IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i9p2675-d549739.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Oxygen and Steam Equivalence Ratios on Updraft Gasification of Biomass

Author

Listed:
  • Nadia Cerone

    (Energy Technologies Department, ENEA, ss Ionica 106, 75026 Rotondella, Italy)

  • Francesco Zimbardi

    (Energy Technologies Department, ENEA, ss Ionica 106, 75026 Rotondella, Italy)

Abstract

Several experimental datasets available on the gasification of different lignocellulosic feedstocks were used to correlate the flow of gasifying agents with the performance of updraft gasification in an autothermic 200 kWth pilot plant. The feedstocks used included eucalyptus wood chips, torrefied eucalyptus and spruce chips, lignin rich residues from biorefined straw and reed, shells of almond and hazelnut, which were gasified in flows of air, air and steam, oxygen, oxygen and steam. Thermal profiles inside the gasifier and gas quality in terms of incondensable gas and tar content were recorded and used to calculate the energy efficiency of converting solid feedstock into gaseous and liquid carriers. Common behaviors and parametric functionalities were identified to better understand the process and the most efficient tools to achieve the desired products. In analyzing data, the ratio steam to biomass was reported in terms of the equivalence ratio, ER(H 2 O) i.e., the fraction of the stoichiometric quantity required to convert the feedstock into H 2 and CO 2 . The use of steam was useful to stabilize the process and to tune the H 2 /CO ratio in the syngas which reached the value of 2.08 in the case of oxy-steam gasification of lignin rich residues at ER(H 2 O) of 0.25. Larger use of steam depressed the process by lowering the average temperature of the bed, which instead increased steadily with ER(O 2 ). The production of tar depends on the biomass type and a substantial reduction can be achieved with the torrefaction pretreatment. The same effect was observed increasing the residence time of the syngas in the reactor, typically achieved using oxygen instead of air as main gasification flow or reducing the ER(H 2 O). Oxy-steam gasification of torrefied wood led to the best results in terms of cold gas efficiency and low heating value when carried out in the ranger 0.23–0.27 of both the ERs.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadia Cerone & Francesco Zimbardi, 2021. "Effects of Oxygen and Steam Equivalence Ratios on Updraft Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2675-:d:549739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2675/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2675/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nadia Cerone & Francesco Zimbardi, 2018. "Gasification of Agroresidues for Syngas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Rolandas Paulauskas & Kęstutis Zakarauskas & Nerijus Striūgas, 2021. "An Intensification of Biomass and Waste Char Gasification in a Gasifier," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-11, April.
    3. Sansaniwal, S.K. & Rosen, M.A. & Tyagi, S.K., 2017. "Global challenges in the sustainable development of biomass gasification: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 23-43.
    4. Ahmad, Anis Atikah & Zawawi, Norfadhila Abdullah & Kasim, Farizul Hafiz & Inayat, Abrar & Khasri, Azduwin, 2016. "Assessing the gasification performance of biomass: A review on biomass gasification process conditions, optimization and economic evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1333-1347.
    5. Umeki, Kentaro & Namioka, Tomoaki & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2012. "Analysis of an updraft biomass gasifier with high temperature steam using a numerical model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 38-45.
    6. Segurado, R. & Pereira, S. & Correia, D. & Costa, M., 2019. "Techno-economic analysis of a trigeneration system based on biomass gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 501-514.
    7. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "A Holistic Review on Biomass Gasification Modified Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-31, January.
    8. Alexander N. Kozlov & Nikita V. Tomin & Denis N. Sidorov & Electo E. S. Lora & Victor G. Kurbatsky, 2020. "Optimal Operation Control of PV-Biomass Gasifier-Diesel-Hybrid Systems Using Reinforcement Learning Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Ajay Kumar & David D. Jones & Milford A. Hanna, 2009. "Thermochemical Biomass Gasification: A Review of the Current Status of the Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-26, July.
    10. Lech Nowicki & Dorota Siuta & Maciej Markowski, 2020. "Carbon Dioxide Gasification Kinetics of Char from Rapeseed Oil Press Cake," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, May.
    11. Lech Nowicki & Dorota Siuta & Maciej Markowski, 2020. "Pyrolysis of Rapeseed Oil Press Cake and Steam Gasification of Solid Residues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-12, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abraham Castro Garcia & Shuo Cheng & Jeffrey S. Cross, 2022. "Lignin Gasification: Current and Future Viability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Donald Ukpanyang & Julio Terrados-Cepeda, 2022. "Decarbonizing Vehicle Transportation with Hydrogen from Biomass Gasification: An Assessment in the Nigerian Urban Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Dmitrii Glushkov & Galina Nyashina & Anatolii Shvets & Amaro Pereira & Anand Ramanathan, 2021. "Current Status of the Pyrolysis and Gasification Mechanism of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-24, November.
