IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i19p7289-d933173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy Consumption and Environmental Impact of E-Grocery: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Soukaina Aziz

    (ENSA Marrakech, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech 40000, Morocco)

  • Ila Maltese

    (TRElab (Transport Research Lab), Department of Political Sciences, Roma Tre University, Via Gabriello Chiabrera 199, 00145 Rome, Italy)

  • Edoardo Marcucci

    (TRElab (Transport Research Lab), Department of Political Sciences, Roma Tre University, Via Gabriello Chiabrera 199, 00145 Rome, Italy
    Department of Logistics, Molde University College, Britvegen 2, NO-6410 Molde, Norway)

  • Valerio Gatta

    (TRElab (Transport Research Lab), Department of Political Sciences, Roma Tre University, Via Gabriello Chiabrera 199, 00145 Rome, Italy
    Department of Logistics, Molde University College, Britvegen 2, NO-6410 Molde, Norway)

  • Rachid Benmoussa

    (ENSA Marrakech, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech 40000, Morocco)

  • El Hassan Irhirane

    (ENSA Marrakech, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech 40000, Morocco)

Abstract

E-grocery is fast growing worldwide and represents a relevant issue for city logistics. Although in almost all countries the percentage of food e-buyers was lower than those purchasing other commodity categories, due to the pandemic, they have increased significantly in the last two years, with consequences that are difficult to fathom and estimate. This phenomenon therefore deserves more attention, especially with respect to its environmental impact, mostly at the urban scale. This paper presents a systematic literature review (SLR) on how e-grocery impacts the environment through the CO 2 emissions generated and the equivalent energy consumption. The methodology used for the review follows a standard approach, with different combinations of keywords used for the search performed in SCOPUS and the Web of Science databases. Emissions and energy consumption assessments were performed for all of the papers considered. The results point to two different findings: some studies consider online grocery as an environmentally friendly channel, while others note that the energy consumption of this emerging channel is higher than alternative ones. This paper contributes by suggesting future research directions to be explored on the relationship between e-grocery and energy use and provides some reflections that are useful not only to e-grocers and logistics operators, but also to policy makers with an interest in developing sustainable urban plans and promoting less environmentally impacting distributions/configurations of grocery delivery systems within city logistics.

