IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2596-d756976.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermochemical Conversion of Biomass for Syngas Production: Current Status and Future Trends

Author

Listed:
  • Ghulamullah Maitlo

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Dawood University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi 74800, Sindh, Pakistan)

  • Imran Ali

    (Department of Environmental Sciences, Sindh Madressatul Islam University, Karachi 74000, Sindh, Pakistan)

  • Kashif Hussain Mangi

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Quaid e Awam University of Engineering Science and Technology, Nawabshah 67480, Sindh, Pakistan)

  • Safdar Ali

    (Asian Institute of Fashion Design, Iqra University, Karachi 75500, Sindh, Pakistan)

  • Hubdar Ali Maitlo

    (Department of Energy and Environment Engineering, Dawood University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi 74800, Sindh, Pakistan
    Key Laboratory of Pollution Process and Environmental Criteria, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Imran Nazir Unar

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76062, Sindh, Pakistan)

  • Abdul Majeed Pirzada

    (Department of Environmental Sciences, Sindh Madressatul Islam University, Karachi 74000, Sindh, Pakistan)

Abstract

The thermochemical conversion of different feedstocks is a technology capable of reducing the amount of biowaste materials produced. In addition, the gasification of feedstock using steam as a gasifying agent also produces hydrogen, which is a clean energy fuel. This article aimed to encapsulate the current status of biowaste gasification and to explain, in detail, the advantages and limitations of gasification technologies. In this review paper, different gasifying agents such as steam, air, and oxygen, as well as their effects on the quality of syngas production, are discussed. In addition, the effects of reactor configuration and different operating parameters, such as temperature, pressure, equivalence ratio, and incorporation of a catalyst, as well as their effects on the ratio of H 2 /CO, LHV, syngas yield, and tar production, were critically evaluated. Although gasification is a sustainable and ecologically sound biomass utilization technology, tar formation is the main problem in the biomass gasification process. Tar can condense in the reactor, and clog and contaminate equipment. It has been shown that an optimized gasifier and a high-activity catalyst can effectively reduce tar formation. However, key biowaste treatment technologies and concepts must first be improved and demonstrated at the market level to increase stakeholder confidence. Gasification can be the driving force of this integration, effectively replacing fossil fuels with produced gas. In addition, support policies are usually needed to make the integration of biomass gasification technology into the industry profitable with fully functional gasification plants. Therefore, to address such issues, this study focused on addressing these issues and an overview of gasification concepts.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghulamullah Maitlo & Imran Ali & Kashif Hussain Mangi & Safdar Ali & Hubdar Ali Maitlo & Imran Nazir Unar & Abdul Majeed Pirzada, 2022. "Thermochemical Conversion of Biomass for Syngas Production: Current Status and Future Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-30, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2596-:d:756976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2596/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2596/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Md. Emdadul Hoque & Fazlur Rashid & Muhammad Aziz, 2021. "Gasification and Power Generation Characteristics of Rice Husk, Sawdust, and Coconut Shell Using a Fixed-Bed Downdraft Gasifier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Udomsirichakorn, Jakkapong & Salam, P. Abdul, 2014. "Review of hydrogen-enriched gas production from steam gasification of biomass: The prospect of CaO-based chemical looping gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 565-579.
    3. Luo, Siyi & Zhou, Yangmin & Yi, Chuijie, 2012. "Syngas production by catalytic steam gasification of municipal solid waste in fixed-bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 391-395.
    4. Lin, Leteng & Strand, Michael, 2013. "Investigation of the intrinsic CO2 gasification kinetics of biomass char at medium to high temperatures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 220-228.
    5. Buragohain, Buljit & Mahanta, Pinakeswar & Moholkar, Vijayanand S., 2010. "Biomass gasification for decentralized power generation: The Indian perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 73-92, January.
