IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i13p4886-d1177301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision for Geoinformation System-Based Offshore Wind Farm Positioning in Croatia

Author

Listed:
  • Ivana Racetin

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Geodesy, University of Split, Matice Hrvatske 15, 21000 Split, Croatia)

  • Nives Ostojić Škomrlj

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Geodesy, University of Split, Matice Hrvatske 15, 21000 Split, Croatia)

  • Marina Peko

    (Independent Researcher, 21000 Split, Croatia)

  • Mladen Zrinjski

    (Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, Kačićeva 26, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Renewable energy is one of the main components of a sustainable world and its future. The consumption of electricity from renewable sources in Croatia has an impressive rate of 53.5%, but offshore wind turbines (OWT) have not yet been installed in the Adriatic Sea. The aim of this study is to determine the possibilities for offshore wind farm (OWF) positioning in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea using marine spatial planning (MSP). Initial research to determine the points of interest was conducted based on wind speed. The authors established ten possible points for further research. Subsequently, different parameters were used as inputs for exclusion. The Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was used to calculate the weighting coefficients for a suitable set of criteria, exactly six of them. Using a combination of geoinformation system (GIS) analysis and weighting coefficients established through Fuzzy AHP, four points were established as suitable for OWF installation in Croatia. Finally, the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method was used to select the best order for OWF positioning in the eastern part of the Adriatic Sea. To conclude, there are not many options for OWF positioning in Croatia. Furthermore, it is clear that they exist and should be explored further.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivana Racetin & Nives Ostojić Škomrlj & Marina Peko & Mladen Zrinjski, 2023. "Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision for Geoinformation System-Based Offshore Wind Farm Positioning in Croatia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:13:p:4886-:d:1177301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/13/4886/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/13/4886/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schallenberg-Rodríguez, Julieta & García Montesdeoca, Nuria, 2018. "Spatial planning to estimate the offshore wind energy potential in coastal regions and islands. Practical case: The Canary Islands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 91-103.
    2. Navid Belvasi & Frances Judge & Jimmy Murphy & Cian Desmond, 2022. "Analysis of Floating Offshore Wind Platform Hydrodynamics Using Underwater SPIV: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Hedi Basbas & Yong-Chao Liu & Salah Laghrouche & Mickaël Hilairet & Franck Plestan, 2022. "Review on Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Models for Nonlinear Control Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-27, July.
    4. Sylvester Stallone Pereira de Azevedo & Amaro Olimpio Pereira Junior & Neilton Fidelis da Silva & Renato Samuel Barbosa de Araújo & Antonio Aldísio Carlos Júnior, 2020. "Assessment of Offshore Wind Power Potential along the Brazilian Coast," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Myhr, Anders & Bjerkseter, Catho & Ågotnes, Anders & Nygaard, Tor A., 2014. "Levelised cost of energy for offshore floating wind turbines in a life cycle perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 714-728.
    6. Mahdy, Mostafa & Bahaj, AbuBakr S., 2018. "Multi criteria decision analysis for offshore wind energy potential in Egypt," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 278-289.
    7. Paweł Ziemba, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Fuzzy Evaluation of the Planned Offshore Wind Farm Investments in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Andrea Farkas & Nastia Degiuli & Ivana Martić, 2019. "Assessment of Offshore Wave Energy Potential in the Croatian Part of the Adriatic Sea and Comparison with Wind Energy Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    9. Dimitra G. Vagiona & Manos Kamilakis, 2018. "Sustainable Site Selection for Offshore Wind Farms in the South Aegean—Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Li, He & Guedes Soares, C, 2022. "Assessment of failure rates and reliability of floating offshore wind turbines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sofia Spyridonidou & Dimitra G. Vagiona & Eva Loukogeorgaki, 2020. "Strategic Planning of Offshore Wind Farms in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Sofia Spyridonidou & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2020. "Systematic