IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i15p5524-d875830.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combined Bio-Hydrogen, Heat, and Power Production Based on Residual Biomass Gasification: Energy, Exergy, and Renewability Assessment of an Alternative Process Configuration

Author

Listed:
  • Mauro Prestipino

    (Department of Engineering, University of Messina, C.da di Dio 1, 98166 Messina, Italy)

  • Antonio Piccolo

    (Department of Engineering, University of Messina, C.da di Dio 1, 98166 Messina, Italy)

  • Maria Francesca Polito

    (Department of Engineering, University of Messina, C.da di Dio 1, 98166 Messina, Italy)

  • Antonio Galvagno

    (Department of Engineering, University of Messina, C.da di Dio 1, 98166 Messina, Italy)

Abstract

Bio-hydrogen from residual biomass may involve energy-intensive pre-treatments for drying and size management, as in the case of wet agro-industrial residues. This work assesses the performance of an alternative process layout for bio-hydrogen production from citrus peel gasification, with the aim of cogenerating heat and power along with hydrogen, using minimal external energy sources. The process consists of an air-steam fluidized bed reactor, a hydrogen separation unit, a hydrogen compression unit, and a combined heat and power unit fed by the off-gas of the separation unit. Process simulations were carried out to perform sensitivity analyses to understand the variation in bio-hydrogen production’s thermodynamic and environmental performance when the steam to biomass ratios (S/B) vary from 0 to 1.25 at 850 °C. In addition, energy and exergy efficiencies and the integrated renewability (IR) of bio-hydrogen production are evaluated. As main results, the analysis showed that the highest hydrogen yield is 40.1 kg H2 per mass of dry biomass at S/B = 1.25. Under these conditions, the exergy efficiency of the polygeneration system is 33%, the IR is 0.99, and the carbon footprint is −1.9 kg CO2-eq /kg H2 . Negative carbon emissions and high values of the IR are observed due to the substitution of non-renewable resources operated by the cogenerated streams. The proposed system demonstrated for the first time the potential of bio-hydrogen production from citrus peel and the effects of steam flow variation on thermodynamic performance. Furthermore, the authors demonstrated how bio-hydrogen could be produced with minimal external energy input while cogenerating net heat and power by exploiting the off-gas in a cogeneration unit.