    6. Samiran, Nor Afzanizam & Jaafar, Mohammad Nazri Mohd & Ng, Jo-Han & Lam, Su Shiung & Chong, Cheng Tung, 2016. "Progress in biomass gasification technique – With focus on Malaysian palm biomass for syngas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1047-1062.
    7. Centeno, Felipe & Mahkamov, Khamid & Silva Lora, Electo E. & Andrade, Rubenildo V., 2012. "Theoretical and experimental investigations of a downdraft biomass gasifier-spark ignition engine power system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 97-108.
    8. Gadsbøll, Rasmus Østergaard & Sárossy, Zsuzsa & Jørgensen, Lars & Ahrenfeldt, Jesper & Henriksen, Ulrik Birk, 2018. "Oxygen-blown operation of the TwoStage Viking gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 495-503.
    9. Raman, P. & Ram, N.K. & Gupta, Ruchi, 2013. "A dual fired downdraft gasifier system to produce cleaner gas for power generation: Design, development and performance analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 302-314.
    10. Puig-Arnavat, Maria & Bruno, Joan Carles & Coronas, Alberto, 2010. "Review and analysis of biomass gasification models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2841-2851, December.
    11. Asadullah, Mohammad, 2014. "Barriers of commercial power generation using biomass gasification gas: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 201-215.
    12. Ahmed, I.I. & Gupta, A.K., 2011. "Kinetics of woodchips char gasification with steam and carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(5), pages 1613-1619, May.
    13. Kirkels, Arjan F. & Verbong, Geert P.J., 2011. "Biomass gasification: Still promising? A 30-year global overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 471-481, January.
    14. Mohanty, Pravakar & Pant, Kamal K. & Naik, Satya Narayan & Parikh, Jigisha & Hornung, Andreas & Sahu, J.N., 2014. "Synthesis of green fuels from biogenic waste through thermochemical route – The role of heterogeneous catalyst: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 131-153.
    15. Yueshi Wu & Weihong Yang & Wlodzimierz Blasiak, 2014. "Energy and Exergy Analysis of High Temperature Agent Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-16, April.
    16. Asadullah, Mohammad, 2014. "Biomass gasification gas cleaning for downstream applications: A comparative critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 118-132.
    17. Zhang, Qinglin & Dor, Liran & Zhang, Lan & Yang, Weihong & Blasiak, Wlodzimierz, 2012. "Performance analysis of municipal solid waste gasification with steam in a Plasma Gasification Melting reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 219-229.
    18. Watson, Jamison & Zhang, Yuanhui & Si, Buchun & Chen, Wan-Ting & de Souza, Raquel, 2018. "Gasification of biowaste: A critical review and outlooks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-17.
    19. Ruiz, J.A. & Juárez, M.C. & Morales, M.P. & Muñoz, P. & Mendívil, M.A., 2013. "Biomass gasification for electricity generation: Review of current technology barriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 174-183.
    20. Hamad, Mohamed A. & Radwan, Aly M. & Heggo, Dalia A. & Moustafa, Tarek, 2016. "Hydrogen rich gas production from catalytic gasification of biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1290-1300.
    21. Hu, Mian & Guo, Dabin & Ma, Caifeng & Hu, Zhiquan & Zhang, Beiping & Xiao, Bo & Luo, Siyi & Wang, Jingbo, 2015. "Hydrogen-rich gas production by the gasification of wet MSW (municipal solid waste) coupled with carbon dioxide capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 857-863.
    22. Dantas, Guilherme A. & Legey, Luiz F.L. & Mazzone, Antonella, 2013. "Energy from sugarcane bagasse in Brazil: An assessment of the productivity and cost of different technological routes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 356-364.
    23. Sansaniwal, S.K. & Pal, K. & Rosen, M.A. & Tyagi, S.K., 2017. "Recent advances in the development of biomass gasification technology: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 363-384.
    24. Motta, Ingrid Lopes & Miranda, Nahieh Toscano & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Wolf Maciel, Maria Regina, 2018. "Biomass gasification in fluidized beds: A review of biomass moisture content and operating pressure effects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 998-1023.
    25. Puig-Arnavat, Maria & Bruno, Joan Carles & Coronas, Alberto, 2014. "Modeling of trigeneration configurations based on biomass gasification and comparison of performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 845-856.
