao & van Dam, Koen H. & Wang, Xiaonan, 2018. "Energy Demand Side Management within micro-grid networks enhanced by blockchain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1385-1398.
    6. Khaqqi, Khamila Nurul & Sikorski, Janusz J. & Hadinoto, Kunn & Kraft, Markus, 2018. "Incorporating seller/buyer reputation-based system in blockchain-enabled emission trading application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 8-19.
    7. Ruan, Hebin & Gao, Hongjun & Qiu, Haifeng & Gooi, Hoay Beng & Liu, Junyong, 2023. "Distributed operation optimization of active distribution network with P2P electricity trading in blockchain environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    8. Oskar Juszczyk & Khuram Shahzad, 2022. "Blockchain Technology for Renewable Energy: Principles, Applications and Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, June.
    9. Lai, Vincent S. & Wong, Bo K. & Cheung, Waiman, 2002. "Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 134-144, February.
    10. Forman, Ernest & Peniwati, Kirti, 1998. "Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 165-169, July.
    11. Thomas Morstyn & Niall Farrell & Sarah J. Darby & Malcolm D. McCulloch, 2018. "Using peer-to-peer energy-trading platforms to incentivize prosumers to form federated power plants," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(2), pages 94-101, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Z.F. & Soh, K.Y. & Islam, M.R. & Chua, K.J., 2023. "Development of a novel grid-free district cooling system considering blockchain-based demand response management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    2. Yeray Mezquita & Ana Belén Gil-González & Angel Martín del Rey & Javier Prieto & Juan Manuel Corchado, 2022. "Towards a Blockchain-Based Peer-to-Peer Energy Marketplace," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Seyedhossein, Seyed Saeed & Moeini-Aghtaie, Moein, 2022. "Risk management framework of peer-to-peer electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    4. Wang, Longze & Liu, Jinxin & Yuan, Rongfang & Wu, Jing & Zhang, Delong & Zhang, Yan & Li, Meicheng, 2020. "Adaptive bidding strategy for real-time energy management in multi-energy market enhanced by blockchain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    5. Contreras, Francisco & Hanaki, Keisuke & Aramaki, Toshiya & Connors, Stephen, 2008. "Application of analytical hierarchy process to analyze stakeholders preferences for municipal solid waste management plans, Boston, USA," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 979-991.
    6. Azim, M. Imran & Tushar, Wayes & Saha, Tapan K., 2020. "Investigating the impact of P2P trading on power losses in grid-connected networks with prosumers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    7. Umar, Abdullah & Kumar, Deepak & Ghose, Tirthadip, 2022. "Blockchain-based decentralized energy intra-trading with battery storage flexibility in a community microgrid system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    8. Ruiz-Villaverde, Alberto & Picazo-Tadeo, Andrés J. & González-Gómez, Francisco, 2015. "The ‘social choice’ of privatising urban water services: A case study of Madrid in Spain," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 616-629.
    9. Li, Yinan & Yang, Wentao & He, Ping & Chen, Chang & Wang, Xiaonan, 2019. "Design and management of a distributed hybrid energy system through smart contract and blockchain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 390-405.
    10. Zeng, Yu & Wei, Xuan & Yao, Yuan & Xu, Yinliang & Sun, Hongbin & Kin Victor Chan, Wai & Feng, Wei, 2023. "Determining the pricing and deployment strategy for virtual power plants of peer-to-peer prosumers: A game-theoretic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    11. Wang, Juan & Zheng, Junjun & Yu, Liukai & Goh, Mark & Tang, Yunying & Huang, Yongchao, 2023. "Distributed Reputation-Distance iterative auction system for Peer-To-Peer power trading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    12. Byeongtae Ahn, 2022. "Implementation and Early Adoption of an Ethereum-Based Electronic Voting System for the Prevention of Fraudulent Voting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Ahl, Amanda & Yarime, Masaru & Tanaka, Kenji & Sagawa, Daishi, 2019. "Review of blockchain-based distributed energy: Implications for institutional development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 200-211.
    14. Han, Dong & Zhang, Chengzhenghao & Ping, Jian & Yan, Zheng, 2020. "Smart contract architecture for decentralized energy trading and management based on blockchains," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    15. Yildizbasi, Abdullah, 2021. "Blockchain and renewable energy: Integration challenges in circular economy era," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 183-197.
    16. Elena Rokou & Konstantinos Kirytopoulos, 2014. "A Calibrated Group Decision Process," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 1369-1384, November.
    17. Ahl, Amanda & Goto, Mika & Yarime, Masaru & Tanaka, Kenji & Sagawa, Daishi, 2022. "Challenges and opportunities of blockchain energy applications: Interrelatedness among technological, economic, social, environmental, and institutional dimensions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    18. Azim, M. Imran & Tushar, Wayes & Saha, Tapan K. & Yuen, Chau & Smith, David, 2022. "Peer-to-peer kilowatt and negawatt trading: A review of challenges and recent advances in distribution networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    19. Vaidya, Omkarprasad S. & Kumar, Sushil, 2006. "Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 1-29, February.
    20. Guixing Yang & Haoran Liu & Weiqing Wang & Junru Chen & Shunbo Lei, 2023. "Distributed Optimal Coordination of a Virtual Power Plant with Residential Regenerative Electric Heating Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:1278-:d:1352811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.