IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i23p4413-d289073.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental and Modeling Analysis of Brewers´ Spent Grains Gasification in a Downdraft Reactor

Author

Listed:
  • Sérgio Ferreira

    (CT2M—Centre for Mechanical and Materials Technologies, Mechanical Engineering Department of Minho University, 4804-533 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Eliseu Monteiro

    (VALORIZA—Research Center for Endogenous Resource Valorisation, Polytechnic Institute of Portalegre, 7300-555 Portalegre, Portugal
    CIENER-LAETA/Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Luís Calado

    (VALORIZA—Research Center for Endogenous Resource Valorisation, Polytechnic Institute of Portalegre, 7300-555 Portalegre, Portugal)

  • Valter Silva

    (VALORIZA—Research Center for Endogenous Resource Valorisation, Polytechnic Institute of Portalegre, 7300-555 Portalegre, Portugal)

  • Paulo Brito

    (VALORIZA—Research Center for Endogenous Resource Valorisation, Polytechnic Institute of Portalegre, 7300-555 Portalegre, Portugal)

  • Cândida Vilarinho

    (CT2M—Centre for Mechanical and Materials Technologies, Mechanical Engineering Department of Minho University, 4804-533 Guimarães, Portugal)

Abstract

The first part of the current reported work presents experimental results of brewers’ spent grains gasification in a pilot-scale downdraft gasifier. The gasification procedure is assessed through various process characteristics such as gas yield, lower heating value, carbon conversion efficiency, and cold gas efficiency. Power production was varied from 3.0 to 5.0 kWh during the gasification experiments. The produced gas was supplied to an internal combustion engine coupled to a synchronous generator to produce electricity. Here, 1.0 kWh of electricity was obtained for about 1.3 kg of brewers’ spent grains pellets gasified, with an average electrical efficiency of 16.5%. The second part of the current reported work is dedicated to the development of a modified thermodynamic equilibrium model of the downdraft gasification to assess the potential applications of the main Portuguese biomasses through produced gas quality indices. The Portuguese biomasses selected are the main representative forest residues (pine, eucalyptus, and cork) and agricultural residues (vine prunings and olive bagasse). A conclusion can be drawn that, using air as a gasifying agent, the biomass gasification provides a produced gas with enough quality to be used for energy production in boilers or turbines.