Suggested Citation

  • Soukaina Aziz & Ila Maltese & Edoardo Marcucci & Valerio Gatta & Rachid Benmoussa & El Hassan Irhirane, 2022. "Energy Consumption and Environmental Impact of E-Grocery: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:19:p:7289-:d:933173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/19/7289/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/19/7289/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lagorio, Alexandra & Pinto, Roberto, 2021. "Food and grocery retail logistics issues: A systematic literature review," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Aileen Nowlan & James Fine & Timothy O’Connor & Spencer Burget, 2021. "Pollution Accounting for Corporate Actions: Quantifying the Air Emissions and Impacts of Transportation System Choices Case Study: Food Freight and the Grocery Industry in Los Angeles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Dariusz Milewski & Beata Milewska, 2021. "The Energy Efficiency of the Last Mile in the E-Commerce Distribution in the Context the COVID-19 Pandemic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Juan Carlos Martín & Francesca Pagliara & Concepción Román, 2019. "The Research Topics on E-Grocery: Trends and Existing Gaps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Hajdas, Monika & Radomska, Joanna & Silva, Susana C., 2022. "The omni-channel approach: A utopia for companies?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    6. Ewa Kochańska & Rafał M. Łukasik & Maciej Dzikuć, 2021. "New Circular Challenges in the Development of Take-Away Food Packaging in the COVID-19 Period," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Cervellon, Marie-Cécile & Sylvie, Jean & Ngobo, Paul-Valentin, 2015. "Shopping orientations as antecedents to channel choice in the French grocery multichannel landscape," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 31-51.
    8. Sufyan Habib & Nawaf N. Hamadneh, 2021. "Impact of Perceived Risk on Consumers Technology Acceptance in Online Grocery Adoption amid COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Zeng, Yiwu & Jia, Fu & Wan, Li & Guo, Hongdong, 2017. "E-commerce in agri-food sector: a systematic literature review," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 20(4), February.
    10. Leonardo Salvatore Alaimo & Mariantonietta Fiore & Antonino Galati, 2020. "How the Covid-19 Pandemic Is Changing Online Food Shopping Human Behaviour in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Wang, Xiaojun & Zhang, Shukai & Schneider, Niels, 2021. "Evaluating the carbon emissions of alternative food provision systems: A comparative analysis of recipe box and supermarket equivalents," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    12. Rosario Michel-Villarreal & Martin Hingley & Maurizio Canavari & Ilenia Bregoli, 2019. "Sustainability in Alternative Food Networks: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Chu, Junhong & Arce-Urriza, Marta & Cebollada-Calvo, José-Javier & Chintagunta, Pradeep K., 2010. "An Empirical Analysis of Shopping Behavior Across Online and Offline Channels for Grocery Products: The Moderating Effects of Household and Product Characteristics," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 251-268.
    14. Lukas Hardi & Ulrich Wagner, 2019. "Grocery Delivery or Customer Pickup—Influences on Energy Consumption and CO 2 Emissions in Munich," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Wygonik, Erica & Goodchild, Anne, 2012. "Evaluating the Efficacy of Shared-use Vehicles for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A U.S. Case Study of Grocery Delivery," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 51(2).
    16. Campo, Katia & Breugelmans, Els, 2015. "Buying Groceries in Brick and Click Stores: Category Allocation Decisions and the Moderating Effect of Online Buying Experience," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 63-78.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ellen Van Droogenbroeck & Léon Van Hove, 2021. "Adoption and usage of E-grocery shopping: A context-specific UTAUT2 model," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/324918, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Ellen Van Droogenbroeck & Leo Van Hove, 2021. "Adoption and Usage of E-Grocery Shopping: A Context-Specific UTAUT2 Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-27, April.
    3. Neslin, Scott A., 2022. "The omnichannel continuum: Integrating online and offline channels along the customer journey," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 111-132.
    4. Harris-Lagoudakis, Katherine, 2023. "The effect of online shopping channels on brand choice, product exploration and price elasticities," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    5. Ilyuk, Veronika, 2018. "Like throwing a piece of me away: How online and in-store grocery purchase channels affect consumers’ food waste," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 20-30.
    6. Campo, Katia & Lamey, Lien & Breugelmans, Els & Melis, Kristina, 2021. "Going Online for Groceries: Drivers of Category-Level Share of Wallet Expansion," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 154-172.
    7. Alaimo, Leonardo Salvatore & Fiore, Mariantonietta & Galati, Antonino, 2022. "Measuring consumers’ level of satisfaction for online food shopping during COVID-19 in Italy using POSETs," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    8. Melis, Kristina & Campo, Katia & Lamey, Lien & Breugelmans, Els, 2016. "A Bigger Slice of the Multichannel Grocery Pie: When Does Consumers’ Online Channel Use Expand Retailers’ Share of Wallet?," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 268-286.
    9. Hao Huang, 2022. "Food Environment Inequalities and Moderating Effects of Obesity on Their Relationships with COVID-19 in Chicago," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Magalhães, David José Ahouagi Vaz de, 2021. "Analysis of critical factors affecting the final decision-making for online grocery shopping," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Verstraeten, Julie & Heeremans, Eva & Geuens, Maggie & Vermeir, Iris, 2023. "How online grocery shopping drives private label food purchases," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Vassalos, Michael & Lim, Kar Ho, 2016. "Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Various Features of Electronic Food Marketing Platforms," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 19(2), pages 1-19, May.
    13. Deniz Turkcu & Nina Tura & Ville Ojanen, 2022. "A Conceptual Framework of the Sustainability Challenges Experienced during the Life Cycle of Biobased Packaging Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    14. Hassan Alkhiyami & Laoucine Kerbache & Majed Hadid, 2024. "Consumers’ Marketing Channel Choice and the Impact on Logistics and Operations: A Systematic Literature Review of the Fresh Food and Grocery Sector," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-18, January.
    15. Sylvain Charlebois & Mark Juhasz & Janet Music, 2021. "Supply Chain Responsiveness to a (Post)-Pandemic Grocery and Food Service E-Commerce Economy: An Exploratory Canadian Case Study," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Alexandra Doernberg & Annette Piorr & Ingo Zasada & Dirk Wascher & Ulrich Schmutz, 2022. "Sustainability assessment of short food supply chains (SFSC): developing and testing a rapid assessment tool in one African and three European city regions," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(3), pages 885-904, September.
    17. Li, Chia-Ying & Zhang, Jin-Ting, 2023. "Chatbots or me? Consumers’ switching between human agents and conversational agents," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    18. Li, Feng & Du, Timon C. & Wei, Ying, 2020. "Enhancing supply chain decisions with consumers’ behavioral factors: An illustration of decoy effect," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    19. Gaofeng Guan & Dong Liu & Jiayang Zhai, 2022. "Factors Influencing Consumer Satisfaction of Fresh Produce E-Commerce in the Background of COVID-19—A Hybrid Approach Based on LDA-SEM-XGBoost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Jee-Won Kang & Young Namkung, 2022. "Measuring the Service Quality of Fresh Food Delivery Platforms: Development and Validation of the “Food PlatQual” Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:19:p:7289-:d:933173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.