IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i21p7918-d952940.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Pumped Hydro Storage Flexibility in China: Scenarios for Advanced Solutions Adoption and Policy Recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Leonardo Nibbi

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, Via S. Marta, 3, I-50139 Florence, Italy)

  • Paolo Sospiro

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, Via S. Marta, 3, I-50139 Florence, Italy)

  • Maurizio De Lucia

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, Via S. Marta, 3, I-50139 Florence, Italy)

  • Cheng-Cheng Wu

    (International Hydropower Association, One Canada Square, London E14 5AA, UK)

Abstract

The decarbonisation targets of the People’s Republic of China are ambitious. Their achievement relies on the large-scale deployment of variable renewable energy sources (VRES), such as wind and solar. High penetration of VRES may lead to balancing problems on the grid, which can be compensated by increasing the shifting flexibility capacity of the system by integration with energy storage, e.g., by installing additional electricity storage. Pumped Hydro Storage (PHS) is the most diffused electricity storage technology at the global level and the only fully mature solution for long-term electricity storage. China already has the highest PHS capacity installed worldwide and plans to increase it strongly before 2030. The present study, based on the data from the “Pumped Storage Tracking Tool” of the International Hydropower Association, investigates the potential for technological improvement of the existing and future PHS fleet in China. The aims of adopting advanced PHS solutions allow China to better cope with the task of balancing the VRES production. The potential for adopting advanced PHS solutions is evaluated through five different intervention possibilities (here referred to as scenarios). These scenarios consider revamping part of the operational Pumped Storage Plant (PSP) fleet and redesigning future installations that are already planned. As a result, considering all the major technical and authorisation process constraints, 4.0% (5.2 GW) of the 132 GW fleet expected to be commissioned before 2035 could additionally adopt advanced PHS in a high-potential scenario. Meanwhile in the medium and low potential scenarios, the quota can reach 11.1% (14.6 GW) and 26.2% (34.5 GW), respectively. Furthermore, policy recommendations are elaborated to promote, facilitate, and support the adoption of these advanced PHS solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonardo Nibbi & Paolo Sospiro & Maurizio De Lucia & Cheng-Cheng Wu, 2022. "Improving Pumped Hydro Storage Flexibility in China: Scenarios for Advanced Solutions Adoption and Policy Recommendations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-25, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:21:p:7918-:d:952940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/21/7918/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/21/7918/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chirag Trivedi & Igor Iliev & Ole Gunnar Dahlhaug, 2020. "Numerical Study of a Francis Turbine over Wide Operating Range: Some Practical Aspects of Verification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-10, May.
    2. Yang, Weijia & Yang, Jiandong, 2019. "Advantage of variable-speed pumped storage plants for mitigating wind power variations: Integrated modelling and performance assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 720-732.
    3. Dotzauer, Martin & Pfeiffer, Diana & Lauer, Markus & Pohl, Marcel & Mauky, Eric & Bär, Katharina & Sonnleitner, Matthias & Zörner, Wilfried & Hudde, Jessica & Schwarz, Björn & Faßauer, Burkhardt & Dah, 2019. "How to measure flexibility – Performance indicators for demand driven power generation from biogas plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 135-146.
    4. Ming, Zeng & Junjie, Feng & Song, Xue & Zhijie, Wang & Xiaoli, Zhu & Yuejin, Wang, 2013. "Development of China's pumped storage plant and related policy analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 104-113.
    5. Kong, Yigang & Kong, Zhigang & Liu, Zhiqi & Wei, Congmei & Zhang, Jingfang & An, Gaocheng, 2017. "Pumped storage power stations in China: The past, the present, and the future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 720-731.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Papadakis C. Nikolaos & Fafalakis Marios & Katsaprakakis Dimitris, 2023. "A Review of Pumped Hydro Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-39, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahfoud, Rabea Jamil & Alkayem, Nizar Faisal & Zhang, Yuquan & Zheng, Yuan & Sun, Yonghui & Alhelou, Hassan Haes, 2023. "Optimal operation of pumped hydro storage-based energy systems: A compendium of current challenges and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Hunt, Julian David & Zakeri, Behnam & Lopes, Rafael & Barbosa, Paulo Sérgio Franco & Nascimento, Andreas & Castro, Nivalde José de & Brandão, Roberto & Schneider, Paulo Smith & Wada, Yoshihide, 2020. "Existing and new arrangements of pumped-hydro storage plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    3. He, YongXiu & Liu, Yang & Li, MoXing & Zhang, Yan, 2022. "Benefit evaluation and mechanism design of pumped storage plants under the background of power market reform - A case study of China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 796-806.