    26. Anukam, Anthony & Mamphweli, Sampson & Reddy, Prashant & Meyer, Edson & Okoh, Omobola, 2016. "Pre-processing of sugarcane bagasse for gasification in a downdraft biomass gasifier system: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 775-801.
    27. Ahmed, I.I. & Gupta, A.K., 2010. "Pyrolysis and gasification of food waste: Syngas characteristics and char gasification kinetics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 101-108, January.
    28. Font Palma, Carolina, 2013. "Modelling of tar formation and evolution for biomass gasification: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 129-141.
    29. Ahmed, I.I. & Gupta, A.K., 2012. "Sugarcane bagasse gasification: Global reaction mechanism of syngas evolution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 75-81.
    30. Marcin Siedlecki & Wiebren De Jong & Adrian H.M. Verkooijen, 2011. "Fluidized Bed Gasification as a Mature And Reliable Technology for the Production of Bio-Syngas and Applied in the Production of Liquid Transportation Fuels—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-46, March.
    31. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Chen, Chih-Jung & Hung, Chen-I & Shen, Cheng-Hsien & Hsu, Heng-Wen, 2013. "A comparison of gasification phenomena among raw biomass, torrefied biomass and coal in an entrained-flow reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 421-430.
    32. Irfan, Muhammad Faisal & Arami-Niya, Arash & Chakrabarti, Mohammed Harun & Wan Daud, Wan Mohd. Ashri & Usman, Muhammad Rashid, 2012. "Kinetics of gasification of coal, biomass and their blends in air (N2/O2) and different oxy-fuel (O2/CO2) atmospheres," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 665-672.
    33. Li, Hongyu & Xu, Qingli & Xue, Hanshen & Yan, Yongjie, 2009. "Catalytic reforming of the aqueous phase derived from fast-pyrolysis of biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2872-2877.
    34. Seabra, Joaquim E.A. & Macedo, Isaias C., 2011. "Comparative analysis for power generation and ethanol production from sugarcane residual biomass in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 421-428, January.
    35. Jun Sheng Teh & Yew Heng Teoh & Heoy Geok How & Thanh Danh Le & Yeoh Jun Jie Jason & Huu Tho Nguyen & Dong Lin Loo, 2021. "The Potential of Sustainable Biomass Producer Gas as a Waste-to-Energy Alternative in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-31, April.
    36. Zhang, Qinglin & Dor, Liran & Fenigshtein, Dikla & Yang, Weihong & Blasiak, Wlodzmierz, 2012. "Gasification of municipal solid waste in the Plasma Gasification Melting process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 106-112.
    37. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Pinto, R.G. & Matos, M.A.A. & Frade, J.R. & Yaremchenko, A. & Mishra, G.S. & Pinto, P.C.R., 2018. "Low-cost catalysts for in-situ improvement of producer gas quality during direct gasification of biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 442-454.
    38. Susastriawan, A.A.P. & Saptoadi, Harwin & Purnomo,, 2017. "Small-scale downdraft gasifiers for biomass gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 989-1003.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Santa Margarida Santos & Ana Carolina Assis & Leandro Gomes & Catarina Nobre & Paulo Brito, 2022. "Waste Gasification Technologies: A Brief Overview," Waste, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Mahmoud G. Hemeida & Ashraf M. Hemeida & Tomonobu Senjyu & Dina Osheba, 2022. "Renewable Energy Resources Technologies and Life Cycle Assessment: Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-36, December.
    3. Savelii Kukharets & Gennadii Golub & Marek Wrobel & Olena Sukmaniuk & Krzysztof Mudryk & Taras Hutsol & Algirdas Jasinskas & Marcin Jewiarz & Jonas Cesna & Iryna Horetska, 2022. "A Theoretical Model of the Gasification Rate of Biomass and Its Experimental Confirmation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Saaida Khlifi & Marzouk Lajili & Patrick Perré & Victor Pozzobon, 2022. "A Numerical Study of Turbulent Combustion of a Lignocellulosic Gas Mixture in an Updraft Fixed Bed Reactor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Rabah, Ali A., 2022. "Livestock manure availability and syngas production: A case of Sudan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    6. Shadbahr, Jalil & Ebadian, Mahmood & Gonzales-Calienes, Giovanna & Kannangara, Miyuru & Ahmadi, Leila & Bensebaa, Farid, 2022. "Impact of waste management and conversion technologies on cost and carbon footprint - Case studies in rural and urban cities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Motta, Ingrid Lopes & Miranda, Nahieh Toscano & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Wolf Maciel, Maria Regina, 2018. "Biomass gasification in fluidized beds: A review of biomass moisture content and operating pressure effects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 998-1023.
