IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i17p5219-d620367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Capacity-Building Mobilization towards Energy Transitions in the Era of Thailand 4.0: A Case Study on Biomass Power Plants

Author

Listed:
  • Yuttana Homket

    (Public Policy Institute, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand)

  • Pongthep Sutheravut

    (Public Policy Institute, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand)

  • Sawpheeyah Nima

    (Public Policy Institute, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand)

Abstract

In 2015, the National Energy Policy Council (NEPC) approved the latest Alternative Energy Development Plan (AEDP) 2015–2036, targeting electricity generation from biomass, biogas, and municipal solid waste by 2036 towards the Thailand 4.0 policy. The small biomass power plants are intensively promoted, contributing to many more public concerns. Therefore, this study provided new insight using the readiness and resilience in the communities near the biomass power plant generation in Southern Thailand. The community readiness model (CRM) and community health impact assessment (CHIA) were adopted using mixed methods during January–November 2019. A total of 999 respondents replied to the questionnaires, 153 informants were interviewed, and the panel was discussed and analyzed by descriptive statistics and content analysis. Findings illustrated that all stakeholder sectors strengthened community-driven development based on the average community readiness (3.01 ± 0.11) in a vague awareness stage, only with participation in information giving (75.38%) and having an impact pain point score of 7.64 ± 0.54, which was a highly intense level used to develop the public policy towards biomass power plants. Recent advanced community tools offered new insights for the first time about community strategic plans for sustainable biomass power generation, to achieve community security and values of democracy in Southern Thailand.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuttana Homket & Pongthep Sutheravut & Sawpheeyah Nima, 2021. "Community Capacity-Building Mobilization towards Energy Transitions in the Era of Thailand 4.0: A Case Study on Biomass Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:17:p:5219-:d:620367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5219/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5219/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghazouani, Tarek & Boukhatem, Jamel & Yan Sam, Chung, 2020. "Causal interactions between trade openness, renewable electricity consumption, and economic growth in Asia-Pacific countries: Fresh evidence from a bootstrap ARDL approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    2. Galai, Noya & Sirirojn, Bangorn & Aramrattana, Apinun & Srichan, Kamolrawee & Thomson, Nicholas & Golozar, Asieh & Flores, Jose M. & Willard, Nancy & Ellen, Jonathan M. & Sherman, Susan G. & Celentano, 2018. "A cluster randomized trial of community mobilization to reduce methamphetamine use and HIV risk among youth in Thailand: Design, implementation and results," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 216-223.
    3. Samuel I. C. Dibia & Evelyn N. Nwagu & Amelia N. Odo, 2020. "Drug Use and Abuse Prevention Concerns in Rural Communities in Enugu State Nigeria," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 1-78, February.
    4. Prestipino, Mauro & Salmeri, Fabio & Cucinotta, Filippo & Galvagno, Antonio, 2021. "Thermodynamic and environmental sustainability analysis of electricity production from an integrated cogeneration system based on residual biomass: A life cycle approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    5. Famoso, F. & Prestipino, M. & Brusca, S. & Galvagno, A., 2020. "Designing sustainable bioenergy from residual biomass: Site allocation criteria and energy/exergy performance indicators," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    6. Aberilla, Jhud Mikhail & Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro & Azapagic, Adisa, 2019. "Environmental sustainability of small-scale biomass power technologies for agricultural communities in developing countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 493-506.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mauro Prestipino & Antonio Piccolo & Maria Francesca Polito & Antonio Galvagno, 2022. "Combined Bio-Hydrogen, Heat, and Power Production Based on Residual Biomass Gasification: Energy, Exergy, and Renewability Assessment of an Alternative Process Configuration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Muhammad Ikram, 2021. "Models for Predicting Non-Renewable Energy Competing with Renewable Source for Sustainable Energy Development: Case of Asia and Oceania Region," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 133-160, December.