Review of Site-Selection Processes in Onshore and Offshore Wind Energy Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    3. Peters, Jared L. & Remmers, Tiny & Wheeler, Andrew J. & Murphy, Jimmy & Cummins, Valerie, 2020. "A systematic review and meta-analysis of GIS use to reveal trends in offshore wind energy research and offer insights on best practices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    4. Gkeka-Serpetsidaki, Pandora & Tsoutsos, Theocharis, 2022. "A methodological framework for optimal siting of offshore wind farms: A case study on the island of Crete," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    5. Mohammed Ifkirne & Houssam El Bouhi & Siham Acharki & Quoc Bao Pham & Abdelouahed Farah & Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh, 2022. "Multi-Criteria GIS-Based Analysis for Mapping Suitable Sites for Onshore Wind Farms in Southeast France," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, October.
    6. Hugo Díaz & Carlos Guedes Soares, 2021. "A Multi-Criteria Approach to Evaluate Floating Offshore Wind Farms Siting in the Canary Islands (Spain)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Ika Kurniawati & Beatriz Beaumont & Ramon Varghese & Danka Kostadinović & Ivan Sokol & Hassan Hemida & Panagiotis Alevras & Charalampos Baniotopoulos, 2023. "Conceptual Design of a Floating Modular Energy Island for Energy Independency: A Case Study in Crete," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Virtanen, E.A. & Lappalainen, J. & Nurmi, M. & Viitasalo, M. & Tikanmäki, M. & Heinonen, J. & Atlaskin, E. & Kallasvuo, M. & Tikkanen, H. & Moilanen, A., 2022. "Balancing profitability of energy production, societal impacts and biodiversity in offshore wind farm design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    9. Laura Castro-Santos & Almudena Filgueira-Vizoso & Carlos Álvarez-Feal & Luis Carral, 2018. "Influence of Size on the Economic Feasibility of Floating Offshore Wind Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, November.
    10. Marina Polykarpou & Flora Karathanasi & Takvor Soukissian & Vasiliki Loukaidi & Ioannis Kyriakides, 2023. "A Novel Data-Driven Tool Based on Non-Linear Optimization for Offshore Wind Farm Siting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Adalberto Ospino Castro & Carlos Robles-Algarín & Luis Hernández-Callejo & Yecid Muñoz Maldonado & Amanda Mangones Cordero, 2023. "Feasibility Analysis of Offshore Wind Power Projects in the Caribbean Region of Colombia: A Case Study Using FAHP–GIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Martinez, A. & Iglesias, G., 2022. "Mapping of the levelised cost of energy for floating offshore wind in the European Atlantic," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    13. Gil-García, Isabel C. & Ramos-Escudero, Adela & García-Cascales, M.S. & Dagher, Habib & Molina-García, A., 2022. "Fuzzy GIS-based MCDM solution for the optimal offshore wind site selection: The Gulf of Maine case," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 130-147.
    14. Guerrero-Lemus, Ricardo & Nuez, Ignacio de la & González-Díaz, Benjamín, 2018. "Rebuttal letter to the article entitled: “Spatial planning to estimate the offshore wind energy potential in coastal regions and islands. Practical case: The Canary Islands”," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 12-16.
    15. Kamali Saraji, Mahyar & Aliasgari, Elahe & Streimikiene, Dalia, 2023. "Assessment of the challenges to renewable energy technologies adoption in rural areas: A Fermatean CRITIC-VIKOR approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    16. Ziemba, Paweł, 2022. "Uncertain Multi-Criteria analysis of offshore wind farms projects investments – Case study of the Polish Economic Zone of the Baltic Sea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    17. Ran Tao & Jingpeng Yue & Zhenlin Huang & Ranran An & Zou Li & Junfeng Liu, 2022. "A High-Gain DC Side Converter with a Ripple-Free Input Current for Offshore Wind Energy Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.
    18. Vinhoza, Amanda & Schaeffer, Roberto, 2021. "Brazil's offshore wind energy potential assessment based on a Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    19. Sofia Spyridonidou & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2022. "A comparative analysis of decision-making methods on site suitability for on- and offshore wind farms: the case of regional unit of Euboea, Greece," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    20. Wang, Yongli & Tao, Siyi & Chen, Xin & Huang, Feifei & Xu, Xiaomin & Liu, Xiaoli & Liu, Yang & Liu, Lin, 2022. "Method multi-criteria decision-making method for site selection analysis and evaluation of urban integrated energy stations based on geographic information system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 273-292.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:13:p:4886-:d:1177301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.