IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i23p7829-d1289784.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Air-Blown Biomass Gasification Process Intensification for Green Hydrogen Production: Modeling and Simulation in Aspen Plus

Author

Listed:
  • Bernardino Novais

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Ana Ramos

    (LAETA-INEGI, Associated Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aeronautics, Institute of Science and Innovation in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Abel Rouboa

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
    LAETA-INEGI, Associated Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aeronautics, Institute of Science and Innovation in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Eliseu Monteiro

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
    LAETA-INEGI, Associated Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aeronautics, Institute of Science and Innovation in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Hydrogen produced sustainably has the potential to be an important energy source in the short term. Biomass gasification is one of the fastest-growing technologies to produce green hydrogen. In this work, an air-blown gasification model was developed in Aspen Plus ® , integrating a water–gas shift (WGS) reactor to study green hydrogen production. A sensitivity analysis was performed based on two approaches with the objective of optimizing the WGS reaction. The gasifier is optimized for carbon monoxide production (Case A) or hydrogen production (Case B). A CO 2 recycling stream is approached as another intensification process. Results suggested that the Case B approach is more favorable for green hydrogen production, allowing for a 52.5% molar fraction. The introduction of CO 2 as an additional gasifying agent showed a negative effect on the H 2 molar fraction. A general conclusion can be drawn that the combination of a WGS reactor with an air-blown biomass gasification process allows for attaining 52.5% hydrogen content in syngas with lower steam flow rates than a pure steam gasification process. These results are relevant for the hydrogen economy because they represent reference data for further studies towards the implementation of biomass gasification projects for green hydrogen production.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernardino Novais & Ana Ramos & Abel Rouboa & Eliseu Monteiro, 2023. "Air-Blown Biomass Gasification Process Intensification for Green Hydrogen Production: Modeling and Simulation in Aspen Plus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-12, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:23:p:7829-:d:1289784
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/23/7829/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/23/7829/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Luís Calado & Valter Silva & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "Experimental and Modeling Analysis of Brewers´ Spent Grains Gasification in a Downdraft Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Jarungthammachote, S. & Dutta, A., 2007. "Thermodynamic equilibrium model and second law analysis of a downdraft waste gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1660-1669.
    3. Mendiburu, Andrés Z. & Carvalho, João A. & Coronado, Christian J.R., 2014. "Thermochemical equilibrium modeling of biomass downdraft gasifier: Stoichiometric models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 189-201.
    4. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Carlos Castro & Luís Calado & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "Experimental Analysis of Brewers’ Spent Grains Steam Gasification in an Allothermal Batch Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Mendiburu, Andrés Z. & Carvalho, João A. & Zanzi, Rolando & Coronado, Christian R. & Silveira, José L., 2014. "Thermochemical equilibrium modeling of a biomass downdraft gasifier: Constrained and unconstrained non-stoichiometric models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 624-637.
    6. Ismail, Tamer M. & Monteiro, Eliseu & Ramos, Ana & El-Salam, M. Abd & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "An Eulerian model for forest residues gasification in a plasma gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 1069-1083.
