IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v168y2022ics1364032122007547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of waste management and conversion technologies on cost and carbon footprint - Case studies in rural and urban cities

Author

Listed:
  • Shadbahr, Jalil
  • Ebadian, Mahmood
  • Gonzales-Calienes, Giovanna
  • Kannangara, Miyuru
  • Ahmadi, Leila
  • Bensebaa, Farid

Abstract

Bioenergy pathways based on waste-to-energy (WTE) technologies are potential solutions to address two major societal challenges: climate change and a lack of sustainable municipal solid waste (MSW) diversion solutions. This study identifies and addresses the absence of an integrated decision-making framework that includes upstream operations (collection, separation, and delivery) and energy recovery technologies of the MSW supply chain. Modeling tools are developed for each WTE stage and integrated for the first time under a single cost and carbon footprint assessment framework. This framework is validated using two case studies to capture urban and rural characteristics. The first pathway includes gasification and an Internal Combustion Engine, and the second pathway consists of combustion and an Organic Rankine Cycle. The outcomes of this study show that Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions of the WTE pathways are slightly higher than fossil-based heating. This difference is explained by two factors. First, upstream logistics (often overlooked) are a major contributor to the net GHG emissions (36% in rural cases), and their emissions would offset the potential credits when replacing the current heating systems with the WTE pathways. Secondly, MSW is not entirely carbon neutral, and when the fossil-based carbon is accounted for, WTE pathways show higher GHG emissions for both rural (12–16%) and urban (17–19%) communities, which confirms that the WTE pathways still require more technology optimization and improvement. However, integrated framework revealed that WTE pathways are economically competent to reduce the current heating cost by up to 36% in rural and 25% in urban communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Shadbahr, Jalil & Ebadian, Mahmood & Gonzales-Calienes, Giovanna & Kannangara, Miyuru & Ahmadi, Leila & Bensebaa, Farid, 2022. "Impact of waste management and conversion technologies on cost and carbon footprint - Case studies in rural and urban cities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:168:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122007547
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122007547
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112872?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghulamullah Maitlo & Imran Ali & Kashif Hussain Mangi & Safdar Ali & Hubdar Ali Maitlo & Imran Nazir Unar & Abdul Majeed Pirzada, 2022. "Thermochemical Conversion of Biomass for Syngas Production: Current Status and Future Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-30, February.
    2. Malinauskaite, J. & Jouhara, H. & Czajczyńska, D. & Stanchev, P. & Katsou, E. & Rostkowski, P. & Thorne, R.J. & Colón, J. & Ponsá, S. & Al-Mansour, F. & Anguilano, L. & Krzyżyńska, R. & López, I.C. & , 2017. "Municipal solid waste management and waste-to-energy in the context of a circular economy and energy recycling in Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2013-2044.
    3. Mukherjee, C. & Denney, J. & Mbonimpa, E.G. & Slagley, J. & Bhowmik, R., 2020. "A review on municipal solid waste-to-energy trends in the USA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Achillas, Ch. & Vlachokostas, Ch. & Moussiopoulos, N. & Banias, G. & Kafetzopoulos, G. & Karagiannidis, A., 2011. "Social acceptance for the development of a waste-to-energy plant in an urban area," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(9), pages 857-863.
    5. Bruglieri, Maurizio & Liberti, Leo, 2008. "Optimal running and planning of a biomass-based energy production process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 2430-2438, July.
    6. Situmorang, Yohanes Andre & Zhao, Zhongkai & Yoshida, Akihiro & Abudula, Abuliti & Guan, Guoqing, 2020. "Small-scale biomass gasification systems for power generation (<200 kW class): A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    7. Shabani, Nazanin & Sowlati, Taraneh & Ouhimmou, Mustapha & Rönnqvist, Mikael, 2014. "Tactical supply chain planning for a forest biomass power plant under supply uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 346-355.
    8. Holland, Robert A. & Scott, Kate & Hinton, Emma D. & Austen, Melanie C. & Barrett, John & Beaumont, Nicola & Blaber-Wegg, Tina & Brown, Gareth & Carter-Silk, Eleanor & Cazenave, Pierre & Eigenbrod, Fe, 2016. "Bridging the gap between energy and the environment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 181-189.
    9. Nasim Zandi Atashbar & Nacima Labadie & Christian Prins, 2018. "Modelling and optimisation of biomass supply chains: a review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(10), pages 3482-3506, May.
    10. Skaggs, Richard L. & Coleman, André M. & Seiple, Timothy E. & Milbrandt, Anelia R., 2018. "Waste-to-Energy biofuel production potential for selected feedstocks in the conterminous United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2640-2651.
    11. Bajić, Bojana Ž. & Dodić, Siniša N. & Vučurović, Damjan G. & Dodić, Jelena M. & Grahovac, Jovana A., 2015. "Waste-to-energy status in Serbia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1437-1444.
    12. Mobini, Mahdi & Sowlati, Taraneh & Sokhansanj, Shahab, 2011. "Forest biomass supply logistics for a power plant using the discrete-event simulation approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 1241-1250, April.