    4. Mauro Prestipino & Antonio Piccolo & Maria Francesca Polito & Antonio Galvagno, 2022. "Combined Bio-Hydrogen, Heat, and Power Production Based on Residual Biomass Gasification: Energy, Exergy, and Renewability Assessment of an Alternative Process Configuration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Fabio Montagnaro & Lucio Zaccariello, 2022. "Gasification of Spruce Wood Chips in a 1.5 MW th Fluidised Bed Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-13, August.
    6. Mateusz Wnukowski & Wojciech Moroń, 2021. "Warm Plasma Application in Tar Conversion and Syngas Valorization: The Fate of Hydrogen Sulfide," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    2. Díaz González, Carlos A. & Pacheco Sandoval, Leonardo, 2020. "Sustainability aspects of biomass gasification systems for small power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    3. Antonio Molino & Vincenzo Larocca & Simeone Chianese & Dino Musmarra, 2018. "Biofuels Production by Biomass Gasification: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, March.
    4. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Luís Calado & Valter Silva & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "Experimental and Modeling Analysis of Brewers´ Spent Grains Gasification in a Downdraft Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Inayat, Muddasser & Sulaiman, Shaharin A. & Kurnia, Jundika Candra & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2019. "Effect of various blended fuels on syngas quality and performance in catalytic co-gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 252-267.
    6. Yahaya, Ahmad Zubair & Somalu, Mahendra Rao & Muchtar, Andanastuti & Sulaiman, Shaharin Anwar & Wan Daud, Wan Ramli, 2019. "Effect of particle size and temperature on gasification performance of coconut and palm kernel shells in downdraft fixed-bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 931-940.
    7. Ram, Mahendra & Mondal, Monoj Kumar, 2019. "Investigation on fuel gas production from pulp and paper waste water impregnated coconut husk in fluidized bed gasifier via humidified air and CO2 gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 522-529.
    8. Ku, Xiaoke & Wang, Jin & Jin, Hanhui & Lin, Jianzhong, 2019. "Effects of operating conditions and reactor structure on biomass entrained-flow gasification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 781-795.
    9. Alejandro Lyons Cerón & Alar Konist, 2023. "Co-Pyrolysis of Woody Biomass and Oil Shale in a Batch Reactor in CO 2 , CO 2 -H 2 O, and Ar Atmospheres," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Elsner, Witold & Wysocki, Marian & Niegodajew, Paweł & Borecki, Roman, 2017. "Experimental and economic study of small-scale CHP installation equipped with downdraft gasifier and internal combustion engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 213-227.
    11. Ramin Khezri & Wan Azlina Wan Ab Karim Ghani & Dayang Radiah Awang Biak & Robiah Yunus & Kiman Silas, 2019. "Experimental Evaluation of Napier Grass Gasification in an Autothermal Bubbling Fluidized Bed Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Segurado, R. & Pereira, S. & Correia, D. & Costa, M., 2019. "Techno-economic analysis of a trigeneration system based on biomass gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 501-514.
    13. Andreas Schwabauer & Marco Mancini & Yunus Poyraz & Roman Weber, 2021. "On the Mathematical Modelling of a Moving-Bed Counter-Current Gasifier Fuelled with Wood-Pellets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    14. Ferreiro, A.I. & Segurado, R. & Costa, M., 2020. "Modelling soot formation during biomass gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    15. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Silva, Valter & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Co-gasification and recent developments on waste-to-energy conversion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 380-398.
    16. Matheus Oliveira & Ana Ramos & Tamer M. Ismail & Eliseu Monteiro & Abel Rouboa, 2022. "A Review on Plasma Gasification of Solid Residues: Recent Advances and Developments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Hung-Ta Wen & Jau-Huai Lu & Mai-Xuan Phuc, 2021. "Applying Artificial Intelligence to Predict the Composition of Syngas Using Rice Husks: A Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and Gradient Boosting Regression," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    18. Xia Liu & Juntao Wei & Wei Huo & Guangsuo Yu, 2017. "Gasification under CO 2 –Steam Mixture: Kinetic Model Study Based on Shared Active Sites," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-10, November.
    19. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    20. Li, Shenghui & Sun, Xiaojing & Liu, Linlin & Du, Jian, 2023. "A full process optimization of methanol production integrated with co-generation based on the co-gasification of biomass and coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2675-:d:549739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.