    7. Eliseu Monteiro & Sérgio Ferreira, 2023. "Some Perspectives for the Gasification Process in the Energy Transition World Scenario," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-11, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hiago Oliveira & Isabela Pinheiro & Ana Ramos & Osvaldo Venturini & Adriano Mariano & York Santiago, 2024. "Influence of Physicochemical Properties of Oil Sludge on Syngas Production for Energy Applications," Resources, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-27, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. HajiHashemi, MohammadSina & Mazhkoo, Shahin & Dadfar, Hossein & Livani, Ehsan & Naseri Varnosefaderani, Aliakbar & Pourali, Omid & Najafi Nobar, Shima & Dutta, Animesh, 2023. "Combined heat and power production in a pilot-scale biomass gasification system: Experimental study and kinetic simulation using ASPEN Plus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    2. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    3. Rodriguez-Alejandro, David A. & Nam, Hyungseok & Maglinao, Amado L. & Capareda, Sergio C. & Aguilera-Alvarado, Alberto F., 2016. "Development of a modified equilibrium model for biomass pilot-scale fluidized bed gasifier performance predictions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1092-1108.
    4. Monteiro, Eliseu & Ramos, Ana & Rouboa, Abel, 2024. "Fundamental designs of gasification plants for combined heat and power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    5. Elmaz, Furkan & Yücel, Özgün & Mutlu, Ali Yener, 2020. "Predictive modeling of biomass gasification with machine learning-based regression methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    6. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "A Holistic Review on Biomass Gasification Modified Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-31, January.
    7. Safarian, Sahar & Unnthorsson, Runar & Richter, Christiaan, 2020. "The equivalence of stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric methods for modeling gasification and other reaction equilibria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    8. Silva, Isabelly P. & Lima, Rafael M.A. & Santana, Hortência E.P. & Silva, Gabriel F. & Ruzene, Denise S. & Silva, Daniel P., 2022. "Development of a semi-empirical model for woody biomass gasification based on stoichiometric thermodynamic equilibrium model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    9. Upadhyay, Darshit S. & Sakhiya, Anil Kumar & Panchal, Krunal & Patel, Amar H. & Patel, Rajesh N., 2019. "Effect of equivalence ratio on the performance of the downdraft gasifier – An experimental and modelling approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 833-846.
    10. Aydin, Ebubekir Siddik & Yucel, Ozgun & Sadikoglu, Hasan, 2017. "Development of a semi-empirical equilibrium model for downdraft gasification systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 86-98.
    11. Alexander A. R. Gamboa & Leila R. dos Santos & Cristiane A. Martins & Ana M. A. Rocha & Carlos A. Alvarado-Silva & João A. de Carvalho, 2023. "Thermodynamic Evaluation of the Energy Self-Sufficiency of the Tyre Pyrolysis Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-26, December.
    12. Silva, Isabelly P. & Lima, Rafael M.A. & Silva, Gabriel F. & Ruzene, Denise S. & Silva, Daniel P., 2019. "Thermodynamic equilibrium model based on stoichiometric method for biomass gasification: A review of model modifications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    13. Safarian, Sahar & Unnþórsson, Rúnar & Richter, Christiaan, 2019. "A review of biomass gasification modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 378-391.
    14. Qitai Eri & Wenzhen Wu & Xinjun Zhao, 2017. "Numerical Investigation of the Air-Steam Biomass Gasification Process Based on Thermodynamic Equilibrium Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Sandra Untoria & Abel Rouboa & Eliseu Monteiro, 2024. "Hydrogen-Rich Syngas Production from Gasification of Sewage Sludge: Catalonia Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-13, March.
    16. Samadi, Seyed Hashem & Ghobadian, Barat & Nosrati, Mohsen, 2020. "Prediction and estimation of biomass energy from agricultural residues using air gasification technology in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1077-1091.
    17. Amaro, Jordan & Mendiburu, Andrés Z. & Ávila, Ivonete, 2018. "Modeling of syngas composition obtained from fluidized bed gasifiers using Kuhn–Tucker multipliers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 371-382.
    18. Hafiz Muhammad Uzair Ayub & Sang Jin Park & Michael Binns, 2020. "Biomass to Syngas: Modified Stoichiometric Thermodynamic Models for Downdraft Biomass Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    19. Ibrahim, A. & Veremieiev, S. & Gaskell, P.H., 2022. "An advanced, comprehensive thermochemical equilibrium model of a downdraft biomass gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 912-925.
    20. Costa, M. & Massarotti, N. & Indrizzi, V. & Rajh, B. & Yin, C. & Samec, N., 2014. "Engineering bed models for solid fuel conversion process in grate-fired boilers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 244-253.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:23:p:7829-:d:1289784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.