    3. Badshah, Noor & Al-attab, K.A. & Zainal, Z.A., 2020. "Design optimization and experimental analysis of externally fired gas turbine system fuelled by biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    4. Xiaojie Zhang & Xiaoyu Liu & Lili Wang, 2023. "Evaluating Community Capability to Prevent and Control COVID-19 Pandemic in Shenyang, China: An Empirical Study Based on a Modified Framework of Community Readiness Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Jessica A. Thomas & Emma R. Miller & Paul R. Ward, 2022. "Lifestyle Interventions through Participatory Research: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of Alcohol and Other Breast Cancer Behavioural Risk Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Zahida Aslam & Hu Li & James Hammerton & Gordon Andrews & Andrew Ross & Jon C. Lovett, 2021. "Increasing Access to Electricity: An Assessment of the Energy and Power Generation Potential from Biomass Waste Residues in Tanzania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Vu Manh Hoai Nguyen & Tin Huu Ho & Luan Huynh Nguyen & An Thi Ha Pham, 2023. "The Impact of Trade Openness on Economic Stability in Asian Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Geoffrey Ssebabi Mutumba & Tomson Odongo & Francis Nathan Okurut & Vincent Bagire & Livingstone Senyonga, 2022. "Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth in Uganda," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(7), pages 1-28, July.
    9. Leonel J. R. Nunes & Margarida Casau & João C. O. Matias & Marta Ferreira Dias, 2022. "Assessment of Woody Residual Biomass Generation Capacity in the Central Region of Portugal: Analysis of the Power Production Potential," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Laurene Desclaux & Amaro Olimpio Pereira, 2024. "Residual Biomass Gasification for Small-Scale Decentralized Electricity Production: Business Models for Lower Societal Costs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-26, April.
    11. Daiva Makutėnienė & Algirdas Justinas Staugaitis & Valdemaras Makutėnas & Dalia Juočiūnienė & Yuriy Bilan, 2022. "An Empirical Investigation into Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Agricultural Economic Performance in Baltic Countries: A Non-Linear Framework," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, August.
    12. Wang, Zhe & Yao-Ping Peng, Michael & Anser, Muhammad Khalid & Chen, Zhong, 2023. "Research on the impact of green finance and renewable energy on energy efficiency: The case study E−7 economies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 166-173.
    13. Lovrak, Ana & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2020. "A Geographical Information System (GIS) based approach for assessing the spatial distribution and seasonal variation of biogas production potential from agricultural residues and municipal biowaste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    14. Guzović, Zvonimir & Duic, Neven & Piacentino, Antonio & Markovska, Natasa & Mathiesen, Brian Vad & Lund, Henrik, 2022. "Recent advances in methods, policies and technologies at sustainable energy systems development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    15. Juan Camilo Solarte-Toro & Carlos Ariel Cardona Alzate, 2023. "Sustainability of Biorefineries: Challenges and Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-24, April.
    16. Andante Hadi Pandyaswargo & Mengyi Ruan & Eiei Htwe & Motoshi Hiratsuka & Alan Dwi Wibowo & Yuji Nagai & Hiroshi Onoda, 2020. "Estimating the Energy Demand and Growth in Off-Grid Villages: Case Studies from Myanmar, Indonesia, and Laos," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    17. Su, Min & Wang, Qiang & Li, Rongrong & Wang, Lili, 2022. "Per capita renewable energy consumption in 116 countries: The effects of urbanization, industrialization, GDP, aging, and trade openness," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    18. Ghazouani, tarek, 2018. "Reexamining the Foreign direct investment, Renewable energy consumption and Economic growth nexus: Evidence from a new Bootstrap ARDL test for Cointegration," MPRA Paper 103348, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 11 Sep 2020.
    19. Alvaro Quiles Garcia & Naoya Nishiumi & Atsushi Saito & Eriko Matsumura & Jiro Senda, 2021. "Economic, Environmental and Energetic Analysis of a Distributed Generation System Composed by Waste Gasification and Photovoltaic Panels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    20. Yasutsugu Baba & Andante Hadi Pandyaswargo & Hiroshi Onoda, 2020. "An Analysis of the Current Status of Woody Biomass Gasification Power Generation in Japan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-13, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:17:p:5219-:d:620367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.