IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i8p1935-d1378210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Generative AI Chatbots for Net-Zero Emissions Energy Internet-of-Things Infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Amali Matharaarachchi

    (Centre for Data Analytics and Cognition, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Wishmitha Mendis

    (Centre for Data Analytics and Cognition, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Kanishka Randunu

    (Centre for Data Analytics and Cognition, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Daswin De Silva

    (Centre for Data Analytics and Cognition, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia)

  • Gihan Gamage

    (Centre for Data Analytics and Cognition, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia)

  • Harsha Moraliyage

    (Centre for Data Analytics and Cognition, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia)

  • Nishan Mills

    (Centre for Data Analytics and Cognition, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia)

  • Andrew Jennings

    (Centre for Data Analytics and Cognition, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia)

Abstract

Internet-of-Things (IoT) technologies have been steadily adopted and embedded into energy infrastructure following the rapid transformation of energy grids through distributed consumption, renewables generation, and battery storage. The data streams produced by such energy IoT infrastructure can be extracted, processed, analyzed, and synthesized for informed decision-making that delivers optimized grid operations, reduced costs, and net-zero carbon emissions. However, the voluminous nature of such data streams leads to an equally large number of analysis outcomes that have proven ineffective in decision-making by energy grid operators. This gap can be addressed by introducing artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, or more formally conversational agents, to proactively assist human operators in analyzing and identifying decision opportunities in energy grids. In this research, we draw upon the recent success of generative AI for optimized AI chatbots with natural language understanding and generation capabilities for the complex information needs of energy IoT infrastructure and net-zero emissions. The proposed approach for optimized generative AI chatbots is composed of six core modules: Intent Classifier, Knowledge Extractor, Database Retriever, Cached Hierarchical Vector Storage, Secure Prompting, and Conversational Interface with Language Generator. We empirically evaluate the proposed approach and the optimized generative AI chatbot in the real-world setting of an energy IoT infrastructure deployed at a large, multi-campus tertiary education institution. The results of these experiments confirm the contribution of generative AI chatbots in simplifying the complexity of energy IoT infrastructure for optimized grid operations and net-zero carbon emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Amali Matharaarachchi & Wishmitha Mendis & Kanishka Randunu & Daswin De Silva & Gihan Gamage & Harsha Moraliyage & Nishan Mills & Andrew Jennings, 2024. "Optimizing Generative AI Chatbots for Net-Zero Emissions Energy Internet-of-Things Infrastructure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:1935-:d:1378210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/8/1935/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/8/1935/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik Brynjolfsson & Danielle Li & Lindsey Raymond, 2023. "Generative AI at Work," Papers 2304.11771, arXiv.org.
    2. Tyna Eloundou & Sam Manning & Pamela Mishkin & Daniel Rock, 2023. "GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models," Papers 2303.10130, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carvajal, Daniel & Franco, Catalina & Isaksson, Siri, 2024. "Will Artificial Intelligence Get in the Way of Achieving Gender Equality?," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 3/2024, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics.
    2. Daniel Goller & Christian Gschwendt & Stefan C. Wolter, 2023. ""This time it's different" Generative Artificial Intelligence and Occupational Choice," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0209, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    3. Walkowiak, Emmanuelle, 2023. "Task-interdependencies between Generative AI and Workers," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    4. Jason P Davis & Jian Bai Li, 2024. "Early Adoption of Generative AI by Global Business Leaders: Insights from an INSEAD Alumni Survey," Papers 2404.04543, arXiv.org.
    5. Evangelos Katsamakas & Oleg V. Pavlov & Ryan Saklad, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and the transformation of higher education institutions," Papers 2402.08143, arXiv.org.
    6. Yang Shen, 2024. "Future jobs: analyzing the impact of artificial intelligence on employment and its mechanisms," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1-33, April.
    7. Jai Vipra & Anton Korinek, 2023. "Market Concentration Implications of Foundation Models," Papers 2311.01550, arXiv.org.
    8. Kristina McElheran & J. Frank Li & Erik Brynjolfsson & Zachary Kroff & Emin Dinlersoz & Lucia Foster & Nikolas Zolas, 2024. "AI adoption in America: Who, what, and where," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 375-415, March.
    9. Alexander Cuntz & Carsten Fink & Hansueli Stamm, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property : An Economic Perspective," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 77, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division.
    10. Anna Davies & Betsy Donald & Mia Gray, 2023. "The power of platforms—precarity and place," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(2), pages 245-256.
    11. Samir Huseynov, 2023. "ChatGPT and the Labor Market: Unraveling the Effect of AI Discussions on Students' Earnings Expectations," Papers 2305.11900, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    12. Dario Guarascio & Jelena Reljic & Roman Stollinger, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence and Employment: A Look into the Crystal Ball," LEM Papers Series 2023/34, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    13. Kreitmeir, David & Raschky, Paul Anton, 2023. "The Unintended Consequences of Censoring Digital Technology - Evidence from Italy's ChatGPT Ban," SocArXiv v3cgs, Center for Open Science.
    14. Jin Liu & Xingchen Xu & Yongjun Li & Yong Tan, 2023. ""Generate" the Future of Work through AI: Empirical Evidence from Online Labor Markets," Papers 2308.05201, arXiv.org.
    15. Dandan Qiao & Huaxia Rui & Qian Xiong, 2023. "AI and Jobs: Has the Inflection Point Arrived? Evidence from an Online Labor Platform," Papers 2312.04180, arXiv.org.
    16. Shun Yiu & Rob Seamans & Manav Raj & Ted Liu, 2024. "Strategic Responses to Technological Change: Evidence from ChatGPT and Upwork," Papers 2403.15262, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    17. Thomas Cantens, 2023. "How will the State think with the assistance of ChatGPT? The case of customs as an example of generative artificial intelligence in public administrations," CERDI Working papers hal-04233370, HAL.
    18. Jakub Growiec, 2023. "Industry 4.0? Framing the Digital Revolution and Its Long-Run Growth Consequences," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 4, pages 1-16.
    19. Kausik, B.N., 2023. "Long Tails & the Impact of GPT on Labor," MPRA Paper 117063, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Anil R. Doshi & Oliver P. Hauser, 2023. "Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity but reduces the diversity of novel content," Papers 2312.00506, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:1935-:d:1378210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.