Suggested Citation

  • Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Luís Calado & Valter Silva & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "Experimental and Modeling Analysis of Brewers´ Spent Grains Gasification in a Downdraft Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:23:p:4413-:d:289073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/23/4413/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/23/4413/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ptasinski, Krzysztof J. & Prins, Mark J. & Pierik, Anke, 2007. "Exergetic evaluation of biomass gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 568-574.
    2. Ferreira, Sérgio & Monteiro, Eliseu & Brito, Paulo & Vilarinho, Cândida, 2017. "Biomass resources in Portugal: Current status and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1221-1235.
    3. Jarungthammachote, S. & Dutta, A., 2007. "Thermodynamic equilibrium model and second law analysis of a downdraft waste gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1660-1669.
    4. Karamarkovic, Rade & Karamarkovic, Vladan, 2010. "Energy and exergy analysis of biomass gasification at different temperatures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 537-549.
    5. Ruiz, J.A. & Juárez, M.C. & Morales, M.P. & Muñoz, P. & Mendívil, M.A., 2013. "Biomass gasification for electricity generation: Review of current technology barriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 174-183.
    6. La Villetta, M. & Costa, M. & Massarotti, N., 2017. "Modelling approaches to biomass gasification: A review with emphasis on the stoichiometric method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 71-88.
    7. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Carlos Castro & Luís Calado & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "Experimental Analysis of Brewers’ Spent Grains Steam Gasification in an Allothermal Batch Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Puig-Arnavat, Maria & Bruno, Joan Carles & Coronas, Alberto, 2010. "Review and analysis of biomass gasification models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2841-2851, December.
    9. Kirkels, Arjan F. & Verbong, Geert P.J., 2011. "Biomass gasification: Still promising? A 30-year global overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 471-481, January.
    10. Couto, Nuno Dinis & Silva, Valter Bruno & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2015. "Assessment of municipal solid wastes gasification in a semi-industrial gasifier using syngas quality indices," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 864-873.
    11. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "A Holistic Review on Biomass Gasification Modified Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-31, January.
    12. Ahmad, Anis Atikah & Zawawi, Norfadhila Abdullah & Kasim, Farizul Hafiz & Inayat, Abrar & Khasri, Azduwin, 2016. "Assessing the gasification performance of biomass: A review on biomass gasification process conditions, optimization and economic evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1333-1347.
    13. Azzone, Emanuele & Morini, Mirko & Pinelli, Michele, 2012. "Development of an equilibrium model for the simulation of thermochemical gasification and application to agricultural residues," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 248-254.
    14. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    15. Faaij, Andre P.C., 2006. "Bio-energy in Europe: changing technology choices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 322-342, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Octávio Alves & Luís Calado & Roberta M. Panizio & Catarina Nobre & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Margarida Gonçalves, 2022. "Gasification of Solid Recovered Fuels with Variable Fractions of Polymeric Materials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Monteiro, Eliseu & Ramos, Ana & Rouboa, Abel, 2024. "Fundamental designs of gasification plants for combined heat and power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Fang, Yi & Paul, Manosh C. & Varjani, Sunita & Li, Xian & Park, Young-Kwon & You, Siming, 2021. "Concentrated solar thermochemical gasification of biomass: Principles, applications, and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    4. Sandra Untoria & Abel Rouboa & Eliseu Monteiro, 2024. "Hydrogen-Rich Syngas Production from Gasification of Sewage Sludge: Catalonia Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Bernardino Novais & Ana Ramos & Abel Rouboa & Eliseu Monteiro, 2023. "Air-Blown Biomass Gasification Process Intensification for Green Hydrogen Production: Modeling and Simulation in Aspen Plus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-12, November.
    6. Gabriele Calì & Paolo Deiana & Claudia Bassano & Simone Meloni & Enrico Maggio & Michele Mascia & Alberto Pettinau, 2020. "Syngas Production, Clean-Up and Wastewater Management in a Demo-Scale Fixed-Bed Updraft Biomass Gasification Unit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Francesco Arfelli & Cristian Tosi & Luca Ciacci & Fabrizio Passarini, 2024. "Life Cycle Assessment of a Wood Biomass Gasification Plant and Implications for Syngas and Biochar Utilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Jacek Roman & Robert Wróblewski & Beata Klojzy-Karczmarczyk & Bartosz Ceran, 2023. "Energetic, Economic and Environmental (3E) Analysis of a RES-Waste Gasification Plant with Syngas Storage Cooperation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-29, February.
    9. J. R. Copa & C. E. Tuna & J. L. Silveira & R. A. M. Boloy & P. Brito & V. Silva & J. Cardoso & D. Eusébio, 2020. "Techno-Economic Assessment of the Use of Syngas Generated from Biomass to Feed an Internal Combustion Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-31, June.
    10. HajiHashemi, MohammadSina & Mazhkoo, Shahin & Dadfar, Hossein & Livani, Ehsan & Naseri Varnosefaderani, Aliakbar & Pourali, Omid & Najafi Nobar, Shima & Dutta, Animesh, 2023. "Combined heat and power production in a pilot-scale biomass gasification system: Experimental study and kinetic simulation using ASPEN Plus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "A Holistic Review on Biomass Gasification Modified Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-31, January.
    2. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    3. Silva, Isabelly P. & Lima, Rafael M.A. & Silva, Gabriel F. & Ruzene, Denise S. & Silva, Daniel P., 2019. "Thermodynamic equilibrium model based on stoichiometric method for biomass gasification: A review of model modifications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Safarian, Sahar & Unnthorsson, Runar & Richter, Christiaan, 2020. "The equivalence of stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric methods for modeling gasification and other reaction equilibria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    5. Ibrahim, A. & Veremieiev, S. & Gaskell, P.H., 2022. "An advanced, comprehensive thermochemical equilibrium model of a downdraft biomass gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 912-925.
    6. La Villetta, M. & Costa, M. & Massarotti, N., 2017. "Modelling approaches to biomass gasification: A review with emphasis on the stoichiometric method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 71-88.
    7. Motta, Ingrid Lopes & Miranda, Nahieh Toscano & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Wolf Maciel, Maria Regina, 2018. "Biomass gasification in fluidized beds: A review of biomass moisture content and operating pressure effects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 998-1023.
    8. Ismail, Tamer M. & Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & El-Salam, M. Abd & Rouboa, Abel, 2020. "Parametric studies in the gasification agent and fluidization velocity during oxygen-enriched gasification of biomass in a pilot-scale fluidized bed: Experimental and numerical assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 2429-2439.
    9. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Silva, Valter & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Co-gasification and recent developments on waste-to-energy conversion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 380-398.
    10. Tavares, Raquel & Monteiro, Eliseu & Tabet, Fouzi & Rouboa, Abel, 2020. "Numerical investigation of optimum operating conditions for syngas and hydrogen production from biomass gasification using Aspen Plus," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1309-1314.
    11. Monteiro, Eliseu & Ramos, Ana & Rouboa, Abel, 2024. "Fundamental designs of gasification plants for combined heat and power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    12. Mendiburu, Andrés Z. & Carvalho, João A. & Coronado, Christian J.R., 2014. "Thermochemical equilibrium modeling of biomass downdraft gasifier: Stoichiometric models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 189-201.
    13. Ku, Xiaoke & Wang, Jin & Jin, Hanhui & Lin, Jianzhong, 2019. "Effects of operating conditions and reactor structure on biomass entrained-flow gasification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 781-795.
    14. Upadhyay, Darshit S. & Sakhiya, Anil Kumar & Panchal, Krunal & Patel, Amar H. & Patel, Rajesh N., 2019. "Effect of equivalence ratio on the performance of the downdraft gasifier – An experimental and modelling approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 833-846.
    15. Safarian, Sahar & Unnþórsson, Rúnar & Richter, Christiaan, 2019. "A review of biomass gasification modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 378-391.
    16. Ferreiro, A.I. & Segurado, R. & Costa, M., 2020. "Modelling soot formation during biomass gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    17. Wang, Linwei & Izaharuddin, Ainul N. & Karimi, Nader & Paul, Manosh C., 2021. "A numerical investigation of CO2 gasification of biomass particles- analysis of energy, exergy and entropy generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    18. Patra, Tapas Kumar & Sheth, Pratik N., 2015. "Biomass gasification models for downdraft gasifier: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 583-593.
    19. Ramos, Ana & Rouboa, Abel, 2020. "Syngas production strategies from biomass gasification: Numerical studies for operational conditions and quality indexes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1211-1221.
    20. Matheus Oliveira & Ana Ramos & Tamer M. Ismail & Eliseu Monteiro & Abel Rouboa, 2022. "A Review on Plasma Gasification of Solid Residues: Recent Advances and Developments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:23:p:4413-:d:289073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.