Suggested Citation

  • Mauro Prestipino & Antonio Piccolo & Maria Francesca Polito & Antonio Galvagno, 2022. "Combined Bio-Hydrogen, Heat, and Power Production Based on Residual Biomass Gasification: Energy, Exergy, and Renewability Assessment of an Alternative Process Configuration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5524-:d:875830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5524/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5524/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nadia Cerone & Francesco Zimbardi, 2021. "Effects of Oxygen and Steam Equivalence Ratios on Updraft Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Marcin Siedlecki & Wiebren De Jong & Adrian H.M. Verkooijen, 2011. "Fluidized Bed Gasification as a Mature And Reliable Technology for the Production of Bio-Syngas and Applied in the Production of Liquid Transportation Fuels—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-46, March.
    3. Prestipino, Mauro & Salmeri, Fabio & Cucinotta, Filippo & Galvagno, Antonio, 2021. "Thermodynamic and environmental sustainability analysis of electricity production from an integrated cogeneration system based on residual biomass: A life cycle approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    4. Famoso, F. & Prestipino, M. & Brusca, S. & Galvagno, A., 2020. "Designing sustainable bioenergy from residual biomass: Site allocation criteria and energy/exergy performance indicators," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ratikorn Sornumpol & Dang Saebea & Amornchai Arpornwichanop & Yaneeporn Patcharavorachot, 2023. "Process Optimization and CO 2 Emission Analysis of Coal/Biomass Gasification Integrated with a Chemical Looping Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Squadrito, Gaetano & Maggio, Gaetano & Nicita, Agatino, 2023. "The green hydrogen revolution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    3. Matteo Baldelli & Lorenzo Bartolucci & Stefano Cordiner & Giorgio D’Andrea & Emanuele De Maina & Vincenzo Mulone, 2023. "Biomass to H2: Evaluation of the Impact of PV and TES Power Supply on the Performance of an Integrated Bio-Thermo-Chemical Upgrading Process for Wet Residual Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Thuan Duc Mai & Tamás Koós & Emese Sebe & Zoltán Siménfalvi & András Arnold Kállay, 2023. "Efficiency Enhancement of the Single Line Multi-Stage Gasification of Hungarian Low-Rank Coal: Effects of Gasification Temperature and Steam/Carbon (S/C) Ratio," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Yiru Zhao & Nathalie Bourgougnon & Jean-Louis Lanoisellé & Thomas Lendormi, 2022. "Biofuel Production from Seaweeds: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-34, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuttana Homket & Pongthep Sutheravut & Sawpheeyah Nima, 2021. "Community Capacity-Building Mobilization towards Energy Transitions in the Era of Thailand 4.0: A Case Study on Biomass Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    3. María Pilar González-Vázquez & Roberto García & Covadonga Pevida & Fernando Rubiera, 2017. "Optimization of a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Plant for Low-Temperature Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Sharma, Monikankana & N, Rakesh & Dasappa, S., 2016. "Solid oxide fuel cell operating with biomass derived producer gas: Status and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 450-463.
    5. Carlos Vargas-Salgado & Elías Hurtado-Pérez & David Alfonso-Solar & Anders Malmquist, 2021. "Empirical Design, Construction, and Experimental Test of a Small-Scale Bubbling Fluidized Bed Reactor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, January.
    6. Rawan Hakawati & Beatrice Smyth & Helen Daly & Geoffrey McCullough & David Rooney, 2019. "Is the Fischer-Tropsch Conversion of Biogas-Derived Syngas to Liquid Fuels Feasible at Atmospheric Pressure?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, March.
    7. Nii Nelson & Jo Darkwa & John Calautit & Mark Worall & Robert Mokaya & Eunice Adjei & Francis Kemausuor & Julius Ahiekpor, 2021. "Potential of Bioenergy in Rural Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    8. O'Connor, S. & Ehimen, E. & Pillai, S.C. & Black, A. & Tormey, D. & Bartlett, J., 2021. "Biogas production from small-scale anaerobic digestion plants on European farms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    9. Grové, Johannes & Lant, Paul A. & Greig, Chris R. & Smart, Simon, 2018. "Is MSW derived DME a viable clean cooking fuel in Kolkata, India?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 50-60.
    10. Leonel J. R. Nunes & Margarida Casau & João C. O. Matias & Marta Ferreira Dias, 2022. "Assessment of Woody Residual Biomass Generation Capacity in the Central Region of Portugal: Analysis of the Power Production Potential," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Watson, Jamison & Zhang, Yuanhui & Si, Buchun & Chen, Wan-Ting & de Souza, Raquel, 2018. "Gasification of biowaste: A critical review and outlooks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-17.
    12. Donald Ukpanyang & Julio Terrados-Cepeda, 2022. "Decarbonizing Vehicle Transportation with Hydrogen from Biomass Gasification: An Assessment in the Nigerian Urban Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    13. Ghulamullah Maitlo & Imran Ali & Kashif Hussain Mangi & Safdar Ali & Hubdar Ali Maitlo & Imran Nazir Unar & Abdul Majeed Pirzada, 2022. "Thermochemical Conversion of Biomass for Syngas Production: Current Status and Future Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-30, February.
    14. Dmitrii Glushkov & Galina Nyashina & Anatolii Shvets & Amaro Pereira & Anand Ramanathan, 2021. "Current Status of the Pyrolysis and Gasification Mechanism of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-24, November.
    15. Agus Haryanto & Wahyu Hidayat & Udin Hasanudin & Dewi Agustina Iryani & Sangdo Kim & Sihyun Lee & Jiho Yoo, 2021. "Valorization of Indonesian Wood Wastes through Pyrolysis: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, March.
    16. Fabio Montagnaro & Lucio Zaccariello, 2022. "Gasification of Spruce Wood Chips in a 1.5 MW th Fluidised Bed Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-13, August.
    17. Alvaro Quiles Garcia & Naoya Nishiumi & Atsushi Saito & Eriko Matsumura & Jiro Senda, 2021. "Economic, Environmental and Energetic Analysis of a Distributed Generation System Composed by Waste Gasification and Photovoltaic Panels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    18. Pode, Ramchandra & Diouf, Boucar & Pode, Gayatri, 2015. "Sustainable rural electrification using rice husk biomass energy: A case study of Cambodia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 530-542.
    19. Antonio Molino & Vincenzo Larocca & Simeone Chianese & Dino Musmarra, 2018. "Biofuels Production by Biomass Gasification: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, March.
    20. Yasutsugu Baba & Andante Hadi Pandyaswargo & Hiroshi Onoda, 2020. "An Analysis of the Current Status of Woody Biomass Gasification Power Generation in Japan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-13, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5524-:d:875830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.