    13. Kalyani, Khanjan Ajaybhai & Pandey, Krishan K., 2014. "Waste to energy status in India: A short review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 113-120.
    14. Uris, María & Linares, José Ignacio & Arenas, Eva, 2014. "Techno-economic feasibility assessment of a biomass cogeneration plant based on an Organic Rankine Cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 707-713.
    15. Quoilin, Sylvain & Broek, Martijn Van Den & Declaye, Sébastien & Dewallef, Pierre & Lemort, Vincent, 2013. "Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 168-186.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Munir, M.T. & Mohaddespour, Ahmad & Nasr, A.T. & Carter, Susan, 2021. "Municipal solid waste-to-energy processing for a circular economy in New Zealand," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Ferraz de Campos, Victor Arruda & Silva, Valter Bruno & Cardoso, João Sousa & Brito, Paulo S. & Tuna, Celso Eduardo & Silveira, José Luz, 2021. "A review of waste management in Brazil and Portugal: Waste-to-energy as pathway for sustainable development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 802-820.
    3. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    4. Sanne Lemmens, 2016. "Cost Engineering Techniques and Their Applicability for Cost Estimation of Organic Rankine Cycle Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Mosayeb Dashtpeyma & Reza Ghodsi, 2021. "Forest Biomass and Bioenergy Supply Chain Resilience: A Systematic Literature Review on the Barriers and Enablers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Guo, Jian-Xin & Tan, Xianchun & Gu, Baihe & Zhu, Kaiwei, 2022. "Integration of supply chain management of hybrid biomass power plant with carbon capture and storage operation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1055-1065.
    7. Brigagão, George Victor & de Medeiros, José Luiz & Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz F. & Mikulčić, Hrvoje & Duić, Neven, 2021. "A zero-emission sustainable landfill-gas-to-wire oxyfuel process: Bioenergy with carbon capture and sequestration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. Hasan, M.M. & Rasul, M.G. & Khan, M.M.K. & Ashwath, N. & Jahirul, M.I., 2021. "Energy recovery from municipal solid waste using pyrolysis technology: A review on current status and developments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    9. Malladi, Krishna Teja & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2018. "Biomass logistics: A review of important features, optimization modeling and the new trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 587-599.
    10. Franco Cotana & Antonio Messineo & Alessandro Petrozzi & Valentina Coccia & Gianluca Cavalaglio & Andrea Aquino, 2014. "Comparison of ORC Turbine and Stirling Engine to Produce Electricity from Gasified Poultry Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Przemysław Rajca & Andrzej Skibiński & Anna Biniek-Poskart & Monika Zajemska, 2022. "Review of Selected Determinants Affecting Use of Municipal Waste for Energy Purposes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Badgett, Alex & Milbrandt, Anelia, 2020. "A summary of standards and practices for wet waste streams used in waste-to-energy technologies in the United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    13. Uris, María & Linares, José Ignacio & Arenas, Eva, 2015. "Size optimization of a biomass-fired cogeneration plant CHP/CCHP (Combined heat and power/Combined heat, cooling and power) based on Organic Rankine Cycle for a district network in Spain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 935-945.
    14. Wójtowicz-Wróbel, Agnieszka & Kania, Olga & Kocewiak, Katarzyna & Wójtowicz, Ryszard & Dzierwa, Piotr & Trojan, Marcin, 2023. "Thermal-flow calculations for a thermal waste treatment plant and CFD modelling of the spread of gases in the context of urban structures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    15. Nunes, L.J.R. & Causer, T.P. & Ciolkosz, D., 2020. "Biomass for energy: A review on supply chain management models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    16. Feng, Yongqiang & Zhang, Yaning & Li, Bingxi & Yang, Jinfu & Shi, Yang, 2015. "Sensitivity analysis and thermoeconomic comparison of ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) for low temperature waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 664-677.
    17. Daniela Guericke & Ignacio Blanco & Juan M. Morales & Henrik Madsen, 2020. "A two-phase stochastic programming approach to biomass supply planning for combined heat and power plants," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(4), pages 863-900, December.
    18. Ukrit Suksanguan & Somsak Siwadamrongpong & Thanapong Champahom & Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao & Tassana Boonyoo & Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha, 2022. "Structural Equation Model of Factors Influencing the Selection of Industrial Waste Disposal Service in Cement Kilns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Li, Wei & Yuan, Zhihang & Chen, Xiaoliang & Wang, Hui & Wang, Luochun & Lou, Ziyang, 2021. "Green refuse derived fuel preparation and combustion performance from the solid residues to build the zero-waste city," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    20. Samadi, Seyed Hashem & Ghobadian, Barat & Nosrati, Mohsen, 2020. "Prediction and estimation of biomass energy from agricultural residues using air gasification technology in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1077-1091.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:168:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122007547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.