IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Buying Groceries in Brick and Click Stores: Category Allocation Decisions and the Moderating Effect of Online Buying Experience


  • Campo, Katia
  • Breugelmans, Els


The large majority of online grocery shoppers are multichannel shoppers who keep visiting offline grocery stores to combine convenience advantages of online shopping with self-service advantages of offline stores. An important retail management question, therefore, is how these consumers divide grocery purchases across the retailer's online and offline channel. We provide a comprehensive analysis of the impact of category characteristics on the allocation pattern of multichannel grocery shoppers and find that category allocation decisions are affected not only by marketing mix differences between the online and offline channel, but also by intrinsic category characteristics like perceived purchase risk and shopping convenience. In addition, we examine the effect of online buying experience. In line with expectations, we find that it can affect allocation patterns in different ways: (i) it attenuates the perceived risk of buying sensory categories online, thereby reducing differences in online category share, (ii) it reinforces marketing mix (assortment) effects, thereby making online category share differences more pronounced, and (iii) it has no effect for factors such as promotions that are easy to evaluate without experience, thereby leaving the online category share stable. In addition to different experience effects across allocation factors, we also observe variations in experience effects across consumer segments.

Suggested Citation

  • Campo, Katia & Breugelmans, Els, 2015. "Buying Groceries in Brick and Click Stores: Category Allocation Decisions and the Moderating Effect of Online Buying Experience," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 63-78.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:joinma:v:31:y:2015:i:c:p:63-78
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intmar.2015.04.001

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. repec:eee:joinma:v:27:y:2013:i:2:p:130-140 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Junhong Chu & Pradeep Chintagunta & Javier Cebollada, 2008. "Research Note—A Comparison of Within-Household Price Sensitivity Across Online and Offline Channels," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 283-299, 03-04.
    3. repec:eee:jouret:v:86:y:2010:i:1:p:37-50 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Dhar, Ravi, 1997. " Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 215-231, September.
    5. Pradeep K. Chintagunta & Junhong Chu & Javier Cebollada, 2012. "Quantifying Transaction Costs in Online/Off-line Grocery Channel Choice," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 96-114, January.
    6. repec:eee:ijrema:v:27:y:2010:i:2:p:142-150 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. repec:eee:joinma:v:24:y:2010:i:2:p:86-95 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. David R. Bell & Jeongwen Chiang & V. Padmanabhan, 1999. "The Decomposition of Promotional Response: An Empirical Generalization," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 504-526.
    9. Sharad Borle & Peter Boatwright & Joseph B. Kadane & Joseph C. Nunes & Shmueli Galit, 2005. "The Effect of Product Assortment Changes on Customer Retention," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 616-622, July.
    10. Alba, Joseph W & Hutchinson, J Wesley, 1987. " Dimensions of Consumer Expertise," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 411-454, March.
    11. Hoch, Stephen J, 2002. " Product Experience Is Seductive," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 29(3), pages 448-454, December.
    12. repec:eee:joinma:v:23:y:2009:i:1:p:70-81 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. repec:eee:joinma:v:24:y:2010:i:2:p:168-180 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Andrea Pozzi, 2012. "Shopping Cost and Brand Exploration in Online Grocery," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 4(3), pages 96-120, August.
    15. repec:eee:joinma:v:27:y:2013:i:3:p:226-235 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. repec:eee:joinma:v:26:y:2012:i:4:p:244-255 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. repec:eee:jouret:v:84:y:2008:i:4:p:398-413 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Rebecca W. Hamilton & Debora Viana Thompson, 2007. "Is There a Substitute for Direct Experience? Comparing Consumers' Preferences after Direct and Indirect Product Experiences," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(4), pages 546-555, June.
    19. repec:eee:joinma:v:23:y:2009:i:2:p:179-190 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Praveen K. Kopalle & Carl F. Mela & Lawrence Marsh, 1999. "The Dynamic Effect of Discounting on Sales: Empirical Analysis and Normative Pricing Implications," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 317-332.
    21. repec:eee:joinma:v:24:y:2010:i:4:p:251-268 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. repec:eee:ijrema:v:25:y:2008:i:1:p:5-21 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. repec:eee:joinma:v:25:y:2011:i:3:p:134-144 is not listed on IDEAS
    24. repec:eee:jouret:v:87:y:2011:i:1:p:75-89 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Vassalos, Michael & Lim, Kar Ho, 2016. "Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Various Features of Electronic Food Marketing Platforms," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 19(2), pages 1-19, May.
    2. repec:eee:jouret:v:95:y:2019:i:1:p:10-23 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:431-:d:197930 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:eee:jouret:v:92:y:2016:i:3:p:268-286 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph, 2017. "Global consolidation of industries and business failures: insights from brick-and-mortar and online outlets," MPRA Paper 82509, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. repec:eee:joreco:v:41:y:2018:i:c:p:20-30 is not listed on IDEAS


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joinma:v:31:y:2015:i:c:p:63-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.