IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i23p9062-d988719.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lignin Gasification: Current and Future Viability

Author

Listed:
  • Abraham Castro Garcia

    (Department of Transdisciplinary Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan)

  • Shuo Cheng

    (Department of Transdisciplinary Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan)

  • Jeffrey S. Cross

    (Department of Transdisciplinary Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan)

Abstract

The consumption of fossil fuels is one of the main drivers of climate change. Lignin derived from biomass is a carbon-neutral raw feedstock, and its conversion into fuels is gaining much attention. The gasification of biomass aims to transform heterogeneous feedstocks into syngas and heat that could be used for various purposes. Lignin is a biomass feedstock of special interest due to its particular properties and its ability to be obtained in abundant quantities as a side product from the paper pulp industry as well as the growing cellulosic ethanol industry. This review explores the existing works regarding lignin gasification from different perspectives and compares the results obtained with other existing thermochemical processes, in addition to providing a perspective on the long-term fate of gasification as a technology compared to other emerging technologies. The analysis indicates that while lignin gasification may grow in importance in the near future due to increased interest in hydrogen production, its potential in emerging applications indicates that lignin may be too valuable to be used purely for energy generation purposes, and applications that take advantage of its inherent chemical compounds are expected to take priority in the long-term.

Suggested Citation

  • Abraham Castro Garcia & Shuo Cheng & Jeffrey S. Cross, 2022. "Lignin Gasification: Current and Future Viability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:23:p:9062-:d:988719
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/23/9062/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/23/9062/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moriarty, Patrick & Honnery, Damon, 2016. "Can renewable energy power the future?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 3-7.
    2. Chio, Chonlong & Sain, Mohini & Qin, Wensheng, 2019. "Lignin utilization: A review of lignin depolymerization from various aspects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 232-249.
    3. Nadia Cerone & Francesco Zimbardi, 2021. "Effects of Oxygen and Steam Equivalence Ratios on Updraft Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Malladi, Krishna Teja & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2018. "Biomass logistics: A review of important features, optimization modeling and the new trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 587-599.
    5. LiLu T. Funkenbusch & Michael E. Mullins & Lennart Vamling & Tallal Belkhieri & Nattapol Srettiwat & Olumide Winjobi & David R. Shonnard & Tony N. Rogers, 2019. "Technoeconomic assessment of hydrothermal liquefaction oil from lignin with catalytic upgrading for renewable fuel and chemical production," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(1), January.
    6. Anshuman Chaube & Andrew Chapman & Yosuke Shigetomi & Kathryn Huff & James Stubbins, 2020. "The Role of Hydrogen in Achieving Long Term Japanese Energy System Goals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Asadullah, Mohammad, 2014. "Barriers of commercial power generation using biomass gasification gas: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 201-215.
    8. De Blasio, Cataldo & De Gisi, Sabino & Molino, Antonio & Simonetti, Marco & Santarelli, Massimo & Björklund-Sänkiaho, Margareta, 2019. "Concerning operational aspects in supercritical water gasification of kraft black liquor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 891-901.
    9. Abraham Castro Garcia & Shuo Cheng & Jeffrey S. Cross, 2020. "Solvolysis of Kraft Lignin to Bio-Oil: A Critical Review," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Fonseca, G.C. & Costa, C.B.B. & Cruz, A.J.G., 2020. "Economic analysis of a second-generation ethanol and electricity biorefinery using superstructural optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jukka Lappalainen & David Baudouin & Ursel Hornung & Julia Schuler & Kristian Melin & Saša Bjelić & Frédéric Vogel & Jukka Konttinen & Tero Joronen, 2020. "Sub- and Supercritical Water Liquefaction of Kraft Lignin and Black Liquor Derived Lignin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-45, June.