    4. Pejman Bahramian, 2021. "Integration of wind power into an electricity system using pumped-storage: Economic challenges and stakeholder impacts," Working Paper 1480, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    5. Garcet, J. & De Meulenaere, R. & Blondeau, J., 2022. "Enabling flexible CHP operation for grid support by exploiting the DHN thermal inertia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).
    6. Yunfei Wu & Jianfeng Liu & Jian Zhou, 2022. "The Strategy of Considering the Participation of Doubly-Fed Pumped-Storage Units in Power Grid Frequency Regulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Fuquan Zhao & Fanlong Bai & Xinglong Liu & Zongwei Liu, 2022. "A Review on Renewable Energy Transition under China’s Carbon Neutrality Target," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-27, November.
    8. Hilario J. Torres-Herrera & Alexis Lozano-Medina, 2021. "Methodological Proposal for the Assessment Potential of Pumped Hydropower Energy Storage: Case of Gran Canaria Island," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-27, June.
    9. Krzemianowski, Zbigniew & Steller, Janusz, 2021. "High specific speed Francis turbine for small hydro purposes - Design methodology based on solving the inverse problem in fluid mechanics and the cavitation test experience," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1210-1228.
    10. Selleneit, Volker & Stöckl, Martin & Holzhammer, Uwe, 2020. "System efficiency – Methodology for rating of industrial utilities in electricity grids with a high share of variable renewable energies – A first approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    11. Dallinger, Bettina & Schwabeneder, Daniel & Lettner, Georg & Auer, Hans, 2019. "Socio-economic benefit and profitability analyses of Austrian hydro storage power plants supporting increasing renewable electricity generation in Central Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 482-496.
    12. Huang, Jingjian & Xu, Yujie & Guo, Huan & Geng, Xiaoqian & Chen, Haisheng, 2022. "Dynamic performance and control scheme of variable-speed compressed air energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    13. Schipfer, F. & Mäki, E. & Schmieder, U. & Lange, N. & Schildhauer, T. & Hennig, C. & Thrän, D., 2022. "Status of and expectations for flexible bioenergy to support resource efficiency and to accelerate the energy transition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    14. Vasudevan, Krishnakumar R. & Ramachandaramurthy, Vigna K. & Venugopal, Gomathi & Ekanayake, J.B. & Tiong, S.K., 2021. "Variable speed pumped hydro storage: A review of converters, controls and energy management strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    15. Wen-Tao Su & Wei Zhao & Maxime Binama & Yue Zhao & Jian-Ying Huang & Xue-Ren Chen, 2022. "Experimental Francis Turbine Cavitation Performances of a Hydro-Energy Plant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    16. Xiaoxia Hou & Yongguang Cheng & Zhiyan Yang & Ke Liu & Xiaoxi Zhang & Demin Liu, 2021. "Influence of Clearance Flow on Dynamic Hydraulic Forces of Pump-Turbine during Runaway Transient Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    17. Xu, Beibei & Zhang, Jingjing & Egusquiza, Mònica & Chen, Diyi & Li, Feng & Behrens, Paul & Egusquiza, Eduard, 2021. "A review of dynamic models and stability analysis for a hydro-turbine governing system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    18. He Wang & Zhijie Ma, 2021. "Regulation Characteristics and Load Optimization of Pump-Turbine in Variable-Speed Operation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Xiangxin Meng & Yakun Zhang & Zekun Wu & Wenzhe Tang, 2023. "Enhancing Operations Management of Pumped Storage Power Stations by Partnering from the Perspective of Multi-Energy Complementarity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Banshwar, Anuj & Sharma, Naveen Kumar & Sood, Yog Raj & Shrivastava, Rajnish, 2018. "An international experience of technical and economic aspects of ancillary services in deregulated power industry: Lessons for emerging BRIC electricity markets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 774-801.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:21:p:7918-:d:952940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.