    2. Watson, Jamison & Zhang, Yuanhui & Si, Buchun & Chen, Wan-Ting & de Souza, Raquel, 2018. "Gasification of biowaste: A critical review and outlooks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-17.
    3. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C., 2021. "Industrial gasification systems (>3 MWth) for bioenergy in Europe: Current status and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    4. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Silva, Valter & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Co-gasification and recent developments on waste-to-energy conversion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 380-398.
    5. Díaz González, Carlos A. & Pacheco Sandoval, Leonardo, 2020. "Sustainability aspects of biomass gasification systems for small power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    6. Antonio Molino & Vincenzo Larocca & Simeone Chianese & Dino Musmarra, 2018. "Biofuels Production by Biomass Gasification: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, March.
    7. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    8. Sharma, Monikankana & N, Rakesh & Dasappa, S., 2016. "Solid oxide fuel cell operating with biomass derived producer gas: Status and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 450-463.
    9. Samiran, Nor Afzanizam & Jaafar, Mohammad Nazri Mohd & Ng, Jo-Han & Lam, Su Shiung & Chong, Cheng Tung, 2016. "Progress in biomass gasification technique – With focus on Malaysian palm biomass for syngas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1047-1062.
    10. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Inayat, Muddasser & Sulaiman, Shaharin A. & Parthasarathy, Prakash & McKay, Gordon, 2020. "A critical review on the influence of process parameters in catalytic co-gasification: Current performance and challenges for a future prospectus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    11. Sansaniwal, S.K. & Rosen, M.A. & Tyagi, S.K., 2017. "Global challenges in the sustainable development of biomass gasification: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 23-43.
    12. Monteiro, Eliseu & Ismail, Tamer M. & Ramos, Ana & Abd El-Salam, M. & Brito, Paulo & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Experimental and modeling studies of Portuguese peach stone gasification on an autothermal bubbling fluidized bed pilot plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 862-877.
    13. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Pinto, P.C.R., 2020. "Gasification-based biorefinery integration in the pulp and paper industry: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    14. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Pinto, R.G. & Matos, M.A.A. & Frade, J.R. & Yaremchenko, A. & Mishra, G.S. & Pinto, P.C.R., 2018. "Low-cost catalysts for in-situ improvement of producer gas quality during direct gasification of biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 442-454.
    15. Rakesh N, & Dasappa, S., 2018. "A critical assessment of tar generated during biomass gasification - Formation, evaluation, issues and mitigation strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1045-1064.
    16. Silva, Isabelly P. & Lima, Rafael M.A. & Silva, Gabriel F. & Ruzene, Denise S. & Silva, Daniel P., 2019. "Thermodynamic equilibrium model based on stoichiometric method for biomass gasification: A review of model modifications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Chaves, Luiz Inácio & da Silva, Marcelo José & de Souza, Samuel Nelson Melegari & Secco, Deonir & Rosa, Helton Aparecido & Nogueira, Carlos Eduardo Camargo & Frigo, Elisandro Pires, 2016. "Small-scale power generation analysis: Downdraft gasifier coupled to engine generator set," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 491-498.
    18. Hameed, Zeeshan & Aslam, Muhammad & Khan, Zakir & Maqsood, Khuram & Atabani, A.E. & Ghauri, Moinuddin & Khurram, Muhammad Shahzad & Rehan, Mohammad & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar, 2021. "Gasification of municipal solid waste blends with biomass for energy production and resources recovery: Current status, hybrid technologies and innovative prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    19. Salem, Ahmed M. & Abd Elbar, Ayman Refat, 2023. "The feasibility and performance of using producer gas as a gasifying medium," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    20. Monteiro, Eliseu & Ramos, Ana & Rouboa, Abel, 2024. "Fundamental designs of gasification plants for combined heat and power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2596-:d:756976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.