IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i11p2812-d1666603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balancing the Interests of Various Community Groups in Local Government Policy on the Energy Performance of Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Girts Karnitis

    (Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Latvia, 1586 Riga, Latvia)

  • Maris Pukis

    (Scientific Institute of Economics and Management, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Latvia, 1586 Riga, Latvia)

  • Janis Bicevskis

    (Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Latvia, 1586 Riga, Latvia)

  • Edgars Diebelis

    (Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Latvia, 1586 Riga, Latvia)

  • Stanislavs Gendelis

    (Institute of Numerical Modelling, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Latvia, 1586 Riga, Latvia)

  • Edvins Karnitis

    (Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Latvia, 1586 Riga, Latvia)

  • Ugis Sarma

    (Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Latvia, 1586 Riga, Latvia)

Abstract

EU legislation provides the implementation of most building energy performance measures at a subnational level. This obligation is causing a lot of completely new dilemmas that are challenging for local governments (LGs), requiring a radical re-evaluation of the prioritization of LGs’ traditional tasks and the ranking of new responsibilities. The attitude of local population and businesses towards the solutions to dilemmas, which are set by LGs decisions, vary widely. Separate groups actively lobby for their mutually contradictory interests, questioning decisions and fighting against them during the decision-drafting and -making process, significantly hindering the work of LGs and prolonging decision-making. The authors’ suggested solution to the problem is to make municipal decisions based on verifiable data and facts, thus preventing the manifestations of populism and demagogy, and reducing the possibilities for interest group advocacy. To obtain objective information for balanced decision-making about the benefits and costs of heating system retrofitting projects without carrying out the labor-intensive, time-consuming, and costly design of various options, an express methodology and an easy-to-use tool for project feasibility studies have been developed. The methodology utilizes a limited number of open indicators to streamline the evaluation process, and does not require specific knowledge in thermal physics, economics, or construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Girts Karnitis & Maris Pukis & Janis Bicevskis & Edgars Diebelis & Stanislavs Gendelis & Edvins Karnitis & Ugis Sarma, 2025. "Balancing the Interests of Various Community Groups in Local Government Policy on the Energy Performance of Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:11:p:2812-:d:1666603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/11/2812/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/11/2812/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tilman, Andrew R. & Haight, Robert G., 2025. "Public policy for management of forest pests within an ownership mosaic," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Carattini, Stefano & Figge, Béla & Gordan, Alexander & Löschel, Andreas, 2024. "Municipal building codes and the adoption of solar photovoltaics," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    3. Takahashi, Takuya & Hori, Yasuto & Otsuka, Ikumi & Shibata, Shingo & Tsuge, Takahiro, 2024. "Innovativeness of Japanese forest owners and municipalities regarding the valorization of forest ecosystem services: Quantitative evaluation of mutual influences," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    4. Lindvall, Daniel & Sörqvist, Patrik & Lindeberg, Sofie & Barthel, Stephan, 2025. "The polarization of energy preferences – A study on social acceptance of wind and nuclear power in Sweden," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    5. Fredriksson, Anders & Macchione Saes, Maria Sylvia, 2025. "Quantifying political effects in the spatial allocation of public services," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Nunes, Anna Manuella Melo & Santos Júnior, Edvaldo Pereira & Araújo, Jevuks Matheus de & Melo, Ana Karolina Acris & Rolim, Maria João Carreiro Pereira & Simioni, Flávio José & Carvalho, Monica & Coelh, 2024. "Impact assessment of public policies in the municipalities covered by the Brazilian Incentive program for alternative electricity sources (PROINFA)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    7. Māris Pūķis & Jānis Bičevskis & Staņislavs Gendelis & Edvīns Karnītis & Ģirts Karnītis & Andris Eihmanis & Uģis Sarma, 2023. "Role of Local Governments in Green Deal Multilevel Governance: The Energy Context," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Bally, Frédéric & Sebi, Carine, 2025. "Shifting public perception: A longitudinal analysis of national and local media narratives on nuclear and wind energy in France," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    9. Emma Marris, 2019. "Why young climate activists have captured the world’s attention," Nature, Nature, vol. 573(7775), pages 471-472, September.
    10. Moberg, Karen Richardsen, 2025. "Limits to local democracy in practice? The case of governing sustainable land use in Norwegian municipalities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gustavo de Andrade Melo & Paula Medina Maçaira & Fernando Luiz Cyrino Oliveira & Guilherme Armando de Almeida Pereira, 2025. "Socioeconomic Impacts of Renewable Energy Plants Through the Lens of the Triple Bottom Line," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Rodrigo Vellardo Guimarães & Milad Shadman & Saulo Ribeiro Silva & Segen F. Estefen & Maurício Tiomno Tolmasquim & Amaro Olimpio Pereira, 2025. "Cost Breakeven Point of Offshore Wind Energy in Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Guastella, Gianni & Mazzarano, Matteo & Pareglio, Stefano & Xepapadeas, Anastasios, 2022. "Climate reputation risk and abnormal returns in the stock markets: A focus on large emitters," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    4. Timár, Barnabás, 2023. "A klímavédelmi események hatása a köztudatra és a tőkepiacra. Empirikus vizsgálat Google-trends- és ETF-adatokon [The impact of climate events on public perception and capital markets. An empirical," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 713-745.
    5. Manske, David & Lehneis, Reinhold & Thrän, Daniela, 2025. "The landscape of the renewable electricity supply - Municipal contributions to Germany's energy transition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    6. Finke, Jonas & Kachirayil, Febin & McKenna, Russell & Bertsch, Valentin, 2024. "Modelling to generate near-Pareto-optimal alternatives (MGPA) for the municipal energy transition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 376(PA).
    7. Deegen, Peter & Wang, Sen & Kant, Shashi & Hostettler, Martin, 2025. "New frontiers of forest economics, IV: Entrepreneurship in forestry: Innovation, uncertainty and profit," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Felix Meurer & Marco Sebastian Breder & Michael Bucksteeg & Hannes Hobbie & Dominik Moest & Hendrik Scharf & Christoph Weber, 2024. "Can an Obligation Bridge Germany’s PV Capacity Gap? Insights from a Regional Case Study," EWL Working Papers 2408, University of Duisburg-Essen, Chair for Management Science and Energy Economics, revised Dec 2024.
    9. Monika Wawer & Kalina Grzesiuk & Dorota Jegorow, 2022. "Smart Mobility in a Smart City in the Context of Generation Z Sustainability, Use of ICT, and Participation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-30, June.
    10. Johannes Brehm & Henri Gruhl, 2024. "Increase in concerns about climate change following climate strikes and civil disobedience in Germany," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    11. Paola Nanni & David J. Peres & Rosaria E. Musumeci & Antonino Cancelliere, 2021. "Worry about Climate Change and Urban Flooding Risk Preparedness in Southern Italy: A Survey in the Simeto River Valley (Sicily, Italy)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, March.
    12. Shen Molloy & Andrew S. Medeiros & Tony R. Walker & Sarah J. Saunders, 2022. "Public Perceptions of Legislative Action to Reduce Plastic Pollution: A Case Study of Atlantic Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:11:p:2812-:d:1666603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.