    2. Suopajärvi, Hannu & Umeki, Kentaro & Mousa, Elsayed & Hedayati, Ali & Romar, Henrik & Kemppainen, Antti & Wang, Chuan & Phounglamcheik, Aekjuthon & Tuomikoski, Sari & Norberg, Nicklas & Andefors, Alf , 2018. "Use of biomass in integrated steelmaking – Status quo, future needs and comparison to other low-CO2 steel production technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 384-407.
    3. Zhang, Chen & Sun, Zongxuan, 2017. "Trajectory-based combustion control for renewable fuels in free piston engines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 72-83.
    4. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    5. Mauro Prestipino & Antonio Piccolo & Maria Francesca Polito & Antonio Galvagno, 2022. "Combined Bio-Hydrogen, Heat, and Power Production Based on Residual Biomass Gasification: Energy, Exergy, and Renewability Assessment of an Alternative Process Configuration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Liu, Liwei & Ye, Junhong & Zhao, Yufei & Zhao, Erdong, 2015. "The plight of the biomass power generation industry in China – A supply chain risk perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 680-692.
    7. Nieto, Jaime & Carpintero, Óscar & Miguel, Luis J. & de Blas, Ignacio, 2020. "Macroeconomic modelling under energy constraints: Global low carbon transition scenarios," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    8. Artem A. Medvedev & Daria A. Beldova & Konstantin B. Kalmykov & Alexey V. Kravtsov & Marina A. Tedeeva & Leonid M. Kustov & Sergey F. Dunaev & Alexander L. Kustov, 2022. "Carbon Dioxide Assisted Conversion of Hydrolysis Lignin Catalyzed by Nickel Compounds," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-12, September.
    9. Arias-Gaviria, Jessica & Osorio, Andres F. & Arango-Aramburo, Santiago, 2020. "Estimating the practical potential for deep ocean water extraction in the Caribbean," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 307-319.
    10. Gutiérrez-Alvarez, R. & Guerra, K. & Haro, P., 2023. "Market profitability of CSP-biomass hybrid power plants: Towards a firm supply of renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    11. Xiaoye Jin & Meiying Li & Fansheng Meng, 2019. "Comprehensive Evaluation of the New Energy Power Generation Development at the Regional Level: An Empirical Analysis from China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Michel Noussan & Pier Paolo Raimondi & Rossana Scita & Manfred Hafner, 2020. "The Role of Green and Blue Hydrogen in the Energy Transition—A Technological and Geopolitical Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, December.
    13. Hanaoka, Toshiaki & Fujimoto, Shinji & Kihara, Hideyuki, 2019. "Improvement of the 1,3-butadiene production process from lignin – A comparison with the gasification power generation process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1303-1313.
    14. Bart Hawkins Kreps, 2020. "Energy Sprawl in the Renewable‐Energy Sector: Moving to Sufficiency in a Post Growth Era," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(3), pages 719-749, May.
    15. Duch-Brown, Néstor & Rossetti, Fiammetta, 2020. "Digital platforms across the European regional energy markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    16. K. M. Akkoli & N. R. Banapurmath & Suresh G & Manzoore Elahi M. Soudagar & T. M. Yunus Khan & Maughal Ahmed Ali Baig & M. A. Mujtaba & Nazia Hossain & Kiran Shahapurkar & Ashraf Elfasakhany & Mishal A, 2021. "Effect of Producer Gas from Redgram Stalk and Combustion Chamber Types on the Emission and Performance Characteristics of Diesel Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Doyeon Lee & Keunhwan Kim, 2021. "Research and Development Investment and Collaboration Framework for the Hydrogen Economy in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-28, September.
    18. Cataldo De Blasio & Gabriel Salierno & Andrea Magnano, 2021. "Implications on Feedstock Processing and Safety Issues for Semi-Batch Operations in Supercritical Water Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    19. Justyna Cader & Renata Koneczna & Piotr Olczak, 2021. "The Impact of Economic, Energy, and Environmental Factors on the Development of the Hydrogen Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    20. Delsoto, G.S. & Battisti, F.G. & da Silva, A.K., 2023. "Dynamic modeling and control of a solar-powered Brayton cycle using supercritical CO2 and optimization of its thermal energy storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 336-356.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:23:p:9062-:d:988719. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.